Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The classical theories of crime
Theories of crime in human society
The classical theories of crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The classical theories of crime
This outline will serve as a detailed road map as to how the paper will progress from this stage onwards and the concepts and theories explored within. First, this paper will begin with outlining the historical social context under which subcultural theories of crime came into being in the mid twentieth century in North America. Second, this paper will begin with the first posed subcultural theory of crime; Delinquent boys by Albert Cohen. Third, Skyes and Matza’s, ‘Techniques of Neutralization’ as a theory will be examined and commented on. Fourth, Walter B. Miller’s subcultural theory of crime on Lower-class focal concerns will be examined. Fifth, Ohlin and Cloward’s theory on ‘Delinquency and Opportunity’ will be looked at. Finally, the …show more content…
As a result, the 1950s and 1960s in the United States were considered to prominently reflect the socially conservative values held by the middle class and more or less considered other classes, specifically the working class to be a nuisance and counterproductive within society, being the middle class was considered ‘normal’. Industrialization led to urbanization which in turn led to an increased inhabitation in city centers. Although, independent movements such as the civil rights movement pushed for equality amongst citizens, this did little to aid the problems within inner cities where residents were already labelled as deviant by the middle class simply due to the social and economic standings, hence the ‘lower class’ was the scapegoat who was blamed for the rise in crime within cities and were deemed to be deviant as a group. The popular view held that, poor or working class individuals are responsible for the situations they are currently in and this is because they do not work hard enough (William and McShane, …show more content…
Numerous academics of the time aimed to understand the crime trends in relation to juvenile population, hence this gave rise to subcultural theories of crime. As previously mentioned, the Chicago school of study is credited for creating an environment where subcultural theories of crime where able reflect and explain to some extent why crime exists with certain groups. Edward Sutherland’s differential association (1939) and Robert Merton’s (1938) anomie and strain theory focus on social structure and social class differences can be seen as a basis for the development of subcultural theories of
As a social process theory, drift and Neutralization sees a crime to be a part of wider social interactions. It views social order as non objective and non consensual and posits that there is not a single fundamental social goal that is held by all social groups; rather there are many different overlapping social values within a society, both conventional and delinquent: legitimate and illegitimate. Drift and Neutralization Theory posits that individuals learn values and delinquent behaviours through their exposure to sub-cultural values. “Deviant or delinquent (or criminal) subcultures do not reject ‘dominant’ values and beliefs. Instead, there is tension between inclinations to adhere to mainstream values and beliefs.” This sees that criminals can drift between deviant and conventional behaviours and how to use various techniques of neutralisation to rationalise their criminal activity. In analysing McVeigh’s motives, his learned sub cultural values can be examined to demonstrate how he was able to rationalise his violations of the law and how he came to drift from non delinquent to delinquent actions. The techniques of neutralisation; denial of responsibility, denial of injury, denial of
ically based control policy (punish and deter individuals) address the issues that surround the social construction of crime and deviance? References and Related Readings Bureau of Justice Statistics-1989, UNCRIM Gopher, SUNY-Albany, 1994. Marcus Felson, Crime and Everyday Life: Insight and Implications for Society, Pine Forge Press, 1994. Allen Liska, Perspectives on Deviance, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1987. Steven Messner and Richard Rosenfeld, Crime and the American Dream, Wadsworth, 1994.
Miller, Walter B. "Lower Glass Culture and Gang Delinquency." Crime in Society. Edited by L.D. Savitz and N. Johnston. Wiley. New York. 174-185. 1978.
In the 1950’s, Cohen (1955) acquired Merton’s theory of crime further by concentrating on gang delinquency within the working class demographic. Cohen used the dominant knowledge of the anomie theory but narrowed its emphasis on this precise subculture and particularized it in order to clarify the features of gang delinquency. Comparable to Merton and Cohen, Cloward and Ohlin (1960) tried to clarify why certain individuals or groups are more likely to involve in criminal activities. They contended that people are strained when they fail to attain financial achievement through legitimate means. Cloward and Ohlin remained in...
Cultural criminology is a relatively new perspective and approach to understanding crime and deviance. Cultural criminology first began to develop in the 1990s and rapidly progressed in to a new field of criminology that is both influential and informative. The core concept of cultural criminology is built upon by using traditional approaches from different disciplines such as sociological studies, cultural studies, symbolic interactionism and many other disciplines, theories and methods. (Oxford bibliography Keith Hayward) Although it would seem that cultural criminology is nothing more than an interdisciplinary field, using only the studies and theories of some of the disciplines mentioned above - it actually does offer a new line of thought and individuality that other fields of criminology in the past did not. This is because instead of viewing crime objectively, it instead looks at crime subjectively by analysing the idiosyncrasies of the modern sociocultural environment. It offers an explanation of crime and deviance as a constructed result from either political, social or cultural actors and groups who commit crime, because of a shared sense of meaning, emotions, symbols, styles and even fashion within different subcultures. (Oxford bibliography Keith Hayward) Cultural Criminologists hope to explain and examine how the meaning of certain aspects of a subculture can play an active role in society and the construction of crime, not only by explaining why crime is committed, but also how crime is controlled. This essay will explain what cultural criminology is by using The 1989 Hillsborough disaster as an example in illustrating some of the research findings by cultural criminologists. There have been many different topic area...
