For months, the prospect of a T-Mobile and AT&T merger has become more public. The prolonged merger discussion has left the public wondering if the acquisition will allow AT&T to completely rule the telecommunications market, leaving Verizon and Sprint in the dust. Mobile subscribers have been left unsure by the shocking announcement, wondering how their pockets and cellular services will be affected. With lawsuits being filed by both the Department of Justice and Sprint, the future of the acquisition is unclear. AT&T stands by its history of fair dealing, publishing the following in its Code of Ethics:
AT&T does not seek competitive advantages through illegal or unethical business practices, meaning that no employee, officer, or director should take unfair advantage of anyone, including customers, suppliers, and competitors, through manipulation, concealment, abuse of privileged information, misrepresentation of material facts, or unfair dealing practices. (“Corporate Governance”, 2011)
With the significant possibility of the merger giving AT&T the chance to monopolize, it seems as though the company has lost sight of its code of maintaining fair competition.
American business is protected by pro-competition legislation, including antitrust laws that were enacted to prohibit monopolies. As noted in the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, it is illegal for companies to hold a large concentration of economic power. AT&T is no stranger to manipulating this federal law in order to gain an unfair advantage, according to the Federal Communications Commission. During the 1980’s, AT&T made a name for itself by practically dominating its industry, an unfair competitive advantage that contradicts its Code of Ethics. However, the company’s ...
... middle of paper ...
...011, August 22). Going deep on AT&T- T-Mobile merger: How will it really impact wireless competition? Connected Planet. Retrieved from Factiva.
Kellner, M. (2011, October 27). T-Mobile’s pitch: Take our smartphones, please. The Washington Times. Retrieved from Factiva.
Malik, O. (2011, March 20). In AT&T & T-Mobile Merger, Everybody Loses. Retrieved from http://gigaom.com/2011/03/20/in-att-t-mobile-merger-everybody-loses/
McCracken, H. (2011, March 20). A Brief History of the Rise and Fall of Telephone Competition in the US, 1982-2011. Retrieved from http://technologizer.com/2011/03/20/att-buys-t-mobile/
Sorkin, A. (2011, March 21). AT&T Makes Deal to Buy T-Mobile for $39 Billion. The New York Times. Retrieved from Factiva.
Thillien, D. (2011, November 3). Judge rules Sprint can sue AT&T over merger. HIS Global Insight Daily Analysis. Retrieved from Factiva.
Perhaps no other company has benefited more from this deregulation than the company which is the focus of this essay – Clear Channel Communications, Inc (CC). The Telecommunications Act and the actions of the FCC paved the way for the rise of this radio industry behemoth. In 1995, the company owned 43 radio stations nationwide. By 2002, it owned 1,239, making it the largest radio company in th...
...lities of TWC. If this deal goes through, the acquiring corporation, Comcast, would expand in size and value dramatically, bringing its overall audience to 30 million households, while TWC ceases to exist as a separate corporation and ultimately all account balances of TWC would be adjusted and consolidated in the financial records of Comcast while TWC’s records will be closed out.
Imagine if nobody had a cellphone in today’s world. That’s why today everybody has some form of a cellphone contract with the four major companies (AT&T, Sprint, Verizon or T-Mobile) or a less know cellphone provider. AT&T and Verizon Wireless provide more than the other two major companies.
MCI Case Analysis INTRODUCTION MCI is at a critical point in their company history. After going public in 1972, they experienced several years of operating losses. Then in 1974 the FCC ordered MCI's largest competitor AT&T to supply interconnection to MCI and the rest of the long distance market. With a more even playing field, the opportunities to increase market share and revenue were significant. In order to maximize this opportunity, MCI requires capital.
Many people turn to the AT&T and T-Mobile takeover that was turned down and do not understand why the Comcast and Time Warner merger would be allowed. The main reason this is allowed, is because the cable providers service different areas as shown in exhibit 2. Comcast and Time Warner will have control of their region, but they will not be taking away business from the other cable providers. Cell phone service providers service the entire country and have overlapping markets. If AT&T took over T-Mobile, they would gain more power and take away business from Verizon and Sprint. The merger had different implications and this is one of the reasons why Comcast and Time Warner can actually pull off this merger. The VP of Comcast stated “This transaction has the potential to slow the increase in prices. ... Consumers are going to be the big winners (Reuters 2)."
The planned settlement is a concession reflecting the reality that ending the hearing would expose Microsoft to an undefined result and would put the government case at risk. The government dropped numerous basics of the conduct remedies that they had accomplished in the original hearing and the ...
