Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Womens rights in the middle east religion
Misconceptions of Muslim women
Womens rights in the middle east religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Womens rights in the middle east religion
Within the chapter ‘size 6: The Western Women’s Harem’, Fatema Mernissi analyzed the depiction and relegation of women from both the perspective of a Muslim woman and from that of a Western woman. Mernissi disputed that the subordination and suppression of Western women by their own society, more specifically men, are more insensitive and overall worse than the general depiction of Muslim women. Her reasoning revolved around the idea that Muslim women are perceived as more repressed because they wear a veil, among the plethora of other constraints on women in Islam. Mernissi ultimately wants the audience to relate to her issue by means of an emotional appeal, while also utilizing both ethical and logical appeal to support her thesis. Though, there may be stereotypical flaws within the authors reasoning behind the depiction of American women, I do find her thesis to be very well supported …show more content…
within this literature. One major contributor to the way that this author chose to depict American women was that although she may have originated from a society where women have to constantly cover their faces, an American woman has to face day-to-day brutalities that are crueler than what an Eastern woman typically confronts. This conflict of ideas between Western and Eastern women was triggered when she was navigating through an American department store where Mernissi was told that she had too big of hips to fit into a size 6. That specific situation was where both the beauty perspectives of Western and Muslim women came into light. “That distressing experience made me realize how the image of beauty in the West can hurt and humiliate a woman as much as the veil does when enforced…” (208). In trying to understand the destructive beauty standards of Western women she linked the comments she has heard previously in the Muslim culture. The only negative feedback she received from men regarding her image was about her moderately long neck. When receiving comments about her neck, she displayed great self-confidence because it was their problem not hers. “I have often had to defend myself against remarks such as zirafa (giraffe), because of long neck, I learned long ago not to rely too much on the outside world or my sense of self-worth.” (209). However, unlike Western ideals, Moroccan men made complimentary remarks about her ‘generous hips’. “In the Moroccan streets, men’s flattering comments regarding my particularly generous hips have for decades led me to believe that the entire planet shared their convictions.” (209). But, this department store incident was different. Mernissi felt as if she was “savagely attacked”. What was once considered a feature of beauty for her was now considered something humiliating. Western women have a direct set of norms to fulfill in order to be considered ‘appealing’ within their society. Mernissi learned this detail the hard way. “The norm is everywhere, my dear, it’s all over, in the magazines, on television, in the ads. You can’t escape it” (211). From this, Mernissi comes to the conclusion that Western ideals are more destructive than the Muslim ideals. “Her words sounded so simple, but the threat they implied was so cruel that I realized for the first time that maybe ‘size 6’ is more violent restriction imposed on women than is the Muslim Veil.” (213). Mernissi then looks into how Western male authority compares to that of a Muslim man. The principles that she establishes for her comparisons focus on the idea that Muslim men use the concept of space to exclude women to be able to grasp male power, whereas Western males chose to manipulate time and light. “The Western man uses images and spotlights to freeze female beauty within an idealized childhood, and forces women to perceive aging-that normal unfolding of the years- as a shameful devaluation” (214). Unlike a Muslim man, a Western man creates a set of standards for the ‘perfect’ look of a woman. These standards are centered on the idea of maintaining a skinny figure similar to the look of a fourteen-year old. “He declares that in order to be beautiful, a woman must look fourteen years old” (213). If a woman does not fit these set of standards they are considered to be ‘unpleasant’. Mernissi backs this thought process up with philosophies from Immanuel Kant’s 19th century theories that state: ‘To be beautiful, women have to appear childish and brainless’. Mernissi uses her own personal example to exemplify her thoughts on the influence Western Males have on women. In the department store she expresses that “here I am, transformed into a dinosaur” (214). This statement cultivates the audience’s ability to emotionally empathize for Mernissi. A lot of this chapter focused on the tyranny behind the size 6 in the Western culture. I believe that this is a constant issue within our Western society. We have created an outrageous set of ideal norms that are nearly impossible to fulfill. So, in this regard I do agree with Mernissi’s thought process on these ridiculously expected norms. Though, I do disagree as to who is to blame for this. Mernissi argues that Western men have total control over the depiction of the ‘ideal American woman’. This flawed argument conveys the idea that American women are weak and oppressed. However, people within our society do judge women, including Mernissi, because they are considered to be too ‘big’ or ‘overweight’. We see this accurately represented in this story when the saleswoman shares that “many women working in highly paid fashion-related jobs could lose their positions if they didn’t keep to a strict diet” (213). These issues in our society only fuel the stereotypes about both the media and the idea that males have authority over western women’s bodies. Throughout the entirety of this chapter, Mernissi has a consistent theme that she continuously makes apparent to the audience.
