Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How identities shape individuals
The role of identity
The role of identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. The word face as defined today has many different connotations. Simply and most commonly it is often thought about as the part of the body, which is most often seen and recognizable to others. Because of this, it can be said to be one of the most vulnerable parts of the body. It can also be understood at a front or more often mask that people put up to disguise their true selves. The expression” that’s just a face” infers that the subject being talked about is hiding behind the face and is not being real or true to what they are. As Levinas explained his meaning of the face in Totality and Infinity he drew upon this idea. In his view, if something had a face then it was more accessible and easier to deal with. This is applicable to the physical world in many ways. …show more content…
If something is visible it is easier to understand and thus comprehend.
This idea is also expressed in chapter 1 of Eboo Patel's Act of Faith. Throughout the chapter, Patel familiarizes the reader with several suicide bombers. Through this, he is essentially giving them a ‘face’. Although he doesn’t go into much detail on their appearance, he does talk about their lives and their families. This allows them to become more comprehensible and show that they truly are just people. A quote from Terry McDermott simplifies it quite well on page 3 as he concludes,” The men of September 11 were, regrettably, I think, fairly ordinary men.” It's an idea that Levinas also touches on in this paper on page 197 when he talks about ‘faceless gods’ having power over people. This concept confirms the belief that if something, in this case, someone, is not seen seem bigger or more powerful that they really are. These conclusions that terrorist are truly just people wouldn’t have come together if they had remained anonymous. It is the power of the face that allowed Patel and others to be able to relate to them and see them as they truly are. Levinas says on page 194,” In gaining access to in I maintain myself within the same,” to say that by seeing it and understanding it he relates to
it. In this way, the ‘face’ can also be understood as the truth, which in itself is independent and can be altered by identity or personalization because one person's truth is often not the same as another person's truth, and both of those truths are often different from the true or real truth. In this way, the truth cannot be contained or understood because the reality of it can never be seen. Truth and face are often synonymous and because they are unseen and intangible they will forever remain incomprehensible. The ‘face’, who a person is, the truth of that person are all present and real because they cannot be comprehended, if they were to be then they would seize to be. The ’face’, who you are to others, how you present yourself and interact with others exists and is real because it can’t be defined.
As Author, Amitava Kumar, shares an unusual story that tells of a law that is
Perspective allows people to see another person’s point of view. In the essay “The Cabdriver’s Daughter” by Waheeda Samady, she addresses her perception versus society’s opinion of her father. In her eyes, her father is a person capable of displaying kindness and expressing his profound knowledge while for some Americans, he is their preconceived notion of what a terrorist might look like. She challenges people to look past his scars and the color of skin, and “look at what the bombs did not destroy” (19). To her, he is the man that has lived through the Soviet-Afghan War, persevered through poverty, and denied these experiences the power of changing him into a cantankerous person. Samady feels prideful of her father’s grit through his past experiences yet feels sorrowful thinking about the life he could have lived if the war had never happened.
Among these forms of support is the use of examples and the persuasive appeal to pathos. One way Kimmel uses pathos is when he discusses the backgrounds of Timothy McVeigh, Adolf Hitler, and Mohammed Atta; three men who, according to Kimmel, have something other than widespread destruction in common, this something is a feeling of emasculation and enervation, “What unites Atta, McVeigh, and Hitler is not their repressed sexual orientation but gender - - their masculinity, their sense of masculine entitlement and their thwarted ambitions (Kimmel par. 25).” Kimmel uses these three men’s backgrounds to make them appear more personable to the audience, as well as to revise the audience’s stereotypical beliefs about terrorists, creating a feeling of empathy towards these three terrorists from the audience that may not have been previously present, “Looking at these two men through the lens of gender may shed some light on both the method and the madness of the tragedies they wrought (Kimmel par. 7).” This quote gives a direct statement from Kimmel himself as he tries to gain understanding from the audience towards the men he is writing about, showing how Kimmel is looking for the audience to perceive these men’s acts of terror in sequence with the circumstances of which they were derived. Kimmel continues to constrain the audience and
According to Junot Diaz’s short story "No Face", it’s sort of a reimagining of Ysrael’s life as a superhero narrative. Diaz explores how a man’s mental growth is stunted by his community’s perpetual scrutiny of him for reasons beyond his control and he relates the story in a very masculinity way which makes the story a powerful and strong with the character named No Face. He’s created a fantasy world in which to live, separate from the world that is so cruel to him. The story function here as the introduction of hope and revelation that such hope is fanciful. The influence of masculinity supports No Face’s goal and motive through his story.
Rachel Held Evans in “Faith Unraveled” questions every part of her religion, and is not sure how she should be living her life. Evans struggles to fully believe in faith that Christians are supposed to. She has all these questions and doubts, and is looking for answers but struggles to find the answers. Other Christians think what she is doing is unfaithful and she is not a real Christian. She is curious how people who profess Gods’ holy name, but then do not act in a holy way will be judged. Skeptics exist in almost every aspect of life, but when it comes to religion there seems to be a lot more. She struggles to handle some of the questions the skeptics ask and makes her question her religion. Evans also struggles to understand how this
One reason for this mistrust of Muslims is that terrorists are able to hide in plain sight, much like the invisible owner’s family in the film, because people are unable to sense the true intentions of someone. To combat this, the American public developed a stereotype against people who wore Muslim cultural clothing such a hijab. Much like Grace seeking to gain control of her house by locking every door behind her, Americans felt the need to “reinstall patriarchal order against the natural” (Pizzato 221) by profiling and corralling Muslims away from the general
Tarkovsky’s refusal to attach these faces to a situation, to a decision, or to an exchange of looks with another character makes these anonymous and minor figures especially elusive. Yet their impact is undeniably strong. It is as if the viewer’s mind, unable to read the characters’ eyes, turns away from the distractions of the world towards deeper and unspeakable regions, thus reacting in a way comparable to the beholder of a holy face in an icon. (143)
‘On face-work’ is Goffman’s first essay from his book entitled ‘Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior’ which was originally written in 1955. It considers the approaches to human interaction alongside five more essays featured in this book and focuses on the concept of the face. His essay on face-work offers an analytic study which explores interaction as a ritual process. It is instrumental in providing a sound understanding of the definition of face and is a comprehensive insight into basic kinds of face-work. Some of Goffman’s other works include ‘The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life’, ‘Asylums’, and ‘Stigma’, which are a series of books about social behaviour.
