Talking about certain topics with someone may cause disagreements that lead to debates. Debates meaning that stuff said will not always be agreed between the people talking about them. One would say that this show is awesome because they have this person in it. Someone that hears that will not agree because they think that the plot is good but the actors that play that character aren’t good at all. In “World of Wrestling” by Roland Barthes the story talks about wrestling as a sport and how to be connected to other sports. The story also talks on how wrestling is different from other sports and how that impacts the viewers. Compare/Contrast is to take two topics and break them down into how they are the same against how they differ. By doing …show more content…
People that debate those things can talk about how the way they look if talking about a car or if they are an actor how they perform. People can get carry away when talking about just the good in two things. Talking about difference to will help in decided on how people feel about the topics that are being talk about. People that take the time to talk about things means that they care enough about them to talk. There will always be different options for topics and that is why compare/contrast helps when talking about them. Wrestling and Call of Duty are in some ways different but mainly have the same ideas. Talking about these two topics will show how they do bring the same things to the table. On the other hand, they will have differences with how people will base how they feel when asked about these two …show more content…
The two do have a lot that are different about them but they do have some things that are the same when it comes to their customers. Both of them “bring a justice that is serving to the bad to show that good will always win.” (Barthes 10). People spend money to watch the wrestlers do amazing things that make the people wanting to stay to watch more. People want to see what new things that wrestlers have come up with like new music to showing off new finishing moves. Doing that will keep people coming to watch them perform for years to come. Call of Duty keeps people around by having a new game every year that is better than the last one with story and online play. Call of Duty has this thing of making a game from the past and then the next year to make a game from the future. By doing that then people can play in the old wars one year with crazy story and online play then turn around to buy the next game to have it be in the year 2210 or farther. Players that get the different year sets will not get bored if they just play one type of era and they will go out to buy the next Call of Duty to see what era they are in
As well, metaphors exists everywhere. They influence the way we process information in our minds. Without the idea of comparison in order to achieve a better understanding of material, everything would be abstract and the way we perceive the information would be completely
In The Norton Mix, Suzanne Britt’s “Neat People vs. Sloppy People,” Bruce Catton’s “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts,” and Barbara Ehrenreich’s “Cultural Baggage,” all compare and contrast people or things in the stories. It is important for the author to clearly distinguish what he or she is saying, because it allows the reader to understand the story better. Comparing and contrasting different things is also a way to organize the author’s thoughts. It is important for the reader to be able to see the difference between things or people so one can have a more suitable understanding, better insight, and a firm viewpoint of the subject.
Contrast is used to demonstrate how two completely opposite matters work together to find one answer. From the text, “Not all scientific investigators can deal comfortably with uncertainty, and those who can may not be creative enough to understand and design the experiments that will illuminate a subject.” Different traits are a necessity for different pieces of experimentation which some scientists lack whether it is creativity, confidence, or patience. This rhetorical strategy also helps indicate all of the different characteristics that scientists need to be creative and effective in their studies. Barry insists, “To be a scientist requires not only intelligence and curiosity, but passion, patience, creativity, self-sufficiency, and courage.” All of these different qualities have to come together; although, they are very contrasting traits. Numerous qualities are required to be a successful scientist; although all together they establish the effective character of a scientist.
... Their attitude and tone is something that can be contrasted in the two stories.
William Shakespeare's Use of Conflict in Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet. I believe conflict has a number of different meanings, like a fight or perhaps a feud, or maybe even just an everyday argument. But also it could be referred to as a clash, not as a physical clash but a clash. of two different things completely opposite coming together.
A strong example is the way they learn. Santiago learns through observation and actions, while the Englishman can only learn by reading books. They have even tried the other’s method, but failed to learn anything. This is an important difference because they would have to find different methods to learn the same thing, which would take different amounts of time. Another contrast between the two is their beliefs. Santiago is obviously a believer in God, while the Englishman appears to hold to no particular religion. In other words, this means he is more than likely an Atheist. This contrast is more of a conflict between them, as most religious differences are. The Englishman and Santiago’s most significant differences are arguably the ways in which they learn and their religious
When I was little everyone told me I would make a great lawyer, they said I loved to argue. For a long time I believed them, I do love to argue. However, the older I got the more I realized that it wasn’t the arguing I loved, it was the dialog. How two people can have the exact same experience, but have two totally different views about that experience baffled me. When I was in high school I struggled with some things that I didn’t quite understand at the time. I didn’t understand why my teammates would listen to my male co-captain instead of me even when we said the exact same thing. I didn’t understand why my teammates would skip practice or do something that might get them kicked off of the team. We all loved water polo and had a great
In literature there are 3 diffrent types of conflict, man versus man, man versus nature and man verus himself. A conflict is something that opposes the protagonist in the story.
Throughout the movie there are numerous occasions in which the comparisons between the two are noticeable.
...to see that within all of those big differences are many similarities. This includes things such as the occurrence of different series of events, the actions that the main character will take throughout the story, and the traits that people from those societies honor within a hero. All of stages of the cycle that the hero takes produces similar stories within societies without the realization of it.
Comparison and contrast order, items of information are arranged to show the similarities and differences between the items.
In lieu of all of their differences, both had major effects on rhetoric in history.
In photography it is common for images to have similar qualities and at the same time, have qualities that oppose each other. In order to show that two photographs can be similar yet very different, the two images I chose were Chariots of Fire by Adam Bartos and The Open Door by William Henry Fox Talbot. These two images are not only similar and different in regards to their formal elements and composition but the artists who created them are focused on the same goals of their photography. These two photographers grew up differently had had two different interests. I felt that these two images were the best images to compare and contrast. Without learning formal elements such as light, color, depth and balance, these two images would look
(week 4 reading 1). "Difference" is a non-violent approach that indicates that develops the notion that men and women communicate from and in different cultural worlds (reference ppp). Deborah Tannen is a major advocate of this position with her book You Just Don't Understand (1990). (reference week4 reading 1). Comparing conversational goals, Tannen argues that men aim to communicate factual information, whereas women are more concerned with building and maintaining cooperative, caring, emotional relationships. In addition, Cameron (kai imerominia einai to week 4 reading 1) again provides a very good example of ‘difference approach’ helping us to understand the way it entered the public view of language and gender. The example used is the book of a mass-writer, John Gray, who wrote a fictional tale about how the two sexes migrated to planet earth from the different planets of Mars and Venus and that each sex is acclimated to its own planet's society and customs, but not to those of the
I’m the type of guy that would go out and buy a Call of Duty game, pop it open and gather all my friends and jump right into it. Call of Duty is one of the most popular games out and many people love to play. It is competitive, it has online play, and you can also create a clan or group to play against other people around the world online. Call of Duty dates back to 2003 and really wasn’t popular then because it’s all about killing your enemy. Many parents didn’t want their child to play the game. Growing up, I didn’t know much about video games, so I wasn’t really into them until I started playing Call of Duty. Not only does it have military based features, it also has zombies and/or aliens features as well.