When speaking about Western males she uses very aggressive adjectives and expressions to convey male dominance over American women. But, when expressing male dominance for Muslim men she does not use the same aggressive language. I believe this creates controversial stigmas that limit the ability to share the full picture to the readers. By forcing the idea that Western men are horribly wicked, it creates the impression that American women are extremely oppressed and have zero authoritative power in the Western society. “By putting the spotlight on the prepubescent female, the Western man veils the older, more mature woman, wrapping her in shrouds of ugliness” (214). Ultimately, she is conveying the idea that trying to fit into a size 6 is more punishing than hiding your face with a veil. I shared similar thoughts with the author about the choice to wear a veil, I believe that wearing a veil is equivalent to a woman freeing herself from societal
judgements. After analyzing Mernissi’s arguments, I think that they would have been more accurate if she would have impartially compared the women from both societies. Mernissi expressed views that offered explanations behind the societal expectations for women in Western societies. These views focused on how male domination has created ideal beauty standards for women, and that there is zero association between body figure and maturity in western culture. It is apparent that there are societal expectations for women but, Mernissi’s arguments are flawed for the fact that she asserts that Western men are in total control of women and their feminineness and also solely to blame for the societal standards. Overall, this was a very intellectually written piece of literature that furthered my understanding of cultural differences among sex’s, but included, in my opinion, a flawed argument regarding the oppression of western women.
Professor Leila Ahmed, active Islamic feminist, in her article “Reinventing the veil” published in the Financial Times assumes that there is a connection between “advancement” and veiling, which means that unveiled women are advanced and vice versa. In addition, she supports that it led to increasing rate of violence. She questions why women wear veil, that is considered as “symbol of patriarchy and women’s oppression”. However, research changed her position towards wearing veil. Firstly, she states that wearing veil was essential for women, because it could be beneficial and influence to how people treat women, in terms of job, marriage and free movement in public. Secondly, her assumption was explained while interviewing women, who stated
One of Sultana Yusufali’s strongest arguments in “My body is my own business” is her scrutinization of the exploitation of female sexuality. Initially Yusufali writes about the injudicious individuals that assume she is oppressed by her hijab. Thereafter, she describes them as “brave individuals who have mustered the courage to ask me about the way I dress”. Moreover, Yusufali’s word choice is intriguing as she utilizes the word “brave” when laymen hear this word they habitually associate the aforementioned with heroic, valiant and courageous. Consequently, Yusufali ensues to comprise her opinions on the hijab and how it carries a number of negative connotations in western society. Furthermore, Yusufali proceeds to strike on the importance
Fatemeh Fakhraie’s essay “Scarfing it Down,” explains how Muslim women suffer because of what they wear. Fakhraie blogs about Muslim women in her website she explains; “Seeing ourselves portrayed in the media in ways that are one-dimensional and misleading." Several people judge Muslim's by their appearance because they assume they're a bad person. The author of this essay wants the reader to know that Muslim women wearing a hijab are not a threat to the world.
Some people fit the stereotypes to be true, but, I believe that one person doesn't prove a stereotype to be true. Sterling himself writes, “Like all American women, she was dressed in a way intended to provoke lust” 614. This stereotype was said by a Muslim about American women. He believes that all women dress to provoke lust. Women dress the way they want to dress for many reasons such as wanting to look good for themselves or even to be comfortable. Not all American women dress to grab the attention of men sexually. To the Muslim women, they are used to wearing full clothing and wearing the Hijab in their country. Seeing the way Americans dress to them is very shocking because of the differences in the way they dress in their countries. Sterling states, “They call the simple, modest clothing of Islam “bondage” while they spend countless hours, and millions of dollars, painting themselves” 616. This stereotype was said by an American addressed towards a Muslim woman. The bondage is referring the Hijab which is a covering for a Muslim woman's head. The Hijab is a religious clothing and has sentimental value to the woman of Islam.To an American, it's just a piece of clothing that covers their head and only some understand the meaning of the Hajib. Both of the people that made these remarks are from different countries so they don't have a full understanding of each
For some women wearing a veil is not something that is forced on them but rather a choice of their own. Martha Nussbaum and Maysan Haydar are both authors that try to explain their reasoning that veiling isn't an oppressive tool used against women. Martha Nussbaum's article “Veiled Threats”, is a political and philosophical take on why banning the burqa is a violation of human rights. On the other hand Maysan Haydar’s article “Don’t Judge a Muslim Girl by Her Covering”, is a more humorous and personal take on why veiling shouldn't be as judged or stereotyped. Though Nussbaum and Haydar have equal goals this essay is being used to understand the main argument, claims and whether or not each article has any weaknesses.
