Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sleep paralysis essayt
Sleep paralysis essayt
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sleep paralysis essayt
Laughing and nightmares do not usually go together. It takes courage to confront a nightmare and laugh. Shane Burcaw, the protagonist of the autobiographical book “Laughing At My Nightmare,” deals with nightmares” all his life. He is a 21-year old man living somewhere in the United States. He has a girlfriend. He likes to play basketball, watch TV, and tell jokes. Shane appears to be a typical young adult, except that he is not. He has spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), which binds him to his wheelchair, robs him of his movement, and gives him nightmares because he can die any moment. “Laughing At My Nightmare,” starts when Shane is two, and he first experiences difficulty moving. The book continues to describe Shane’s life year by year. …show more content…
It mentions how in the 5th grade Shane went to a camp. We see how Shane struggles with his daily life, how he is forced to rely on his caretakers for all things. Shane manages to get through high school, and then finishes college. College is the time when his neck muscles get weaker and make his head fall from time to time, and then later he loses his ability to chew and speak clearly. Not all things are bleak, however: Shane gets a girlfriend, and he starts a successful charity. Shane copes with his misfortune with humor, and the book is written in a humorous tone, both ha-ha silly humor and sarcastic humor.
For example, when Shane needs to pee in a jar and it tips on him and his mattress, he says “Nooooo” and starts cracking up. On another occasion, he talks about his disfigured arms and says “My severely atrophied arms are sexy” and “My arms are like T-rex arms.” Shane is mentally strong. He has learned how to accept his disease. For example, he says “Look at me, I have a method for dealing with my problems that fall into this category have to do with my disease. Some examples include: realizing my arms are a lot weaker than they were a year ago, thinking about my long term future, and being unable to do things because of my wheelchair.” Shane is charitable. He devotes much of his time to his foundation “Laughing at My Nightmare.” He visits places and tries to inspire people. He also hosts Q&A sessions online and during …show more content…
meet-ups. Shane is taken care of by his dad, his brother and his best friend, Patt.
In the words of Shane, “Patt, who was a year younger than me and would eventually grow up to be one of my closest friends.” Patt spends most of his time with Shane playing video games, chatting, and playing basketball. They are having fun together despite Shane’s disability. Once upon a time, Patt and Shane’s brother attached a rope to Shane’s wheelchair. They threaded the rope through a basketball hoop and tied the other end of the rope to Shane’s brother. Then Shane and Patt started to pull the rope, so that Shane’s brother could do a slam dunk. Unfortunately, this did not work. They broke the chair, and Shane’s dad had to pay $4,000 for a pair of new
wheels. This is a serious book with a charismatic hero, Shane. It will be particularly helpful to readers who are shy and insecure because it will inspire them to do things. Whatever problems they might have probably pale in comparison with Shane’s. If Shane can overcome his physical challenges and be mentally strong, so can they. For those like me, who are more interested in facts than feelings, this book can be useful too. It nudges to think about the human emotions. Lastly, “Laughing at my nightmare” is written in an entertaining way and it is rich with humor. So, those readers who like comedy, jokes, and laughter will find it to be quite captivating despite the serious topic.
The essays, “On Being a Cripple”, by Nancy Mairs, and “Living Under Circe’s Spell”, by Matthew Soyster are both about how each author deals with multiple sclerosis in their life and their opinions on it. Mairs’ piece is a careful examination of her experience with MS and her perspective towards her future. In contrast, Soyster writes humorously of a particular incident he had with MS and artfully weaves his ideas about the disease in with his story. In both instances, the authors share the purpose of narrating their encounter with MS to the world to raise awareness. Both employ the rhetorical strategies of appeals to pathos and varying sentence structures to achieve this goal, some more effectively than others.
In this work Nancy Mairs, a woman with multiple sclerosis, discusses why she calls herself a cripple as opposed to the other names used by society to describe people with disabilities. She prefers the word “cripple” over the words “disabled” and “handicapped”. Nancy Mairs presents herself as a cripple using a straightforward tone, negative diction, repetition, and logical/ethical appeal.
As the story continues and McMurphy’s influence over the patients strengthens, the reader sees other occasions where the laughter is healing. With McMurphy’s big, boisterous laugh dominating the ward, the patients begin to laugh themselves. Their laughs sound awkward at first- forced, simulated- but nevertheless they are laughing and whether the patients, or Bromden realize it, this phony laugh does begin to heal them.
In her essay “On Being a Cripple,” Mairs describes her path of acceptance of her multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis by declaring that she is a “cripple” in alternative to the more broadly acceptable terms: disabled or handicapped. Her essay is written with humor, satire, an open heart, and open eyes. Mair’s purpose is to describe her acceptances of her condition by using rhetorical elements and appeals, such as ethos and pathos, in order to allure her audience.
“As a cripple, I swagger,” she says, expressing one of her weaknesses that she has no worries about because of how comfortable she is with herself.
