Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shakespeare's influence on modern culture
Julius Caesar impact on roman history
Imagery in Shakespeare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Shakespeare's influence on modern culture
Sympathizing with Brutus of William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is an interesting and complex
play based on historical events that took place in Rome in 44 BC. The
plot revolves around the assassination of Julius Caesar by his closest
'friend'- Marcus Brutus, and Marc Antony's attempt to avenge his
death. The play portrays many important themes that are still relevant
in today's society like the struggle for political power; love and
friendship; the fallibility of men; and the fickleness of common
people.
Despite the title of the play, Brutus is the main character, and the
most important in the group of conspirators that murder Julius Caesar.
The justification of the killing of Caesar is arguable from many
different perspectives.
Brutus justifies the assassination by saying Caesar would have gone on
to become a tyrant, an oppressor and a burden on Rome for long to
come. He argues that by killing Caesar, he is relieving Rome of a
certain dictator. Cassius sums this ideology up well when he says -
'Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus; and we
petty men walk under his huge legs, and peep about to find ourselves
dishonourable graves.'
Cassius even goes as far as comparing Caesar to the devil -
'There was a Brutus once that would have brook'd the eternal devil to
keep his state in Rome as easily as a king.' Cassius is saying that a
Brutus long ago would have wilfully allowed the devil to be in Rome as
it would be no different than the oncoming dictatorship rule of Rome
under Julius Caesar.
Things like the execution of Flavius and Marullus because they sp...
... middle of paper ...
...the play.
Like the sayings - 'What goes around comes around' and 'What you give
is what you get' - Brutus killed Caesar, and you could argue that
Caesar metaphorically killed Brutus. You could argue this by saying
Caesar haunts Brutus' conscience in the form of a ghost and tells him
that he will see him at Philippi, which is where the final battle
takes place.
Also Marc Antony is representing Caesar in a way because he his
avenging his friend's death, so when Anthony's army defeat Brutus',
you could say it was Caesar. And the final piece of evidence that
indicates Brutus has been haunted and figuratively killed by Julius
Caesar is when he confirms it himself by saying 'Caesar, now be still,
I killed not thee with half a good will' which basically means 'okay
Caesar rest now, but I was more reluctant to kill you.'
In the story Julius Ceaser, Antony was a more honorable and trusting man which stated to
In Act 1 Scene 2, we see that Cassius is jealous of Caesar and detests
In William Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is a skillful orator who makes use of rhetorical devices to convey his points. In his speech made after the death of Caesar, Brutus uses devices such as ethos, parallelism, and rhetorical questions to persuade the people to his way of thinking. Ethos is when a speaker gives an example of credibility in order to appeal to the listener’s ethics. When Brutus asks the people to “believe me for mine honor, and have respect for mine honor” (3.2.14-15), he is using ethos to appeal to their morals in order to make them consider his opinions. The use of ethos exhibits Brutus’ need for the people to approve of him, and by extension, the assassination of Caesar. Later, Brutus utilizes parallelism
For instance, Cassius said “I know where I will wear this dagger then. Cassius from bondage will deliver Cassius.” (Act 1, Scene 3, Line 92-93). Cassius’ quote is saying if the killing of Caesar does not occur he will kill himself. Cassius has no other compromise option, he is stating, if this one event doesn't occur he will have no other choice but to kill himself. Another example of cassius not compromising is when he said, “I have moved already some certain of the noblest-minded Romans to undergo with me an enterprise of honorable-dangerous consequence.” (Act 1, Scene 3, Line 126-129), meaning he has already convinced many noble Romans to carry out this dangerous and honorable deed. At this point the men he has gathered to help him with the killing of Caesar can not go back there is no possible way for them to compromise. Cassius decided not to compromise to do the right thing in many situations, therefore he was not very successful while leading.
Brutus, Honorable Man Brutus, an honorable conspirator? Honorable is defined as genuine, truthful and displaying integrity, while a conspirator is defined as one that engages in an agreement to commit an illegal or wrongful act. Anyone can clearly see that these two words do not belong together. There are also other reasons why Brutus should not be considered honorable. In the play, three distinct acts can be recalled.
The tragedy “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare should be renamed “Brutus” because Caesar is not the tragic hero. He is only in a small portion of the play and does not possess a major tragic flaw; however Marcus Brutus fits the description of tragic hero much better than Julius Caesar. Typically, tragedies are named after the tragic hero, which Aristotle describes as: a person of noble birth with a tragic flaw that leads to his or her downfall because of that flaw. Brutus exhibits all of these qualities, therefore rightfully naming him a tragic hero.
