Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Processes of social cognition
Processes of social cognition
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Processes of social cognition
1a) The title of the article is “The Gift Of Similarity: How Good And Bad Gifts Influence Relationships”.
1b) The authors are Elizabeth W. Dunn, Jeff Huntsinger, Janetta Lun, and Stacey Sinclair.
1c) Social Cognition
2008
Volume 26
Page 469 to 481
2a) It is to test the idea that gifts can be used to determine preferences similarity between people. Thus, gifts can impact relationship development by revealing similarity between people, especially relationship partners.
2b) The main limitation is that it lack experimental evidence. Findings are determined by participant’s memory based on past experience and prediction thus, they were not actual responses as challenges to imagine or recall accurately was observed (Areni, Kiecker, & Palan, 1998;
…show more content…
The ratings show that’s participants in the good gift condition liked the gift more than participants in the bad gift condition.
4a) The main findings in terms of perceived similarity is that there is an evident relationship between gift condition and gender. After receiving a bad gifts, men perceived lesser similarity between themselves and their partner while women did not perceive much. Likewise, in a good gift condition, men perceived greater similarity to their partner and women did not report differences in similarity with their partner.
4b) The main finding in perceived similarity is that both gender and gift condition plays a part in one’s perception of similarity. For example, men perceived lesser similarity between themselves and their romantic partner after receiving a bad gift while women perceived greater similarity with their partner in the same condition. This affected perceived similarity can influence the outlook on their relationship as well. Results show that after receiving a bad gift, men rated their relationship’s future to be significantly more negative while women perceived the relationship to be slightly more
…show more content…
With that, researchers were able to move beyond studies that relied on participant’s intuitions and imagination which may be inaccurate. Also, gifts giving is concluded to have the ability to influence important judgement which includes participant’s perceived relationship similarity and the likelihood of marriage. Thus, as gifts have the potential to play a surprisingly powerful role in the interpersonal relationship, the researcher provided an answer source as to why people practices gift-giving despite all
Roediger III, H. L., Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(3), 385-407.
However, as may be expected from our modern society, the custom of giving gifts quickly turned into the practice of exchanging them. If one gives gifts to loved ones at Christmas, the reasoning goes, then those who do not receive gifts from a person are obviously not loved by him/her. So each individual now is required to give a gift to all of his/her friends, or risk communicating to them that s/he no longer loves them -- or perhaps never did! Also, there arises another problem when someone gets a gift from a person to whom they did not give one. The logic here is that the one who gave the gift obviously has a greater love for or places a greater value on the friendship than the one who did not. A decidedly awkward situation arises from this, one can imagine.
I have learned that, interpersonal relationships are difficult to maintain. I often ask myself why, relationships require so much work. Why do I, stay in a relationship where the bad outweighs the good? The social exchange perspective argues, according to Monge & Contractor, as cited by West & Turner that “People calculate the overall worth of a particular relationship by subtracting its cost from the rewards it provides.”
Watson, J. M., Bunting, M. F., Poole, B. J., & Conway, A. R. (2005). Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(1), 76-85.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Journal of personality and social psychology and. Retrieved from http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~broberts/Hazan & Shaver, 1987.pdf
Farrants, J. (1998, September). The 'false' memory debate. Counseling Psychology Quarterly. Retrieved September 14, 2000 from ProQuest database (Bell & Howell Information and Learning-ProQuest) on the World Wide Web: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb
Klohnen, E., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive--self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity or attachment
We live in a culture where people are expected to give to others gifts of gratitude and expressions of love. Sometimes these gifts are accepted for what they are worth and other times they are not. We use that which others give us based on several factors. Among them are whether we perceive the gift as valuable, whether we can practically use the gift, or whether the gift is given earnestly and for the right reasons. Because of this there is not one explanation why certain attitudes about gifts exist. We should, however, understand that it is not for us to realize why a gift is given, but rather that someone thinks enough of us to give a gift in the first place. It is certain that if gifts are not accepted and used in a prudent and expeditious manner, then the gifts that are received will deteriorate or whither completely away.
...; With the use of applying this theory to an episode as a demonstration, an application, and then an explanation, it is easy to see how the Social Exchange theory is related to everyday situations. Not only can the theory be applied to amorous relationships, but to that of friendships. The utility of the theory is seen in just about every type of interaction and is key to better understanding why relationships, friendships, or any mutual interaction, for that matter, turn out being costly or rewarding.
...gender, and the self: Variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1118-1134.
Weiner, I. Healy, A. Freedheim, D. Proctor,R.W., Schinka,J.A. (2003) Handbook of Psychology: Experimental psychology,18, pp 500
Researchers randomly assigned each participant an image of the women with either a red or green background used in the study. Conceptually, the experiment was testing whether the background color of a picture of a woman (IV) affected how perceived attractiveness, sexual attraction, kindness, and intelligence were perceived (DV). The independent variable was operationalized through the different colors used in the background (red or green). Whereas, the dependent variable was operationalized through the use of a scale, the scale ranged from 1 (not at all) to 9 (very/extremely). The results of the experiment demonstrated that perceived attractiveness and sexaul sexual attraction was highly influenced by the effect of the background color; however, perceived kindness and intelligence were not affected by the background color of the
relationship problems between men and women because of the fundamental psychological differences between them. The author represents men and women from two different planets. Men are from Mars and women are from Venus. This book also states the difference of values of men's and
Taylor, Pepau, & Sears (2000) explain that first impressions are extremely important because they are the initial idea that an individual forms about another individual and determine whether they decide to pursue any type of relationship. People tend to form impressions of each other relatively quickly and use minimal information such as the gender of the o...
The study basically suggests that couples through time tend to become more similar because they spend more time together and adapt to their partners’ lifestyle and different ideas. Five factors that suggest how similar the personalities are were examined, which are openness, eroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and extroversion. These factors were examined by making the couple reflect two times, upon themselves and their partner through online surveys and questionnaires. In fact, both eroticism and conscientiousness are greatly affected through time. As the duration of the relationship increases, couples become more similar in terms of these two factors, so overall, their similarity increases.