Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing the synoptic gospels
Comparing the synoptic gospels
Comparing the synoptic gospels
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing the synoptic gospels
Synoptic Problem Similarities between the Synoptic Gospels There are numerous similarities between the synoptic Gospels, to many to say that it is just chance. There are similarities in events, grammar, location, use of words, expressions and many more. Four types of similarities, according to the ‘Catholic planet’ article are “that some material is found in all three, second that there are similarities between Matthew and Luke which are not found in mark, third, that there are similarities in Mark and Luke not found in Matthew, and fourth is that there are similarities between Matthew and Mark not found in Luke. The strongest proponent of the synoptic characterization in my opinion would have to be items that are in all three gospels. These
are the items that carry the most weight. For instance, the journey into Galilee is in all three and John, which lends to crediting the event. Jesus’ Ministry in Galilee is also in all three as well as John. The healing of Peter’s Mother in law was in all three, as well as the cleansing of the leper, the healing of the paralytic, the call of Levi (Matthew), the question about fasting, plucking grain on the Sabbath, the man with the withered hand, Jesus healing multitudes by the sea, the choosing of the twelve, and the occasion of the preaching of the sermon on the mount. Material for the Gospel Matthew’s gospel source was probably the Old Testament, combined with his firsthand experience with Jesus. It is quite possible that they relied on each other in some manner for their content. It is often speculated that each one had access to some of the same material. Some think that Mark was written first and that Matthew and Luke was written afterwards. Source. The International Bible Society, the synoptic Gospel article, states that a mathematical comparison shows that 91 per cent of mark’s Gospel is found in Matthew, while 53 percent of Mark is found in Luke. It also states that the most common view is that the Gospel of Mark and a hypothetical document called Quelle (German for “source”) or Q, were used by Matthew and Luke. Solution. I describe the synoptic problem as being a way for the enemy to oppose the true word of God. Most of this is just a diversionary tactic to try to get people focus away from the importance of His word. The books were the accounts of three different individuals who walked and fellowshipped with the same man, a God-Man who walked the earth for three and a half years and then ascended back to heaven and is now on the throne. There accounts are true as was his appearance three days after they crucified him, and are accounted for by many witnesses. Our job is to just continue praying for those who are trying to use these methods to discredit the authenticity of the Gospel. References WWW.CATHOLICPLANET.COM.ROMAN CATHOLIC THEOLOGY AND BIBLICAL STUDIES INTERNATIONAL BIBLE SOCIETY (zondervan N.I.V.). (2014, JANUARY 16). THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS. BIBLICA.
The book of Luke, found after the books Matthew and Mark, focuses on the ministry of Jesus Christ but it also gives us a look into His birth and growth in totality. In this chapter we see a historical account of some of the journeys that Christ experienced. It is important to keep in mind that the Bible and all of its books do serve as historical accounts but each book is unique in the fact that they incorporate a theological timeline. The Bible is, conceivably, the most important book that has ever been written. It gives the world eyewitness accounts to historical events that helped not only shaped a region of the world but the whole entire world. It is nearly impossible to go through some formal societal education and have never once read a part of the bible or have heard a story that adapts from the stories within the bible. The bible has helped formed institutions, associations and so much more. By reading the Gospel of Luke we are truly reading what is meant for us to read as Christians. The principal plot in the book of Luke is the life of Jesus Christ, his sacrifice, His ability to beat death and remain perfect as the son of GOD despite being human as well. Jesus is seen as the perfect savior for humans in the book of Luke. Luke not only gives multiple examples of the power of Jesus but also it gives us a look at The Lord’s triumph over temptation. Luke also depicts Jesus as a man/GOD who had a very deep concentration on people and relationships. The book of Luke gives Jesus a loving characteristic but doesn’t shy away from showing that at times Jesus got angry too. Jesus showed a great deal of compassion to the sick, those in pain, the poor, and unambiguously the sinful. Jesus had genuine love for everyone. Throughout this...
It is stated in the New Jerusalem Bible that “the Gospels don’t reflect the biography or the life of Jesus but are the four versions of the preaching from Jesus and are full of wonders and mysteries regarding the life of Jesus.” (New J Bible 1147). All the stories in gospels share similar outcomes and main ideas. They are very similar mainly that of Gospels of Mathew, Mark and Luke while Gospel of John is a little different from the rest three. The stories from Matthew, Mark and Luke are known as the synoptic. It is because they have the same synopsis and are simil...
