Radical Ecology Summary

Prior to this course, my understanding of environmental issues was limited. When it comes to planet earth, there are many interpretations of how humans see the world and interact with it. These interpretations are referred to as our worldviews. There are certain prevailing values of society that are contributed by our history. Religion and culture are the major influences on these values. Overtime every community establishes its own views about the world. This makes it hard for people to accept new information that does not appropriately fit with their own world views. In this course understanding issues pertaining to the environment is best understood through a complex ethical framework. In Carolyn Merchant’s “Radical Ecology” explores issues

There needs to be a clear understanding that non-human subjects also do suffer and there is nothing we can do to stop that suffering. Non-human animals are very much similar to humans but, we cannot assess how much suffering they are enduring. and therefore people who are holding other try to justify how we treat these non-human animals. Answering these types of fundamental question can help assess a course of action for animal treatments. Branching of the ethics of ecocentrism my theoretical assumptions about my own ethics and worldview would be holism. A philosophical theory that considers the value of the whole over the an individual entity. The value of the individual, then would only depend on the contribution the individual makes for the good of the whole. The most general type of holism in environmental ethics is ecocentrism. Many people whose worldviews align with holism argue that it, can cause the most or less value to individual if people decided to become a part of the ecosystem processes. On the other side of the argument if we must intrinsic value to all existing things equal, would that bring about shortages in normal animals, for example, chicken and cows would considerably not be worth as extraordinary or jeopardized species

However, many accuse that hoists essentially ignore the wort for people recognizing their worth from their ecological commitments. Other arguments against holism is that the entire for example, ecosystems and species do not have those intrinsic value Also that species don't have a good on their own. Hence their good must take chances, to be subordinate of the worth of distinctive organisms, which would have a great on their own. This approach inevitably turned out so great that a few scholars started to think about Animal rights a unique field from environmental ethics and dedication for holism to be will comprehensive characteristic of environmental ethics. An mix from claiming ethics and the field from claiming ecology, the examine of the connections between organic entities Furthermore, their surroundings “moral extensionism”: those extension about morals Past people to land, plants, animals, and so forth. view people Concerning illustration and only the nature, as opposed to it being from it. In the Animal liberation movements, it strongly contends that we should in part have some moral consideration for