Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of disaster on society
Importance of selfishness
The pursuit of self-interest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of disaster on society
Imagine a disaster. Rather, imagine August 6th, 1945 when the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima. Or October 17th, 1989, the 6.9 Richter earthquake that destroyed San Francisco, killing 60 plus civilians. Or April 20th, 1999, the deadliest school shootings in history, Columbine. September 11th, 2001 a terrorist attack on one of the world’s tallest buildings (the world trade center) in the heart of New York City. August 23rd, 2005 a category five hurricane that swept through the Gulf of Mexico, breaking the levies to New Orleans, Louisiana and destroying the city. Imagine the sounds of planes flying over your house as you sit on your couch and watch T.V., ignorant to the fact that that is the sound of disaster. …show more content…
Smith argues that despite how self centered an individual may be, he or she will have interest in the welfare of others(source). Similarly, no matter how cruel or insensitive one may appear, he or she will be moved by the misfortune of another person. Smith examines compassion and pity, which is “the emotion we feel for the misery of others, when we see it or are made to think about it in a vivid way. The sorrow of others makes us sad” (Smith 1759). Therefore, it can be assumed that in times of a disaster one should become sympathetic for the victims of the …show more content…
Within The Wealth of a Nation’s, Smith accredits the nation’s wealth to individuals self-interest. Adam Smith states that self-interest is what controls the behavior of the people and the economy is “led by an invisible hand to promote an end which is no part of his intentions” (Wealth of Nations, Book 1, Chapter 7). For example, a drug dealer does not sell drugs based on good intention. Instead, a drug dealer sells drugs because it generates him or her a profit. If the drug dealer begins to sell low quality drugs at an unreasonable price, then people will not purchase drugs from the dealer. As a result, to maintain customers, it is in the best interest of the drug dealer to sell quality drugs for a reasonable price. Therefore, self-interest is beneficial to all member of society. In the drug dealer scenario, the drug dealer generates a profit and the customer increases his or her utility from the drug. Smith measures wealth as a flow of goods and services, which is based upon the productivity of labor. Smith posits that workers are most productive when there is a division of workers and they engage in specialization. An increase in labor productivity increases a firm’s output and leads to market expansion. To support market expansion, Smith suggests investing in machinery to make workers more productive. Eventually, a firm will increase capital
Journal Eleven In “The Telescope Effect” Shankar Vedantam states his theories on why people are so willing to help a single person deal with tragedy. However, when it comes to mass tragedies or terror people seem to shy away from helping or lending a hand. Vedantam seems to bring to light some issues people have in their minds when it comes to who they provide help for. Vedantam in the beginning of the essay tells the story of a Dog named Hokget and how the puppy was abandoned by her owner on a big tanker lost at sea.
As you can see, labor and trade are the key importance to modern wealth. Production and trade are not just needed but are essential for a country to survive. Smith makes it ideal for countries to interact and trade. Trade means you get more directs workers into jobs in which they have a comparative advantage, which means more
Drea Knufken’s thesis statement is that “As a society, we’ve acquired an immunity to crisis” (510-512). This means that humans in general, or citizens of the world, have become completely desensitized to disasters, we think of them as just another headline, without any understanding of their impact upon fellow
In this quote, Ma explains that poor people are the only people who understand suffering and the fear of suffering. They are the only ones during this time that can feel sympathy for other sufferers. So, they help others because they hope that one day, if necessary, someone else would help them.
Compassion is a feeling that humans portray towards others, but you also have to act in some way to aid them and to decrease their suffering. Barbara Lazear Ascher's purpose “On Compassion” of her essay was to distinguish emotions that people feel towards homeless people. She posed the question of whether or not people feel compassion or pity towards homeless people. The thesis statement is the first sentence, which encompasses the main themes that compassions revolves around somebody’s circumstances, rather than a situation that one can dream about. In other words, it is one’s reality. Specifically, “the man’s grin is less the result of circumstance
Compassion towards someone or something that an individual has can spread to others and change their perspective and thought process on that specific subject. In the novel, Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, provides a story of a man who
In the article “The Baby in the Well: The Case Against Empathy,” Paul Bloom puts forward a tendentious thesis. Empathy, according to him, is overrated. The imaginative capacity to put oneself in the place of an oppressed, afflicted, or bereaved person does not lead to rational, thoroughly-considered solutions to important problems. Indeed, it can lead to hysterical displays of ill-directed charity, the misallocation of resources, and total blindness to other significant issues. Bloom appeals to his readers’ sense of logic by using examples of environmental and geopolitical crises that require forward-thinking solutions; he suggests that, because of the need to think about the future and the big picture, a politics of empathy cannot be relied
The two essays “On Compassion” and “This is Water” by Barbara Ascher and David Wallace argue their different viewpoints on both compassion and empathy. While Ascher simply argues that compassion is not a simple character trait but more so a skill acquired overtime; Wallace tries to convince his audience that humans are preprogramed to be motivated by their own selfish desires and must reprogram themselves to think out of sympathy and concern for others.
