Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender relations in taming of the shrew
Gender relations in taming of the shrew
Gender relations in taming of the shrew
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender relations in taming of the shrew
Have you ever heard of two stories in different time periods with characters following the same actions? This occurs in two different plays. Taming of the Shrew is a play written by William Shakespeare. In this play a high-class noble man, Petruchio, finds a woman, Katherine, he would like the marry but makes the decision to tame her as well. Pygmalion is a play written by Bernard Shaw. A low-class flower girl, Eliza, is taken in by a man who is willing to change Eliza into a proper lady. Petruchio and Higgins are basically the same characters. Some people may not think these two characters are the same because Higgins and Eliza do not fall in love and get married like Petruchio and Katherine do. In Pygmalion Higgins and Eliza do have …show more content…
You have wounded me to the heart” (Shaw 80). This was said after Higgins and Eliza got into an argument and she threw a slipper at him. This is evidence that Higgins cares for Eliza as he tries to teach her at the same time. Petruchio and Katherine fall in love and do end up getting married. Although these things are true, the story line does change for the majority of the plays. The men are still trying to make their women better. One reason why they are the same is both men are trying to tame their women. In Taming of the Shrew, during the reception of the wedding Petruchio says to Baptista “If you knew my business, you would ask me to go rather than the stay” (Shakespeare 119). Petruchio is telling Katherine’s father if he knew that Petruchio was trying to tame Katherine as well as marry her, he would want Petruchio to leave. This is evidence that Petruchio has made the decision to go through …show more content…
They are selfish, and arrogant. Petruchio is selfish by showing up late to his wedding, poorly dressed. “Gentlemen, I think you frown. Why does this good company gaze, as if they saw some wondrous monument, some comet or unusual wonder” (Shakespeare 113)? He shows up late and poorly dressed for the purpose of not letting society dictate only what he looks like and he is trying to show Katherine who the boss is here. Petruchio is not thinking of how poorly Katherine will feel, or how others may look at her. He is arrogant by thinking he is better than Gremio and Hortensio. “Tush, tush! You might as well frighten little boys with monsters” (Shakespeare 59). Petruchio says a long speech about him not caring what a woman looks like, how she talks, or how she acts. He is overly confident about being able to handle any women without being afraid of her. Higgins is very selfish when it comes to teaching Eliza how to speak proper English. “Come back to business. How much do you propose to pay me” (Shaw 27)? Higgins is only in it for the money at the beginning and only worried about how much he is going to get paid if he decides to teach Eliza. Higgins has a very arrogant attitude throughout the story. “But when I saw we were going to win hands down, I felt like a bear in a cage hanging about doing nothing” (Shaw 75). This was Higgins response to Pickering as he was discussing how well Eliza
Eliza meets both Boyer and Sanford in the beginning of her tale. Mr. Boyer is a respectable man from a rich family. He is studying to be a reverend. Everyone likes him and he would be a very suitable husband for Eliza. However Eliza is enamored with Major Sanford. Sanford is a supposedly rich man with a reputation of being trouble. Eliza is warned of Sanford’s reputation but chooses to ignore the warnings. Eliza even tries to rationalize her feelings for such a troublesome man by telling her best friend Lucy “A reformed rake makes the best husband,” (Foster 47). Eliza also states that she wants advice from her mother about what to do, but will only follow the advice if it concurs with what she already plans to do.
Eliza's assaults against True Womanhood are violations of the virtues submissiveness and purity. When Eliza refuses to ignore the gallantry of Major Sanford in favor of the proposals of Reverend Boyer despite the warnings of her friends and mother, she disregards submissiveness in favor of her own fanc...
Petruchio could possibly just be trying to get his woman the best food possible, or in the case of his wedding, the best tailored clothes for Kate. Petruchio brings in a tailor for his wedding, and when the dress doesn’t live up to his expectations, he lets the tailor know (IV.iii.113-121) “O monstrous arrogance!... that thou hast marred her gown.” Petruchio cares so much about getting everything for his wife to be perfect that he does not let one thing fall out of line for his wedding preparations. These things could be taken as sexist acts; however they were just acts... ...
...ironic use of manipulation before and after the wedding, Petruchio is able to tame Kate. Or so he thinks. The only real change is that Kate agrees with him, but she only does this to get her way. Therefore she is manipulating him by pretending that he has been able to tame her. He has not tamed her, because she also utilizes the art of manipulation. Before, Kate’s only defense against patriarchy is to be outspoken; now, she negotiates her own sense of power within patriarchy by using manipulation. Shakespeare’s critic of the patriarchal social structure is therefore just, because not only are women denied the same legal power as men, but their manipulative power is also disregarded and considered a weakness. Therefore women are not to be blamed for utilizing this powerful form of control, because that is what the patriarchal social structure forces them into.
