Summary Of Religion For Atheists By Alain De Botton

1092 Words3 Pages

Alain de Botton, the author of Religion for atheists : a non-believer's guide to the uses of religion believes that agents should be able to stay as committed atheists and still find religions practical, compelling and encouraging. It is possible for atheists to be uninterested by the doctrines of the Christian Trinity and the Buddhist Eightfold Path and nonetheless at the same time be provided with the ways in which religions save sermons, advocate morality, provoke a spirit of community, inspire travels, motivate gratitude. In the first section of the book 'Wisdom without Doctrine', de Botton holds that it is possible for atheists to balance a disbelief in religion with a selective admiration for religious ceremonies and notions.
According …show more content…

To Christians, the purpose and meaning of education is different from the concept of human nature. Christianity believes that human beings are vulnerable, sinful and far from being knowledgeable. These facts lead Christians to the need of God. De Botton holds that Christianity is more focused on souls rather than intelligence and emotion. Christian's part of job is to "nurture, reassure, comfort and guide our souls" (pg.113). Atheists, on the other hand, hold a new perspective on education, insisting that religions teach wisdom while secular societies offer information. For instance, "Secular education will never succeed in reaching its potential until humanities lecturers are sent to be trained by African-American Pentecostal preachers" (pg.131). Secular society gives agents a pile of new information, and make agents unable to remember the whole information which are taught. Then how should secular education should be changed? According to de Botton, the way could be found from how Christians are being taught.  Just as pastors teaching sermons, ideas need to be presented and repeated. If secular education had redeemed with the way how Christians are taught, most philosophical and informative ideas and figures would have been able to be taught more …show more content…

They believe that even though gospels could be replaced by the secular books, ecclesiastical art could not be replaced. Even if they visit museums or galleries, it is difficult to find piece of art which brings agents to come up with any questions related to religion. To christians, art reveals that "other people are just altered versions of ourselves: fellow fragile, uncertain, flawed being likewise craving love and in urgent need of forgiveness" (pg.227). Christian art has a mission to spread God's words, virtues and vices. It also keep reminds modern society not to forget some important factors of life that could be easily forgotten such as love, hope and faith. De Botton holds that art galleries and museum could be transformed as a new form of church rather than just a place for showing impressive art pieces. Most arguments from this section were agreeable except for the part that the theme of Christian's ecclesiastical art is quite limited. This point of argument is not agreeable since the main goal of ecclesiastical art is to reveal how God saved us and how he created world. It is supposed to have curative powers for people who believe in God rather than painting a variety of different subjects. It should be reminded for most atheists that one of the ecclesiastical art's purposes is a therapeutic

Open Document