Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Grendel by john gardner symbolism
Nature in literature
Compare and contrast beowulf and grendel novels
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Grendel portrays numerous symbols, themes, and motifs which add great meaning to the plot, thus helping the reader to capture a more thorough understanding of the novel as a whole. However, John Gardner presents the reader with three animals that eventually play a large role. These three animals come to epitomize Grendel’s understanding of nature as indifferent and mechanical.
The first symbolic animal that Gardner depicts is the ram. In the beginning, the ram exasperates Grendel because of the way it mindlessly follows its instincts and mechanical urges. Grendel exclaims, “Scat! Go back to your cave; go back to your cowshed-whatever!” (Gardner 1). After receiving nothing but blank stares from the oblivious creature, Grendel condemns the ram
…show more content…
for the unthinking manner that it simply just follows patterns. In his view, animals, like machines, pursue tedious routines determined by outside forces, never striving to undergo their own original thoughts. Grendel sees this tendency in the ram, which instinctively responds to the arrival of spring with a rash of ludicrous behavior. Grendel becomes angry when he realizes that he exemplifies these same qualities; it simply takes his interaction with the ram for him to realize this. He describes himself as “mechanical as anything else” when the warm weather causes him to begin attacking men again. Grendel’s hatred for the human race increases day by day, as well as hatred for himself when he realizes that he possesses their same qualities. Thus, when Grendel realizes that he strongly epitomizes the ram, this also amplifies his feeling of isolation. The next vital animal portrayed, would be the bull.
When the young Grendel gets his leg stuck in a tree, the bull repeatedly charges him in an attempt to defend its calf, which Grendel attempts to hunt. The bull cannot do much harm to Grendel, as he can easily dodge its horns. However, the bull continues to charge at Grendel without altering its approach whatsoever. Grendel finds the bull’s inability to think amusing, even scoffing at the animal. Once Grendel realizes how oblivious the poor creature is, his outlook on nature becomes increasingly worse. Now, not only does he envision creation as tedious, but ignorant as well. Grendel’s encounter with the bull pushes him to theorize. Grendel, at this point, believes that only he exists. He thinks that he is the only thing that exists, and that everything else is either something pushing him or something he pushes against. Not long after the bull begins its attack on Grendel, a band of human's chime in, too. Unlike the bull, which never once changes its routine in striking Grendel, the humans have the ability to make new patterns and to break out of routine and mechanism. This ability triggers Grendel’s lifelong fascination and slight envy with the human race. However, when Grendel attempts to communicate with the humans, they interpret his yelling as an expression of anger rather than excitement. This causes Grendel's depression about his inability to communicate to increase, which magnifies to his despise for the humans. …show more content…
After noting what the humans are capable of, Grendel momentarily rethinks his invasion on Hart, but quickly sides with his attack. Toward the end, Gardner includes one last vital symbol, the goat.
As Grendel stalks the woods, he encounters a goat's attempt to ascend the cliff side near his den. Angered by the goat’s determination, Grendel yells at the creature. When the goat’s obvious response is nothing, Grendel reacts by throwing trees and stones at it. However, the goat continues to climb, even after its skull splits, and it appears to continue climbing even after its death. Unlike the ram, which frustrates Grendel, and the bull, which amuses him, the goat haunts him with its mindless persistence. As the goat keeps climbing toward its imminent death, it also foreshadows Grendel’s upcoming death. Just as the goat tragically falls to its death, so does Grendel. After witnessing the persistent ram, Grendel questions his place in the world. He ponders his social ranking in creation, and even begins to wonder what his purpose is in the world. These mind boggling thoughts only give him anxiety, as he has no sense of identity whatsoever. Though Grendel scorns the stupidity of nature, the reader must also ponder whether Grendel, who goes willingly to fight Beowulf regardless of the dangers, and the humans, who attempt to fight Grendel in the same way time after time, are merely other implements that simply function absentmindedly. Though Grendel faces isolation for a majority of the novel, what he does not realize is that he and the humans are much alike. Just as Grendel thrives for attention and
hierarchy, the humans do as well. The use of symbolism is extremely important in a novel, thus adding nuance to the story. Symbolism also reinforces the ideas that the author wants the reader to remember within the plot, ergo why Gardner uses the goat to foreshadow Grendel’s death. Gardner also implements the ram, the bull, and the goat to bring more out of Grendel. The three symbols help add to the themes of isolation, language and communication, and identity. Without the use of symbolism, the novel would not illustrate nearly as much meaning, and would fail to help the reader thoroughly understand whom Grendel really is and his perspective on nature.
