Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of media in shaping society
Role of media in shaping society
Mass media and its influence on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of media in shaping society
I agree with this statement. The Cold War was not only brought about by Stalin’s stubbornness and paranoia, it was also fueled by the conflicting political ideologies between these two Superpowers. Stalin also had great influence over his people, allowing him to further spread Communism and ultimately allowed him to gain total control of his country. While mutual distrust between these countries before and during World War II does play a part in leading up to the Cold War, it is ultimately Stalin’s thirst for power, influence, and paranoia that was the catalyst for this war.
After World War II Stalin was focused on spread Communism and began occupying some of the newly liberated nations in Eastern Europe. This did not sit well with the United
…show more content…
He had a large group of devout followers, molding them from a young age. Stalin, along with other Communist leaders, used education, literature, and even romance to mold the diverse group people. They used these sources to make the people adopt the positive attitude towards hard work, undying devotion for their country, and strict social cooperation. In A.O. Avdienko’s The Cult of Stalin, Avdienko examines the extent of devotion that Stalin’s followers had for him and how he used this to transform Russia’s society to his liking. He goes on to state that “centuries will pass, and the generations still to come will regard us as the happiest of mortals, as the most fortunate of men, because we were privileged to see Stalin, our inspired leader”. Avdienko then goes on to explain that Stalin “never had an equal in world history” and that when he and his wife has a child “the first word it shall utter will be: Stalin” (Avdienko, p.339-340). Not only does this show the blind devotion these people have for the great “Stalin” it also shows how influential Stalin was. Avdienko refers to Stalin as the “great educator” multiple times, which most likely pays homage to his use of education to promote the Communist way. By having such a wide spread influence over his people and their education, it was no wonder Stalin was able to …show more content…
He had an extreme thirst for power that drove him to completely reform Russia aware from its Tsar monarchy into a Communist empire. Unfortunately while he did have major influence and the devotion of his people, he was also extremely stubborn and paranoid. This paranoia caused him to crush his opposition in any means necessary, even using torture and death to get his way. Stalin’s stubborn and paranoid nature combined with conflicting political ideologies is what essentially drove the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet
However, evidence that is presented may indicate otherwise, as Joseph Stalin provides adequate counter claims for discrediting the “simplicity” of “yes”. Within this controversial topic, two authors provide their sides of the story to whom is to blame and/or responsible for the “Cold War.” Authors Arnold A. Offner and John Lewis Gaddis duck it out in this controversial situation as each individual leads the readers to believe a certain aspect by divulging certain persuading information. However, although both sides have given historical data as substance for their claim, it is nothing more than a single sided personal perception of that particular piece of information; thus, leaving much room for interpretations by the reader/s. Finding the truth to either claim is the obligation of the reader and outside research would accommodate the authors potential inadequacies and personal fallacies.... ...
Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.
Joseph Stalin was a realist dictator of the early 20th century in Russia. Before he rose to power and became the leader of Soviet Union, he joined the Bolsheviks and was part of many illegal activities that got him convicted and he was sent to Siberia (Wood, 5, 10). In the late 1920s, Stalin was determined to take over the Soviet Union (Wiener & Arnold 199). The main aspects of his worldview was “socialism
Stalin’s leadership of the Soviet Union can be best described as a period of terror and censorship. In other words, he was very strict, considering the fact that he created the totalitarian government. In order to create this type of government, Stalin used fear and propaganda. He took part in The Great Purge, which was a campaign of terror that was supposed to eliminate anyone who threatened Stalin’s power. He also relied on secret police, who would arrest and execute any traitors. The online blog, “The Reasons For the Failure of The Russian Revolution”, brings up information on how Stalin planned to rule as dictator of Russia. It has been noted, “This ‘reshaping’ had three main aspects: the elimination of all dissent; the liquidation of all forms of democracy and of working class organisation; the slashing of the living standards of the working class and the physical annihilation of millions of peasants” (Text 5). This quote explains how Stalin wanted to industrialize Russia, which includes the deaths of several peasants of Russia. The Russians did not just die from The Great Purge, but also from Stalin’s Five-Year Plan. The Five-Year Plan was an attempt to industrialize the Soviet Union. It was also a plan for increasing the output of steel, coal, oil, and electricity. He had control over economic resources, including farms and
In “Origins of the Cold War” the author explains what happened at the start of the Cold War. “The Cold War in its original form was a presumably moral antagonism, arising in the wake of the Second World War, between two rigidly hostile blocs, one lead by the Soviet Union, the other by the United States.” He starts off with his reasons on why the Cold War started in the first place. It was originally about morals and ideologies, but it quickly escalated into an arms race, where both belligerents could easily wipe each other off the map. He starts off with different views of the Cold War.
There have been many attempts to explain the origins of the Cold War that developed between the capitalist West and the communist East after the Second World War. Indeed, there is great disagreement in explaining the source for the Cold War; some explanations draw on events pre-1945; some draw only on issues of ideology; others look to economics; security concerns dominate some arguments; personalities are seen as the root cause for some historians. So wide is the range of the historiography of the origins of the Cold War that is has been said "the Cold War has also spawned a war among historians, a controversy over how the Cold War got started, whether or not it was inevitable, and (above all) who bears the main responsibility for starting it" (Hammond 4). There are three main schools of thought in the historiography: the traditional view, known alternatively as the orthodox or liberal view, which finds fault lying mostly with the Russians and deems security concerns to be the root cause of the Cold War; the revisionist view, which argues that it is, in fact, the United States and the West to blame for the Cold War and not the Russians, and cites economic open-door interests for spawning the Cold War; finally, the post-revisionist view which finds fault with both sides in the conflict and points to issues raised both by the traditionalists as well as the revisionists for combining to cause the Cold War. While strong arguments are made by historians writing from the traditionalist school, as well as those writing from the revisionist school, I claim that the viewpoint of the post-revisionists is the most accurate in describing the origins of the Cold War.
