Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How language reflects on family
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Rodriguez tells a story of his childhood, which appeals to those families in today’s world that struggle to adhere to the needs and wants of a society they aren’t accustomed to, and the difference between the language one uses at home versus the language in public. When he was a child, his parents were still learning the English language for themselves. So when he starts school, he is not yet knowledgeable in the language, and struggles a bit in class. Richard was a shy and timid child, “Richard, stand up. Don’t look at the floor. Speak up. Speak to the entire class, not just to me!” (Rodriguez 6). The nuns pushed him to come out of his shell, but he was so affected by sounds that their insistence caused him to bury himself further in the comforting …show more content…
sounds of Spanish at home. It was this problem that caused the nuns to come out Richards home, “is it possible for you and your husband to encourage your children to practice their English when they are home? …. In an instant, they agreed to give up the language (the sounds) that had revealed and accentuated our family’s closeness.” (Rodriguez 7). When he says “closeness”, Rodriguez refers to the thread of Spanish that is what makes his family so unique and in tune to each other. Some families have activities these days, like family game nights, but for Richard, it was the language of his heritage that brought his family into the close knit relationship they had. To describe this childhood of his, Rodriguez uses narration quite a bit, creating an image for the reader. “For a second or two, I’d stay, linger there, listening. Smiling, I’d hear my mother call out, saying in Spanish (words): “is that you, Richard?” All the while her sounds would assure me: You are home now; come closer; inside. With us.” (Rodriguez 5), showing us that during his days at school, the harsh language of English was constantly filling his ears, and he felt, almost attacked. But as soon as he Nally 2 stepped up to the door of his family, and heard the soft Spanish tones the associated with home, and a sense of belonging, he was comfortable. When the language of school, and public became the language of his home, his life changed. It took away the closeness the family had, the intimacy. Which is what Rodriguez is trying to convey, throughout most of his essay. English, can be one of the hardest languages to learn if one already speaks another.
In Rodriguez’s situation, his family had moved into the United States, and spoke Spanish, which is what he grew up with. He first learned his “home” language, and began, as a small child, to associate Spanish with the feeling of home, belonging, and comfort. To take that language away is to rob families of the intimacy and relationships they have with each other. In order to tell the story of the change in his younger life, Rodriguez shares stories of school and home, wielding narration to capture readers. In addition, a simple cause and effect mode is used, to describe his actions ultimately leading to the elimination of Spanish in his household. With tools such as these, the essay grips readers and tunes them into the drastic changes from Rodriguez’s childhood. To describe this childhood of his, Rodriguez uses narration, creating an image for the reader. “For a second or two, I’d stay, linger there, listening. Smiling, I’d hear my mother call out, saying in Spanish (words): “is that you, Richard?” All the while her sounds would assure me: You are home now; come closer; inside. With us.” (Rodriguez 5), showing that during his days
at school, the harsh language of English was constantly filling his ears, and he felt, almost attacked. But as soon as he Nally 2 stepped up to the door of his family, and heard the soft Spanish tones the associated with home, and a sense of belonging, he was comfortable. Richard was pushed headfirst into English when he entered school, and he was not ready. He reluctantly spoke to the class and the nuns, “Richard, stand up! Don’t look at the floor. Speak up. Speak to the entire class, not just to me!”. (Rodriguez 6). He refused to cooperate, as he was barraged by the language and sounds of English, and the stark difference between it and Spanish. This continued until it caused the nuns came to his home, and asked his parents to use English at home instead. A simple cause and effect relationship conveys Richards actions and the effect it had on his personal life with family. When the language of school, and public became the language of his home, his life changed drastically. It took away that closeness they had shared, and the intimate relationships he had with his family members.
Slick showed Rios the “hotspots” where life shapes these youth environments. The structure, as well as the constraints, that shape these young boys life in the neighborhood, slick points out a corner where one of his best friends got shot by a drive-by shooting. The lifestyle of these young boys is tragic.
By making sure that others pronounce it with the intended accents, he gives the impression that he is not ashamed of his hispanic background.
Family is one of those words that have a significant meaning to various individuals. Family may be viewed one way to an individual and another way to someone else. Family consists of those who have played a particular role in one’s life, whether it is positive or negative. In this paper, I will assess Reymundo’s family both nuclear and extended and speak of how his family has become significant in his life and how they have played a role in his decisions. I will also speak of my personal reactions to the story as well as address ways that as a social worker I could work to impact the gang problems in Orlando.