Grendel, as a character, has a much more complex identity than just a monster and a human. Some, such as Ruud, classify him as a mixture of three different characteristics, but alone, they tend to conflict with each other. By making the connection that Grendel represents immorality, the previous idea makes more sense, while simultaneously incorporating more aspects of the character into the analysis. In either case, Grendel represents much more than meets the eye, and provides a fascinating insight into
Good vs. Evil in John Gardner's Grendel? & nbsp; John Gardner's novel Grendel gives the reader a new perspective on the classic "good vs. Evil" plot. From the start of the book the reader can tell that there is something very unique about the narrator. It is evident that the narrator is a very observant being that can express himself in a very poetic manner. The story is one the reader has most likely seen before, the battle between the glorious thanes and the "evil" beast. In this case, however, the "beast" is the eyes and ears of the. reader. This, of course, forces the reader to analyze situations in the book in the same way that Grendel does. By using this viewpoint, author allows his readers to see the other side of the coin. Therefore, Throughout the course of the novel the reader is able to understand how important to Grendel in defining the human. & nbsp; Grendel's first encounter with the human beings that he literally defines is not a pleasant one. After accidentally trapping himself in a tree he is discovered by a group of thanes out on patrol. Grendel expresses absolutely no hostile intentions towards these "ridiculous" (ch. 2). pp.24) creatures that "moved by clicks." (ch.2, pp.24) The thanes do not understand what Grendel is and are very uneasy about the whole situation.
This ‘beast’, the protagonist of the story, fights an internal struggle, of which is a part of the Hero’s Journey. Grendel is unable to decide what to make of himself and of the world surrounding him. He has only ever known the world as wild and mechanical, yet he is charmed by the artistic brilliance of the Shaper’s words. Grendel ultimately meets a brutal yet peaceful demise. Standing on the face of the same cliff he found himself in the beginning of the novel, surrounded by mindless eyes, he states, “Poor Grendel’s had an accident. So may you all.” (Grendel, John Gardner, pg.174) Previous to this, he questions if what he is feeling is joy. The reader is lead to believe that Grendel must feel nothing but peace. This, is the concluding moment of his
Throughout John Gardner’s Grendel, the audience bears witness to a creature who has been ostracized by the world around him. Throughout his journey, the stories protagonist tries to live out his own life the way he wants to, despite being labeled as evil by those around him. Due to this constant criticism by his peers, he develops an inferiority complex that he desperately tries to make up for as the story progresses. Throughout his development, Grendel very rapidly moves past his existentialist beginning, through a brief phase of forced skepticism, and into a severely nihilistic point of view.
Authors often have to choose between concentrating on either plot or social commentary when writing their novels; in John Gardener's Grendel, the plot becomes is a secondary consideration. Grendel's exploits provide the reader with a clear understanding of the strong opinions the author carries and can be seen clearly as a narrative supporting nihilism in its many forms. The reader easily perceives the blatant religious subtext in the guise of corrupt priests and the foolish faithful. The notion of the old being wise is unacceptable to Gardener along with any notion of hero idolization. Within his novel, Gardner expresses his views concerning religion, wisdom and nature.
John Gardener’s Grendel is another version of the epic Beowulf, except in a differing perspective. This story is retold from the viewpoint of Grendel. Gardener wants us to empathize with Grendel through his own thoughts and emotions. The way one sees the monster in Beowulf is completely different than how one would think of him in Grendel. One is forced to view someone else’s opinion versus getting to form an opinion for oneself.
Throughout the novel, this monster, Grendel, seems confused as to whether he wants to view life like his existentialistic dragon mentor, or like the ignorantly optimistic humans on which he feeds. At times he is captivated by the romantic songs of the Shaper, and feels no desire to kill, while at others he thrives on the "knowledge" of the dragon, and goes on bloody rampages. At one point during Grendel's insecure state, the dragon tells him something that changes his outlook, and gives him a new feeling of self-worth.
