Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comcast's takeover of TWC
Time Warner Cable mergers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comcast's takeover of TWC
A) According to the article:’ Time Warner Cable to Merge with Comcast Corporation to Create a World-Class Technology and Media Company”, Time Warner Cable and Comcast came to a friendly agreement in which the board of directors approved the stock-for-stock transaction where Comcast will acquire 100% of Time Warner’s cable shares outstanding. This acquisition will be both beneficial for Comcast’s consumers and their shareholders where this merger will create a technological innovating company with ground breaking products and services. This acquisition will be accretive to Comcast’s free cash flow and yield many synergies for both companies. As Robert D. Marcus, Chairman and CEO of Time Warner Cable said, "This combination creates a company that delivers maximum value for our shareholders, enormous opportunities for our employees and a superior experience for our customers". Through this merger, many consumers and businesses will benefit from the new company with cutting-edge products that will broaden the technological platform in the media. Not only this merger will reduce competition, but also will add to Comcast the 11 million TWC subscribers, which will be totaled in around 30 million subscribers and will expand to Comcast’s geographic footprint in the media platform.
B) The critical issue is that Comcast, the biggest internet and cable provider in the nation, is seeking to become even bigger in merging with Time Warner Cable, the second biggest company in the market. This merger will increase the influence Comcast has on TV channels and internet content providers, leaving consumers with fewer alternatives and will reduce competition to the amount where Comcast will control two thirds’ of the cable TV market and about 40% of ...
... middle of paper ...
...lities of TWC. If this deal goes through, the acquiring corporation, Comcast, would expand in size and value dramatically, bringing its overall audience to 30 million households, while TWC ceases to exist as a separate corporation and ultimately all account balances of TWC would be adjusted and consolidated in the financial records of Comcast while TWC’s records will be closed out.
Conclusion:
The likely scenario is that shareholders will approve the merger at the end of 2014, but could be rejected by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), considering the size of the market share they are getting out of the deal. Nevertheless, many sources suggest that legislators are already skeptical that the deal is any good for the markets, and with Comcast increasing influence in Washington, and an army of lobbyists already on the move, the result will remain to be seen.
By the acquisition, Comcast was clearly investing in content; this is a huge transformation for Comcast. This acquisition signals that they want to get bigger ...
Robert Zimmerman, the senior vice president of business development, for American Cable Communications (ACC) was in the process of looking for a potential acquisition target for ACC. In December 2007, Zimmerman remember a presentation that was made recently by Rubinstein & Ross (R&R). R&R was a boutique investment bank that was well known for doing deals in the media and telecommunications area. During this presentation it was suggested that ACC buy out AirThread Connections (AirThread) which is a large regional cellular provider. The current industry of these companies were moving more toward bundled service offerings and by adding AirThread it would help ACC cover an area of service it does not currently offer. In order to determine if the acquisition should be done an analysis needs to be done.
...ns especially when it came to deregulating the telecommunications industry. The new law was expected to bring radical changes to the communications industry, providing high quality services to the masses at minimal cost. The act was also designed with the specific purpose of ensuring that advanced telecommunications will be available to every citizen as part of the policy for universal service. The FCC and the states, as the regulatory bodies, implement the law. Its been over three years since the law was passed and most critics have claimed that nothing worthwhile came out of the act besides the mergers of course. Ultimately however, the services brought to the public will depend on the providers of those services and their success in the marketplace.
Perhaps no other company has benefited more from this deregulation than the company which is the focus of this essay – Clear Channel Communications, Inc (CC). The Telecommunications Act and the actions of the FCC paved the way for the rise of this radio industry behemoth. In 1995, the company owned 43 radio stations nationwide. By 2002, it owned 1,239, making it the largest radio company in th...
The company faces intense competition for the clients that it serves and the products and services it offers. There has been significant consolidation as financial institutions with which the company competes have been acquired by or merged into or acquired other firms. For instance, in November 2010, The Charles Schwab Corporation acquired Windward Investment Management, Inc. for $150 million in cash and stock. In June 2009, TD Ameritrade completed the acquisition of thinkorswim Group Inc. thinkorswim is among the fastest growing online brokerage firms and has unique trading and investor education capabilities, particularly for the fastest growing segment of the industry-options trading. So, this acquisition underscores TD AMERITRADE's position as a successful industry consolidator. Consolidation in discount brokerage industry is creating larger rivals to compete with.
I am interest in the study of this topic because I am curious about the financial effects of such a merger.
When we think of those skilled in the art of rhetoric, we often jump to those we know are trying to convince us of something, like politicians, salesmen, lawyers, etc. We do not always consider corporate CEOs part of that group though Netflix CEO, Reed Hastings, would have us believing another thing. On March 20th, 2014, Hastings published an article titled “Internet Tolls And The Case For Strong Net Neutrality” on Netflix’s official blog. Just under a month before the blog was posted, Netflix settled a deal paying Comcast, America’s largest cable and Internet service provider (ISP), for faster and more reliable service to Comcast’s subscribers (Cohen and Wyatt). These “internet tolls” go against the culture of net neutrality in America, which in its essence is when no piece of information is prioritized over another on broadband networks. Hastings took to their blog to advocate for net neutrality and against abusive ISPs. Whether he was conscious of his rhetorical finesse or not, he wrote quite convincingly thus turning this blog into an excellent rhetorical artifact. Reed Hastings’ blog post aims to convince American Internet consumers that strong net neutrality is important by appealing to their values of choice, frugality and empathy while simultaneously making ISPs seem ill intentioned and Netflix seem honorable.
