Summary: The Problem Of Homelessness

1034 Words3 Pages

Homeless Are Heartbreaking or Hyperbolic?
Is homelessness really as big of a problem as what your hear about? The National Student Campaign Against Hunger & Homelessness (NSCAHH) would explain in Homelessness Is a Widespread Problem how it has become a widespread problem in the United States of America. They believe it’s not only a huge issue, but the rate of homelessness is rapidly growing, according to the 2004 Survey of Hunger and Homelessness. Mike Rosen, a radio talk show host, argues in The Problem of Homelessness is Exaggerated that the topic of homelessness is over exaggerated than what it really is. He examined the same survey and presented the idea that they had several miscalculations and just made it seem like a big problem in …show more content…

The NSCAHH’s main claim is that homelessness is expanding and spreading. More people are becoming homeless, so there aren’t enough homeless shelters for every homeless person. They explain how food pantries and services that feed the homeless are more common in communities than what they were in the 1980s, which is when they claimed was the largest increase in the number of homeless. Except, they begin to move the focus about the hunger and poverty percentages in America by stating, “In the year 2002 to 2003 the number of people living in poverty grew from 1.3 billion to 35.9 billion,” and “the number of people living in food-insecure households rose for the third year in a row to 36.3 million Americans, including more than 13 million children.” Throughout the article, they continue to have part of the focus on hunger when it should be completely on homelessness. Rosen argues, saying homeless activist lie about the number, and tend to just pull them out of thin air to make is seem more extreme. He claims their definition of homelessness is too broad and doesn’t pinpoint the true amount of people living on streets or under bridges. He explains how the people who do are usually mental patients, drunks, drug addicts, hobos, and runaway kids, who all need effective remedies and systems to solve their problems. The activists just say things to create something to be politically talked about. The NSCAHH …show more content…

After making a point in an argument, it needs to be followed up with support and evidence. The NSCAHH claims there are food increases in shelter request. They followed up with the statement that a high percentage of agencies reported this. They never give more details about what agencies discovered this, lacking the persuasiveness. They also explain how poverty has increased from 31.1 million to 35.9 million from 2000 to 2003. Again, they get off topic of the number of homeless and shifts the focus to hunger and poverty in America which isn’t followed by any additional information. Rosen claimed that activists stretch the truth and make it seem more severe than it really is. He includes a specific time when Mitch Snyder, an American Advocate for the homeless, claimed there are 1.2 million homeless in the U.S., and then later claimed it was actually 3 million(Snyder). He even follows it up with research that Snyder confessed he was just satisfying the media’s lust for hunger. His other point was that after studying the survey, the actual number of homeless is incorrect and supports this claim by explaining that the homeless tend to go to multiple places for help, so they actually are counted more than once and people who move back in with their parents or double up with friends are counted as well. Although Rosen has fewer points than the NSCAHH, he has stronger support

Open Document