Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Christianity and American slavery
The Relationship Between Slavery And Christianity
The importance of religion to slaves
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Christianity and American slavery
Thesis: Paul subtle hints that he does not condone slavery, but it does not outright defy the practice. He uses it many times as a helpful analogy for Christian life, and he encourages believer to stay enslaved it if will help their witness. Paul encourages believers to view everyone as equal, and to stay in whatever position will help them spread the gospel.
Because of the time Paul lived in his view on slavery would be different than what his view on modern slavery might be, additionally it is difficult to obtain information about the plight of slaves in the first century because many of the resources written about them we written by the slave owners instead of the slaves. (Harrill 1, 2000) This could have skewed the information available today. Scholars either believe that slavery was a moral and ethical practice or it was inhuman as it is in modern times. (Bartchy, 1997)
However, biblical scholars do agree that slaves were able to complete the same types of jobs that other freemen could do as well. They were able to be a part of any economic group, and they could have any job from physician to shopkeepers
…show more content…
to magicians to ordinary laborers. Some slaves could accumulate much wealth. This leads many scholars to argue that slavery might not have been as negative of practice as it is in modern times. (Harrill 1, 2000) Paul’s main focus in talking about slavery in the New Testament is ensure that Christians know they should not be in slavery to sin. He wants us to be free from any slavery that would keep them from serving Christ. In Galatians 5:1 he says, “For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery.” Because Paul refers to slavery as a yoke it is hard to think that slavery was not a negative practice at least at times in the first century. From his references in his letters, I think that he did not view slavery as a positive thing. He drops subtle hints that he does not approve of the practice of slavery in 1 Timothy 1, “Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine, in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.” Paul includes slave owners in his list of those who the law is created to help change. This shows that he had a very negative view of slavery, although he did not want to come outright and say it. He dropped this subtle hint in the middle of a long list of groups of sinners to show that he didn’t approve. In Romans 6, Paul uses slavery as a metaphor to how we should behave as Christians. He says, “Do you not know that if you present yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness? But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness. I am speaking in human terms, because of your natural limitations. For just as you once presented your members as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness leading to more lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves to righteousness leading to sanctification.” Paul encourages Christians to view themselves as slaves to sin. This analogy is illuminating for our relationships with God because it shows us that we should value our new position in Christ as his slaves. I think that although slavery could be seen as a negative or derogatory practice in the first century, Paul’s metaphor is not perceived that way because of the prevalence of slavery at that time. Slaves also made up 1/3rd of the population and a much larger percentage had been enslaved earlier in their lives, so when Paul was writing his letter many of his readers could possibly be slaves or former slaves. This could have affected the way he was writing the letter. If he had made a bold statement about his views on slavery, he might have challenged the comfortable positions of people in slavery who were thriving. Also, in the first century not many people were questioning the practice of slavery. If the people he was writing to were happy and being treated well and he condemned their jobs, then they would be very confused and worse off not being a slave. Many slaves could have been active in their faith, and leaving that position would hinder their spreading the gospel more than helping it. (Bartchy, 1997) In Titus 2:9-11 Paul talks about slaves, but he also uses these verses to equalize all people under Christ. He says, “Bondservants are to be submissive to their own masters in everything; they are to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing all good faith, so that in everything they may adorn the doctrine of God our Savior. For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people.” At first I only looked at verse 9-10, but I think what Paul says in the next verse relates well to the idea of slaves as well. He is saying that all people, slaves or free, are equal in God’s eyes and can be saved. This is critical for Paul’s view of slaves. He does not view them as lesser or not as important in the kingdom of God, therefore I think he would condone slavery in the world that hurt the dignity of another person. He would not support derogatory slavery. Paul talks about slaves and master in Ephesians 6:5-9, “Bondservants, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ, not by the way of eye-service, as people-pleasers, but as bondservants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart, rendering service with a good will as to the Lord and not to man, knowing that whatever good anyone does, this he will receive back from the Lord, whether he is a bondservant or is free.
