Step one: Rank Canada’s economic goals in order of most important to least important.
1. Full Employment
2. Economic Growth
3. Viable Balance of Payments
4. Increased Productivity and Efficiency
5. Environmental Stewardship
6. Price Stability
7. Reduced Public Debt
8. Political Stability
9. Economic Freedom
10. Equitable Distribution of Income
Step two: Create questions you would ask an economist if you were Prime Minister of Canada today.
1. What is your stance on the employment rates in Canada?
2. How do you feel about how our economy is doing?
3. Do you care about our environment?
4. Do you think people should be able to decide for themselves or should the government control that?
5. Do you care about how much money the government spends
…show more content…
In The Wealth of Nations Smith proposes the concept of economic growth, that it is imbedded in the increasing division of labour. This idea is basically about the specialization of the labour force, actually breaking down each large job into many tiny parts. As a worker spends more time working at one particular job, his efficiency increases. The fact that these workers do not have to switch their tasks during the day not only saves them money but also precious time. This is still being used today as a person who is working in a car repair shop there will be only one specific person fixing the cars and another sweeping/ cleaning up. Thus, separating the jobs to make each individual more efficient and great at their job. Not only does this save time, but it also saves money as they do not have to spend so much time in their jobs as they are more efficient, so it saves the capital. It also promotes full employment, so the economy will also grow. An economist whose theories do not apply in the modern world is Milton Friedman, who argued that the government involvement worsened economy and government should replace welfare programs with guaranteed income. Guaranteed …show more content…
He also replaced government welfare programs with a guaranteed income. Additionally he proposed that the government should only manage the economy by guaranteeing a constant money supply and yearly increase. He was clearly a conservative leader as the past leader of the conservative party also advocated for equal income amongst the population. As the past conservative solution was to aim to solve a steady flow of income, with the capability for capital growth, by investing in an assorted portfolio of fixed-income and equity investments. None of the economists were in the NDP Party as their main principles are advocating for LGBTQ Rights, Environmental Stewardship, and International Peace. In the people’s opinion, the NDP would represent a balance of liberal and conservative, creating democracy. All the main economists were born during a time where their main focus were not on these things, and they had other principles to focus on. As they were born in the 1800s and 1900s, most of them had backwards thinking or were too afraid to say if they weren’t. One thing that Adam Smith forced on was Classical Liberalism, which is the political ideology that values the freedom of individuals that includes the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and markets. Adam Smith was clearly a left wing politician. Adam Smith was clearly a liberalist as he argued that the state played a role in
As you can see, labor and trade are the key importance to modern wealth. Production and trade are not just needed but are essential for a country to survive. Smith makes it ideal for countries to interact and trade. Trade means you get more directs workers into jobs in which they have a comparative advantage, which means more
Canada’s ability to maintain a healthy income is important, for without it, Canada’s economy would not be functional. This is where Canada’s three main exports come into play. In 2013, Canada earned 133 billion dollars in exporting Mineral products, 123 billion dollars of that coming from mineral fuels, oils, products of their distillation, bituminous substances, and mineral waxes (Ibid.). With such a booming mineral industry, Canada receives a large income from mining that can be invested in schools, jobs, public projects, and many other important areas . Also, the earnings can be devoted towards small businesses looking to expand by using government funding programs, which helps support and expand Canadian economy (Mentor Works). Overall the money is used for activities that support the Canadian economy and make numerous people’s lives better.
There were two major political consequences of the Great Depression. The first was that new political parties were formed in Canada. The new political parties were the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the Social Credit Party, and the Union Nationale (UN). The CCF was founded by J.S. Woodsworth and believed in the establishment of minimum wage, accident and sickness insurance, old age pensions and unemployment insurance. The Social Credit Party was founded by William Aberhart. He believed that governments should issue money to everyone so that they could buy goods in a form of “social credits”. In the 1935 provincial elections he took 56 of 63 seats giving him a total victory. The UN was founded by Maurice Duplessis due to the union of Action Liberale Nationale and the Conservative Party. They promoted the traditional values of the Catholic Church and believed in a rural lifestyle. The second political consequence was a conflicted relationship between the federal and the provincial governments. The depression showed the federal government that provincial governments did not have enough money to carry out significant projects.
Canada ruled the 20th century through science and technology and advanced more than any other country in this time period. Prime Minister Laurier was correct when he stated in his speech “that it is Canada that shall fill the 20th century.” Technology and science were one of the huge factors for Canada being a successful country compare to the world. In technology and science, there were many inventions that were developed in Canada that wowed the world and made Canada feel incredible. Even though war is sad and cruel, the crazy need to survive and the confidence to strive for success has made Canada’s technology and science advance greatly. During the near closing point of the 20th century, Canada’s environment and living is being more advanced and they are thinking about the future generations to come.
Have you ever wondered which events in Canadian history have been the most significant in shaping Canadian identity? Many significant events in the twentieth century left a lasting legacy for Canada. Canada would not be the culturally rich, prosperous and progressive nation that it is today, without its immigration patterns in the past. World War I (WWI) was also a significant event as it united Canada and left behind a legacy of sacrifice and national pride. Economic development during the post war period contributed to Canadian success nationally and globally. Immigration, WWI and economic development were significant events in Canadian twentieth century history. Each event brought new and powerful
Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land, more tools, etc) which will allow for even more increased efficiency and production. Both thought that this increased production was great. But Marx said that capitalism was only one stage... that every country must go through capitalism, to get that increased production, but that capitalism is unstable. It requires expanding markets and will end up creating a large gap between the wealthy and the poor, with more and more people becoming poor. Because of this instability, he thought that it would eventually collapse.
