Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of learning styles
An essay about learning styles
Analysis of learning styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of learning styles
Throughout the course of the years, scholars, researchers as well as teachers have developed a common perspective in regards to the notorious 10,000-hour rule. Of course, the idea that one must practice and devote their relentless time to a certain activity in order to thrive was developed and reshaped by many. Yet, Malcolm Gladwell presents this idea in a new light which utterly stimulates a new way of thinking. Throughout the passage, “The 10,000-Hour Rule”, Malcolm Gladwell argues that although innate talent exists in many individuals, preparation plays an even bigger role in the lives of many. Malcolm explains through a plethora of research and test studies that in order to thrive in a certain area one must be able to sacrifice their …show more content…
However, Gladwell divides them into a set of three groups. Each group is categorized by disparate aspects. One group contains exemplary students who possess vital skills in order to become professional violinists, in the second group, those who were intermediate, who were good but not fantastical. Lastly, the last group contained those who would just amount to becoming a school music teacher. Yet, this study proved that what differed in each of these students is a number of hours each one of them practiced. Of course, those who possessed the skills to become world class soloist had practiced relentlessly throughout the course of their life. In fact, the study fundamentally proved that those who excelled musically had practiced over 10,000 hours. In the text, Gladwell presents his point of view by presenting professional opinion and analyzing the lives of individuals that rose up in society by committing their lives to practice. The 10,000-hour rule is, in fact, necessary in order to thrive in a certain activity because, it develops exemplary skills, helps build up discipline, and unlock one’s full …show more content…
Although many perceive discipline with a negative perspective in can benefit an individual who is devoting their time to a task. In my opinion, the 10,000-hour rule helps develop necessary discipline needed to excel. For instance, practicing for a certain activity requires a strict schedule that must be followed accordingly. However, by following a schedule one is developing discipline that will help them achieve their fundamental goals. In my perspective, discipline eventually help practice become natural actions. However, Gladwell’s perspective on the subject is compelling. Gladwell strongly believes that practice is essentially a way of life that must be maintained in order to succeed. I, on the hand, argue that in order to devote yourself to practicing you must develop a certain amount of discipline that can only come from preparing yourself mentally and starting off small. Of course, as the years progress by adding on the amount of time one practices, one’s discipline begins building up a skill that is crucial. Gladwell expresses his point of view using one of the most famous composers in the world, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. Furthermore, Gladwell states that “ Even Mozart- the greatest musical prodigy of all time couldn’t hit his stride until he had his ten thousand hours in” (Gladwell. 362). However, I am sure that through these amount of hours
Even when one has a rough childhood and upbringing, they are able to take all of these hard times and turn them into motivation to work harder to improve not only their lives, but their family and friends lives. Through this hard work and dedication comes the 10,000 hour rule. Marcus Gladwell is a very well-known author, writer, and speaker from The New York Yorker; his first four books were on the New York Times best seller list and in 2005, Time magazine named Gladwell one of its 100 most influential people. Because of Gladwell’s outstanding achievements and background, it furthers his readers to believe that he is a very credible and knowledgeable resource. Gladwell’s purpose in writing Outliers is to teach and inform the audience about what an outlier really stands for and how some people become an outlier from a young age. Gladwell’s main audience is people around the world that are interested in the statistical studies. Gladwell, through the use of several rhetorical devices and examples is effectively able to express what it takes to be successful through the 10,000 hour rule....
Schall describes ‘self discipline’ to be a fundamental principal that will ultimately enrich the ‘self.’ Hence, to posses qualities of dedication through a set of self-discipline habits are virtues that will enable to comprehend the truth in our reality. Indeed, the author makes a key-point by explaining that one must be able to achieve order in our mundane lives, from what “deviates from what it is we know we ought to be or do.” Therefore, one must be able to overcome any obstacle that may impede from reaching our goal of seeking knowledge and understanding. However, self-discipline is only the “beginning of wisdom, not its end.” Hence, wisdom may be achieve through a personal library, by studying the greatest minds that had existed in the past and perhaps, in the our present time, in which they have come close and/or achieve the goal one purposely
...heir 10,000 hours of practice to become successful in their passion, therefore making his writing effective. Gladwell provides information to his audience that success is achieved by many factors and some of these factors they can control, such as the amount of hours they practice. His writing style provides hope for the future in young generations who may not know how to go about achieving success in their desired area. Gladwell's writing is truly timeless in a sense that in two hundred years from now, younger generations will be able to read his writing about the 10,000 hour rule and it will still have the same effect in giving them hope of becoming future outliers.
Malcolm Gladwell is a canadian-english journalist, speaker, and bestselling author. In his bestselling book “Outliers”, Malcolm Gladwell discusses success and what patterns correlate with it. He states that how much time you put into a certain activity, specifically 10,000 hours, can put you in a elite level of proficiency. This in turn can give someone the tools to allow them the ability to be successful. Using historical citations, patterns, and real life examples, Gladwell forms his 10,000 hour rule. Due to his knowledgeable yet calm tone Gladwell seems to show credibility. His intended audience could be people who enjoy statistics or people who want to be successful and find possible ways to do so. Gladwell uses a logical appeal to show the patterns he has found through his studies of success. He supports his claim with overwhelming statistics which back it. He also uses similes to help better understand how he can relate the patterns he has found for the elite in a certain activity to other things. Foil is probably Gladwell's best means of convincing the reader to his thesis of the 10,000 hour rule. He uses Foil to compare success and we define to legends such as Bill Gates The Beatles and Bill Joy. Overall Gladwell uses Logos, similes, and foils to support his claim of the 10,000 hour rule.
In the book Outliers, written and published by Malcolm Gladwell in association with Little, Brown and Company in 2008. There is a section in the book called the "10,000-Hour Rule'' that explains it takes roughly ten thousand hours of practice to achieve mastery in a field. Does this sort of idea work to acheive greatness in any profession? How does the writer go about figuring out this rule?
