Summary Of The Great Influenza By John M Barry

418 Words1 Page

Uncertainty can make anyone fear the unknown. However, scientists learn to work with this looming obstacle, for they frequently encounter uncertainty. In the passage, The Great Influenza, author John M. Barry depicts his idea of scientific research and how constant uncertainty impacts it. His purpose is to give characteristics to scientific research thus enabling his audience to view methodical scientific research in a new light. Barry’s inventive use of antithesis, metaphor, and rhetorical questions, establishes the important characteristics of scientific research, especially the ability to embrace uncertainty. Barry begins his account with contrasting the strength of certainty and the weakness of uncertainty to better define the term uncertainty. This sophisticated antithesis initiates a contrast between the …show more content…

He demonstrates examples of scientists approaching uncertainty while conducting their research like “scientists exist of the frontier”(Line 23). Barry also discusses that the best of the scientists “move deep into a wilderness region..,” in which they know nothing and have scavenge for information to then create tools that did not exist beforehand. He describes that as “grunt work, tedious work…,”(Line 37). The purpose of the figurative language demonstrates examples of how scientific research is given characteristics. Furthermore, Barry includes a sequence of rhetorical questions as another example of scientists and conducting their research, such as “Would a pick be best..,” along with “...would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive?”(Line 40, 42). Barry adopts the rock scenario in order to to demonstrate for the audience how a scientist starting out would bounce from idea to idea quickly. This example of how scientists encounter uncertainty prompts the audience, and leaves the audience to consider how these rhetorical strategies strengthen Barry’s

Open Document