Branding Strategies Samsung utilizes many branding strategies in order to expand its global brand image and recognition. The first expansion of Samsung’s brand image was started in 1993. Samsung Electronics changes its logo from its basic black bold letters spelling Samsung to a white Samsung word on a blue background. The blue background was designed in the shape of an elliptical because it gives the impression of modernization and is futuristic. The idea of updating the logo was definitely a success because it have the Samsung logo a vibrant look that is more aesthetically pleasing. Samsung’s branding efforts have definitely paid dividends because the brand is world class and is one of the top brands in terms of recognition. …show more content…
In the mobile phone market Samsung faces stiff competition from companies such as Apple, HTC and Microsoft etc. As a means of combatting this market saturation and competition, Samsung employs a mix of different marketing strategies. The pricing strategies utilized by Samsung are as follows:
• Competitive Pricing- As a means of gaining a competitive edge Samsung deploys a competitive pricing strategy. For most of its products except high end smartphone Samsung uses a competitive pricing strategy. Products such as televisions, refrigerators, air conditions and lower end smartphones have stiff competition from other companies such as LG, Panasonic and HTC etc. Samsung has great brand recognition for home appliances but nit greater than LG. As a matter of fact LG is actually above Samsung in the home appliance category. This trend is similar for Whirlpool with washing machines and Cannon with Cameras. Therefore it is evident that Samsung are nit the market leaders in numerous products the make so they must have a competitive pricing in order to gain customers form their competitors. Samsung hardly utilized penetrative pricing because it does have a well-recognized brand. However, its prices will be completive or slightly better than its competitors in categories that it does not have competitive advantage.
…show more content…
The price skimming strategy is used as a means of competing with Apple who is its harshest rival. Samsung is able to use price skimming in the smart phone market because of the fact that it always has a product that has the latest and greatest technological features so people are willing to pay a premium for these mobile devices. So Samsung employs the price skimming strategy by charging a high price for its mobile devices before competitors are able to catch up. One competitors catch up Samsung will have another device that is of a higher quality that it can utilize with price skimming. For example currently Samsung has the Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge as its top handsets and they are extremely popular among consumers despite their premium price
In 1990s, ground-based wireless phone service grew rapidly around the world. A key factor in the growth of wireless phones was the adoption of a single standard, known as GSM, in Europe and parts of Asia. There were 480 million cellular subscribers worldwide by January 2000 and it reached more than billions before 2005. The economy of scale that introduced will provide the extent of competitive pressure in the business environment. It helps to stimulate Iridium to consider price-performance tradeoff that offered by the substitutes and the need of product differentiation alternatives in advance.
It is determined by the cost of production, the segment aimed, the capability of the market to recompense, supply and demand, and all other direct and indirect factors. There are more than a few kinds of pricing strategies, each corresponded with the total business plan (Yoo, Donthu et al. 2000). Pricing could also be used to discriminate different brands of product, and to enhance the appearance of a particular company (Kotler and Levy 1969). In this case, Amazon is quite competitive in term of its prices, and has strategic approaches of staying up front of its market competitors (Chevalier and Goolsbee 2003). For instance, when a person is considering to purchase a particular book, Amazon has options whether that individual would prefer a new copy or a used one, and it also presents the prices for these books together with their conditions. A further proposal is to pay to create a premium account, where the items purchased would be delivered quicker. Amazon’s competitive prices also results from the minimum number yet well skilled employees, thus the customers are actually benefitting from the reduced cost of overheads, hence, the low prices of Amazon
While profits from semiconductor sales are keeping stakeholders happy, Samsung is pursuing a differentiation strategy in the smartphone market. The managers are committing more resources to researching something they think will revolutionize phones. author name writes, “All smartphone makers face the issue of stagnancy in hardware innovation. Samsung is currently working on developing a smartphone with foldable displays…” (Tanner). There has not been a ground-breaking development in smart phones in the last few years, so the managers believe
Predatory pricing “is alleged to occur when a firm sets a price for its product that is below some measure of cost and forfeits revenues in the short run to put competitors out of business” (Sheffet p.163-164). The reason firms take the short term loss is because they hope to drive out competitors and raise prices to monopolistic levels. By doing this, they covered their short term loss to make even greater profits in the long term than they would have by not using predatory tactics (Sheffert). Predatory pricing became illegal under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. It has remained one of the more difficult allegations for prosecutors to prove, due to the complexity of determining the company’s actual intent and whether or not it the strategy is competitive pricing. According to Areeda and Turner, there are three ways to determine if a firm is implementing predatory pricing. First, a price above marginal cost is presumed lawful; second, a price below marginal cost is considered unlawful, except when there is strong demand; and third, average variable cost is considered a good proxy for marginal cost. This is a reason predatory pricing is still important today. The courts must decide whether or not companies are engaging in competitive prices for the good of the consumers or are using predatory tactics for the good of their own company. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the current legislation regarding predatory pricing, determining when there is predation in an industry and the cause and effect relationship it has on an industry.
