More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of communication in relationships
Importance of communication in relationships
Life in the USA in the 1920s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hemingway’s short story “Hills like White Elephants” fluctuates many sparse details to compel a young couple’s life. It introduces multiple critics towards its interesting use of symbolism towards religious outlook. “Hills like White Elephants” connects multiple accusations with religious perspective amongst its very own characters, and is rather deeply assumed to open a deeper inside of the story. Hemmingway’s short story sure does bargain with such deep religious out take on everything when observed obscurely.
A little background information of Hemingway’s short story “Hills like White Elephants” would be the historical and literary context that influenced this story. Hemmingway published “Hills like White Elephants” in 1927 along with his
…show more content…
It’s a huge symbol of what lays down at the end of the road for their relationship, but also upkeeps their ways of life towards being fearful of having a child. The “American Man “appears to manipulate Jig in giving up the child for their joy ride of adventure. For example, the “American Man picks up the suitcases and carries them to the other side of the station”, he’s showing selfishness towards Jig in wanting to continue the joy ride (Hemingway 547). On the other hand, “fields of grain” symbolizes life, therefore depicting the fertility of Jig (Hemingway 532). Jig alone is stuck in a depressed state of mind, and allowing her American boyfriend fonder his actions into accepting the abortion method to continue their travels together. The story was “published in 1927”, at the time abortion was not a skeptical topic, as it showed societal attitudes toward unwed mothers (Piers 3). There wasn’t really government aid back then, therefore, Jig would endow a tough time raising the child while finding work. Late 1920’s alone were on the brink of an economical tragedy leaving many people unemployed, and leaving Jig in a more stressed situation of raising a newborn. Not only is Jig facing a rough decision, but the issue of illegitimacy would have arisen against her. If the father refused to help raise the child, then the only option open to Jig would have been …show more content…
Ernest Hemingway did a good job of setting the theme of “Talking versus Communicating” as it shows neither the couple both truly understand both of their point of views. The American man can be seen as frustrated, and will say anything to convince of Jig accepting the “the operation” (Hemingway 520). Jig meanwhile, waffles indecisively over wanting to go through with the abortion just to continue their travels together. Later on in their conversation Jig exclaims “please, please, please, please, stop talking”, realizing the futility of their relationship together. Observing closely the couple merely “dance around each other and the issue at hand without ever saying anything meaningful to each other” leaving them helpless. This alone conveys the theme of “Talking versus Communicating” because talking is rather a more effective way of getting your thoughts across to each other. According to Doctor Melanie M. Maddison “for an effective relationship to grow strong, talking must be present in any state, rather it being deciding on decisions, vacations, and other subjects amongst that line”. Therefore, Jig and the American Man both show no methods of talking, but rather communicating each other’s personal gain of their situation. Ernest Hemingway did a great job in escalating this topic with such
The main characters’ conflict over not wanting the same things in life is the root of the women’s disillusionment. The theme is furthered by the complication of the antagonist manipulation of the Jig’s feelings for him. Similar to Cisneros’s written work, Hemingway uses the narrative point of view to illuminate the growing disillusionment the women feels about not being able to have everything if she terminates the pregnancy. Hemingway leads the audience to this conclusion when the protagonist states “no, we can’t it isn’t ours anymore… Once they take it away, you never get it back” when referring to her disappointment that the antagonist will not change his mind and they can no longer have everything they ever wanted
Ernest Hemingway has a superbly unique style of writing in Hills Like White Elephants. His short, to the point syntax and sentence style plays a great role in helping readers understand the theme of this short story. The critique M.A.K. Halliday observed, “The story is frequently generated by the repetition of words, clauses, and groups of related words or ethical sets” (Link, Alex). The first set of dialogue that can be pulled from this story is story is short and to the point. The American states, “We can have the whole world.” Jig replies with “No, we can’t” (Hemingway, Ernest). The sentence length is very short, yet there is a hidden meaning behind the small talk. Jig is referring to not having the baby. She can have everything, but her will to decide things. She can’t have a baby due to unloving pressure from the American. It is in sync with the tone of the story perfectly. The tone is forward, direct, and shallow. That is exactly what happens in this dialogue. There is no emotion, just pure sarcasm on a huge topic. Abortion to this couple is nothing more then a qui...