Stalin did not trust the West, Britain and USA. because he remembered they had invaded Russia in 1919 and had ignored Stalin's appeal for a second front. Stalin was convinced they wanted the USSR to destroy itself when fighting Germany. At the end of the war, the Allies met at Yalta and later Potsdam.... ...
Stalin continued even once he was successful in accomplishing those goals, as he did not stop hurting people, but if anything it gave him more power to hurt people even more. But, at the end of the day, although Lenin ruled for only a very short time, he did raise the standard of living, though there maintained a large amount of hardship. Stalin, however, transformed the USSR from a peasantry to an industrialized nation in less than a decade, he did it on the backs of his millions of victims, who died because of his harsh policies and many purges. Lenin made a series of policies throughout the beginning of the Revolution and through his short time in public office that came to be collectively known as ‘Leninism’. There were many things that influenced Leninism, such as Karl Marx.
The cold war didn’t start all at once, in the beginning it was made up of speeches and small worries that slowly ate away at their hosts. Calls for preparedness were sounded which gave way to large dramatic events. According to The Cold War; A Military History in 1946, President Harry S. Truman was worried that the Union of Soviet Socialists (U.S.S.R) wanted to invade Turkey. They were demanding to be allowed to establish naval and army bases. The gamble was taking form.
Son of a poverty-stricken shoemaker, raised in a backward province, Joseph Stalin had only a minimum of education. However, he had a burning faith in the destiny of social revolution and an iron determination to play a prominent role in it. His rise to power was bloody and bold, yet under his leadership, in an unexplainable twenty-nine years, Russia because a highly industrialized nation. Stalin was a despotic ruler who more than any other individual molded the features that characterized the Soviet regime and shaped the direction of Europe after World War II ended in 1945. From a young revolutionist to an absolute master of Soviet Russia, Joseph Stalin cast his shadow over the entire globe through his provocative affair in Domestic and Foreign policy.
Stalin united his people through a common love. Similar to George Orwell's 1984, in which conformity to the Party was rooted in love for Big Brother, conformity to the Soviets was rooted in love for Stalin. Joseph Stalin built up this love with the "Cult of Personality". Stalin was in every facet of Soviet life and appeared daily on the cover of Soviet newspapers. Giant statues of Stalin were built and towns named after him. Daily visual imagery of Stalin portrayed him as a Georgian peasant, which emphasized socialist principles of power from the people. In addition, people called him “father and teacher of th...
In the beginning Josef Stalin was a worshiper of his beloved Vladimir Lenin. He followed his every move and did as he said to help establish and lead the Bolshevik party. Much of the early part of his political career was lost due to his exile to Siberia for most of World War I. It wasn’t until 1928, when he assumed complete control of the country were he made most of his success. After Lenin’s death in January 1924, Stalin promoted his own cult followings along with the cult followings of the deceased leader. He took over the majority of the Socialists now, and immediately began to change agriculture and industry. He believed that the Soviet Union was one hundred years behind the West and had to catch up as quickly as possible. First though he had to seal up complete alliance to himself and his cause.
The policies that Soviet Union established before Cold War during 1945 that took place, could have been in depth a key factor to the development of the Cold War. Still, remains a concern because their are not necessarily one reason to what led to the Cold War. For example, most historians believe the cause of the Cold War was at the meeting of the Yalta Conference with the leaders to set the postwar structure of World War 2. Studies show that both the United States and Soviet Union were in a competition to become the only superpower country after WW2. “Eager to consolidate influence over a number of countries near the Soviet Union, Stalin pursued aggressive policies after World War II that provoked strong Western reaction.” (Raymond Zickel). Zickel perspective which signifies that Soviet policies were aggressive, and not just any policies passed. With that in mind, Stalin’s strive to achieve his country to be the only superpower had consequences. Stalin thought that by taking control of Eastern-Europe
The Cold War was an interesting time period for the world, seeing that it was after one of the biggest and most memorable wars ever. Yet, it was a different type of war. One that no one had ever seen before, it was a war without fighting (kind of). It was a war fought in between the USSR and the United States. Each side also included their allies: the US had NATO and the USSR had the Warsaw pact. The timeframe of this war was from 1947 to 1991. Despite the fact that this war is one of the longest in our history, I have chosen three main points that I think are vital for understanding the Cold War.
Today, there is a single event in history that which still has an effect on the entire world. It is one among many is still discussed and debated over of it’s beginnings. Source for many social and political going-ons in the world, the Cold War is that event. So what precisely was the Cold War? Since the country had won independence and started as it’s own, we have always fought for our freedoms and the natural rights of man. The war was an arms race and a battle for individual countries’ freedom from communism in the east, and so it was therefore our duty to protect those other countries from oppressive dictation. The common enemy that is spoken of in many pieces of literature regarding the war always point their fingers at us, and that enemy was Russia. Thanks to Stalin’s ongoing invasion back in those times, today many countries are still impacted economically and socially in the east; some countries still remaining split, such as Korea, divided north and south. As such, the Cold War originated between the conflict, between the US and the UN (Soviet Russia), the UN being at fault for the most part.