As a young child, Rodriguez finds comfort and safety in his noisy home full of Spanish sounds. Spanish, is his family's' intimate language that comforts Rodriguez by surrounding him in a web built by the family love and security which is conveyed using the Spanish language. "I recognize you as someone close, like no one outside. You belong with us, in the family, Ricardo.? When the nuns came to the Rodriquez?s house one Saturday morning, the nuns informed the parents that it would be best if they spoke English. Torn with a new since of confusion, his home is turned upside down. His sacred family language, now banished from the home, transforms his web into isolation from his parents. "There was a new silence in the home.? Rodriguez is resentful that it is quiet at the dinner table, or that he can't communicate with his parents about his day as clearly as before. He is heartbroken when he overhears his mother and father speaking Spanish together but suddenly stop when they see Rodriguez. Thi...
How to tame a wild tongue is an essay by Gloria Anzaldua. This essay focuses on the different types of Spanish people spoke, and in this case, Anzaldua focuses on losing an accent to adjust to the environment she was living in. The issue that was applied in this essay was that the Spanish she spoke wasn’t exactly considered “Spanish”. The essay was divided into different sections as where the author tries to let people know, her Spanish speaking language should be considered valid just like every other Spanish speaking language out there.
Anzaldua grew up in the United States but spoke mostly Spanish, however, her essay discusses how the elements of language began to define her identity and culture. She was living in an English speaking environment, but was not White. She describes the difficulty of straddling the delicate changing language of Chicano Spanish. Chicano Spanish can even differ from state to state; these variations as well as and the whole Chicano language, is considered a lesser form of Spanish, which is where Anzaldua has a problem. The language a person speaks is a part...
when describing his father. At the beginning of the story he spoke as a child
(Rodriguez 18). All of this starts when he begins reading books about his culture and important figures like, Pedro Albizu Campos, this makes his culture feeling increased, not wanting to follow the American standards. He is also discriminated against by his teachers and others at school due to his feelings of not participating in the national anthem “Some smart-ass”. I stuck him in the corner. Thinks he can pull that shit.
In the essay “Private Language, Public Language” by Richard Rodriguez he made a comparison between public and private language. I believe he made this comparison because of the battle between their family and public languages. Rodriguez grew up in an immigrant family, and depending on the location they were staying in, they had a hard time using the different languages they had to speak at home and in society. In their lives they had two forms a language, the private language only spoken with the family and the public language with people outside the family. Rodriguez struggles to overcome the difference between his home language, Spanish and English. The purpose in this distinction is to illustrate the struggle with the different types of languages that the author had to adapt to in his childhood.
His home was the place where it was a private world then homes of his English speakers. Since his family only spoke Spanish at home. However, the further the story goes, Rodriguez recognized he has school and family collide. However later on the story, Richard started to refer to speak English then Spanish. I think that there wasn’t any communication between Richard and his family after that so they started to feel this separation between them. In addition, His family started on trying to speak English to help Richard out. “In an instant, they agreed to give up the language (the sounds) that had revealed and accentuated our family’s closeness” (paragraph 7). In my opinion, since his family started to no longer speak Spanish, Richard family lost their
In Suzette Haden Elgin’s Native Tongue, infants of linguistic households are required to acquire various alien languages to become native speakers of Earth for the new languages studied. Our society, for the most part, understands that adults acquire foreign languages differently from the acquisition of a second language by a child. Furthermore, most people generally have the understanding that children learn languages quickly and easily compared to adults. Adults, however, are able to acquire foreign languages in fair or controlled conditions. There may be resulting differences between language acquisitions of new languages, but the rate at which adults acquire second languages should not be a factor.
I chose this story for Eduardo for many reasons. Eduardo is a 2nd grad male whose parents are not always involved in his life.
...xpressing her Chinese culture. Mastering a second language allows her to articulate her and her mother’s thoughts; it is a foundation for her pride and a foundation to express herself. For Gloria Anzaldua, instead of choosing one language over the other, she chose a mix of the two and fights for it. She realized the value of her language when she lost it and now treasures it. The kind of Spanish she speaks is neither English nor Spanish, but both. It is overflowing with culture from Medieval Spain, France, Germany, etc., just from the origins of the words. It is her pride and a representation of herself, fighting and living. In conclusion, in addition to Lera Boroditsky’s article proving that the structure of language affects how we think, the articles by Eric Liu, Amy Tan, and Gloria Anzaldua show how language is a foundation for a person’s culture, pride, and self.
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
Language development is a complex topic which has been largely debated about amongst linguists over a long period of time. Some believe that language is acquired through experience and communication with those in their environment (nurture). Studies have indicated that there is a correlation between environmental factors (such as the way we speak to infants and socio economic status) and language acquisition. Conversely, others claim that language development is natural and innate (nature). Research shows how language is inherent regardless of what the language is. Additionally theorists such as Noam Chomsky believe that we are born with an intrinsic mechanism/device for acquiring language (Bee & Boyd, 2010). Either way, it seems that both nurture and nature play vital roles in a child’s language development.