The Gospel of Matthew is an eyewitness story written for an audience of believers, under great stress, and persecution. Matthew develops a theological plot incorporating genealogy, speeches, parables, inter and intra textual references, common vocabulary, and fulfillment quotations, with a tension that builds as we are invited into the story. The crucifixion and resurrection bring us to a Christological climax that symbolically points beyond its conclusion to God’s Kingdom, bringing atonement, salvation and the ushering in the Eschaton. The extraordinary events surrounding the crucifixion act as commentary, adding important details concerning the death of Jesus.1
While both the Gospel of Matthew and John tell of the global reordering plan for the world, each does so in a unique way. The Gospel of Matthew is able to show the reordering of the world by focusing on the aspect of Jesus as a teacher and the results of this; while the Gospel of John shows the reordering occurring as God works through Jesus showing signs to the people of who he is, focusing on the belief this brings to people. “But all who received him, who believed in his name, he gave power to become children of God” (John 1:12). Through this verse, we see the reordering in effect, as all who receive him and believe in him have the power to become children of God.
Compare and contrast the birth narratives in the Gospel of Matthew and that of the Gospel of Luke.
The reason that the Gospel of Matthew is in the first place among the four Gospels is due to the early church tradition that Matthew was the earliest one who recorded Lord’s word and Jesus stories. In the fifth century, Augustine of Hippo claimed that "the canonical order of the four Gospels was the chronological order." In the late-eighteenth century, J. J. Griesbach stated that The Gospel of Mark was a short version of the combination of the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke. In the nineteenth century, German scholars concluded that the Gospel of Matthew was preceded by the Gospel of Mark and Matthew used the Gospel of Mark as his primary source. No matter which theory that most New Testament scholars accept, Matthew did not simply copy sources from other Gospels, but also included his own ideas and quoted verses from the Old Testament. So the question of readers should rise is "How strong relationship did the Gospel of Matthew have with the Old Testament?" or "How accurately did Matthew use the Old Testament?
Matthew 2:3, “at this news King Herod became greatly disturbed.” I thought the king would be happy to hear about the birth of Jesus. Apparently the kings intentions were not very nice. I really find this passage interesting, mainly because it separates God from the kingdom. Meaning the King has power and is afraid of losing it to the Son of God.
how to get in to the Kingdom of God, what it is, and what it means to
Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand,
The contents of the Bible have dealt with controversy in regards to its inerrancy since publication, and will surely continue to. Historians progress to learn more about biblical stories in order to provide evidence for the reliability of information. Many believers today understand that not everything in the Bible has been factually proven. An outstanding topic many scholars pay attention to lies within the four gospels. The three synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, replay essentially the same story with minor inconsistencies, while John portrays Jesus in an entirely different way. The differences in each gospel are due to how each gospel entertains different portrayals of the life and understanding of Jesus himself, in order to persuade
God’s written law is something that is and should be continuously turned, to not only when Christians find themselves in need, but also throughout in one’s daily life. The four gospels tell to story of Jesus’ life and his teachings he gave while on the earth making it possible for there to be a true example of Christ-like faith. The proposition that there are differences in the story of Jesus and in his teachings seems to question the basis upon which the Christian faith is found upon. Rather than proclaiming the gospels as falsehoods because on the differences they possess, by analyzing the differences in the context of the particular gospel it can be understood that the differences are not made by mistake, rather as a literary device. While the four gospels have differences and similarities, they cannot be regarded as an argument against the faith because their differences are what point to the many aspects of Christ.
The first three gospels are sometimes called the 'synoptic' (same view) gospels. This is because they each cover teaching and miracles by Jesus that are also covered in another account. John, writing later, recounts Jesus' other words and miracles that have a particular spiritual meaning.
The four gospels are detailed accounts of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. Each portrays a unique story and angle of Jesus, who is the savior of the Jews and the world. Apostle Matthew’s writings are to prove to the Jews that Jesus is their Messiah. Mark stressed the humanity of Jesus and also his deity. Luke wanted to show that the gentile Christian in God’s kingdom is based on the teachings of Jesus. John speaks of Jesus as one sent from God to reveal His love and grace to man. The four gospels work together to elaborate on the several key themes; salvation, spreading His word, and the fulfillment of Jesus’ promise.
Matthew utilised the the Q source, originating from the German word ‘Quelle’, meaning “source”. This was a hypothetical collection of Jesus’ sayings, supposedly shared by oral tradition between Matthew and Luke. Both gospels contain common material in similar sequence and wording, evident in the Healing of the Leper and the Calming of the Storm.
The Synoptic Gospels give differing accounts about the resurrection of Jesus, however each is telling the same story. They state these same things: a group of women walked to the tomb, the stone was removed from in front of the tomb, a being told of Jesus' resurrection and the women were instructed to or told the disciples about the resurrection. The author of each gospel may have been writing for a specific audience and had specific purpose for their writings. Although, that can never be proven, there is no doubt that the gospels have stood the test of time and will continue to unless the words are proven false.