Clare provides different paradigms of disability in order to demonstrate the wide variety of views concerning disabilities. He states that the paradigms of disability "all turn disability into problems faced by individual people, locate those problems in our bodies, and define those bodies as wrong," (Clare, 2001, p. 360). The first paradigm model Clare explains is the medical model which defines disability as a disease or a condition that is treatable. Next, he explains that the charity model defines disability as a tragedy and the supercrip model defines disability as a tough challenge that individuals overcome; the supercrip model makes individuals with disabilities out to be superheroes. Lastly, Clare explains that the moral model defines disability as a weakness. In order to demonstrate the paradigms and how they overlap, Clare cleverly uses an array of popular examples. One significant example is Jerry Lewis' telethon. During this time, Jerry Lewis attempts to raise money in order to find a cure for a condition. Overall, his Labor Day telethon raises money to end a disability by finding a cure for the broken bodies. This telethon employs the medical model because it demonstrates disability as a condition that needs to be treated. In addition, the telethon employs the charity model because it shows disability as a misfortune. All four disability paradigms are known as the social model because they are the ideas that society has about certain bodies. When society creates these ideas about disabilities, they create unnatural
“I am a Cripple,” when people typically hear these words, they tend to feel bad for that person, but that is exactly what Mair does not want. She prefers that people treat her the same way they would if she did not have the disease. Throughout the essay, Mair discusses her disease openly. She uses an optimistic tone, so that the reader will not recoil with sadness when they hear her discuss the disease and how it affects her life. In Nancy Mair’s essay “On Being A Cripple,” Mair uses her personal stories, diction, and syntactical structures to create an optimistic tone throughout the essay, so that the audience can better connect with the story.
I have used a wheelchair my entire life, but it wasn’t until Friday Night Lights premiered on NBC in 2008 that I ever saw a character who looked like me on television. Jason Street, whose accident precipitates the plot of the show, was the first disabled main character I had ever seen on TV. He was paralyzed, and I am not, but for the first time there was a character who reflected the daily idiosyncrasies that come from being in a wheelchair.
I specifically made a connection to the part when it said “Rick realized that he too could raise awareness of the physical and mental barriers that disable people face” (page 44). That sentence relates to 31 year old Spencer West. He was born with sacral agenesis, a genetic disorder causing him to have no limbs waist down. Spencer decided to climb mountain Kilimanjaro. Spencer worked day and night to climb up that mountain with his two friends. They made it to the top of the mountain saying it was all worth it. He said “I set out to climb Mt. Kilimanjaro not only to redefine what's possible for me, but to inspire others to overcome obstacles and challenges of their own, and to give back to communities, that need our help reaching the peak of Mt. Kilimanjaro was the most mentally and physically challenging thing I have ever done, but in doing so, it reinforced the powerful message behind believing in yourself, and believing in others so many people made this journey possible for me and I am so humbled by everyone's support”. Still to this day this article inspires me to do what I believe in. The second text to world connection I made is with the part when he said “After the accident he started coaching”. That reminds me of 51 year old Sudha Chandran lost her leg to a terrible accident at the age of 16 due to that her leg had to be amputated .Even though she had barely any use of her right leg she became one of
Question: Misunderstandings between the anthropologists and the people whose ways of life he/she is attempting to understand are often the most revealing moments of fieldwork. Discuss one or two of Bowen’s mistakes and explore what they told her about the Tiv and herself.
The book I am reading, laughing at my nightmare by Shane Burcaw, shows three different types of conflict: man vs self, man vs society, and man vs man. Shane, the main character, and author of laughing at my nightmare, deals with struggles with himself and others. Man vs self is defined as an internal conflict that a character overcomes making he/she make their own choices. Man vs society, an external conflict, is where a character strongly believes against a majority of a community or surroundings and decides to act upon it. In other words, man vs society is one against many. Lastly, man vs man is an external conflict with another character.
The author writes, "People–crippled or not–wince at the world "cripple", as they do not at "handicapped" or "disabled." (Perhaps I want them to wince. I want them to see me as a tough customer, one whom the fates/gods/viruses have not been kind, but who can face the brutal truth of her existence squarely. As a cripple, I swagger." (194) This quote shows the author's strength and sense of humor. These are the two things which allow her to honestly face the truth of her situation as well as how other people react to it. She does not want pity from people who see her limping down the street with her cane, nor does she want them to shy away as though she is some ...
An old proverb states “laughter is the best medicine”. After Randall McMurphy arrives into the hospital, most of the men start to laugh for the first time in many years. The more time McMurphey spends there, the men that are starting to laugh multiplies. They find the littlest things to put a smile on their face, but no one can take this away from them.
In the book See Ya Simon by David Hill one of the main characters is Simon Shaw. Simon has Muscular Dystrophy and doesn’t have very long to live. This book is about him and his friend Nathan and all the stuff they do together in Simon’s final year of life. Simon is important because the story is about him having Muscular Dystrophy. He teaches us that having Muscular Dystrophy is difficult but he shows that it doesn’t hold him back and that he can do pretty much anything. He teaches us to live life to the fullest because you never know what can happen. He teaches and affects other characters and the way they behave. He stays positive despite him struggling with Muscular Dystrophy. He shows how he had an impact on so many other people’s lives in such a short amount of time. “Let them ask, they’ve got to learn about these sorts of things. I don’t mind telling them.
I think it was at its peak from about the age of twelve to roughly