When someone is a female their first thought should not be weak or nurturing, just as when someone is male their first though shouldn’t always be powerful. Unfortunately it has becomes so ingrained in societies mentality that this is the way that things work. The Taming of the Shrew is a past writing piece that expands on a mentality that is modern. The male gender cannot be put into this same constraint. Petruchio is the epitome of what society would describe a male as. He thinks he is in charge and always the superior to women. He expects Katherine to always do what he tells her to do, because he believes that is her duty as his wife. Moreover he should not be expected to do that for her. Furthermore, Bianca is what many would describe as the perfect woman. She is nurturing and she does not speak out against what she is told. When she does speak she always speaks like a lady. She exists merely for decoration in the home and to serve her husband. Katherine is the inconsistency in this stereotype on femininity. Her purpose in the novel originally is to rebel against this biased thought on female gender roles. Katherine is not afraid to speak out against the things that she is told to do. If she disagrees with something she will act on it and she is just as strong as the men in the novel; which is why many of the men actually fear her. Katherine is not submissive and does not believe that the only reason that she exists is to serve a husband. Katherine does not want to be just the damsel in distress, she wants to be in charge. At the end of the novel there is a switch in the personalities of Katherine and Bianca. This alteration provides the purpose of showing that gender is not something that someone can be confined in just because they were born a female. A woman can have many different traits and still be feminine. It is impossible to put femininity in a box because there are no real qualities for what
Higgins and Eliza still sharing the archetypes of the teacher and student get into an argument. The argument starts with Higgins explaining that he does not specifically treat her poorly but treats everyone poorly. Higgins explains, “the question is not whether I treat rudely, but whether you ever heard me treat anyone else better,” (Shaw, 77). Eliza threatened to leave although Higgins explained that she has no money or skill besides speaking properly and proposes that she marry someone rich. Insulted, Eliza threatened to marry Freddy which deeply bothers Higgins because he feels that the idea is a waste of his work on specifically on someone like him. This particular detail shows how Higgins does value his creation and work of art not wanting it to be wasted. In the end, Eliza leaves and later ends up marrying Freddy who together opens a flower shop. Even though there is some similarity in the theme of loving one’s own creation, Shaw’s Pygmalion does not compare to the archetypes in the myth Ovid’s Pygmalion as the movie did.
Petruchio achieves his goal through witty persuasion rather than resorting to beating his wife like many a man before him has done. Though Shakespeare does not go as far as some feminists would like him to, Shakespeare does much for the fight for equality of the sexes. Katherine’s as strong, or stronger than any woman in Shakespeare’s plays. The amazing thing is that she achieves this without ulterior motives, such as Lady Macbeth. She is an honest, bright, independent woman.
The Taming of the Shrew took place in the 1500’s and Petruchio even then was interested in Katherine for the sole purpose of the wealth. He arrives to Padua looking for a wealthy wife and is quick to jump on the first opportunity that comes to him. Arriving in Padua Petuchio states, “Hortensio... If you can find a woman rich enough for me—because money is all I look for in a wife” He then states that he doesn’t care if she’s unattractive, “It wouldn’t matter one way or the other. I’ve come here in search of a rich wife. If I find a rich wife in Padua, I’ll have found a good wife in Padua.” ( Sparknotes: Act 1, Scene 2, Page
Eliza repeatedly speaks to her friend Lucy about friendship and how important it is to her, more important than her future marrying a man of stature. Eliza fully believes that one cannot have both a marriage and friendships. Eliza even states that, “marriage is the tomb of friendship and that it appears to her to be a very selfish state” (Foster 24). Eliza’s harsh thinking of marriage really show the audience how marriage is the one thing that she fears more than anything, Eliza even feels that marriage could lead to her demise. According to The Cult of Womanhood in
A full change for Eliza comes when she begins being able to take care of herself and others. Berst explains “Eliza grows as a woman (not a lady) though progressively rising to the engaging this counter force and coming to grips with alternatives--Freddy and independence” (Berst 133). The differences between Eliza and Cinderella are that we see a happily ever after for Cinderella marring the prince. A similarity is that Eliza has reached her goal and she may not be at the top of society.
As a flower girl, Eliza is neither cared for nor loved at home or in the neighborhood. Although she has a father, Eliza is no more than an orphan. Doolittle, her father, is a thorough rascal. He cares nothing for his family responsibility. He is addicted to drink and women. He believes in the philosophy that a strap is the best way to improve his daughter's mind. So Eliza is often beaten by her father when he loses his temper. Among her mates, Eliza has no friends and is often laughed at by other girls. The hard life cultivates her a strong character. She learns to support...
Higgins, a teacher of proprietary manners, lacks those very manners which others pay to learn from him. Ironically, Higgins believes that he is the greatest teacher of manners. He announces that in “three months [he] could pass [Eliza] off as a duchess.” Higgins thinks that he can take any lower class girl and pass her off as a duchess. He truly believes that he is capable of transforming Eliza. Once the teaching begins, Higgins shows no respect for others in his life. When he goes to see his mother, she reminds him that “[he] promised not to come on” her days when she is having guests. He ignores this promise to his mother because he believes that his newest experiment is more important than his mother’s insignificant visitors are. This behavior continues throughout the ...
Eliza is no more the old Eliza, she transforms and becomes a woman with a upper-class language. She is a respected woman and has a new identity in the society. Higgins doesn’t realize she is not the same. In fact he still threats her as he did the first day they met in his office. However Eliza is different and changed.
...nd an upper-class gentleman while she is ignorant and a lower-class flower girl. The man is superior, intelligent and reasonable whereas the woman is inferior, stupid and emotional. However, in Act 5, which can be considered as a climax, Eliza begins to disobey Mr. Higgins and oblige him to treat her equally and respectfully. This shows Eliza’s independence and maturity. This self-confidence and revolution against the existing conventions is a plain criticism of Shaw on the existing ideas at that time.
...for her. This is also comical as Shaw uses words like ' good girl' which suggests that Higgins is talking to a small child. This could mean that Higgins feels slightly sympathetic towards Eliza as treating her like a child might suggest that he is more concerned. The comedy in this is that Higgins is treating Eliza like a small child and he is unaware of doing so.