Comcast Cable’s intent during the next five years is to continue increasing their market share by providing superior customer service to their existing customers and any potential customers. They will continue building their customer base through increasing residential and business service accounts. Comcast will continue
Bensimon, Jack J. StockHouse News Desk. “AOL-Time Warner Merger Accelerates Next Internet Revolution” January 11, 2000 http://www.stockhouse.com/shfn/jan00/011100com_aoltime.asp
Television, the phone, and the internet. These inventions have uniquely shaped the 20th century and have led to the 21st century being known as the age of information. These services are the primary ways we communicate, express ourselves, and reach out in our ever increasing global world. In the United States, these services are provided by a number of different firms, chief among them is Comcast, being the largest provider of Cable and internet in America, and a large telephone provider. Next to it stands Time Warner Cable, the second largest provider of cable in the United States. The decision for Comcast to buy Time Warner Cable for forty-five billion dollars in 2014 has led to many criticizing the merger, calling it a monopoly. Others have called the whole cable system an oligopoly. For it to be a monopoly or an oligopoly, it would have to fit their respective categories. The merger between Comcast and Time Warner Cable would not create a true monopoly, but would give it significant market power because it has monopoly resources and can be considered a natural monopoly. It will also further its power in a market dominated by oligopolies. People argue that it is not a danger to Americans for this merger to happen, but when one looks at the practices Comcast already uses, it paints
In fact, some of the biggest threats to the company’s growth are the government’s regulation that increases the risk to the underlying business. In addition, the risk of losing the exclusive contract for the iPhone would be a major loss for AT&T. Most of the consumers choose AT&T because of their exclusive contract for the iPhone. Hence, this loss of business will significantly influence the AT&T's profitability and revenue. Moreover, the antitrust authorities play an important role on approved the merger of AT&T.
In January 2000, Time Warner, Inc. (TW) announced its plans to merge with America Online (AOL) and upon completion in 2001, it had become the largest merger in U.S. corporate history. AOL had a pre-merger value of $163 billion and Time Warner had a preannouncement value of $100 billion, in 2001, the value of the combined firm was stated at $165 billion. While many saw an opportunity to create a synergy out of the two media giants, the overall firm saw little success as a combined entity and has since faced several challenges. Michael R. Baye addresses several issues for discussion concerning the merger in his textbook Managerial Economics and Business Strategy, through the usage of hypothetical memos issued within Time Warner. Memo 4 discusses the possible acquisition of Fox News to increase revenues, bolster subscriptions, and expand their international market. The purpose of this paper is to address the specific problems Time Warner faces by acquiring Fox News and to provide strategic moves that best capitalize on Time Warner's current situation.
The idea inspired Reed Hastings and Marc Randolph, and then they founded Netflix in Scotts Valley, California in 1997 (Netflix, 2014). The company comes into play by developing a subscription-based streaming platform for movies and television shows. Unlike the traditional movie rental businesses such as Blockbuster and Redbox, Netflix’s innovation offers service via Internet, and it does not have any physical stores but instead delivers DVDs through postal mail in the U.S. Since then, Netflix has become the world’s leading internet television network with constant growth of customers to over 48 millions members in more than 40 countries in the North America, Europe, and the Latin America (Netflix, 2014). In this analysis, the main focus is examining the current market environment for Netflix. It identifies the type of market structure that Netflix is currently competing. The analysis also expands on the competitions, product differentiation, pricing strategy, and measuring the level of easy entry-and-exit.
On December 14, 2000, the Federal Trade Commission approved the planned merger of AOL and Time Warner after both companies pledged to “protect consumer choice” both now and in the future. The AOL Time Warner merger was approved by the Federal Communications Commission on January 11, 2001, and is the biggest merger in corporate history, then estimated at a total market value of $350 billion. The merger created a ‘powerhouse’ of new and traditional media. AOL Time Warner has led the union of the media, entertainment, communications and Internet industries. Throughout the years the face of media and entertainment industries has changed drastically as a result of increased technology. The popularity of newspapers gave way to other forms of media and entertainment such as magazines, television, cable, music, and most recently the Internet.
...hoose from. Today there are not near as many airlines to choose from which creates an almost monopolistic feel in the airline industry. Now there are maybe two or three airlines to choose from which creates an oligopoly. According to the Huffington Post, “In oligopoly competition situation, prices move in lock step, even without overt (and illegal!) collusion between the parties” (Neches). So in the end the merger is really not looking too good for the Airline industry. Not only is the merger not looking good for the industry, but for the company as well. Merging two broken companies will not produce a strong company. Everything from Computer system malfunctions, union issues, and aircraft malfunctions have plagued every single step of this merger. The United-Continental merger may have made them the largest airliner in the world, but it has not made them the best.