It’s often said that actions speak louder than words, but perhaps there are some intentions that develop into actions which surpass all understanding. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus assassinates his beloved Caesar. Many assume that Brutus betrayed Caesar when he killed him, but perhaps his intentions for killing Caesar were those of a patriot far beyond our comprehension. Love, whether it’s romantic or brotherly is stronger and far larger than we can put into words or logical actions. What Brutus did may appeared to be that of a betrayer, but he was anything but a traitor; Brutus was a true Patriot.
"He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares
The tragic hero is one of literatures most used (and sometimes abused) characters. The classical definition of a tragic hero is, “a person with heroic or potentially heroic qualities. The person is doomed by the Gods or some other supernatural force to destruction or suffering. The hero struggles against the fate, but due to a personal flaw, ultimately fails in the battle against fate. It is my personal opinion that Brutus,as he is portrayed in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, is a tragic hero by this definition. I came to this conclusion due to the fact that Brutus shares many similarities with other tragic heroes in literature such as Oedipus, Hamlet, and Ralph from Lord of the Flies. All four characters share the two critical traits that are needed to be tragic heroes: a tragic flaw that eventually leads to a tragic downfall. The tragic hero was defined by Aristotle, yet the “invention” of the tragic hero goes to Sophocles.
Brutus’ tragic flaws are part of what makes him a tragic hero. In Julius Caesar, Brutus is a great example of a tragic hero. His tragic flaws are honor, poor judgement, and idealism (Bedell). In Shakespeare’s plays, the tragic hero and his flaws cause the downfall of the play (Tragic Flaws).
In addition to this characteristic of Cassius, he also has a devious nature. This attribute allows him to invent informed manipulative plans to eliminate his opponents. For instance, after saying his farewells to Brutus, he gives a soliloquy that reveals his idea of throwing writings of different handwritings in Brutus’ windows “as if they came from several citizens” all of which “tending to the great opinion that Rome holds of his name, wherein obscurely Caesar’s ambition shall be glancéd at” (Shakespeare I. ii. 306-309). Since Brutus and Cassius have been friends for a long period of time, Cassius holds an abundance of knowledge pertaining to his values--in this case being his honor and desire to please Rome’s citizens. This undermining plot Cassius has devised is based on an informed opinion of the most effective way to subvert Caesar’s authority, and because of the valid observations made of Brutus by Cassius, the likelihood that this clever scheme will be carried out successfully should make Caesar concerned about the intentions of his judicial
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is the story about the men who conspired and followed through with the assassination of the great Julius Caesar. These men fear that Caesar will take the crown and become the next king of Rome. The roman people had a true averse feeling toward the idea of monarchy. So in order to prevent this they come up with a plan to end Caesars life, which is duly followed through on March 15, 44 B.C. Out of these conspirators there is one man that stands out to be a tragic hero, and that is a man by the name of Brutus. He was a great friend of Caesar who ultimately became one of Caesars worst adversaries. He betrayed Caesars trust and friendship when he agreed to be part of the assassination plot. A tragic hero is someone who is in a place of high standings or a place of power. This leads to a huge fall from greatness to death. A tragic hero must have many deep complex character flaws that are revealed throughout the course of the story. They then must ultimately accept responsibility for their mistakes; along with being humbled and enlightened. Brutus demonstrates all of the attributes of a tragic hero.
Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on the villains who killed his beloved Caesar. After Antony turns a rioting Rome on him and wages war against him and the conspirators, Brutus falls by his own hand, turning the very sword he slaughtered Caesar with against himself. Brutus is unquestionably the tragic hero in this play because he has an innumerable amount of character flaws, he falls because of these flaws, and then comes to grips with them as he bleeds on the planes of Philippi.
He is so motivated by ambition that he decides to kill Caesar, the leader of Rome. Although dedication can be a good quality, in Cassius, it blinds him to all other things and makes him ruthless in his quest to rule Rome. Cassius’s desire for power is evident when he states, "Men at some time are masters of their fates. The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings" (1.2.146-148). Cassius’ ambition leads him to go as far as to convince a dear friend with manipulation and false notes to help him plot to kill Caesar. His ambition makes him power hungry and he lacks the honor to back up his overzealous behavior. Cassius envies Caesar and because of this he resorts to bribery, assassinations, and imposing taxes for personal
There is no such thing as the perfect person. We may dream of such a person, but sadly, everyone has flaws. These flaws are what make us human. Something else that makes us human is our need for heroes. We attribute 'perfect' qualities to our heroes. In reality even our heroes are flawed. The closest thing to the idealized person, or hero, is the Shakespearean tragic hero. The tragic hero is someone of high standing, good character, and a flaw. While it may be only one flaw, it is often fatal. An example of a tragic hero can be best seen in William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus is a prominent leader and noble citizen of Rome who leads in the assassination of Julius Caesar. We see that Brutus plays the role of the tragic hero through his noble standing, fatal flaw, and legacy.