Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of cultural assimilation
Importance of indian family
The impact of cultural assimilation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of cultural assimilation
Although race is largely assigned due to appearance, and thus what comes alongside racial division is not by choice, cultural ties from ethnicities are not as straightforward because of selective assimilation. In Assimilation of Transnationalism, Silvia Pedraza defines variations of assimilation for immigrants and their children. She presents transnationalism, in which an individual maintains involvement in both the nation that they originated from and that in which they now reside, resulting in a bicultural identity (Pedraza). Holly’s bicultural identity does resemble transnationalism, but understandably differs slightly due to the lack of first-hand experience in the immigrant culture. As Holly’s mother’s family has entirely assimilated …show more content…
It explains why she believes she would be uncomfortable and feel unsafe traveling in British Guyana where her father’s family came from, precisely because of the differences among native born individuals and those who were raised outside the area. She would have a difficult time assimilating to that culture, despite being a part of it. They would view her as an American.
Her father exhibits selective assimilation in the aspects of Indian culture which he has brought with him to the United States, the celebration of Diwali and his Hindu religion, for example. However, aside from those cultural aspects which he has chosen to maintain from Indian culture, he has also largely assimilated to American culture through language, habits, and values. Because of this, and his lack of interest in passing on most of his Indian cultural ties, it stands to reason that Holly would much more strongly identify to the culture which both parents exercise in some form, the American one, which thereby overpowers the Indian one. She similarly has the choice of selective assimilation, but only for the aspects of Indian culture which her Indian family members have held on to and exposed her to. In this sense, an individual from a mixed parentage can be grouped together with both immigrants and native born
…show more content…
Had her father made more of an effort to expose her to his native culture, this bias may not have been as dramatic, but most likely still prevalent. It is difficult to combat first-hand cultural immersion and structural assimilation with second-hand traditions or practices. In any immigrant family, it is likely that the cultural ties dilute over time alongside increased assimilation of each following generation. This process is only expedited with native parentage as well. This is a foundation upon which the collective American culture has been developed, as this is a country of immigrants. A child of mixed parentage will seek to identify with both parents’ cultures, but undoubtedly finds it easier to understand the culture that they are consistently immersed in. Holly struggled with her cultural, racial, and ethnic identity for some time before becoming comfortable with the designations she now gives. However, she would still like to cultivate some stronger ethnic ties to her Indian culture in the
I am the child of a white man and a Navajo (Diné) woman. Gogol’s parents have tried to force their cultural values upon him since birth, but I would have been lucky if my family had tried to celebrate my A 'wee Chi 'deedloh, my first laugh ceremony. Gogol lives in a world where his family seems to have to do everything possible to scrape together the means to practice their Bengali culture. This suggests that to be the child of first-generation immigrants is to substitute many traditions and ceremonies into more Americanized, less culturally-authentic renditions of themselves, for the only way to be truly authentic is to practice the culture in the land of origin or, in Gogol’s case, India.
...rself in between the two, and in doing so partially “unmakes” the ethnic identity passed on to her from her ancestors. The question of whether she is more assimilated into American culture or is more dissimilated from the culture of her ancestors is arbitrary and ambiguous. She is simultaneously both and neither; she is a new person who enjoys the American way of life but will always feel burdened by the “weight” of her ancestors “upon [her]” (297).
The autobiography Journey of Hope Memoirs of a Mexican Girl and the documentary short “Children in No Man’s Land” has brought into light three important topics that are results of immigration. The first is the “American dream” and the notion of yearning to migrate abroad to seek dreams formed by misconceptions of the limited knowledge one has of their destination. The second is assimilation and the process of assimilating oneself to their new homeland. The third is a unique situation presented in both these works, which is estrangement from their family members. This paper attempts to critically analyze the unique journey of immigration for Rosalina, Maria de Jesus, and Rene. It argues that glorified images and dreams of what America could be like falsely creates a sense of hope. It focuses on the dual task of reviewing the process of assimilation based on each immigrant situation, and an examination of familial estrangement as
Marcus Garvey once said, “A [person] without the knowledge of their past history, origin and culture is like a tree without roots” (Brainy Quote 1). In cross-cultural adoption, many of the children growing up in White families or any other race different from theirs almost always never learn about their cultural background and native language. They grow up without an understanding or connection to their native culture. In Only Drunks and Children tell the Truth, Drew Hayden Taylor focuses on Janice, a woman who knows nothing about her indigenous lan...
