Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Views of women in the Victorian era
Role and status of women in colonial america
The role of women in 17th century America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Views of women in the Victorian era
Following the Path to One’s Own Happiness Hannah W. Foster uses incredible language in her novel published in 1797, The Coquette. This novel, made up of letters, allows the audience to fully understand what was expected of women during this time, the restraints on the women, and how women were seen and treated when not following the rules of how to be a proper woman. During this time period woman were to get married, take care of the house and domestic duties, and to produced children that could carry on the family name. Eliza Wharton, the protagonist in the novel, does not want to conform to society and be the domestic lady that everyone else thinks she should be. She does not want to conform because she believes that marriage is the end …show more content…
Lucy as well as Mrs. Richman repeatedly talks to Eliza about Boyer’s status and how her status would change drastically if she would marry him. Everyone repeatedly makes it known that Boyer is out of Eliza’s league and that she should jump on the fact that he is even interested in her. Lucy explains to Eliza that, “his situation in life is, perhaps, as elevated as you have a right to claim,” but Eliza does not care that he could completely improve her life (Foster 27). To the lady’s during this time period, how others see you and think of you is one of the most important things. Mrs. Richman thinks that she is going to be able to convince Eliza to choose to be with only Boyer by stating, “you’re friends, Eliza, would be very happy to see you united to a man of Mr. Boyer’s worth,” but the only thing worth anything to Eliza is happiness and just because Boyer may be the better man and the man that has the money, does not mean that he is the one that contains the happiness for her (Foster 24). To Eliza, there is nothing wrong with how she lives her life because she is happy and that is what truly matters. Throughout The Coquette Eliza explains that, “[she is] too happy in [her] present connections to quit them for new ones” (Foster 24). Eliza does not care that she is doing the very opposite from all of her friends and loved ones, she does not …show more content…
Eliza can never really decide which one she would pick because both of them lead to her happiness even though that is not the norm and creates the rumors surrounding her. Once when Eliza returns from a date with Boyer, she writes to Lucy that Mrs. Richman declares, “that I should own myself somewhat engaged to him. This, I told her I should never do to any man, before the indissoluble knot was tied…that will be the time I resign my freedom” (Foster 30). Not only does Eliza refuse to only see one man, she also shows the audience in this quote that she believes marrying a man means one must resign their freedom. Freedom is what holds Eliza’s happiness, being able to go about dating two men at once is what makes her happy, so giving up that freedom and happiness just to marry sounds insane to her. Eliza repeatedly speaks to her friend Lucy about friendship and how important it is to her, more important than her future marrying a man of stature. Eliza fully believes that one cannot have both a marriage and friendships. Eliza even states that, “marriage is the tomb of friendship and that it appears to her to be a very selfish state” (Foster 24). Eliza’s harsh thinking of marriage really show the audience how marriage is the one thing that she fears more than anything, Eliza even feels that marriage could lead to her demise. According to The Cult of Womanhood in
Eliza’s blatant disregard for the concern of those around her contributed heavily to her demise. Had she listened to her friends and family when they told her to marry Mr...
One might question if Eliza really had any choice in her situation. Early in the novel she declares, "What a pity . . . that the graces and virtues are not oftner united!" (Foster 22). While Sanford possessed all the suavity she desired and Reverend Boyer all the integrity, she could find no companion who possessed both. This lack of options seems to be what truly destroys Eliza. It may have been within Eliza's power to be a True Woman, but due to the societal constraints imposed upon her, it does not seem at all possible for her to have been a happy woman.
Sanford, “a pretentious rake” (Foster 818), was a bad influence; Boyer was boring and pompous, but polite and respectable. Obviously, either of the two choices could lead to her downfall. So, it was a choice between two evils, but Boyer from all indications appeared to be a better choice. However, “Brought up to understand the behavior expected of a proper young woman of her station, Eliza is not an immoral person” (Foster 818). So, Eliza had a strong sense of what is wrong and what is right based on her upbringing; but despite this, she had some difficulties keeping to her morals, and still ended up making a poor choice of a partner. In my opinion, she did not make a very good choice, but what happened to her in the end is not entirely her fault, but a combination of her poor choices, and the fate she met. She knew the kind of person Sanford was, and her friends did warn her that “Many have been the victims of his treachery” (Foster 864). In her letter to Eliza, Lucy Freeman says “Methinks I can gather from your letters, a predilection for this Major Sanford. But he is a rake, my dear friend; and can a lady of your delicacy and refinement think of forming a connection with a man of that character? I hope not… you will not find a more excellent partner than Mr. Boyer. Whatever you reasonably expect in a lover, a
The Coquette; or, The History of Eliza Wharton narrates the tribulations of an unmarried woman in post-revolutionary America. The author Hannah Webster Foster uses the story of Miss Wharton as an allegory of female moral decay. The highly patriarchal demands that women be submissive, domestic, and married. However, the protagonist Eliza Wharton has conflicting ideas of her expectations within the society. She is highly intelligent and yearns for self-determination. Though the novel is about seduction, Foster significantly altered the basic structure of novels at the time by relating it from the female perspective. The result is a novel that explores several significant themes in post-revolutionary America among them, the existence, and the need for female education.