Grendel as a character is very intelligent, he is capable of rational thought at all times. Because of this, at sometimes during the story I would forget Grendel is a monster, the way he acts in his thoughts and actions I would mistake him for a human; at times I was even feeling bad for Grendel because he is a very lonely person who tries to understand all of the meaningless of the world around him. Grendel can never get to close to
In the beginning Grendel’s perspective of himself leads to various encounters that help him discover the meaninglessness to his very own existence. From the beginning through many centuries of pondering Grendel has come to the idea that the world consists entirely of Grendel and not-Grendel. Thus Grendel begins his search for meaning of his very own life with an existential philosophy, the belief that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will. While Grendel’s overall perspective of nature is that of mindless and mechanical machine, he believes that he is a separate entity from this machine. Furthermore he holds the philosophy that he himself is a god like creature that “blink by blink” creates the world. This philosophy undermined when Grendel notices that events occur before he can think them into existence. Grendel witnesses the death of a deer by the hands of humans: “Suddenly time is a rush for the hart: head flicks, he jerks, his front legs buckling, and he’s dead. He lies as still as the snow hurtling outward around him to the hushed world’s rim. The image clings to my mind like a
In Chapter 8, Grendel exclaims, “I’m a machine. Like all of you. Blood-lust and rage are my character,” (Gardner 123). This profound statement establishes a connection between Grendel and the ambiguous “you,” the reader. The monster, though he confesses to his wrongdoing, asserts that readers are no better than he. Countless bible verses reiterate this concept: “For all have sinned,” (Romans 3:23) “[Humans] are all. .impure with sin,” (Isaiah 64:6). Gardner’s reminder to readers of mankind’s predisposition to sin earns pity for the monster. He expands on these sympathies by describing the nature of Grendel’s lonely existence. “But there was one thing worse,” Grendel states after discovering the dragon’s charm, “no weapon could cut me,” (Gardner 75). In this moment, nihilism overcomes Grendel; if fighting poses no danger, it has no purpose, and neither does he. Any reader who has had an experience which challenged his or her values cannot help but feel empathetic towards the purposeless creature. Perhaps more piteous, however, is the suggestion that Grendel has no choice in being “the dark side. . the terrible race God cursed,” (Gardner 51). The dragon condemns Grendel as “the brute existent by which [humans] learn to define themselves,” telling him that it is worthless to better his character (Gardner 72). It is not until after
Grendel feels like an outcast in the society he lives in causing him to have a hard time finding himself in the chaotic world. He struggles because the lack of communication between he and his mother. The lack of communication puts Grendel in a state of depression. However, Grendel comes in contact with several characters with different philosophical beliefs, which allows his to see his significance in life. Their views on life influence Grendel to see the world in a meaningful way.
...n very human feelings of resentment and jealousy. Grendel was an unstable and saddened figure because of his outcast status. Though Grendel had many animal attributes and a grotesque, monstrous appearance, he seemed to be guided by vaguely human emotions and impulses. He truthfully showed more of an interior life than one might expect. Exiled to the swamplands outside the boundaries of human society, Grendel’s depiction as an outcast is a symbol of the jealousy and hate that seeks to destroy others' happiness and can ultimately cripple a civilization. This take on the outcast archetype ultimately exposes the Anglo Saxon people’s weaknesses, their doubts and anxieties towards the traditional values that bounded nearly every aspect of their life.
In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, there is specific use of three animals as metaphors for human actions. These animals are the deer, boar, and fox. When Gawain rests with the Lord and Lady on his way to battle with the Green Knight, we see three hunting scenes, which coincide with three seduction, or flirting, scenes. During these hunts, the Lord of the manor kills three animals. The first is the deer. White's translation states that the deer, or the stag, can be used as a metaphor for Christians. The author felt that deer were able to eat snakes for medicinal purposes, and thus shed their old skin. This ability makes them like Christians in that when they eat up the devil, or sin, and then they are able to confess or shed their sins. The Lady, who is compared to a snake with the "s" alliteration, tempts Gawain. He refuses her advances at this point in the story, but later, he feels he must confess for taking her sash, thus shedding his sins.
The doe in the clearing goes stiff at the sight of my horridness, then remembers her legs and is gone (page 2). This is where Grendel’s alienation all began because he feels as if nobody understands him. That is their happiness: they see all life without observing it (page 2). He feels this way because no one takes the
...zes humanity in this scene by portraying them as the evil beings instead of Grendel who is the helpless victim of their savage assault. The men attack Grendel solely because they could not understand him and because of his appearance. Grendel makes no attempt to harm the men but to communicate with them while they are the ones that savagely tried to kill him. John Gardner portrays the men as the real monsters who mercilessly tried to kill Grendel while he was defenseless. Grendel has another revelation due to this attack in where he states. “The world resists me and I resist the world… “That’s all there is.”(Gardner, 28) Grendel makes this assertion as a means to organized the ways he perceives the world. While he once saw the world as a confusing array of frightening images, now he can separate the world into categories: those who do not resemble him and himself.