Moving from the unpleasant life in the old country to America is a glorious moment for an immigrant family that is highlighted and told by many personal accounts over the course of history. Many people write about the long boat ride, seeing The Statue of Liberty and the “golden” lined streets of New York City and how it brought them hope and comfort that they too could be successful in American and make it their home. Few authors tend to highlight the social and political developments that they encountered in the new world and how it affected people’s identity and the community that they lived in. Authors from the literature that we read in class highlight these developments in the world around them, more particularly the struggles of assimilating
...d and left with little cultural influence of their ancestors (Hirschman 613). When the children inadvertently but naturally adapting to the world around them, such as Lahiri in Rhode Island, the two-part identity begins to raise an issue when she increasingly fits in more both the Indian and American culture. She explains she “felt an intense pressure to be two things, loyal to the old world and fluent in the new”, in which she evidently doing well at both tasks (Lahiri 612). The expectations for her to maintain her Indian customs while also succeeding in learning in the American culture put her in a position in which she is “sandwiched between the country of [her] parents and the country of [her] birth”, stuck in limbo, unable to pick one identity over the other.
Strained relationships arise between first-generation Americans and their immigrant parents due to differing cultural and societal expectations between the respective groups. Understandably, the first-generation American children quickly grow accustomed to the demands of society in the United States because of the youthful ability to adapt. However, such demands are often at odds with that of the parents’ foreign land. Consequently, tension erupts as a result of conflicting cultural values. As illustrated in “Who’s Irish,” the daughter has assimilated to life in the United States, which includes an
For some people, fitting in is a natural thing, but for others it was a different story. Immigrants often had a hard time blending in with Americans because of their clothing, the way they spoke, and the way they approached people. When reading the experiences of an immigrant’s child, you will find out that some fit in because of how independent they are while others do not fit in because they follow the wishes of their parents. In the book Living In Two Worlds, it appears that for Aisha it came natural to fit in with Americans, it was as if she was a natural born teenager. She “was dressed like any American girl of her age- large gold earrings, baggy jeans, and an oversized sweatshirt” (Kosof 19-20). Her father hated the fact that he brought her to America and that he was the reason she had received an American influence in ...
... culture and they become a combination of both. Therefore it’s a culture within a culture. Immigrant youth are more satisfied changing their ‘old’ culture to adjust to the new one, however parents are more hesitant to do so. This transformation causes a lot of tension within the family.
* The other history explained how the intermarriages include Indians with whites as well. These intermarriages produced mixed racial children whose skin color could favor one or both parents. Throughout the trial, the defense proposed the idea that these “Mashpee Indians” belong to the black community than the Indian. * Even Clifford mentioned how few of the “Mashpee Indians” resemble Indian while some others appeared black or white. And this perception behind skin color connects to the certain ideas about a person’s identity.
Her parents were immigrants who had to get used to the American People, along with
In “My Two Lives” Jhumpa Lahiri talks about her hardship growing up in America coming from two different cultures. At home she spoke Bengali with her parents, ate with her hands. According to Jhumpa’s parents she was not American and would never be. This led her to become ashamed of her background. She felt like she did not have to hide her culture anymore. When Jhumpa got married in Calcutta she invited her American friends that never visited India. Jhumpa thought her friends would judge from being part of the Indian culture and isolate her.However her friends were intrigued by her culture and fascinated. She felt like her culture should not be hidden from her friends anymore, and that coming from an Indian-American culture is unique. Jhumpa believes that her upbringing is the reason why she is still involved with her Bengali culture. Jhumpa says“While I am American by virtue of the fact that I was raised in this country, I am Indian thanks to the efforts of two individuals.” Jhumpa means that she is Indian, because she lived most of her life and was raised here. In the story Lahiri explains that her parents shaped her into the person she is. Growing up coming from two different cultures can be difficult, but it can also be beneficial.
More importantly she has beginning to observed the difference in the culture and is evident that she respects her parent culture when she said, “She would come to “wake me” exactly forty-five minutes after they gotten up. It was their time together at the beginning of each day and even at an early age I could feel their disappointment if I interrupted them by getting up to early”. This girl
The first way describes cultural identity as a shared culture by many people; a culture is like a collective self. As he further argues that cultural identities always highlight the same practices of past which give people stability, unshifting and constant frames of reference and meaning beneath the shifting divisions and shifting in their actual history (6). Hall shares his personal experience of immigration in Minimal Selves (1987) that when he thinks about identity, he got to know that he has always felt that he is a migrant amongst the foreigners. Similarly Lahiri’s fiction is autobiographical she explains her sorrows as a migrant and suffering in a foreign
When two cultures meet, there is usually a disagreeable point. Either one tries to dominate the other, or both struggle for acceptance. This is shown by Eulalie’s behaviour in the presence of her in-laws and the reaction of Ato’s family upon knowing of his bride. Eulalie’s disgust at the ways and manners her fiancé’s family relate with her points out the theme of clashing cultures. Eulalie considers many of Ato’s family customs backwards and is disdainful of many of them. She also makes ignorant statements about the African women and culture. She states that all palm trees are the same, and she declares that knowing the difference does not really matter. The woman’s nonchalant act of smoking and excessive drinking displeases Ato’s family and even Ato himself. Ato’s family, on the other hand, displays the prejudice of thinking of African-Americans inferior because they are descendants of slaves. They think it is strange for Eulalie to have no tribe or surname, likening her to a “tree without roots.” When they hear that Eulalie is an African by descendant, the women in the house start weepi...