Smith is against mercantilism, which puts more government emphasis on exports than imports and typically puts high tariffs on imports. The goal of a nation, according to Smith, is to be wealthy, and that means to have plenty of affordable goods and services. To Smith, the best political order would be centered on the market. The goal would be to have a larger market so the citizens would be able to specialize more and increase production. It appears that Smith’s views on the type of political order are along the lines of what we consider capitalism today, and that Smith does not agree with the government involvement in citizen’s life. In this type of political order, the citizens profit from their product, and they also help others by hiring workers and paying rent on the property they are using. The success of the individual is determined by his or her wealth, and wealth is the amount of stuff an individual can buy with his or her money. To be a successful nation, all of the individuals have to be wealthy, and therefore the nation will be
Today, Canada is among the most free and secure countries in the world. Although Canada has gone through some rough patches, like every country is bound to do, it is safe to say that all Canadians should be proud of the country that Canada is today. When faced with the question, “Is Canada a country to be proud of?”, the answer is simple, yes. The justification for this response is explained through many reasons, however a few stand out. These outstanding reasons are, one being Canada’s participation in peacekeeping missions, another being the Canadian charter of human rights, and lastly Canada’s participation in war. All of these three essential reasons substantiate that Canada is truly one of the finest countries in
Let’s get started with Adam Smith and his second coming. Adam smith was one of the greatest economics minds that have ever existed, teaching us that our wealth is not just in gold and silver but in the products that we produce and commerce we engage in! Much like today we can understand the idea of Gross National Product and how we can better adjust our habits and ourselves. Smith unlike most economists of that age understood the value in hard work and social aspect behind our decisions.
Smith’s text in his book seems to be characterized by fact-heavy tangents, tables and supplementary material that combine hard research with generalities, showing his commitment to give proof for what seem like never-ending observations about the natural way of economics. Smith’s Wealth of Nations Books I and II focus on the idea of the development of division of labor, and describe how each division adds to the fortune of a given society by creating large surpluses, which can be traded or exchanged amongst the members of Labor. The division of labor also fuels technological innovation, by giving a lot of focus to specific tasks, and allowing workers to brainstorm ways to make these tasks quicker or more efficient, increasing maximum output. This, again, adds to efficiency and increases surpluses so that the surplus items may be traded or re-invested somewhere else. Near the end of the case, technologies are likely to improve, foreshadowing them to become even greater efficient.
Moral, political, and social are the three cores of liberalism, and the ideas in each core have a very similar resemblance to the ideas the feminist movement was trying to promote in the 19th century. Liberals believe that individuals had the right to personal liberties, which included the freedom to think, talk, and worship. Feminist believe women had the right to think, to have an opinion different from that of their husband, or fathers. The faith in total freedom, and equality for the individual that liberals, and feminist shared came from their faith in education. Their theory was that if individuals were educated, then they could be trusted to make the right decisions, decisions which would then in return helped make a better society. Adam Smith, writer of "The Wealth of Nations" considered the bible of liberal economics, believed in that theory, he expressed that "each person,.
It is up to the citizens to decide. If the yearning to be free overcomes the fight to grasp power, then a new wave of democracies will begin overcoming the old authoritarian rule. Everyone has the right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.
These were an insufficiency of workers, a reversing of accumulation and the lack of nature. He saw that the depletion of finite resources and inability to create renewable ones could potentially put a strain on the growth of the economy and the productivity of society. According to Smith however, there were no imminent threats to economic growth as during the time that he wrote, there was still a great amount of fossil fuel to be utilised. On the other hand, both Malthus and Ricardo who wrote later than Smith saw that there was an issue with the use of finite resources. They also put emphasis on how scare land was, which they saw as the main restraint on economic growth. Their previous arguments regarding population are again valid here as they stated that if the population increased then the land for farming and food production would become increasingly infertile or unavailable due to demand. This puts a strain on economic growth as only the rich could afford to rent the land, leaving the poor to work for pay that only just exceeds subsistence level, meaning they have no spare money to buy products in order to stimulate the economy. Malthus then furthered this idea by arguing that the economy could enter a state of stagnation if there’s a lack of demand. If wages are less than the total cost of goods production then industry output will be too high, causing prices to
Adam smith argues that the amount of labor used in production of a commodity determines its exchange value in a primitive society; however, this changes in an advanced society where the exchange value now includes the profit for the owner of capital.
By giving the example of pin factor, smith said “by improving the skill and specialization of labour the profit can maximise.” The skilled labour produces more goods and services and save time. “The division of labour improve three areas of production one is to increase a dexterity of in every particular workman, second is saving time which labour were spending from passing one piece of work to another and third is invention of machines which maximise the production activities.” The specialisation of labour permitted full use of machineries and produce goods and services rapidly. The economic development depends upon the division of labour. “A larger market generates a larger division of labour among people and, therefore, among firms, and a larger division of labour generates a larger productivity of labour for all