Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on transformation leadership
Critique of transformational leadership
Critique of transformational leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on transformation leadership
Sydney Finkelstein says, “workplaces could be transformed from dull, dreary places to powerhouses of innovation. But the stakes are greater than that. Ultimately, more companies may survive if superbosses’ practices become widespread.”
Superbosses, according to Finkelstein, are much better than good managers because they redeem unexpected creativity, engagement, and accomplishment in their teams, generating and regenerating great talent under their supervision. In short, they let people grow under their nourishment.
Finkelstein discussed about the five traits of superbosses, they possess extreme confidence, even fearlessness, they are highly competitive when they want to achieve some goal and furthering their agendas, they have clear vision.
…show more content…
According to research, all three types of superbosses are extraordinary at generating talent, and that’s what ultimately matters. This reminds me of the topic “Leadership in Organizations” by Greenberg, specifically “Transformational leaders”. The behaviour of leaders fully influences the working culture in an organization.
Finkelstein develops what he calls as “Superboss Playbook,” which describes the common habits and practices of world’s greatest talents. It discusses every aspect of superboss and offers suggestions for how regular managers can incorporate some of these behaviors to enhance their management style.
For example, in the chapter on networking, he says to not be afraid of attrition, but consider it inevitable. When employees leave, “be smart: act like a concerned godparent and stay in touch with them.” Ensure that succession plans are in place for all top jobs, and when employees leave, do your best to sustain the bonds that were built while your former employees were still with you. You don’t know how or when opportunities will come up to work together
…show more content…
Even if you have an extremely demanding boss, one who is working all hours of the day and night or who assigns you gargantuan tasks, you are not stressed of working because it is a life changing experience. Just like it is explained by Greenberg in chapter “Motivation in Organization”, people are motivated because of Challenging work and opportunities.
He mentioned superboss is a skill and in the end is a list of questions to train yourself like a superboss, just like the “Skill” mentioned by Greenberg in chapter “Individual Differences”, it can be learned. Some of the questions are: Do you have a specific vision for your work that energizes you, and that you use to energize and inspire your team? How much affection or connection do members of your team feel with one another? What is the balance of competition and collaboration on the team? Do you continue to stay in touch with employees who have left to work elsewhere?
In short, he wants to convey the message that becoming a superboss is not impossible. The superbosses picturised in this book are role model people—those who doesn’t settle for mediocrity in their careers—but there’s no reason why we can’t start to think like a superboss on daily
There have been countless books, lectures, and and trainings, and retreats constructed around the idea of cultivating leadership in an individual. However, cultivating individuals’ ability to follow great leadership has received far less attention. Who are these people leading if each person within an organization is being trained to be a leader? The word follower has negative connotations, evoking the images of a weak, uncreative, milquetoast personality. However, Jimmy Collins, in his book, “Creative Followership: In the Shadow of Greatness”, suggests that the ability to be led brings as much creativity, consciousness, and indeed leadership to an organization or team as the leader himself. Great followership is a reflection of great leadership. In this, the follower is just as important as the leader in the relationship. Many great leaders have asserted that a leader with even a modicum of understanding of what drives their subordinates can take their organization to previously undreamt-of heights in creativity and productivity. Collins does not disabuse us of this notion, he does however add that the follower is indispensable agent in this interplay between leader and follower.
Under his leadership, companies like Scott Paper and Sunbeam-Oster benefited from massive layoffs designed to give the illusion of profitability. This is in stark contrast to what great leaders do during the inevitable downturn. According to Collins, great leaders are looking for way to find and keep great talent, especially during dips in earnings or productivity. The idea of employee-churn to great organizations is paramount to a failure in leadership. When hiring, great leaders “take the time to make rigorous A+ selections right up front” (GTG, p.75) Good to Great leaders take their time with important hiring decisions. It is more important to have the right people on the bus and in the right seats then to have a bus filled with people who do not belong. Letting people who do not belong on the bus comes down to two simple questions: 1. “If it were a hiring decision (rather than a “should this person be off the bus?” decision) would you hire the person again? 2. If the person came to you to tell you he or she is leaving to pursue an exciting new opportunity, would you feel terribly disappointed or secretly relieved?” (GTG,
CEO Johnston also has plans to bolster the company’s leadership with the best minds available and also use motivational techniques to invigorate his employees. These ideas show the character of the CEO in enhancing productivity from his work force.
In Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell analyzes numerous success stories in an attempt to understand the circumstances that make certain individuals particularly exceptional. Through his analysis, Gladwell strives to find an explanation for why some people succeed, while others, despite their persistent efforts, do not. He questions the validity of conventional attitudes towards accomplished figures—that these figures simply rise to fame as a result of sheer talent and ambition—and points out that the superficial summaries leave out crucial details. As Gladwell studies the lives of these “outliers,” from piano virtuosos to software moguls, he indicates that their success stemmed from a variety of components, including fortunate
The author has chosen companies which hide their flaws from investors. The author does mention about taking right people on the bus but he never mention the nature of these right people. How they are made and how they can be identified. And people need some motivation and money is a big motivator. Less salary can definitely built up regression and frustration in employees. So the author is wrong on this fact. The author should have compiled the book with some novel information and tips to build a great company. I believe the information was redundant and does not live up to the mark. People know discipline, right employees are all part of a successful company. The information in the book can set out much debate and the author might not have right answer to them. Overall the book is average and common on information.
Remember the days when life was easy and our biggest worry was what mum had packed us for lunch, or whether we would get up early enough to catch the morning cartoons? No? Or have those days been drowned out by the endless nagging of parents to study and get a good job…Now don’t get me wrong-I know education is important, but sometimes I feel we have too much pressure placed on us to live a ‘perfect life’ that when one mistake comes along, everyone, including ourselves, ends up upside down. Instead, as presented in the novel ‘Maestro’, by Peter Goldsworthy, we find the importance of not losing ourselves, but rather, taking these adversaries as opportunities. . I don’t know about you but I plan on living a life with no regrets-
Dr. Sutton highlights what it takes to be a good boss. People that work for a good boss are 20 percent less likely to have a heart attack (Sutton, 2010). Dr. Sutton wrote that teams with stronger leaders cost the company less money and achieved their work better (Sutton, 2010). Engagement and performance of employees were based upon their direct boss and not if the company was good or bad (Sutton, 2010). Most bad bosses have employees who have check-out: actively disengaged, and undermine their co-workers accomplishments. Managers have to find the balance between performance and humanity to be successful. Performance is about doing everything possible to help followers do great work; while humanity is about employees experiencing dignity and pride. Treating managerial work as an endurance race instead of a sprint race with small wins will lead one to becoming a good boss called grit by Sutton. Sutton believes that good bosses walk a constructive line between being assertive and not assertive enough with guidance, wisdom, and feedback that he called Lasorda’s law (Sutton, 2010).
I will use what I have learned from this book in the future by creating more urgency in myself when I know that something needs to be changed. Also, if I ever find myself in a position of leadership, I will be sure that every employee working for me understands why we need the change, supports it, and has a sense of urgency to get it done. Next, it will help me be more careful about my communication, and making sure that everything I do, verbally and nonverbally, should be showing that I am incredibly dedicated to the change that I am trying to introduce. Also, there was a time where we very briefly talked about the importance of change in a business; this book would help in those times wherein changing something proves to be difficult. If you make it appear to yourself and your employees that the change is absolutely needed, then they will all work to accomplish the
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary
Getting the right people on the bus (and in the right seat), getting the right people off the bus, and then deciding where to drive it are important concepts that the author has frequently referenced. These concepts are essential to a company if they want to become great. A great quote from the book is "People are not your best asset, the right people are."
In Good to Great, Jim Collins discusses major key points companies have used to go from a good company to a great one. He did this by discussing seven characteristics companies should listen and absorb to transition from being good to becoming great. These characteristics included: level 5 leadership, first who…then what, confront the brutal facts, the hedgehog concept, a culture of discipline and the flywheel. Companies who can approach these successfully are the ones who enable themselves to separate from other competing companies. Furthermore, the statement Jim Collins said, which caught my attention immediately, was not in these seven characteristics, but in the first chapter of the book.
Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge is an organizational management book written by Warren Bennis and Burt Nanus for those who aim to become better leaders. The authors emphasize that having executive positions or being a manager does not automatically make one a leader. A leader is one who inspires his staff, help them find purpose in their work, and effectively implement their plans. They separate the book not quite into chapters on different topics, but rather by four strategies that they have determined are vital for any leader to take on. The strategies are effectively concluded as attention through vision, meaning through communication, trust through positioning, and the deployment of self. A prominent feature of Leaders is the various
...may have our preferences in the style of management we deem to be the most successful, we have just seen three examples of individuals and companies who took it upon themselves to use the style of managing that is normally unfavorable and have made their organization a successful empire.
Ngirwa, C. C., Euwema, M., Babyegeya, E., & Stouten, J. (2013). Leaders styles of managing
...sect. If the article identifies a seamless integration, between the three aspects, then, the article would have achieved its mandate. I feel that the author has achieved commendable results through the identification of the mindsets of effective management, however I feel that the author needs to emphasize on the need to combine the three factors. Instead, the author has emphasized on the mindset of effective management. In either case, effective management is all about mindset and not the capacity and environment. I believe that although different individuals are gifted differently, everyone can be an effective manager if given a chance.