Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to adultery
Reflection on the book of Hosea
Reflection on the book of Hosea
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to adultery
In this book, there is an ongoing story of adultery, fornication, and betrayal between God and Israel portrayed through the relationship between the prophet Hosea, and his wife Gomer. There are a few different views on the actual relationship between Hosea and Gomer, the first of which is that Gomer was already a harlot when Hosea took her as his wife. This one I would think is the most widely accepted, simply because it's the literal description of the book, and people tend to lean towards literal definitions more frequently than not, just look at how people of the world have torn apart the book of Revelation!
The second view is that Gomer was a harlot, but was only adulterous after getting married. Those who believe this say that she was pure at the beginning, but later on committed adultery and became a harlot. To me, and this is just my opinion I know, but this idea is refuted simply with 1:2, when God tells Hosea to "Go, take a wife of harlotry.." not to go take a wife inclined toward harlotry and adultery. Many say that it couldn't be accurate that Hosea took a wife already a...
In his book, The Good Book, Peter J. Gomes attempts to convince his readers the proper way to read and interpret the Bible, takes an analytical standpoint on past (and current) controversial topics such as racism, women, Jews, and homosexuality. Along with these two things, he explains to his readers how the Bible interacts with several topics people typically have questions on in regards to how they relate to the Bible.. The main point of his novel, as I see it, is to inform the readers of two things. The first being that there is both a right and wrong way to read the Bible, while the second is that people in general want to read the Bible but are biblically illiterate and do not know how to approach it.
The original sin of adultery is what starts the events that end up ruining the characters' lives. "Come up hither, Hester, thou and little Pearl...Ye have both been here before, but I was not with you. Come up hither once again, and we will stand all three together!" (p. 133). Though it is never said out in the open, you come to the realization that Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale have committed the sin of adultery and when Hester becomes pregnant, she is convicted for that sin. "I'd been in the arms of my best friend's / wife" The man and his best friend's wife also commit the sin of adultery and when he cannot give an alibi to a judge because he does not want anyone to know where he was that night, he is convicted for murder and executed. Adultery is what ends up destroying the characters lives because none except for Hester are willing to admit to the sin of adultery.
In the first chapter of God Behaving Badly, David Lamb argues that God is unfairly given a bad reputation. He claims these negative perceptions are fueled by pop culture and lead many to believe the lie that the God of the Old Testament is angry, sexist, racist, violent, legalistic, rigid, and distant. These negative perceptions, in turn, affect our faith. Ultimately, Lamb seeks to demonstrate that historical context disproves the presumptuous aforementioned. In addition, he defends his position by citing patterns of descriptions that characterize God throughout the Old Testament. “Our image of God will directly affect how we either pursue or avoid God. If we believe that the God of the Old Testament is really harsh, unfair and cruel, we won’t want anything to do with him” (Lamb 22). Clearly, they way Christians choose to see God will shape their relationship with Him.
In the Hebrew Bible, adultery is considered a capital crime, punishable by the population stoning the adulterous wife and her lover to death. Deut. 22:20 commands this communal punishment in order to “sweep away evil from Israel.” The question remains as to why this crime was considered to be such a transgression. Several explanations exist to account for the seriousness of the crime.
Thus, Goneril is explicitly disobeying one of the Ten Commandments; thou shall honour thy mother and thy father, causing her to sin against her father.... ... middle of paper ... ... ii. The. 105 - 106).
Throughout many of Paul’s letters there are many debates pertaining to the authorship, destination, date, and the purpose. In the book of Ephesians many scholars debate on the authorship and if Paul actually wrote the letter, or if it was a scribe. Although there are some debates on whether Paul actually wrote it or not, he does refer to himself twice in the letter. In 1:1 and in 3:1 Paul states himself, 1:3 states, “For this reason, I Paul, the prisoner of Christ Jesus for the sake of you Gentiles” (NIV) In verse 1:3 Paul states that he is a prisoner, therefore it is debated that he did not specifically write this because he was imprisoned in Rome at this time. According to Wallace “This, of course, is not to say that the letter must be by Paul, but it is to argue that without such internal testimony, no such claim could be made” (Wallace). Many scholars also debate on the vocabulary usage and the structure of the letter. Some believe that the structure is similar, but the vocabulary seems to be different than his New Testament epistles. Hoehner claims that,” Though the book has a close affinity with Colossians, critics claim that Ephesians is uncharacteristic of Paul” (Hoehner 613). The destination of Ephesians is somewhat debated, but many do believe that the letter was sent to the church of Ephesus. “Some to claim that Ephesus is a better starting point, others suggest Caesarea.” (Wallace) Although this is an argument that has many valid points, it is obvious that Paul was imprisoned in Rome while he wrote Ephesians. It is said by Hoehner that “Ephesians was probably delivered by Tychicus (Eph. 6:21-22), who also took Paul’s letter to Colossians (Col. 4:7-9)” (Hoehner 613). As for the date goes m...
