Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Collectivism vs individualism
Collectivism vs individualism
A write-up on pride
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Collectivism vs individualism
The confidence in oneself used to be disregarded. In the East, Confucius preached humility as “the foundation of all virtues”. In Christianity, Pride is considered to be one of the deadly sins. For the majority of human societal history, we squeeze ourselves into the mold of what is expected and humbled ourselves to preserve the stability and harmony of the group. With the age of enlightenment came Individualism and with it, the rise of Pride. For centuries, humility is what kept civilizations on a relative state of stability. One would argue that stability doesn’t mean progress. It is the belief that an individual can strive for something greater than themselves, to pursue greatness and to dream is what push humanity forward. In Jonathan Haidt’s passage The Danger of Naive Realism, the author speaks of how people of western society have a high regard of themselves, with the believe of being above the mediocrity. Professor Haidt believes that this belief brings the notion of over-self-entitlement. Introducing the such phenomena as “naive realism”, Haidt discussed the problems caused from such high self-esteem, believing that it is …show more content…
While one can understand others, it doesn’t mean there is no conflicts of interest. Moreover, it should be recognized that understanding and agreeing are different things. I can understand my roommate’s distastes for doing the dishes while still wanting him to do it because I myself dislike washing dishes. He can acknowledges the fact that I already washed them the previous turn and we can still argue about it. Just because we have understandings, we still have conflicts of interest. Coca-cola and Pepsi are locked in rivalry not because of the lack of understanding between two corporations but because of the conflict of interest for the soft drink
He proposes an experiment where he had a large group of students rate their self-esteem and how much it depended on what others thought. Then he picked a few individuals who- question after question- said they were completely unaffected by the opinion of others. He took those individuals plus the other individuals who admitted to being affected by what others had to say about them, to a lab a few weeks later and had them talk about themselves for five minutes, speaking into a microphone. At the end of each minute, they saw a number flash on the screen indicating how much the person in the other room wanted to interact with them. With ratings one to seven (seven being best), you can imagine how it would feel to see the numbers drop 4…3…2…3…2…etc. Not surprisingly, people who admitted that they cared about what others thought had huge reactions to the numbers, and their self-esteem sank. But the self-proclaimed mavericks suffered shocks almost just as big. They might not have thought that other people’s opinions mattered to them, but when it showed the numbers right in front of their face, the indeed had a negative reaction. Haidt’s quote “Our reasoning is less for our own benefit, and more to convince others of our stance” sums point number one
Feeling good about oneself is an inherently good thing; however when this is intensified so severely that it becomes the focus of everyday life, complications and consequences may occur. Jean Twenge tries to warn today’s “Generation Me” about the dangers of their obsession with the self in her piece, “An Army of One: Me.” This desire to look out for only the individual has dramatic effects on the direction of today’s society. What has also evolved out of this self adoring society is a seemingly endless need for argument, especially in the educational field, an issue addressed by Debora Tannen in her essay, “The Roots of Debate in Education and the Hope of Dialogue.” Of course, no researchers or educational experts expected the negative results such as narcissism and argumentative culture that followed from these teaching methods. These are unintended consequences and displaced risks, just as the types addressed in Edward Tenner’s, “Another Look Back, and A Look Ahead” but applied to a different subject. In effect, one problem causes another as an excess of self-esteem more often than not leads to narcissism. That development of narcissism promotes an argumentative culture in which everyone thinks they are right because confidence in oneself is far too high. Revenge effects may include constant irritability and excessive sensitivity, a lack of obtaining a good education, or in some cases pure laziness. Through a flawed system of education and the development of Generation Me, the attitude of the United States has unintentionally drifted towards narcissism and discontent.
It is a fact that many human beings nowadays, or more specifically, those growing up under the influence of the American dream, have an attitude of entitlement. This directly relates to the idea that the world owes these individuals something. Often, one may find themselves taking things for granted and expecting things at no cost – all descriptions of the ordinary lives of many Americans. It may be true, that a sense of entitlement is naturally distilled into young children, and we may even be breeding human beings to have this element condensed into them at a young age. Children grow up with a sense of entitlement. We know what they want, when they want it. This further continues through a child’s life
People should forget pride and do what is best for others because it makes them a better person, even though having pride in accomplishments is praiseworthy. It is important to realize that modern society does not usually praise an individual’s pride because it is viewed as arrogant and boastful. Furthermore, people should strive to do what is best for the most people, and admit to their mistakes, because it makes them a better person, even if they have to abandon their beliefs.
Coke continuously out-stands Pepsi, even though they share a very similar taste and colour, however Coke should not be the drink that receives all the love and attention for what it offers. Despite their similar soda colour, the drinks actually contain some different ingredients, which produce a different taste, and affect the body differently. Furthermore, the way the companies markets their drinks makes a huge contribution to how successful their products will become. The major element for success however stems from their impact on society and how the companies utilize their social power to evolve. The two major soda companies are constantly head to head with one another, yet it is what they do that sets them apart.