Jig’s sarcastic tone in her dialogues following the Americans’ is indicative of her decision to not get the abortion. After the American assures her that they will be happy like before and it is a “simple operation” (Hemingway 592) Jig retorts, “What makes you think so?” (592). Hence, it implies her disbelief and realization that things would not change much whether or not she got the abortion. Jig’s desire to keep the child is further evident when she tells him “[they] could get along” (593). She sees the possibility of a happy life with the child; the American sees it as an obstacle. Therefore, he continues in his effort to persuade her otherwise because “[he...
Gale. Weeks, Lewis E., Jr. "Hemingway Hills: Symbolism in 'Hills like White'" Elephants. Studies in Short Fiction. 17.1 (Winter 1980): 75-77.
Hills like White Elephants by Ernest Hemingway is a short story that deals with the idea of conformity and the conflict caused by internal desire and pressure from another party. The short story is very subtle, and often uses these subtleties in combination with incredible amounts of symbolism interlaced throughout the narrative to cause the reader to look and think deeper into the motives, values and convictions of the conflict between the two protagonists respective desires. When two parties are at an impasse of desire, the conviction of their opposing beliefs becomes increasingly unshakeable. This results in dissension due to the severe lack of understanding between the parties involved and furthermore, they refuse to be held responsible for the inability to communicate their feelings to one another.
Hemingway, Ernest. "Hills like White Elephants." Responding to Literature. Ed. Judith Stanford. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2006. 841-44. Print.
The story begins with a vivid description of a train station surrounded by hills and fields. This scene tells us a lot about the couple's situation. The view of the hills seen off in a distance symbolizes the growing belly of the girl. The hills also symbolize the obstacles that are in the way of the two character's relationship. In the story, Jig looked at the hills and said, “They look like white elephants.” The man replied, “I've never seen one.” Then she replied, “No, you wouldn't have” (...
Renner, Stanley "Moving to the Girl's Side of `Hills Like White Elephants'." The Hemingway Review, 15 (1) (Fall 1995): 27-41. As Rpt. in Wyche, David "Letting the Air into a Relationship: Metaphorical Abortion in `Hills Like White Elephants'. The Hemingway Review, 22 (1) (Fall 2002): 56-71. EBSCOhost.
---, "Hills Like White Elephants." The Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway. New York: Charles Scribner?s Sons, 1953. 273-278.
The art, literature, and poetry of the early 20th century called for a disruption of social values. Modernism became the vague term to describe the shift. The characteristics of the term Modernism, all seek to free the restricted human spirit. It had no trust in the moral conventions and codes of the past. One of the examples of modernism, that breaks the conventions and traditions of literature prior to Modernism, is Ernest Hemingway’s short story “Hills Like White Elephants”. The short story uses plot, symbolism, setting, dialogue, and a new style of writing to allow human spirit to experiment with meaning and interpretation.
Hemingway, Ernest. “Hills Like White Elephants.” Fiction 101: An Anthology of Short Fiction. James H. Pickering. Twelfth Edition. Pearson Education, Inc., 2010. 638-641
Hemingway, considered to be a modernist writer, makes his readers work by implementing the well-known theory of omission, which “Hills Like White Elephants” is a perfect example of. As he stated in Death in the Afternoon : ‘If a writer of prose knows enough of what he is writing about he may omit things that he knows and the reader, […].’ (259). It seems that Hemingway assumed the reader would know what is being omitted, nevertheless many features of “Hills Like White Elephants” have already been covered by various critics. At the end of the story the reader is forced to unravel the most...
Stukas, Jake. "Literary analysis: Hills Like White Elephants, by Ernest Hemingway." Helium.com. Web. 21 Nov. 2009. .
Hemingway, Ernest. “Hills Like White Elephants.” Literature Approaches to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Ed. DiYanni, Robert. 2nd ed. New York. Mc Grew Hill. 2008. 400-03. Print.
Ernest Hemingway is an incredible writer, known for what he leaves out of stories not for what he tells. His main emphasis in Hills Like White Elephants seems to be symbolism. Symbolism is the art or practice of using symbols, especially by investing things with a symbolic meaning or by expressing the invisible or intangible by means of visible or sensuous representations (merriam-webster.com). He uses this technique to emphasize the importance of ideas, once again suggesting that he leaves out the important details of the story by symbolizing their meaning.