For this report, our team performed a scan of the general environment concerning T-Mobile. Topics which were reviewed include the economy, demographics, technology, legal and political events, and social attributes. Significant events and trends dealing with the segments are analyzed throughout.
Channel Exposure- AT&T is adequate in its point of sales. They intend to match most competitors in using Radio Shack, BEST Buy, Walmart, Mall locations, high visible real estate traffic.
In fact, some of the biggest threats to the company’s growth are the government’s regulation that increases the risk to the underlying business. In addition, the risk of losing the exclusive contract for the iPhone would be a major loss for AT&T. Most of the consumers choose AT&T because of their exclusive contract for the iPhone. Hence, this loss of business will significantly influence the AT&T's profitability and revenue. Moreover, the antitrust authorities play an important role on approved the merger of AT&T.
In January 2000, Time Warner, Inc. (TW) announced its plans to merge with America Online (AOL) and upon completion in 2001, it had become the largest merger in U.S. corporate history. AOL had a pre-merger value of $163 billion and Time Warner had a preannouncement value of $100 billion, in 2001, the value of the combined firm was stated at $165 billion. While many saw an opportunity to create a synergy out of the two media giants, the overall firm saw little success as a combined entity and has since faced several challenges. Michael R. Baye addresses several issues for discussion concerning the merger in his textbook Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, through the usage of hypothetical memos issued within Time Warner. Memo 4 discusses the possible acquisition of Fox News to increase revenues, bolster subscriptions, and expand their international market. The purpose of this paper is to address the specific problems Time Warner faces by acquiring Fox News and to provide strategic moves that best capitalize on Time Warner's current situation.
The article “Justice Department Sues to Block AT&T-Time Warner Merger” by The New York Times was published on November 22, 2017. In this article, the author talks about the disadvantages people will face if the merger between AT&T and Time Warner were to happen. AT&T itself is one of the nation’s largest internet, telephone, and television provider. Time Warner posses huge properties, such as HBO and Warner Bros. Time Warner also possesses news channel CNN and TNT network. AT&T combined with Time Warner will be extremely successful in reaching consumers through the programs of entertainment and news. The union between these two successful companies will harm consumers by raising the price of television and internet subscriptions. Not only
In the year 2005 southwestern bell purchased the former monopoly to create the AT&T we use today. On March 20, 2011, AT&T announced its intention to buy T-Mobile USA for $39 billion only to have the purchase refused. After many failed mergers AT&T finally completed an acquisition between Direct TV while forging a new deal with Time Warner. The merger must undergo regulatory review, with AT&T hoping to complete the acquisition before the end of 2017. AT&T purchased DirecTV last year to become the nation 's largest cable or satellite TV provider. Once again AT&T resembles a natural monopoly having the ability to lower prices at will to force smaller competitors out of business. Here is a graph to support my findings on AT&T profitability during the past decade due to
As we continue into the twenty-first century, one has to consider the importance of technology and its ever-growing influence in today’s world. Technology has allowed us to eliminate the physical boundaries of geography and create a space where data can be relayed throughout the world in a blink of an eye. In other words, communication has become part of a daily necessity. The use of cellular phones has grown exponentially since it was first made available to the public in 1984, when they were still large, bulky, and expensive. Today, almost everywhere you go, everybody has a cell phone. Sizes, shapes, and features vary, but they grow smaller and faster every year. It is not just the technology of phones that one must analyze, but the mobile service that is provided as well. In the United States, we have three major existing wireless service providers: AT&T Wireless, Verizon Wireless, Sprint, and T-Mobile. These carriers sell their service along with phones that are manufactured by Motorola, LG, Nokia, Blackberry, Apple, Samsung, and many more. We will focus on Verizon Wireless and how they utilize technology. We will also address the role of management, real estate, and future endeavors that lie ahead.
After reading the article in the Wall Street Journal and taking the self assessment I believe that my attitude towards the company will not change much. After reading the article I would probably be more excited to work for the new "T-Mobile". A merger of this size would have to excite many of their employees. With this kind of attitude towards the company, I believe that i would look for the potential for positive impacts of the merger. I would look at what I can gain most from the merger. The merger may help T-Mobile with its cellular reliability which could have benefits for the company as a whole if their product is higher quality. This merger might mean that I can move to a new city that fits my personality better if the first city that
Farrell, M., & Bray, H. (n.d.). A new era of competition in wireless - The Boston Globe. BostonGlobe.com. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/01/09/new-era-competition-wireless/fQDEeU7sF7ubiTlDpOObuN/story.html