Stereotypes Of Brutus In Julius Ceaser

Lillian Rubio 6" Period February 19", 2016
In the story Julius Ceaser, Antony was a more honorable and trusting man which stated to
act lll Antony's explanation was far straighter forward compared to the perspective of Brutus.
The pathos perspective according to Antony was that he used emotional attachment and
guilt to convince the audience that Brutus was wrong. “You all did love him once not without
cause; what cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?” Brutus claims that he loves cease like
no other but it was all for petty. “Brutus love to Ceaser was no less than his own.” Antony has a
stronger emotional impact.
The logos from Antony were that he uses the facts about Ceaser refusing the crown to
disapprove Brutus claim of ambition. “I

thrice presented him a kingly which he did not refuse.”
Brutus was using the explanation that he would be dying for Rome. Antony has a stronger stand
with evidence to support his claim.
The ethos from Antony was that he provided his point that Ceaser was ambitious using
Brutus credentials. “He was my friend, faithful to just me.” But Brutus says he was ambitious
and Brutus is an honorable man. According to Brutus in the sense of having people trust in him,
he is showing that people who didn’t want Ceaser dead are contributing, Ceasers friend as an
example. “Mourned by Mark Antony though had no hand in his death, shall receive the benefit
of his dying.
In conclusion I choose Antony's side because he was the more honorable man and Brutus
lied to the people and was more sarcastic in a rude manner. Antony was showing the stronger
evidence and more reason to believe him.