Masters, do the same to them, and stop your threatening, knowing that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and that there is no partiality with him.” In this verse it may see that Paul is contradicting the other things he has said about slavery, but he is actually lining up with them. His wants to show that every slave should have a positive witness to those who are not
believers. 1 Timothy 6:1-2 says, “Let all who are under a yoke as bondservants regard their own masters as worthy of all honor, so that the name of God and the teaching may not be reviled. Those who have believing masters must not be disrespectful on the ground that they are brothers; rather they must serve all the better since those who benefit by their good service are believers and beloved.” This points back to Paul’s desire for slaves to continue in their servanthood as a matter of witness. He recognizes that slaves can have a very positive effect on a people, even if they may seem subservient. However, they are valuable for the spread of the gospel.
Paul Finkelman takes on the role of devil’s advocate in his book “Defending Slavery”. Within the first section of the book, Finkelman explains the background of slavery both in America and around the world, past, post-American Revolution, and around the world. He then goes on to explain the revelations which prompted the South to develop a course of action to defend slavery. In detail and chronological order, he describes the various means of defense used by those in favor of slavery in America. Their justifications for slavery and resistance against its abolishment were rooted in religion, politics, economics and other aspects that drive society.
The fact that he used the Bible to condemn their actions is important for a few reasons: 1.) these people claimed to be Christian men and women, 2.) the Bible was the premier book of history in those times, and 3.) while the slaveholders and the oppressive race might not have feared the consequences of their actions here on Earth, they surely would have feared the consequences for their actions in the afterlife. Asking “ Have we any other Master but Jesus Christ alone? Is he not their Master as well as ours? -- What right then, have we to obey and call any other Master, but Himself?” (Walker) is asking a loaded question. He’s saying to these men “surely you’re not placing yourself about Jesus Christ, are you?” These people may have been slaveholders, but they never would have considered themselves to be
And Jesus is letting them know to remember that you were once slaves and He covered and protected them now they do the same for others that are in the same position as them. Telling them don’t turn their hearts hard or give them their back. And he places this in the article to try to paint the view of blacks where enslaved , had everything taken , and still not giving the right treatment or acknowledgement , so now it’s time for the right return according to what he pulled out of the word. But the scripture from the bible actually in my eyes have nothing to don’t with white supremacy, yes if you pull words of the bile and put it together to fit the situation you need, then yes it will work. But the overall about the scripture from Deuteronomy 15 is Jesus talking and giving a teaching to the former slaves of
Douglass continues to describe the severity of the manipulation of Christianity. Slave owners use generations of slavery and mental control to convert slaves to the belief God sanctions and supports slavery. They teach that, “ man may properly be a slave; that the relation of master and slave is ordained by God” (Douglass 13). In order to justify their own wrongdoings, slaveowners convert the slaves themselves to Christianity, either by force or gentle coercion over generations. The slaves are therefore under the impression that slavery is a necessary evil. With no other source of information other than their slave owners, and no other supernatural explanation for the horrors they face other than the ones provided by Christianity, generations of slaves cannot escape from under the canopy of Christianity. Christianity molded so deeply to the ideals of slavery that it becomes a postmark of America and a shield of steel for American slave owners. Douglass exposes the blatant misuse of the religion. By using Christianity as a vessel of exploitation, they forever modify the connotations of Christianity to that of tyrannical rule and
“...this religion is saying that every person, man, woman, child, slave, barbarian, no matter who, is made in the image of God and is therefore of enormous value in the eyes of God…”(Document C). “Now the Christian community, as we have it particularly in the letters of Paul, … says in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, neither male or female, neither slave nor free… . Here is a community that invites you, which makes you an equal with all other members of that community,” (Document D). This was beneficial to a wide range of people, especially peasants because they could have a part in society and be equal to their Christian peers.
Plans are revealed to, “hold a separate service on Sundays for [the slaves’] benefit,” in which pointed sermons were to be delivered to the slaves (Jacobs 57-58). One such sermon is inherently accusatory and meant to instill fear in its slave audience. Statements such as “God is angry with you,” “You tell lies”. God hears you,” and “God sees you and will punish you” serve to foster a sense of guilt and fear within the slaves, casting disobedience in any form as an affront against God, one that merits divine punishment (Jacobs 58). The sermon creates an emotional tie to profitable slave behavior – obedience stemming from fear – which it goes on to enforce as the will of God: “If you disobey your earthly Master,” the preacher claims, “you offend your heavenly Master” (Jacobs 58).