The problem we find in this story, and in puritanism, is that it presents contrasting views of love. Attachment to earthly possessions, to other people in fact, is discouraged, because everything physical leads to temptation and damnation, and ultimately hell, while the road to salvation of the individual wanders through a spiritual discipline, rigour, austerity. A man should not love his wife more than he loves God; in fact, it is recommended that he not derive pleasure from his wife, but rather seek suffering, in order to redeem himself from his earthly condition, his impure state.
In the Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, Chaucer illustrates the different perspective between men and women on the concept of marriage and love. In The Wife of Bath’s tale, it is shown the woman appreciating marriage and wanting to be able to love a man unconditionally as where in The Miller’s Tale, love isn’t anything, but sex with the man in the story. In accordance with Chaucer, the complication with marriage is that men are consumed by sexual desire and are easily abused by women like The Wife of Bath. As noticed, The Miller’s Tale is all about adultery. “Just like men, the wives have secrets, as does God”, says the Miller. Both have information that the other do not know about that are sacred and better left unsaid.
Chapter two is mainly about the roles of men and the roles of women in the bible. He focuses most of his time in the Old Testament. He talks about how God meant in the garden for it to function like a marriage. He says that the idea of marriage is ancient and that Israel ruined it because they participated in polygamy, divorce, and homosexuality. He mentions that God in start of genesis talks about the roots and the institution of marriage; which is doing the will of the creator and the consequences being the fall of humanity on the married couple. He mentions song of Solomon which is about the ...
The books of I and II Thessalonians, which are in the New Testament, are both letters to a church that Paul the apostle helped establish in the city of Thessalonica. First Thessalonians is agreed by biblical scholars to be written by Paul. The author of II Thessalonians, however, is still being debated about.
For adultery is a serious offense in an era where religion and law are interchangeable and is a crime judged more harshly on women because society dictates that women be held to a higher moral standard than men. This double standard for men and women is evident in how the women regard Hester for her crime, as one of the wives standing about the prison door expresses “Good wives … What think ye … If the hussy [Hester] stood up for judgment before us five … [W]ould she come off with such a sentence as the worshipful magistrates have awarded? Marry, I trow not!” (478,479). This clearly portrays the disdain the people (and especially the women) have for Hester due to her actions and the anger they feel at the law (the magistrates) for not following the traditional Puritan tribunal, which as another wife from the crowd states should customarily kill Hester for her sin as she asserts “This woman has brought shame upon us all, and ought to die. Is there no law for it? Truly there is, both in the Scripture and the statue-book”
Throughout her entire prologue The Wife of Bath has been through several marriages all of them so far have been good until she married her fifth and current husband Jankyn. Jankyn had been reading to The Wife of Bath on a book about wicked wives. Throughout over twenty or more lines he tells her the horrific actions these women do their husbands. At some point these actions are taking a toll on The Wife of Bath as she cannot take the mistreatment that this book gives on women and furthermore, wives. The Wife of Bath finally begins to take the book away from Jankyn which leads into a violence
In "The Wife of Bath" one of the first issues the speaker, Alison, addresses' is the idea of double standards. As she begins the prologue she lays the groundwork for her story by defending one's right to marry as often as they are able. While people often believe that it is immoral for a woman to marry more than once, Alison discusses the idea that she should be free to marry as many times as she wishes and that others should hold their judgment (Hieatt & Hieatt, 183, line 34). She claims that she has never heard the specific number of marriages allowed by the bible defined. She sites Solomon as a biblical standard saying that he had many wives and no doubt received pleasure from all of them (183-184, lines 35-45). Within this example Alison claims that it is acceptable not only for her to marry as often as she wishes, but also to receive phys...
There is another facet of Agamemnon’s character that plays a key role in his eventual punishment. That role is the role of Agamemnon the adulterer. Adultery plays a double role with Agamemnon. First, there is the girl Chryseis about whom Agamemnon admits to liking better than his own wife. Second, the Trojan War is about adultery. The entire war is centered on Helen’s act of adultery. Agamemnon is acting on a double standard. Adultery is the cause of the Trojan War, and is therefore bad. Yet, Agamemnon is cheating on his wife, ...
...or God will have significant implications for the human marriage relationship. Though out the book of Song of Songs, the relationship between the Lord and Israel is illustrated through the poem of two human lovers. This book should be interpreted as an allegory because it shows the God’s covenant, sexual purity how people should properly enjoy the intimacy. It also shows the image for God’s relationship with his people throughout the Bible and explains the marriage is a gift of God.