Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Income inequality abstract
Income inequality abstract
Income inequality abstract
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Income inequality abstract
How is the sociological concept Class (Bourgeois & Proletariat; substructure; superstructure) useful in understanding Australian society?
The sociological concept of Class (Bourgeois & Proletariat; substructure; superstructure) is useful in understanding Australian society. Class is the system ordering society based on social and economic status. Bourgeois is a reference to the higher and middle class, and proletariat is the lower class (also known as the working class).
In the Marxist theory there is a substructure (also known as the base) and a superstructure. The substructure is the forces and social relations, working conditions between employee and employer. The substructure is also made up of relations with property and the division of labour which people use to provide the necessities of life. The superstructure is based on the relations of the substructure but the superstructure is also based on other relationships and ideas such as culture, political power and roles. The superstructure and substructure is both influenced by each other.
The sociological concept class is useful in understanding Australian society because it affects all Australians till this very day. In a country where there are classes, there is immense inequality. Assets and investments are used for the Bourgeois class for items such as luxury and purchaser goods leaving many millions and billions of people’s needs neglected. Majority of the Third Worlds valuable amplitude, specifically land goes into generating yield/crops for exporting to rich countries instead of producing and supplying food for the starving and famishing people. The Bourgeois class people snatch most of the resources before the Proletariat have a chance because they can afford to...
... middle of paper ...
...ciety.
Foreign investors make big conflict between Bourgeois class people and the Proletariat class people. Foreign investors usually end up having winners and losers. The winners being the investors and the Bourgeois and the losers being the proletariat. For example, Vegemite and Arnotts being sold to a foreign investor and the proletariat losing their jobs. Workers are weak and giant numbers of people are being dumped and left unemployed for long periods of time. Poverty is increasing even in the richest countries. Foreign investors and globalisation is decimating society and destroying the circumstances on which are vital for cohesion such as recognising the public good and worry for the society, the underdog and the environment. This also is another factor and reason for why it is useful in understanding the sociological concept of class in Australian society.
Elder, Catriona. "The Working Man Is Everywhere: Class and National Identity." Being Australian: Narratives of National Identity. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin, 2007. 40-53. Print.
In his essay “Land of Opportunity” James W. Loewen details the ignorance that most American students have towards class structure. He bemoans the fact that most textbooks completely ignore the issue of class, and when it does it is usually only mentions middle class in order to make the point that America is a “middle class country. This is particularly grievous to Loewen because he believes, “Social class is probably the single most important variable in society. From womb to tomb, it correlates with almost all other social characteristics of people that we can measure.” Loewen simply believes that social class usually determine the paths that a person will take in life. (Loewen 203)
Class is a key idea related to inequality, prejudice and discrimination in Australian society. It has been considered out of fashion, because some Australian people think that there is no class difference between people in Australia, everyone enjoys equality in society. In fact, the recent de-regulation of the workplace, and the widening gap in access to hospitals, schools and employment opportunities between the rich and poor, have made class more visible in Australian than ever before. Class is "a category of people who have generally similar educational histories, job opportunities, and social standing and who are conscious of their membership in a social group that is ranked in relation to others and is replicated over generations" (Kent, 1998:87). This essay argues that class cause continues to inequality in Australian society. Firstly, class structures labor market inequality. Secondly, class shapes the quality of a person's life. Thirdly, class inequality produces continuing class differences into the next generation. Finally, class has becoming a debate in Australian society, because class inequality encourages the `right' people to work more efficiently in the workforce and helps people to identify themselves in society, but continuing relevance of the concept of class is a matter in contemporary Australia.
If you have ever read the book 1984 by George Orwell, then an interesting topic may have crossed your mind. The way the classes of people break down can be quite similar, and very different at times. In the United States, we have classes like the lower class, the working class, and the middle class. In 1984, there were such classes as the Proles, the Outer Party, and the Inner Party. The way the classes are broken down in 1984 reminds me a little bit of my old history class. When I studied medieval times and the classes back then were broken down into the nobles, the bourgeois, and the serfs.
The working class stays working and the middle class stays being middle. Author Nick Tingle, wrote “The vexation of class”, he argues that the working class and the middle class are separated educationally based on culture and the commonplace. Tingle uses his own personal experiences and Ethos, to effectively prove his point about the difference in class based on culture ; although, Tingle also falls short by adding unnecessary information throughout the article that weakens his belief entirely.
Is class still relevant in Australia? To facilitate this question, the readings of Karl Marx, Fredrick Engels, Max Weber, Helen Marshall, R.W. Connell and T.H. Irving will be considered.