Slave-owners forced a perverse form of Christianity, one that condoned slavery, upon slaves. According to this false Christianity the enslavement of “black Africans is justified because they are the descendants of Ham, one of Noah's sons; in one Biblical story, Noah cursed Ham's descendants to be slaves” (Tolson 272). Slavery was further validated by the numerous examples of it within the bible. It was reasoned that these examples were confirmation that God condoned slavery. Douglass’s master...
Slavery was a dominant part of the political and social arenas of 1800’s America. However, it was not homogenous as it divided America into two distinct groups: those who supported it and those who did not. Traditionally, the states in the north had been anti-slavery while the states in the south had been pro-slavery. Southern life and economy depended on slavery and therefore staunchly supported the continued legal status of slavery. The northern states on the other hand recognized the inhumane nature of slavery and campaigned to establish equality for all citizens. In order to establish solid reasoning for their stance, both pro-slave and anti-slave groups turned to theological inspiration for their actions. The Bible inspired both pro-slavery advocates and anti-slavery abolitionists alike. Religion was used in order to justify slavery and also to condemn it.
For a male slave in Arabia, there were limited options, if already castrated (which was a familiar practice), they were used as eunuchs, mostly in the service of the mosques or for the protection of harems. A system of plantation labour, developed early, but with such terrible consequences, these were relatively rare and often reduced. The need for agricultural labour, in Islam with large peasant populations, was nowhere near as critical as in the Americas, so this didn’t really succeed and slaves in general, were mainly directed at the service sector, the men being cooks, porters and/or soldiers. While slaves were sometimes employed for manual labour during the Arab slave trade, this was usually the exception rather than the norm. In America, slaves were guaranteed hard labour designed exclusively for males like ditch men, ploughme...
Because it offers them the possibility of community and identity, many slaves find themselves strongly attached to religion. They cannot build a family structure and they cannot be identified by family name, but through the church, they can build a community and identify themselves as Christians. This comfort becomes virtually non-existent for it too is controlled by the slaveowners who “came to the conclusion that it would be well to give the slaves enough of religious instruction to keep them from murdering their masters” (57). The fact that one person could have the ability to control the amount of religion another person has and his purpose for having it diminishes any sense of community or identity that it may have initially provided.
...ing the general public to view their fellow men, as less than what they truly are, their equals. The institution of slavery has blinded the clergy and churches of America, causing them to sit idly by as an injustice is being brought upon God’s people, a god that all men share. Christianity has become a tool in which the separation of whom receives liberties and whom does not becomes its clearest. As Douglass says “ At the very moment that they are thanking God for the enjoyment of civil and religious liberty […] they are utterly silent in respect to a law which robs religion of its chief significance, and makes it utterly useless to a world lying in wickedness.” Christianity has become a tool of oppression for the elite; used to deny unalienable rights to their fellow man, the same rights their own fathers had fought so valiantly for during the founding of America.
was a better life awaiting them. "The Spirit of the Lord allowed black slaves to
By 1860, nearly 3,950,528 slaves resided in the United States (1860 census). Contrary to popular belief, not all slaves worked in hot and humid fields. Some slaves worked as skilled laborers in cities or towns. The slaves belonged to different social or slave classes depending on their location. The treatment of the slaves was also a variable that changed greatly, depending on the following locations: city, town or rural.
The most common use of a slave was to have the around the house to do common tasks such as cleaning the house, washing the clothing, cooking, and taking care of the infants with supervision from the mother. Although these were the major uses of a slave there were a few that also educated and were allowed to teach others what they have learned. Plutarch told a story of a man named Cato that had born a son, but he did not wish that his son to be taught by a lowly servant. He wanted his son to have a good education and to not have to owe respect to a slave. Cato wrote many books for his son so that he may never leave the house and encounter false teachings from others. He also taught his son everything that he needed to know about grammar and law. He not only showed his son about the exercise of the mind, he also showed him the exercise of the body also. Cato showed his son how to box, how to stay in shape and get ready for war. Cato wanted none of these things were to be learned from a slave, and none of them were. Slaves were teachers and house hold workers but also since they co...
Slavery goes against god. The slaves should not give in to slavery. “ It is your