‘“It’s not that it makes you more intelligent,” says Phoebe, a history student. “It’s just that it helps you work. You can study for longer. You don’t get distracted. You’re actually happy to go to the library and you don’t even want to stop for lunch. And then it’s like 7pm, and you’re still, ‘Actually, you know what? I could do another hour.’” (Cadwalladr)
Furthermore, Gladwell’s use of broad and lacking hypotheses appear once again when he “‘draws a connection between national cultures that ‘place the highest emphasis on effort and work’ and ‘the tradition of wet-rice agriculture,’” in countries such as Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. Gladwell made this connection after speaking to Alan Schoenfeld, a math professor who argues, “Being good at mathematics is less an innate ability than a function of persistence and doggedness.” Gladwell’s connection from Schoenfeld’s statement may seem plausible when he compares math to wet-rice agriculture because both require rigorous time and effort. However, he does not consider that Schoenfeld’s statement was simply an opinion made from his own personal
In Asia, people believe all the hard work will lead to profits through the experience of growing rice paddies. According to the writer, this argument is not limited to the rice paddies but continues over the experiment of the math tests. For example, Gladwell introduces a story of Renee. Renee is Alan Schoenfeld’s, a math professor at Berkeley, student. He considers Renee different. When Renee meets a problem she does not know, she will not stop until she is absolutely sure she has it right. Renee’s studying spirit helps her to succeed during studying. It is based on a function of persistence and doggedness. However, under the US education system, students are not good at focusing on one thing. Gladwell ends by noting the result of the test called TIMSS, the difference between how Asian and American students learn math is the emphasis on effort and hard work. This doggedness is not
middle of paper ... ... Music was not taught in the high school I was in. To satisfy my interest in learning about music and how to play musical instruments, I had to find a source of education other than school; a great depiction in agreement with Graff’s claim that students are being limited by not considering their interests when creating curricula (Graff 197). In conclusion, education is broader than just falling into what the contemporary school system has to offer. Both Gatto and Graff proved this by explaining how conforming students to certain perspectives of education limits their potential in other educational branches that interest the students.
The ten thousand hour rule is oftentimes linked to success. The more practice a person has the better they will get at the task at hand. Throughout history it can be seen that people such as Bill Gates and The Beatles success came from the ten thousand hour rule as well as many other athletes, musicians and geniuses. Studies show that the most successful of musicians, athletes, mathematicians, etc. come from ten thousand hours of practice. “Practice isn’t the thing you do once you’re good. It’s the thing you do which makes you good” (Gladwell 42). This quote breaks down the ten thousand hour rule, stating that the more practice oneself has the better oneself will be. This thought starts at a young age and depending on resources and opportunity comes to be right.
This book discusses the life of Glenn Gould who was a profound pianist known for his classical music, Peter Ostwald a late violinist who wrote “The Ecstasy and Tragedy of Genius of Glenn Gould” believed that Gould was extraordinary gifted and that his music gained much appreciation among the people in the community. He not only saw Gould as a genius but also as a companion who struggled to find peace in his life through the sound of music. Gould didn’t act like a normal child he isolated himself from others because he felt that others around him did not share the same passion for music. His father noticed when he was born that instead of crying, “Glenn always hum” (Ostwald, 1997). This showed that Glenn was born with a passion towards music from the very early stages of life. Gould formed behaviors of an ambivalent attachment style towards his mother and behaviors of a secure attachment towards his father this impacted his ability to form long lasting relationships with people during his childhood progressing into his adult years. (My thesis)
I wasn’t aware that I am unconsciously procrastinating on other things rather than homework. I am a deadline procrastinator even though I’ve improved so much this semester, and I’ve come to conclude that our lack of discipline is not worth our dreams, our future. It is not easy to overcome procrastination, but I too have a hypothesis: a major cause of my procrastination is that I have a creative mind, I am more inclined to art, to transform new ideas into objects, into sketches, and to be more active. Sadly, our education system is focused on protocols, processes, robot-like tasks and training. It is creating workers in fear of the higher class losing power. Creativity is part of the human being's integral identity and by killing it we lose a little of our humanity. I am not complaining about education; in fact, I love learning new things every day. I am so passionate about education that Leonardo da Vinci is my role model, a man who was interested in many areas of study but, in the end, he was more admired as an artist, a proof that procrastination makes us more
Over the past four years I have asked myself, how do great chess players really become great? Malcom Gladwell's“Outliers”responded with the answer: the 10,000 hour rule. As a chess player, I am reminded that even Bobby Fisher needed a preparation period of nine years. Unfortunately I only had four because my interests in physics and math courses have become more prominent. It appears the 10,000 hour is a necessary condition for exceptional performance in many fields, however, I don't believe it's sufficient. My chess experience, if nothing else, has taught me that ...
Max Anders says, "Only the disciplined ever get really good at anything." Everything in life requires some sort of discipline. Whether it is hitting a baseball, climbing a mountain, playing a musical instrument, making good grades or brushing your teeth it all comes down to a matter of discipline.
“People knew I was different. But not less.” Temple Grandin understood what she had, but she knew she was not less than anyone else. She did what anyone else could do. She knew she could push through everyday, no matter how hard and how long it took. Temple is not different, but she is unique! “We’re focusing so much on academics that we’ve taken out things like, art, sewing, cooking, woodworking, music, and other things that introduce kids to careers.” Temple Grandin is trying to explain and tell the world that it is not all about academics. She had the tremendously strong willpower to prove that what she was thinking was actually right. She wanted people to stop worrying about all academics and more about the arts, sports, and the creativity of all of it. Because if not, only the few students that excel at academics are