Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interpretation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Interpretation
Inerrancy is trustworthy in the bible, and its teachings and declaration are respected. The word is used by traditionalist Protestants and plays a major role in the faith about the bible.
Strict inerrancy states that the bible in its present form has no error, hence as God’s word, should be followed. Contrary, limited inerrancy according to Catholics, talks about the Bible having no errors in certain matters such as faith, morals and salvation. The belief system also states that the Bible contains errors in scientific observation matters as well as historical events. It also fault the fact that people cannot be certain that some occasions in the bible took place. They believe that one should interpret the moral lessons from the bible and apply to their lives but not take the bible literally (Albl, 2009.pg. 5-20).
…show more content…
Strict inerrancy is believed by millions of people though it’s not concrete. The bible is a thousand years old and has frequently undergone re-writing severally. It has caused discrepancies and misspelling of some words during translation. There are several translations and bible verses which make it difficult to know the real bible. The fact that the story of creation of all God's creatures as portrayed in the Bible and the historical analysis of evolution cannot be resigned makes it difficult for people to believe in the strict inerrancy. Limited inerrancy, on the other hand, is possible where as a person I determine what parts of the bible to believe and apply in my life and which parts not to. However, this would depicts me as an average by which truth defined which is wrong, and it waters down the power held by the bible (Imperato,
The Bible is read and interpreted by many people all over the world. Regardless, no one knows the absolute truth behind scripture. Walter Brueggemann, professor of Old Testament, wrote “Biblical Authority” to help people understand what he describes as six different parts that make up the foundation to ones understanding of scripture. He defines these six features as being: inherency, interpretation, imagination, ideology, inspiration, and importance. As Brueggemann explains each individual part, it is easy to see that they are all interconnected because no one can practice one facet without involuntarily practicing at least one other part.
To began this section Placher summarizes the Bible’s vision of the world, “…This is the real world…So if you buy into this picture… then anything real has to fit into this framework. Your life…thus will make sense only if [it has a] place within this grand story” (928). After this statement Placher recognizes that the biggest element in trusting the Bible is that the reader first comes to trust God. Once a person comes to trust the Lord they are caught in a cycle of trusting the Bible because God inspired the Bible, Placher explains.
One difference between Catholicism and Protestantism is the question of adequacy and authorization of the Scripture. Protestants, being more traditional, focus on the Bible. They believe that it is the source of God’s revelation to man (“What”), and that “the whole of Christian truth is found within the Bible’s pages” (“Tracts”). Bible teaches one about their wrongs, and what actions they need to undertake in order to be saved from their sins. They see it as guidelines for Christian behavior. These guidelines are otherwise known as “sola scriptura” (“What”). Sola scriptura derives from “sola” meaning “alone” and “scriptura” meaning “writings.” “Sola scriptura” says that only the Scripture is responsible for the faith of Christians and their practices. The Scripture is the foundation of their religion. It tells one that their salvation is not obtained from random readings, but from the document itself. However, the Catholics rebuff the teachings of the Scripture. Many of their documents such as praying to saints, worship of Mary, etc. are focused only on the Roman Catholic traditions. They do not believe that the Bible alone will satisfy them. Instead, they believe that the Roman Catholic tradition alongside with the Bible are both mandatory for oneself. Both determine the sufficiency of the Bible as well as its authority and completeness (“What”).
...e to the study of the bible instead of all the doubts that was created by the other criticism. To them all the odd parts and repeated phrases or parts all add to a strikingly beautiful tale. They see the bible as a literary masterpiece in which the authors used gorgeous imagery to strike at the heart of the reader to show them God’s greatness. In essence rhetorical critics want you to see the big picture instead of all the little side pictures. The J story of Genesis as well at times the P story is filled with imagery that is meant to show God’s power.
Writings of historical scholars, Josephus, Aristotle, and Plato, to name a few, are taken as truth and fact, yet the writings of the Scripture are constantly disputed. Why? Perhaps because of the ethical imperatives imposed to which people do not want to adhere. Perhaps because of man’s ego and pride that disallows them to submit to a Higher Authority. Nonetheless, The Bible has been, and still remains, the most widely read and revered book of all
believed that the people needed to read the Scripture for themselves rather than depend upon a
Even though humans wrote the text, translating it and passing it down from generations to generations, God’s truth is unchanging. Debates of the inerrancy of the bible cannot usurp God as the King of grace. Instead of focusing on the inerrancy of the Bible, individuals who wish to seek a life of faith should focus on the inspiration God is showing them in his word. These revelations should move them into applicable, daily life changing implications from what they have learned. God shows revelations of himself through the Bible, and his character is revealed time and time again throughout scripture. Any faulty facts or discrepancies in grammar or data, should not take away from the value that scripture holds. When we read scripture we bring new meaning of interpretations of the truths God shows us, since new eras and environmental factors will be influential on how we process information. The bible is not just a fact book, telling humans stories of the past, but instead the bible is inspired instructions for how we can deal with spiritual and ethical encounters we
...ts of the Bible and do not believe in others. By doing so, one is lead to an entirely different interpretation that strays away from the truth of God’s words.
correspond to the stories we learn in religion class. In fact, many critics believe the
The contents of the Bible have dealt with controversy in regards to its inerrancy since publication, and will surely continue to. Historians progress to learn more about biblical stories in order to provide evidence for the reliability of information. Many believers today understand that not everything in the Bible has been factually proven. An outstanding topic many scholars pay attention to lies within the four gospels. The three synoptic gospels, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, replay essentially the same story with minor inconsistencies, while John portrays Jesus in an entirely different way. The differences in each gospel are due to how each gospel entertains different portrayals of the life and understanding of Jesus himself, in order to persuade
Humankind should take their stories as an example and learn from it, by turning to God instead of those things. Works Cited Barker, Kenneth L., ed. The Holy Bible. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 2010. Print.
For example, they explain that the first four trumpet judgments in Revelation do not have to have a literal fulfillment. This is improper because it is the author’s opinion and should not be reflected, especially in a book dealing with hermeneutics. Aside from these weaknesses, the book has much to offer the Bible student. Conclusion The Bible student, layman, or pastor will find the principles presented by Fee and Stuart helpful despite the weaknesses presented. The author’s contribution on how to interpret each of the different genres is especially beneficial.
As a result, Christian leaders questioned the methods used by Gnostic writers for interpreting Scripture. The spread of Gnosticism prompted the church to develop a “traditional” method for interpreting certain scriptures. By implementing a “traditional” guide for interpreting Scripture Christian leaders could ensure that Scripture was interpreted based on the background of the history of the Christian Church. Furthermore, it would distinguish Christian tradition from Gnostic tradition. The guide for interpreting scripture became the “rule of faith”.
Thiselton, A.C. (2005). Can the Bible mean whatever we want it to mean? Chester, U.K.: Chester Acadamic Press, 10-11.
historical data. The fact that the Bible has stood the test of time and has not been