The epistolary novel challenges gender roles because in a society where the most accepted form of female writing was letters, the epistolary novel gives a new voice to women. The letters written by the characters especially the women go hand in hand with new republican virtues of society. Women were becoming more educated and their letters became more frequent. The epistolary form gives a sense of realism. It allows the reader to dive head first into the lives and problems of the characters, it is set up in a way where the reader ultimately knows more than the character does. This style of writing allows us to get the story from each character as an individual, which is important because if told from another character, events and emotions might get lost in translation or become skewed. Through reading Eliza’s letters, the audience can get a grasp of her personality, her morals, her humor, and her intentions. Eliza’s voice is strong and as she begins to decline her voice starts to dwindle and become muffled and eventually lost. Through being able to see how her voice gets lost, the reader can get a real sense of her decline as a character. Eliza begins to fade and other characters start to step into the light. Eliza’s letters are what makes her relatable and without these snippets from Eliza, the audience might not want to side with her. William Brown Hill’s preface to The Power of
Eliza Wharton has sinned. She has also seduced, deceived, loved, and been had. With The Coquette Hannah Webster Foster uses Eliza as an allegory, the archetype of a woman gone wrong. To a twentieth century reader Eliza's fate seems over-dramatized, pathetic, perhaps even silly. She loved a man but circumstance dissuaded their marriage and forced them to establish a guilt-laden, whirlwind of a tryst that destroyed both of their lives. A twentieth century reader may have championed Sanford's divorce, she may have championed the affair, she may have championed Eliza's acceptance of Boyer's proposal. She may have thrown the book angrily at the floor, disgraced by the picture of ineffectual, trapped, female characters.
Eliza is a slave on a plantation that raises her to be a “good” Christian. To Eliza, her masters
Alexander Hamilton’s affair with Maria Reynolds put his marriage in question. In the song, “Burn”, Eliza states that, “You forfeit all rights to my heart/You forfeit the place in our bed/You sleep in your office instead” (Miranda). Eliza is telling Hamilton that he ruined their marriage and does not deserve to be her husband anymore. After much consideration Eliza did forgive Hamilton and they got back together. Eliza wanted Hamilton’s legacy to be great and remembered. “Elizabeth Hamilton stuck by her man until his death in 1804 and for 50 years of widowhood” (Brookhiser). Despite everything Hamilton put his wife through, Eliza forgave him, stuck by him until his death, and then stayed faithful to him for 50 years after his death. While she
Higgins and Eliza still sharing the archetypes of the teacher and student get into an argument. The argument starts with Higgins explaining that he does not specifically treat her poorly but treats everyone poorly. Higgins explains, “the question is not whether I treat rudely, but whether you ever heard me treat anyone else better,” (Shaw, 77). Eliza threatened to leave although Higgins explained that she has no money or skill besides speaking properly and proposes that she marry someone rich. Insulted, Eliza threatened to marry Freddy which deeply bothers Higgins because he feels that the idea is a waste of his work on specifically on someone like him. This particular detail shows how Higgins does value his creation and work of art not wanting it to be wasted. In the end, Eliza leaves and later ends up marrying Freddy who together opens a flower shop. Even though there is some similarity in the theme of loving one’s own creation, Shaw’s Pygmalion does not compare to the archetypes in the myth Ovid’s Pygmalion as the movie did.
married. However, “for pragmatic reasons, the author’s conclusions favor marriage as the ultimate solution, but her pairings predict happiness” (“Austen, Jane”). Als...
As to the relationship with their teachers, both students become more self-confident and their teachers become dependent on them, be it in a materialistic or personal way. Yet it is Eliza who complains about Higgins ignorance and carelessness whereas Frank reproaches Rita for her superficiality. At the end Eliza has regained her pride and improved her standard of living although Eliza remaining a social misfit.
In Jane Austen’s Emma, an emphasis is placed on the importance of female friendships. In particular, Austen places a great deal of emphasis on how Emma treats the women she calls her friends. In many ways, Emma manipulates the people in her life to fit her specific expectations for them. This can be seen in her matchmaking, especially Harriet’s relationship with Mr. Martin. Emma’s manipulation of various relationships serves as a way to control the friendships she has with the women in her life. By matching her friends with the men she has chosen for them, Emma can not only elevate their status but also keep these women in her life as well. It is only when her friendships are affected by marriage that Emma re-evaluates the role of marriage in her own life.
This part of the plot is the climax in Act V of Pygmalion and here it is exemplified that Liza has matured and realizes that she was being treated inhumanely. Her transformation from a girl with no manners and lack of speech skills to a woman with refined speech and eloquence brought Liza to realize that no matter her position socially she should be treated as an equal. It has been brought to light that she is not on the same level as Higgins because Higgins sees both the rich and poor versions of Liza as the lowest of the low, when in fact through her "new self" she is a symbol for power and respect, especially as a female in the Victorian
I don’t matter, I suppose’” (Berst 99). Eliza’s actions can be felt as a Cinderella impulse coming from her (Berst 99). Eliza worked hard to get through the lessons with Higgins and had won that bet, so she deserves the credit for the hard work she put in. It seems that Eliza at this point is lonely and probably wanted someone in her life to tell her she was doing the right thing, she has accomplished things she wanted to do for herself.
As a flower girl, Eliza is neither cared for nor loved at home or in the neighborhood. Although she has a father, Eliza is no more than an orphan. Doolittle, her father, is a thorough rascal. He cares nothing for his family responsibility. He is addicted to drink and women. He believes in the philosophy that a strap is the best way to improve his daughter's mind. So Eliza is often beaten by her father when he loses his temper. Among her mates, Eliza has no friends and is often laughed at by other girls. The hard life cultivates her a strong character. She learns to support...