Structural Functionalist Approach

1145 Words3 Pages

Despite the fact that many critics focus on the economic side of TPP, two sociological theories can be applied to analyze how the approval of TPP would lead to social problems. First of all, TPP will be enforced by the governments of the signatory nations, and will yield enormous changes to the economy of the countries. Thus, Structural Functionalism can be used to study the nature of the problem by focusing on those two major social institutions. Also, as trade and alliance usually involve frictions between nations due to the difference in the core values, social systems, and cultures. Therefore, these conflicts can be studied with non-Marxist Conflict Theory. The main social institutions associated with TPP are the governments and the economies. …show more content…

Structural Functionalism is one of the sociological theory that proposes that society is composed of the many institutions that performs certain role to stabilize the society, and social problems are due to the dysfunctions, or state of not-functioning the role, of institutions. Viewing from structural functionalist perspective, the government will be disorganized as it will not be able to react to the rapid structural changes due to TPP. After TPP is enforced, many changes to the nation 's’ policies will be mandatory. For instance, elimination on over 18,000 products are required among the twelve nations (Green, Goodman 20). The governments cannot easily alter the tariff rules to protect nation’s industries without consent of all other TPP nations as TPP is an international …show more content…

As a result of free trade, global investment will be much more active among TPP nations, which will strengthen the economy. As economic activity will be mixed with many other nations’, nations will work for good relationships between TPP nations because unnecessary collisions will harm the interdependent economic body. This works well geopolitically as the current administration are aiming. Many of nations signing TPP are located in East and South-East Asia, where China is growing its influence for the sovereignty over the South China Sea and the hegemony in Asia. Professor Green and Professor Goodman analyze that the U.S. aim to strengthen economic tie between small Southeast Asian nations are to prevent Beijing’s use of mercantile coercion to quiet those nations on the maritime dispute in the South China Sea (Green, Goodman 28). This will allow the U.S. to continually maintain national security over the Pacific-Asia and hold China from getting out to the

Open Document