Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical evolution of feminism
Historical evolution of feminism
Evolution of the feminist movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As Humanity Changes Beauty Changes In her essay “A Woman's Beauty: Put Down or Power Source” Susan Sontag, a women’s right activist, explains general ideals and observations towards societal pressures on women’s beauty in contrast to men’s beauty. Although she presents historical and current positions on the subject, she generalizes humanity’s views and lacks in acknowledging that society’s perceptions evolve over time. Sontag makes a broad statement that everyone, meaning both men and women, agree to the popular perception that beauty for women, is based only on their physical body parts. While handsome being the perception of men, is more than visual focusing mostly by their character. (Sontag, 644-655) With such a general argument Sontag fails to inform the reader that beauty evolves over time. Wendy Lewis explains in her article “Medicine & Health” that the concept of beauty today is no longer searching for flawlessness but feeling healthy and being proud of one’s age (2009). The basics of Sontag’s argument were based entirely on the perception at the time the essay was written. Even though she includes historical background, and indirectly states that the concept of beauty did changed from pre-modernism to post-modernism. She failed …show more content…
to acknowledge that the views of beauty would change for the future generations. Sontag mentions in her essay: “What is lamentable is that it is (beauty) the only form of power that most women are encourage to seek” She further states that “It is also a duty-It is her work.” (645) Though this subjective statement she can be speaking directly to her female readers.
And being a rights activist herself, involving perhaps her personal experiences and emotions. Including this in her essay also, omits that women are not encourage to pursue education and economical status; instead focusing only on looks. Lewis adds in her article that the new view of beauty is about lifestyles (2009) In contrast to Sontag’s believes in beauty being a job, Lewis describes the modern term of beauty as an overall healthy life
choice. According to Sontag men do not care for their physical bodies as females do. Their beauty is only assessed as a complete being, as well as from what is not seen but shown. Furthermore, she includes in her essay that every individual in society has this common perception. (Sontag, 644-655) However, her claim is not applicable to today’s society. Lewis, states in her article that both men and women today undergo medical procedures because the shame to do so has been diminished. (2009) Men in today’s society care more about physique than Sontag mentions in her essay. By extrapolating beauty, Sontag is directly stating that character and personality is more important for men then it is for women. But this is not the case, both sexes are self-cautious of their bodies, even more so today with the influence of social media. By generalizing the perception of beauty, Sontag is also avoiding the reality of beauty; simply not every person in society had that common believe at the time and still today the reality of beauty is different for everyone. Sontag’s overall statement of humanity involves only current views at the time it was written and as a result is outdated to today’s societal perception and reality of beauty. The view’s of today for both sexes has changed from looks into a more complex idea with many different aspects. To speak of beauty as just looks is not a relevant statement about today’s society.
In the essay “What Meets the Eye”, Daniel Akst explains scientific facts about the beauty of men and women matters to people. He argues that attractive individuals receive attention, great social status, marries, and gets paid more on a job. One can disagree with Akst’s argument because anyone with the skills and knowledge, despite the appearance, can gain a decent relationship and can get paid well. Akst looks at beauty as if it can lead individuals to an amazing and successful life, but he is wrong. Nancy Mairs’ and Alice Walker’s views on beauty are explained internally and through self-confidence. Both women’s and Akst’s arguments on beauty share some similarities and differences in many ways, and an
The concept of beauty is a subject society speaks on through many channels. Social media plays a tremendous role in how society measures beauty and how to achieve these impossible standards. People from all walks of life have become obsessed with the idea of beauty and achieving the highest level it. In many cases, those who do not meet societal views of what is “beautiful” can become very resentful to these predisposed notions of beauty. David Akst in his writing “What Meets the Eye”, is bitter toward women and their ongoing obsession with beauty.
The idea that women are subjected to an unfair amount of pressure as a result of the fashion world and other media outlets is hardly new, but Naomi Wolf takes this claim to a new and absurd level. Her essay is as unorganized as it is impractical. Her ideas are presented in a smorgasbord of flawed logic. Particularly disturbing is what she calls the “beauty myth.” What I disagree with is the word myth. According to Wolf, women in magazines and advertisements have approximately 20% less body mass than that of the average woman, creating an unattainable standard. This fact in no way supports her claim of a “beauty myth.” The existence of a myth suggests something to be untrue in nature. Magazine companies and advertisement agencies are not in the business of showing an average woman. They are in the business of selling a product. Of course they are going to use beautiful people. These companies completely regard the fact that most women do not in fact look like this, but they know that their product would be less appealing if they displayed average or unattractive women. Therefore, they do not deserve scrutiny over the fact that they do not present a typical woman. They in fact do the same for men. Wolf says, “The beauty myth is not about women at all. It is about men’s institutions and institutional power” (page 485, first new paragraph). How does one begin to say how warped this impression is?
Sontag’s article, she characterizes modern society today as the correct manner for how women must be represented. There is no need to look further than the closest billboard to see today’s society’s beautiful woman with her necessary quality. The demanded characteristic of women places a disadvantage to them compared to men, who are not “graded” or treated depending on their appearances. The feature that men are evaluated on are their social aspects, which they can alter. Even though women and men cannot choose their appearances naturally, surgeries and beauty products can be used. One could think that it is the same for women and men, but that is false. As Ms. Sontag writes, “in a man’s face, lines are taken to be signs of character.” But by a woman, she writes, “every wrinkle, every line, every gray hair, is a defeat.” The norm for a woman’s appearance in today’s society is illogical and can get out of
Women have made great advancements in improving their rights and roles within society and are now less likely to be viewed as inferior by males. Nevertheless, they are still facing many challenges including being perceived as objects and being expected to dress and behave a certain way. In his essay “Looking at Women,” Scott Russell Sanders analyzes how men often perceive women as objects because of their indecent wardrobe and their willingness to put their bodies on display. In her essay “Why Women Smile,” Amy Cunningham explains the value of a smile and how it does not always reflect how a woman is truly feeling on the inside. Both essays spend much time looking at women and how they are under the constant scrutiny from those around them. What the essays of Sanders and Cunningham illustrate is that, while trying to shake old stereotypes, women find their identities constructed from their external appearance. The problem is and remains that women are complicit in the shallow construction of female identity that trades depth for surface because they have bought into the idea that a woman must trade on her external appearance to succeed in her public life.
