Summary Of Melissa Dittmann's 'Lord Of The Flies'

1129 Words3 Pages

Several people have experienced instances where their behavior when isolated or part of a group differed from their usual self. Groupthink and isolation may at times lead humans to make reckless choices. Lord of the Flies depicts these events and actions, which Melissa Dittmann indirectly analyzes in her article "Why do good people do bad things”. The actions of the boys in Lord of the Flies are revealed by the studies Dittmann analyzes in that their seclusion leads faltering identities in response to their emergent tribalism revealing the fragility of civilized behaviors. Faltering Pre-existing Identities Dittman's article explains how a change in societal norms can lead to drastic changes in behavior. As time passes, a few of the island's …show more content…

The sticks fell and the mouth of the new circle crunched and screamed. The beast was on its knees in the center, its arms folded over its face. It was crying out against the abominable noise, something about a body on the hill. At once the crowd surged after it, poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed, struck, bit, tore. (Golding p. 152)” The boys, including Ralph and Piggy (the most logical and sane ones) partake in the killing of Simon simply because they were part of a larger group. This illustrates the boys' descent into savagery as a result of their isolation and group circumstance, as the civilized norms they were conditioned by start to crumble. Psychologists explore how group situations and dynamics affect human thought and decision making. Dittmann states, there's also a group effect when all of you are masked. It provides fear in other people because they can't see you, and you lose your humanity” (Dittmann 10). When one is part of a group, they usually aren't seen as an individual, but as part of the larger …show more content…

“That line between good and evil is permeable,” Zimbardo said. “Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out” (Dittmann 3). The boys in Lord of the Flies gradually revert to savagery and violence, abandoning their initial attempts at maintaining civilized order as they adapt to their environment. Civilized behavior is fragile, as shown by the fact that it is fundamentally situational. Their descent into tribalism, triggered by their situation, highlights the permeability of the between good and evil. Tough situations, like those on the island, can disrupt previously held identities and societal norms, leading to adverse behaviors. “Piggy and Ralph, under the threat of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this demented but partly secure society” (Golding 152). For instance, the once civil and intellectual Piggy becomes involved in Simon's death, illustrating the influence of crowd behavior and the loss of individual moral judgment in extreme situations. “You don't need a motive,” Zimbardo said. “All you really need is a situation that facilitates moving across that line of good and evil” (Dittmann 15). This demonstrates the phenomenon that Dittmann discusses in her article, where she notes that individuals can commit

Open Document