Pricing is an important aspect of every business. Chief Financial Officer’s (CFO) use pricing to create financial projections, establish a break-even point, and calculate profit and loss margins (Power Point, 2005). It is the only element in the marketing mix that produces revenue. Price is also one of the most flexible elements of the marketing mix as it can be changed very quickly. This is usually done to beat competitor prices in an attempt to fix the product’s market value position very low (Anderson & Bailey, 1998). After all, high prices make it difficult to become the market share leader. The leading US retailer, Wal-Mart, is an expert at low product pricing as evident in 2004 with $250 billion dollars in sales to their 138 million weekly shoppers. However, they are also responsible for reducing prices so low that it drives specialty stores out of business. This is the effect Wal-mart has had on many toy stores and has almost closed the doors of the famous toy store Toys “R” Us Inc.
Cell phone manufacturers and service providers are at the core of the cell phone industry. These corporations are integral from their research and development endeavors to interactions with the consumer and the marketing of new products. The companies that control such factors of cellular phones are very numerous, so it is difficult to address all the cell phone manufacturers and service providers. However, we have focused largely on only the most significant cellular companies namely in the U.S. marketplace, although many have global ties. Collectively, companies around the world have the same goals in mind – to create desirable cutting-edge technology and to increase consumer satisfaction with hopes of generating sales, and thus profits.
Marketing strategies are based on the 4 P’s or Product, Price, Promotion and Place or Distribution Channel. This section will briefly look into the Product and Pricing strategy of Apple and will illustrate various factors how it has been capable of sustaining competitive advantages in times of extreme competition.
When it comes to smart phone market share in the United States, Apple still trails Android by almost 10%. But if you are to break out the market share figures then you will notice that IPhone reigns supreme by a very wide margin. According to a lot of recent data compiled by ComScore, Phone’s share of the United States smartphone market now is about 43.6%, followed by Samsung which is at 27.6%. Apples market has increased by 4% almost every year, while Samsung has been dropping by 4% almost every year. Although Apple is doing a bit better than Samsung overall, Samsung is still topping Apple with their Android. During the second quarter of 2015 Samsung took a 21.7 percent of the global smartphone market, with shipments 73.2 million units. A reason I feel Samsung is doing much greater then apple right now is their ability to have all these different features, which not only add modern things to their phone but also longevity. With the three new water proof phones that Samsung has come out with Apple has yet to release their first
Under the circumstance that the mobile phone industry entered the 3rd generation, Nokia faced competition from both macro level and industry level. For the macro level, the government encouraged competition among the operators and handset manufacturers by giving digital licenses to new entrants. As a result, the mobile phones became more sophisticated, for example, the cameras and the games in the mobile phone. For the industry level, which can be analyzed by the Porter’s Five Forces, (lecture )Nokia was facing threat of new entrants, competitive rivalry and the bargaining power of buyers is increasing as well. As the government encourage completion between the handset manufacturers, there are several new entrants from different countries enter this industry, such as Apple from USA, Samsung from Korea. These new entrants compete with Nokia in both smartphone segment and basic phone segment. Some of them even constructed “ecosystems”, which they could integrate the services and applications quickly, in order to produce the phone in just two days. For the bargaining power of buyers’ aspect, they do not need to rely on the only operating system Symbian. They can choose Windows mobile launched by Microsoft, Android launched by Google and Ios launched by Apple, in addition, basically all of them are better than Symbian (Amiya, 2010). The buyers could choose any
price as the major decision-making tool for customers (“Global Consumer Electronics”, 2013). This lack of
Samsung is an innovative company that focus highly on quality and specialised products, they became an electronics company in 1969 and they released their very first mobile phone in 1988. In 2006, they became the global leading brand within the television market and in 2011, they became the latest smart phone provider in the world and their successful innovation is furthermore expanding. Today Samsung Electronics has proven to be one of the most successful global brands to follow.
Samsung used the “new product development” strategy. According to Kotler/Armstrong new product development is defined as the development of original products, product improvements, product modification, and new brand through the firm’s own product. Samsung also unveiled a new strategy, which is called “new management,” a top- to-bottom strategy for the entire company. Lee Kung Hee, CEO, hired young designers to produce new ideas that could get the company in the direction that he wanted it. New designs .Sleek, bold and beautiful products, so that they could target high-end users to the company. Samsung also was testing new product concepts.
In this following report I will discuss the phone industry and analysed it in great detail. I will analysis the market structure and try and understand why the mobile industry falls to heavily oligopoly structure. I will highlight all the structures, however I will discuss in detail how, for example Vodafone can be incorporated in the porter’s five forces method to show how the mobile industry has devolved over the years and to understand if consumers are driven by the actual technology of the phone but if it driven more by style.
This case study analysis is on Samsung Electronics Company (SEC) and how it has climbed up the ranks in the past decade via calculated marketing strategies, extensive market research and analysis, and a risky bet on how the market will evolve. Samsung’s principle outlook took time and education from within and thereafter the general market.
...e enough because the company has chosen the best possible way to increase the company performance. The pricing strategy is the company’s best strategy from all because it affected the sales revenue a lot. Although fluctuating the price is quite risky for a business since the customers might order from other companies if the company doesn’t do it properly, but XXX Company manage to done it well so far. The effectiveness might also be seen by the average of sales revenue between January to August from 2011 to 2013.