Ever pass by Muslim woman in a hijab at the mall or park and think how oppressive and restraining her culture must be? Maysan Haydar, a New York social worker who practices the Muslim tradition of veiling, believes otherwise. In her article, “Veiled Intentions: Don’t Judge a Muslim Girl by Her Covering,” Haydar highlights on her experiences as a Muslim living in an American culture, where showing more skin is the “norm.” Haydar speaks specifically to a crowd who unconsciously makes assumptions about certain Muslim practices, in hopes of sharing the truth behind them. Haydar suggests that, contrary to popular belief, not all Muslim women cover themselves strictly as an “oppressive” religious practice, but that some women, like herself, find
She makes the case that Western feminists have radically misinterpreted the veil. For many Muslim women, the veil acts as a divide between the public and private. The veil may actually liberate women from “the intrusive, commodifying, basely sexualizing Western gaze”. The veil frees women from the oppressive hyper-sexualization of found in Western culture. Reducing the veil to a symbol of oppression disregards the possibility of female agency outside a Western feminist paradigm. The veil has the potential to liberate women in the public space. Projecting our Western notions of sexuality and gender roles denies the possibility of different forms of sexual
A lady is an object, one which men attempt to dominate. A man craves to get a hold of this being beneath his command, and forever have her at his disposal. In her piece “Size Six: The Western Women’s Harem,” published in 2002, Fatema Mernissi illustrates how Eastern and Western women are subjugated by the control of men. Mernissi argues that though she may have derived from a society where a woman has to cover her face, a Western woman has to face daily atrocities far worse then ones an Eastern woman will encounter. Moreover, Mernissi’s core dogma in “Size 6: The Western Women's Harem” is that Western women are not more fortunate than women raised into harems in other societies. Additionally, she asserts that though women in the Western world are given liberties, they coincide with the unattainable ideals of what is aesthetically pleasing. Furthermore, to strengthen her argument towards her wavering audience, Mernissi’s main approach in her paper is to get the reader to relate with her issue by means of an emotional appeal, while also utilizing both the ethical and logical appeal to support her thesis.
Lila Abu-Lughod’s article titled, “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving?” takes a closer look at the problematic ethnocentric approach many have when trying to gain an understanding of another culture that may be foreign to that individual. In this analytical paper, Lughod looks at women in Islam, specifically the treatment of women and how it might be utilized as a justification for invading into a country and liberating its people. The country Lughod refers to in her article is Afghanistan, and Lughod points out the misunderstanding from the people to the Bush administration like First Lady Laura Bush who believed that intervention was necessary to free women from the captivity of their own homes. It is important to consider the role that different lenses play into all of this, especially when one’s lenses are being shaped by the media. Depictions of covered women secluded from society leave a permanent image in the minds of many, who would then later support the idea of liberation. This paper will discuss that the practice of using propaganda when referring to the lifestyle in the Middle East is not exclusive to the U.S; rather it has been utilized throughout history. Additionally, we will take a closer look on the importance of symbols, such as veils in this case; help to further emphasize the cause to liberate. Finally, we will analyze Lughod’s plea towards cultural relativism and away from liberal imperialism.
“The Harem Within” is a pioneering work that opens discussion of women’s rights in Islamic societies. With her humble life story Mernissi gives not only a voice to Moroccan women, but stands her advocacy for individual freedom and battle against the harem within. The narrative is a literature example that figures the women discrimination and appeal for
In the book, Women in the Middle East, a Saudi Arabian proverb states, "A girl possesses nothing but a veil and a tomb" (Harik and Marston 83). The key words, "veil" and "tomb" lend evidence to the fact that many Middle Eastern women lack identity symbolized by the “veil” and lack the right of ownership except for their veil and the tomb. This statement further enforces the notion that many women in the Middle East are expected to serve and tolerate the oppression of the men in their lives throughout their lives on this earth. Moreover, it confirms that many of these women do not get the opportunity to obtain education, join the work force, and even participate in the political affairs of the country. This arrangement further helps the Middle Eastern men to view women as their properties, servants, or even as slaves. Ultimately, there are three main reasons why Middle Eastern men engage in the act of oppressing their women.