In "A Woman's Beauty: Put-down or Power Source," Susan Sontag portrays how a woman's beauty has been degraded while being called beautiful and how that conceives their true identity as it seems to portray innocence and honesty while hiding the ugliness of the truth. Over the years, women have being classified as the gentler sex and regarded as the fairer gender. Sontag uses narrative structure to express the conventional attitude, which defines beauty as a concept applied today only to women and their outward appearance. She accomplishes this by using the technique of contrast to distinguish the beauty between men and women and establishing a variation in her essay, by using effective language.
Over history it is proven time and time again that standards of beauty can be very subjective. What was attractive to the general masses in the 19th century is not true of the 20th Century. What was considered beautiful in the 1920’s is different to the 1980’s. Opinions on beauty are constantly changing with the times and fashions. The decade in history I am going to focus on for this essay is females in 1950’s Hollywood.
All throughout history, beauty has been perceived and practiced in various ways. The 1920’s as well as the 21st century are both extremely different time periods, yet in multiple ways, are surprisingly similar with their standard of beauty. Overall, these two eras are the most considerable because of their individual innovations in technology, the progression of their societies and economies, as well as the major events taking place concurrently. These influences surrounding the specific time periods have significant impacts on trends, and the ideal concept of beauty in that era.
Our definition of beauty changes over time for the good and the bad. Society and the media takes our average body shapes and makes us strive for higher expectations, but those expectations often affect our mental well-being. Facing these challenges that comes with body image often forms our perception of life and how we fit in. Beauty, regardless of gender, is forced upon us as our generation is susceptible to these manipulative expectations. Beauty standards have changed drastically in our generation due to many ongoing factors such as media, celebrities and peer pressure. The essay that I’m basing my personal response on is “Chicken Hips” by Catherine Pigott. Pigott wrote this essay to show her own experiences while teaching in Africa then
A beautiful woman has perfect, shiny hair. Her face is inviting and symmetrical. She has sparkling eyes and a dazzling smile. She is in shape and has a great body. This is beauty. Beauty has no concern for what is inside; a woman’s beauty is her body and how she preens and presents herself. Beauty is the first thing that is noticed about a woman and is given a great deal of weight when an opinion of her is formulated. The weight beauty possesses has a lasting effect on how a woman is viewed in society and how she perceives herself.
It has been shown in studies that standards of beauty go hand in hand with biological factors. The theory of evolutionary biology is that beauty standards are those that will attract a mate. In Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, the standards of beauty and the notion of female beauty in the novel is fascinating. There is a moment in the story where the citizens react to Linda’s “unacceptable” appearance. Natural aging has turned her into quite a repulsive image. In the novel, intellect and beauty become almost synonymous with each other. But when placed in comparison to the society of today, it can not be said that society is much different. Fashion and perfection is dictated by the media and technology available in the world and the youth of today does nothing except feed into it. Females and males are on separate levels of complexity when it comes to this idea. People today are on a never-ending search for youth and beauty but the real question that needs to be asked is if that truly brings happiness. Standards of beauty and technological advancements have worked hand in hand over the years and created the mentality established in the minds of young people
Susan Sontag’s essay entitled, “A Women’s Beauty: Put-Down or Power Source” was published in Vogue magazine in 1975. Sontag’s essay is written in a third-person point of view. Susan Sontag was an influential critic, political activist, and novelist who wrote on the modern definition of beauty. She discusses society’s pressure on women to achieve that certain beauty that they defined. Examining Sontag as an author and exploring the purpose of her essay can often emphasize the message she delivers to her audience on society’s intangible standards of beauty that it set for women which can affect how they feel about themselves.
An elevation of beauty is treated as a form of improvement, both for men and for women. Simply put, women emphasize their differences in order to gain a sense of equality and avoid comparison from men. However women are limited in the sense that beauty in itself is very restricting. And the fact that women direct their beauty towards men shows us that men are the basis and the end means of beauty. In which this beautification is not really a form of self-improvement; there is no real flourishing...
In the media beautiful women are used all the time to market products to women. The large amount of exposure the media has is influencing what is considered beauty in the eyes of men and women. It brings to question whether or not this should be seen as the standard of beauty since every image in the media is retouched in one way or the other.
I would like to begin with the fact that women have always been known to dedicate their time to beauty. Those who are devoted to their appearance most often believe that beauty brings power, popularity, and success. Women believe this, because they grow up reading magazines that picture beautiful women in successful environments; not to mention they are popular models and world famous individuals. Beautiful women are no longer just a priority for most advertising, but we have become a walking target for the working class employers. It is documented that better-looking attorneys earn more than others after five years of practice, which was an effect that grew with experience (Biddle, 172). We cannot overlook the fact that it is always the most popular and most beautiful girl who becomes homecoming-queen or prom-queen. While these are possible positive effects of the "beauty myth," the negative results of female devotion to beauty undercut this value. These effects are that it costs a lot of money, it costs a lot of time, and in the long run, it costs a lot of pain.