From 1990 to to the present there has been a sharp increase in juvenile crime across the United States. From 1996 to the present there has been a slight decline from the statistics in 1995(OJJDP). What was the cause for this uprise in juvenile delinquincy? I will discuss 2 different theories to why there was such an increase in juvenile crime rates. I will analyze the rise of the "Gangsta-Rap" culture in the early 1990's and how it may have affected teenagers that are in lower-income families. Many people believe that the increase in real life violence on television is a cause for violence in juveniles. I will discuss the evidence for this theory. It seems to me that the best theory to explain the rise in juvenile crime is the social constructionist theory. Different sub-cultures of teens have higher crime rates than others because of their interests, whether it be the music that they listen to or the types of television programs that they watched as child.
Winslow, R. W., & Zhang, S. (2008). Contemporary Theories of Crime. Criminology: a global perspective (). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Many people in the world today criticize and objectify specific people, merely by their outward appearance, as more likely to commit crime or other violent acts. A theory well known to criminologists is one devised by criminologists of the Chicago school, scholars whose main area of focus were urban, impoverished areas, and called their findings the Social Disorganization Theory in which it offers an idea as to why crime occurs in urban settings. The theory explains how American society is centered on the economy and individual achievement, otherwise known as “The American Dr...
Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory merged ideas from Merton’s Strain theory and the Robert Merton’s strain theory and the Chicago school on how criminal behavior is learned through cultural transmission (Lilly et al.2010). The Chicago school was based off Edwin Sutherland’s Differential Association theory and the research from the Chicago school played a immense role for these two theorists to understand criminal behavior and develop their own theory. Robert Merton’s Strain theory solely focuses on the American Dream and the failure to achieve economic success, in particular his research looked at the social structure barriers for the lower class (Bernburg 2002).
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
The causes of crime are complex, Collectivists believe that acceptable ways to reduce crime, is to address the social conditions in which the conditions for crime are created, things such as, a more equal society, improved work opportunities and effective housing will make crime less of an attraction. If people are in a stable job, providing for their family and are content with life, they could be less motivated to break the law. Individualists focus on individual values’ or absence of as the motive why people commit crimes. In the long run, if someone chooses to commit a crime, they are accountable for their own actions. If they are caught, they should face the consequences.
They would focus on low income areas because according to Cloward and Ohlin, those who do not have the same opportunities as others, are more than likely to commit crimes than those who have multiple opportunities. The scope of the differential opportunity and delinquency theory would be the fact that individuals that do not have the same opportunity as others tend to commit illegal crimes to achieve a certain goal, but more often than not, it is not enough. The easiest way to describe the parsimony of the differential opportunity theory is to understand the different types of criminal cultures that Cloward and Ohlin have developed. According to them, individuals commit crimes because they do not receive the same opportunities as others around them. The opportunities can be presented as an education, extensive or not, and job opportunities. Cloward and Ohlin determined that there are three different subcultures that explain criminal behavior in urban
The expectations of society can either build an individuals decision-making process into generating norms and actions based on what society predisposes as socially acceptable. This can be something as simple as graduating high school an going to college, or it can be short-term and reflect a week schedule consisting of work, family time and Sunday church. These expectations of society are either followed by the men and women living amongst one another or they disregarded by those that decided to walk a different path. Those that choose not to conform to society fall under a different set of principles and well as beliefs and norm. These people living within a society that is bound by different principle and choose not to conform to social expectations
What is street crime? According to McDonald and Balkin (1983) define street crime as “personal contact criminal victimization (p.419)”. As we read this article it argues from different viewpoint that street justice can be explained from different theoretical perspectives. There are three theoretical perspectives that examines the role of justice as a means of informal social control and as a reactionary process to dynamics of social strain and subcultural demands. This theoretical analysis is then applied to concepts of justice, including retributive, distributive, restorative, and procedural. The derived street justice paradigm incorporates these various forms of justice as they are linked with cultural imperatives associated with street culture and
What is this world coming to? Our society is losing its authority. The syllable of the syllable Why is there so much crime in society? There is so much because there are so many people that never consider the other person that they are stealing from or causing harm to. All of these people are self-centered and never think who they could be.