Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on serial killers
Essays on serial killers
Essays on serial killers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on serial killers
Copyrighted in 2004, Michael Connelly’s book, The Narrows, details the story of the return of “The Poet” within 487 pages. The book is about FBI agent Rachel Walling and LAPD detective Harry Bosch. The two are at odds with the FBI and in the direct path of The Poet- a serial killer. The story continues when bodies are unearthed in a California desert after Bosch discovers that McCaleb’s death might have not been natural at all. At the site, he meets Walling, thus bringing the two to join forces on the hunt to bring the killer behind bars once and for all. The book has all the ingredients of a good thriller and had a great combination of both suspense and action. The book didn’t elicit feelings of a “who did it” perspective at all, it was simply a hunt for a serial killer and there was never a doubt as to who the killer was. In my opinion, The Narrows was called this to parallel Bosch’s past to the measures that needed to be taken to stop The Poet. When the book moved forward, I had absolutely no idea how I would investigate or solve it because of how intricate and careful The Poet was in all of his murders. Though he was developed quite nicely, the intricacy and story itself, though was exciting, doesn’t sound 100% realistic- excluding the Zodiac Killer, of course. Well, maybe it can happen, it’s …show more content…
He doesn't leave clues, but does leave all the information out there, so if you are following the story, you will most likely be able to piece together the parts need to complete the story, thus unravelling all its secrets, but he always leaves a few components that you won't find out until the very end. Moreover, Connelly finished the book in a way that left no questions unanswered. The characters were very compelling and very real. The descriptions were graphic enough that a few nauseated me, when it came to the crime scenes mostly, but to have physical reactions as well as emotional ones is the sign of a great
The book is great with the plot mainly focused in the courtroom, but it feels like the author put the plot of the story from different events that happened to younger people and not from one whole event. Finally, the document went into depth of how the defense attorney went on to get every piece of evidence as possible to make the eyes of the jury see that Brenton Butler was not the person that shot and killed the
The story itself was quite interesting. The characters are believable and some had obvious arcs, the plot seems well paced, and most plot points are memorable. The dialogue didn’t seem forced, and flowed fairly realistically. The conflict, Devine Corporations vs the Beanfield (well, really, it’s owner but…), ended well, with Devine not being able to do anything about it, not for a lack of trying. Overall, the story was fairly interesting. The oldest man in their town’s whole story was, in particular, quite interesting. I’m still wondering about a few things, specifically to do with the illusion/ghost/whatever the old guy kept speaking with. That whole plot point both confuses and intrigues me. The only problem I have with the story is the student who came to work on a thesis paper. His whole character and insert into the story just seemed forced. He truly wasn't
After reading the story, I found I had mixed emotions about it. To explain, when we were getting into detail and finally finding out what really happened the day of June 28th, I found myself completely interested and glued to the book. I also enjoyed the way the incident was explained because I felt like I was there watching it all happen from the great detail. I enjoyed Phillips style of writing because through his writing, he really came off as an intelligent person who is very familiar with the legal system. The book is an easy read, and I liked the non-pretentious style of writing. I did not find myself struggling with reading the book at all, which made the overall experience that much more enjoyable.
As the story went own new clues were uncovered slowly but surely. This book really made you think you knew who the murderer was, but would then send you yet again in another direction. So, the technique used to give you clues was very effective in letting you solve the case on your journey through this murder. Ellen Raskin made is harder to find the clues than to understand the characters. This fact is a good thing because clues are suppose to be hidden, not right out in the open. On page 45 Shin Hoo muttered that the clues were jibberish, for they had to find out what they meant, because it would not be a real mystery if the clues were just given to them. Overall Ellen Raskin did a great job giving clues out to the reader so they could solve the
Finding clues left by the author is essential for figuring out where a story’s headed. Readers can find these clues and use them to create a hypothesis in their own mind of how the story will end. “There was Slade and here was Mr. Baumer with his bills and here I was, just as before,
It is very interesting to note how the conventions of 1940’s hardboiled private eye fiction translate into the 1970’s. The low-rent drabness of the genre loses much of its allure. The dark shadows and long nights of urban Los Angeles become the bright lights and warm sunshine of Malibu beaches. The detective’s normally snappy dialogue turns into joking asides. Marlowe’s hardboiled narration becomes the self-conscious mutterings of a lonely man talking to himself. The romantic myth of a man set apart from the city is turned on its head as a pathetic man living alone with his cat.
Perkins, Geroge, and Barbara Perkins. The American Tradition in Literature. 12th ed. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw Hill, 2009. Print
By leaving some crucial details ambiguous, Faulkner adds to the over-all ambiguity of the story. He tantalizes his readers, makes them think for themselves, and thus makes them active readers of the story rather than merely passive recipients of information
in Adventures in American Literature. Ed. Fannie Safier et al. Athena Edition. Austin: Holt, 1996.
Richard Connells “The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story which illustrates that calm analytical thinking can increase your odds of survival and controlling panic.
Self, Will. "Hell, High Water and Heroin: On the Trail of a British Gonzo Journalist to Compare with Hunter S Thompson." New Statesman 10.445 (21 Mar. 1997): 46-47. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism Select. Detroit: Gale, 2008. Literature Resource Center. Web. 2 Mar. 2014.
As I read the novel, I constantly thought about questions such as the following: What importance does he have to write about this? Can I relate this to my life? Who is Alexie’s audience? Can anyone read this novel and learn something from it? By the time I completed the novel, I could answer all of these questions without a doubt.
Rysavy, Tracy. "Secrets of a Poet Spy." Yes. A Journal of Positive Futures. Oct. 1999. 16. Sept. 2003.
The criminal underworld has been an essential aspect of crime fiction since the concept emerged in the mid-eighteenth century. While many authors have constructed their own idealistic conceptualizations of the criminal underworld, they have implemented distinct boundaries between the “good” and “evil” features of society. These opposing “worlds” often intertwine when the protagonist, a crusader for good, is thrust into the hellscape of society’s underworld. The novels A Rage in Harlem by Chester Himes, and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson feature protagonists from differing backgrounds who embark on treacherous journeys through the criminal underworld.
Literature: From Faulkner and Morrison to Walker and Silko, American Literature Readings in the 21st Century. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008. Print.