In the story On Compassion, the author, Ascher, explains how no one is born with compassion and must be taught it. A homeless, black man was staring at a women’s baby in the stroller and she offered him a dollar. At first he was hesitant to take it, but eventually did. Later another man walks into an overpriced coffee shop in which the store owner handed him a bag with food. Ascher makes the readers question whether these were acts of fear, pity, or just simply out of the good of heart.
Smith’s text in his book seems to be characterized by fact-heavy tangents, tables and supplementary material that combine hard research with generalities, showing his commitment to give proof for what seem like never-ending observations about the natural way of economics. Smith’s Wealth of Nations Books I and II focus on the idea of the development of division of labor, and describe how each division adds to the fortune of a given society by creating large surpluses, which can be traded or exchanged amongst the members of Labor. The division of labor also fuels technological innovation, by giving a lot of focus to specific tasks, and allowing workers to brainstorm ways to make these tasks quicker or more efficient, increasing maximum output. This, again, adds to efficiency and increases surpluses so that the surplus items may be traded or re-invested somewhere else. Near the end of the case, technologies are likely to improve, foreshadowing them to become even greater efficient.
The pivotal second chapter of Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, "Of the Principle which gives occasion to the Division of Labour," opens with the oft-cited claim that the foundation of modern political economy is the human "propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another."1 This formulation plays both an analytical and normative role. It offers an anthropological microfoundation for Smith's understanding of how modern commercial societies function as social organizations, which, in turn, provide a venue for the expression and operation of these human proclivities. Together with the equally famous concept of the invisible hand, this sentence defines the central axis of a new science of political economy designed to come to terms with the emergence of a novel object of investigation: economic production and exchange as a distinct, separate, independent sphere of human action. Moreover, it is this domain, the source of wealth, which had become the main organizational principle of modern societies, displacing the once-ascendant positions of theology, morality, and political philosophy.
In The Wealth of Nations Smith proposes the concept of economic growth, that it is imbedded in the increasing division of labour. This idea is basically about the specialization of the labour force, actually breaking down each large job into many tiny parts. As a worker spends more time working at one particular job, his efficiency increases. The fact that these workers do not have to switch their tasks during the day not only saves them money but also precious time. This is still being used today as a person who is working in a car repair shop there will be only one specific person fixing the cars and another sweeping/ cleaning up. Thus, separating the jobs to make each individual more efficient and great at their job. Not only does this save time, but it also saves money as they do not have to spend so much time in their jobs as they are more efficient, so it saves the capital. It also promotes full employment, so the economy will also grow. An economist whose theories do not apply in the modern world is Milton Friedman, who argued that the government involvement worsened economy and government should replace welfare programs with guaranteed income. Guaranteed
English Mid-Year Introflection ¨We cloak ourselves in cold indifference to the unnecessary suffering of others - even when we cause it¨- James Carroll. Indifference has an issue we´ve been studying in ELA this year through short stories, the Holocaust, and other events that have taken place over the course of history in our world. We´ve focused on how empathy impacts the situation, the victims, and the bystanders. Empathy can help us build community, and give everyone reassurance the someone will support them during times of crisis. Kitty Genovese was a woman stabbed to death in front of her apartment, while her neighbors watched.
The masses in society have an innate ability to exercise vehemence towards one another throughout personal criticisms implemented into conversations, whether the vehemence is either intentional or unintentional. But in this era, it is within our obligations to procreate sincerity in our daily encounters with citizens in society through the allotting of compassion and sympathetic appeals to the tragedies of others, even if those people conjure up appeals that are seemingly indifferent to justification of evidence. However, this sincerity cannot be fabricated, for it has to be blossomed from the heart where prudential and truthful passion rests.
Adam smith argues that the amount of labor used in production of a commodity determines its exchange value in a primitive society; however, this changes in an advanced society where the exchange value now includes the profit for the owner of capital.