Pride is at the root of nearly every problem man struggles to solve. The prideful hold the inability to be guilty, which makes them undeserving of forgiveness. The proud’s ignorance turns them into an incriminating character, while the modest remain good. The modest recognize their mistakes for the reason that they want self-improvement. Personal growth and self-improvement are crucial to maximize one’s own potential.
Bottling Network: Both Coke and PepsiCo have franchisee agreements with their existing bottler’s who have rights in a certain geographic area in perpetuity. These agreements prohibit bottler’s from taking on new competing brands for similar products. Also with the recent consolidation among the bottler’s and the backward integration with both Coke and Pepsi buying significant percent of bottling companies, it is very difficult for a firm entering to find bottler’s willing to distribute their product.
PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company are both strong companies with billions in sales each year. A creditor, investor or business planner would each evaluate the company in different ways using different ratio and financial analysis. As an investor, I see Pepsi as a larger company with more assets and I would expect them to have a larger market share as a result. Coca-Cola, however, appears to be a stable company capable of growth with investment priorities in their own companies. Slight changes by either company could propel them to the head of the industry, although they are both industry leaders.
Although produced by main market players, soft carbonated drinks cost more than similar products from local and private label manufacturers, consumers are willing to pay an extra price for the name, particular taste, and image. Fierce competition in the CSD industry forces Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to expand into new and emerging markets which present high potential for the company’s development. However, some foreign markets proved to be highly competitive. Coca-Cola Company’s operations in China faced antitrust regulations, advertising restrictions, and foreign exchange controls. iii.
Therefore, the long-term brand of Coca cola and better pricing strategies would help in competing with Pepsi. Unlike, Pepsi, Coca cola had targeted entering into partnership and alliances with local distributors and firms. This helps to develop strong relationship within the domestic firms to reduce the domestic barriers and thus, enhance the company’s competitiveness (Thabet, 2015). Lastly, the Asian markets consist of related and supporting industries to the soft drink industry that helps the companies in gaining a strong competitive position in the markets. Based on the competitive advantage of nation’s model, Coca cola has more home based advantages to develop a competitive advantage in relation to other countries on a global
Control of market share is the key issue in this case study. The situation is both Coke and Pepsi are trying to gain market share in this beverage market, which is valued at over $30 billion a year. Just how is this done in such a competitive market is the underlying issue. The facts are that each company is coming up with new products and ideas in order to increase their market share.
The case study "Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in the Twenty-First Century" focuses on describing Coke and Pepsi within the CSD industry by providing detailed statements about the companies’ accounts and strategies to increase their market share. Furthermore, the case also focuses on the Coke vs. Pepsi goods which target similar groups of costumers, and how these companies have had and still have great reputation and continue to take risks due to their high capital. This analysis of the Cola Wars Continue case study will focus mainly on the profitability of the industry by carefully considering and analyzing the below questions:
As the world 's largest manufacturer and distributor of non-alcoholic beverages, Coca-Cola is certainly no stranger to global marketing. Established in the US, Coca-Cola initiated its global expansion in 1919 and now markets to more than 200 countries worldwide. It is one of the most recognizable brands on the planet and also owns a large portfolio of other soft drink brands including Schweppes, Oasis, 5 alive, Kea Oar, Fanta, Lilt, Dr Pepper, Sprite and PowerAde. Despite this, Coca-Cola often struggles to maintain its market share over its main rival PepsiCo in some overseas markets, particularly Asian countries.
Their advertising techniques set them apart as Coca-Cola still seems to market themselves as a “classic” company, and Pepsi seems to be more interested in modern methods market themselves. I am not discrediting anything that is classic, but as the world continues to grow and innovate we must move with it, if we continue to live in the past we will be left behind. Coca-Cola’s included image of Marilyn Monroe, a “classic” icon, and Pepsi’s included image of Beyoncé Knowles, a “modern” icon proves this point, which is why would Pepsi’s advertisement is more effective at attracting
Pepsi and Coca-Cola are both sodas, but they differ in terms of the satisfying flavors, the color and the graphic design that represents their two products, and then how Coke makes more money than Pepsi. With that said, you should have gotten the ideology of what we will go further in discussing about. Everybody loves these two very well-known sodas which can inject caffeine into you, which makes you all jittery in filling you up with an energetic energy. Alright, enough of this, let's go straight in-depth in talking about the two rivals throughout this paper of how Pepsi beats Coke in sales, but Coke is usually ahead when it comes to annual net income (Feigin) or how Pepsi is a sweeter brand compared to Coke, though Coke brand is more valuable