In the Muslim culture, Woman are the housekeepers and child raisers as the men go out and work to put food on the table. The relationship between male and female in the culture is very far from equal, as woman have no superiority over any male, and Communication is often nonexistence between male and female. These women were also not allowed to show any of their skin at all or they would be arrested. The Muslims thought that any skin that being shown is inappropriate because it may arouse men. Because of the Afghanistan war, many men who went on to fight never made it back to their families. This left the families struggling to eat and make money because woman were not allowed to work as seen as a cultural norm, or gender role. Meade argues that for some cultures including many native American tribes, masculine and feminine roles are not related to biology but gender role ideology. Looking at this culture from western point of view it astonishes me how poorly the woman are treated as they are looked at as things and not people. The roles of women in this culture looks more like they are being enslaved by the males as they assert their dominance and show ownership over certain
According to Doucleff, “‘wearing the hijab eliminates many of the hassles women have to go through — such as dyeing their hair,’ she says. ‘For example, you're getting old, and gray hairs, when you wear the hijab, you might not think about dyeing your hair because nobody sees it anyway.’” By wearing a hijab women do not have to worry about “gray hairs, and can focus on other parts of their lives. Although this seems like a trivial improvement, women in the west spend inestimable amounts of money on beauty products and a surfeit amount of time on their daily regimen. Even though the burqa is therapeutic in helping women with their appearance, it can be physically restricting, “Mariam had never before worn a burqa…The padded headpiece felt tight and heavy on her skull…The loss of peripheral vision was unnerving, and she did not like the suffocating way the pleated cloth kept pressing against her mouth” (72). In this excerpt the burqa is described as “tight”, “heavy”, and “suffocating, making it seem like an unpleasant garment to be ensconced in. The burqa can cause an “unnerving” feeling, which can make daily tasks hard to complete. When interviewing a girl in Afghanistan Daniel Pipes, American historian, writer, and commentator, got her opinion on the burqa, “When I wear a burqa it gives me a really bad feeling. I don't like to wear it…I don't like it, it upsets me, I can't breathe properly.” The discomfort the girl feels in the burqa “upsets” her, linking her physical distress to emotional distress. The girl gets “a really bad feeling” when she wears a burqa, showing that the physical effects of the burqa can be negative. Besides the physical hardships Muslim dress may cause, it can also cover up physical abuse, “A Muslim teenage girl
299). The study consisted of having in-depth personal interviews to share their experiences of being a Muslim American woman (Anderson Droogsma, 2007, p. 300). Veiling to these women was a way of freedom while also having a Muslim identity (Anderson Droogsma, 2007, p. 301). It was also a source of behavior control, to not be sexually objectified, a way of commanding respect from others and even a source of checking their own behavior (Anderson Droogsma, 2007, p. 301). One of the women interviewed said, veiling to her was a way to feel connected to other Muslim woman who veil (Anderson Droogsma, 2007, p. 302). Veiling can be a way to feel connected to your religion and God as well as being connected to those who practice the same faith, it can be considered an act of membership. Many of the women interviewed noted they have been removed from planes, been treated unfairly, and have had strangers shout at them all for just being Muslim and being more visibly recognized from veiling (Anderson Droogsma, 2007, p. 303). This is an example of how media can affect the general population. When the media only shows radicals and compares all Muslims to being terrorist or dangerous they are actually putting Muslim people at risk of being assaulted in public. Muslim woman in particular are more at risk for being assaulted as they are more identifiable. So while veiling can be a source of empowerment and freedom for women it is a double-edged sword because it also puts them at further risk of being
As an Arab American, a Muslim and a woman writer, Mohja Kahf challenges the stereotypes and misrepresentation of Arab and Muslim women. Her style is always marked by humor, sarcasm, anger and confrontation. “The Marvelous Women,” “The Woman Dear to Herself,” “Hijab Scene #7” and “Hijab Scene #5” are examples of Kahf’s anger of stereotypes about Muslim women and her attempts to fight in order to eradicate them, in addition to her encouragement to women who help her and fight for their rights.