The Pilgrim's Progress by John Bunyan tells the story of Christian, a deeply religious man whose self-imposed pilgrimage takes him through a variety of locations in his quest to reach Celestial City. However, to better understand Bunyan's perspective on Christianity as given in his novel, we must examine the life experiences of the author. Born in 1628, Bunyan lived in a time period that was undoubtedly heavily influenced by the Reformation movement incited by Martin Luther only a century earlier. The lives of Luther and Bunyan parallel in that both disagreed with fundamental doctrines applied by the Church in their lifetime. Additionally, both were labeled as dissenters and subsequently persecuted for adhering to their own principles (Bunyan, Introduction pg. XVII). Perhaps the most striking similarity was their common belief in the theological teaching of justification by faith, and the role, or lack thereof, of works in acquiring salvation (Perry, Peden, Von Laue, pgs. 18-19). The concept of justification by faith and the zero sum value of works as taught by Luther is the central theme of the novel The Pilgrim's Progress and the basic position concerning Christianity that Bunyan conveys to the reader. Three examples of this position contained within the novel include Christian's opinion of morality and legality as a result of his encounter with Mr. Worldly-Wiseman, Christian's definition of hypocrisy and the subsequent demise of By-ends, and finally the refusal of admittance to the Celestial City for Ignorance, despite his works.
Sacrifice is an important part of life. Most people have sacrificed in order to make their lives, someone elses lives or simply the world better.Sacrifice shows character and provides proof of someone's values and morals. In the novel “And The Mountains Echoed”, by Khaled Hosseini, many characters make sacrifices. The character Baba Ayub is a perfect example showing sacrifices project one's values more vividly than anything else.
Since the beginning of civilisation the question can art have the capacity to transform the world politically and morally has invariably haunted the philosophers and social scientists alike. This paper makes an attempt to address two different but interrelated questions in the light of photography by primarily focusing on Abu Ghraib pictures. First, I intend to look critically at Butler’s claim that framing of reality in a certain way imposes constraints on what can be heard, seen and read during the times of war. And second, I propose to consider the various ways in which the relationship between photography and ethical responsiveness can be explored by invoking the idea of face propounded by Levinas in one of his interviews.
Pope John Paul II once said, “Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human spirit rises to the contemplation of truth; and God has placed in the human heart a desire to know the truth – in a word, to know himself – so that, by knowing and loving God, men and women may also come to the fullness of truth about themselves.” (Fallible Blogma) Based on this significant and powerful quote, one can infer that faith and reason are directly associated and related. It can also be implied that the combination of faith and reason allows one to seek information and knowledge about truth and God; based on various class discussions and past academic teachings, it is understood that both faith and reason are the instruments that diverse parties are supposed to use on this search for truth and God. There are many stances and viewpoints on the issues of faith and reason. Some believe that both of these ideas cannot and should not be combined; these parties deem that faith and reason must be taken as merely separate entities. However, this writer does not understand why both entities cannot be combined; both terms are so closely compatible that it would make sense to combine the two for a common task. Based on various class discussions and readings, there are many philosophers and theologians who have certain opinions regarding faith, reason and their compatibility; these philosophers include Hildegard of Bingen, Ibn Rushd, Moses Maimonides, and St. Thomas Aquinas. The following essay will examine each of the previously stated philosopher’s viewpoints on faith and reason, and will essentially try to determine whether or not faith and reason are ultimately one in the same.
...e part of a person’s character. The author also shows that characters who are concerned with appearances, such as Helmer, want to appear morally acceptable in the eyes of society.
In numerous countries, particularly in the West, Muslims are currently looked upon with terror and suspicion, just as they are not by any means a part of the communities in which they live in. The Muslim veil, a long way from being the wonderful clothing of humble and devotion as Muslims see it, is viewed as an image of some dangerous religion. Young Muslim men wearing a facial hair are seen as extremists, and are stopped and searched as possible terrorists. Indeed, even government officials now talk about Islam and Muslims just as if they are considered to be hidden enemies inside these countries, who must be observed carefully.
Modern society and its people have the ability to make a vast range of choice when it comes to anything in their lives. People to today have the ability and free will to choose their partners, their careers, their aspirations in life and their own religion. In the opinion of Peter L. Berger, written in his 1979 book ‘The Heretical Imperative’, modern times provide three fundamental options in relation to religion; the first being ‘The deductive option’, which reaffirms a certain religious tradition in spit of counter claims against it (e.g. Islamic fundamentalism); the second is the reductive option, which modernizes a religious tradition in term which make it sensible or understandable in todays most important modes of though. The final option is called the ‘inductive option’, which turns external forms of authority to individual experience (e.g. William James and the varieties of religious experience). By looking at these options deeper and look at opposing views to Berger’s theory and personal religious preference will give the reader a clearer view of Berger’s ‘The Heretical Imperative’.