The myth that Australia is a classless society is still, till this day, circulating. With education opportunities differing, depending on your status in society and socioeconomic background, not all Australians share the same opportunity of education. Whether being a middle class citizen or an “elite” or from working class, all education opportunities offered, will be influenced by your financial status and hierarchy in society. Power can influence the outcome of an individual’s life.
Our society today, as it develops, seems to be becoming more and more like the World State described in Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.” One very obvious and evident similarity between both the Brave New World and the world we live in today is the existence of different economic classes with widening gaps in their economic conditions and social gaps. The society in Brave New World is split into five castes: Alphas, Betas, Gammas, Deltas, and Epsilons. This is very similar to how our society is split into distinct economic classes such as high,
The myth that Australia is a classless society is still, till this day, circulating. With education opportunities differing, depending on your status in society and socioeconomic background, not all Australians share the same opportunity of education. Whether being a middle class citizen or an “elite” or from working class, all education opportunities offered, will be influenced by your financial status and hierarchy in society.
According to Anthony Giddens, a British sociologist, and David Held, a Professor of Politics and International Relations at Durham University, in their book titled Classes, Power, and Conflict: Classical and Contemporary Debates, “…a social class is defined by its place in the ensemble of social practices…which includes political and ideological relations.” (“Classes, Power, and Conflict”) The distinction of the classes presented in 1984 included economic means, culture, and level of knowledge. Proles, the lowest class, perform the majority of the physical labors required in Oceania. They have the most freedom, but lack the knowledge and ambition to overthrow the government. Big Brother gives them items such as alcohol, porn, and gambling with the name of ‘Prolefeed’ (Orwell, George). Proles are the majority of the population in Oceania and are the poorest. But, they have a culture which includes singing. Outer Party members, the bourgeoisie, perform most government jobs that require an education. Although, Outer Party members are not allowed to make the laws, they only implement them into Oceania’s society. Therefore, they are more educated than the Proles. While they are more educated, they are monitored via telescreens every second of their life. Big Brother, also, encourages them to spy on each other. Rations are severely low for the Outer Party members almost to the point of
Social class has existed in our society since its foundation. Working class, middle class, upper middle class, or upper class, whatever your standing, social class can affect your place in society. Social class can be defined by where you live, who you talk to, where you get an education, even by the clothes you wear. These may not be definite determinants of social class, but categorization of people becomes easier when looking at these factors. In previous papers, I have claimed that social class is a result of capitalism. Though, I still believe this to be true, there are many factors that can affect social class and vice versa. Theorists have looked at different aspects of how these can affect social class. In my paper I am going to explore capitalism, stratification, racism, segregation, and education and their relationship with social class and how this can cause social conflict; I will have a primary focus of how Weber, DuBois, and Marx views this relationship.
Torkildsen (2011) stated that the nature and definition of 'social class' is generally regarded as being problematic, as class not only relates to income or occupation but also upbringing and family background. "social class is often regarded as grouping on the basis of occupation, which is 'socioeconomic class' rather than social class" (Torkildsen, 2011 p.49). divine
For Marx in "The German Ideology" people 's ideas and ideologies are conditioned by the historical formation of powers of production and relations of production. This is the ground for Marx 's famous distinction between economical base; which includes the forces of production, relations of production and division of labor and the "superstructure" which includes culture, ideology, religion etc. For Marx, the superstructure is determined by the material base, and not as the Idealist philosophers would have
What is social class? It is a term used to describe a large group of people who share similar social or economic positions in society based on wealth, income, job status, education, skills or power in the political sphere. Class is not just about what you own or earn but also who you know. Class affects not only how we feel about ourselves, but how others judge and consequently treat us. Those at the top of the class structure, the elite, have more power than those in the middle and even more power than those at the bottom who are of lower class. Education is a highly valued commodity in our world. In his commentary on society Freud, claimed, “ No feature, however, seems better to characterize civilization than its esteem and encouragement
Karl Marx, a philosopher, critiqued capitalism as a system where the Proletarians are manipulated by the Bourgeois. With this theory the concept of Superstructure and Substructure arose. The substructure contains the means of production, the forces of production, and the relations of production; while the subculture contains the ideology and political and legal structure. According to Marx concept, the Bourgeois observe the substructure and based on their opinion the superstructure is affected in their favor for profit. Although this critique on capitalism was derived by Marx - Gramsci, Poulantzas, and Miliband contributed to his critique.