Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime among youth introduction
The effects of youth crime
Period of juvenile justice history
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime among youth introduction
Here we will look at the strategies of youth justice policies and practice with the ideological motivations and identify and evaluate the social and political context. The 1908 Child Act; Children and Young Persons Act, the Criminal Justice Act; Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 will be discussed.
Youth justice is a creature of historical development. The structure of the industry is full of dominant philosophies which have seeped into the foundations, which still monopolise and govern contemporary practice and although new perspectives have emerged over the recent history, it is necessary to trace the evolution over the last century to understand the logic behind the practice.
The strategies of youth justice, as identified by Muncie (2009), will now be discussed throughout the emergence of the youth justice system and how the arrangements and certain relationships between them, present contradictory views over how youth offenders should be dealt with.
First we refer to the two polemic philosophies, the welfare and the justice perspectives and the conflicts that these divergent natures render any attempt at fusion unsuccessful, and then we examine the philosophies of risk-management and authoritarianism. The historical development of youth justice legislation and political positions will accompany this.
Welfare vs Justice
Since the early nineteenth century most young offender legislation has protected young people from the full weight of criminal law and the recognition of this was embodied in the 1908 Children Act creating a distinct system of youth justice, differentiating in terms of responsibility and culpability between adults and young people. Before this, child criminals were punished...
... middle of paper ...
...llenges for social work with children in trouble. Child & Family Social Work, vol 5.
Goldson, B and Muncie, J (2006). Youth Crime and Justice: Critical Issues, London, Sage.
Pickford, J (2006). The development of youth justice philosophies, laws and policies. [Online] Learning Matters. Available at http://www.learningmatters.co.uk/sampleChapters/pdfs/9781844450664-2.pdf [Accessed 11 November 2011].
Nelken, D (1994). The Futures of Criminology. London, Sage.
Newburn, T (2007), Criminology, London, Willan Publishing.
Muncie, J (1984), The Trouble with Kids Today: Youth and Crime in Post-War Britain, London, Hutchinson.
Muncie, J (2009), Youth & Crime, 3rd ed., London, Sage.
Muncie, J, Hughes, G and McLaughlin, E (2002) Youth justice: Critical readings. London: Sage.
Springhall, J (1986) Coming of Age: Adolescence in Britain 1860-1960, London, Gill & Macmillan.
The book “No Matter How Loud I Shout” written by Edward Humes, looks at numerous major conflicts within the juvenile court system. There is a need for the juvenile system to rehabilitate the children away from their lives of crime, but it also needs to protect the public from the most violent and dangerous of its juveniles, causing one primary conflict. Further conflict arises with how the court is able to administer proper treatment or punishment and the rights of the child too due process. The final key issue is between those that call for a complete overhaul of the system, and the others who think it should just be taken apart. On both sides there is strong reasoning that supports each of their views, causing a lot of debate about the juvenile court system. Edward Humes follows the cases of seven teenagers in juvenile court, and those surrounding them.
Thus, the shifting perceptions of the justice system has transformed what it means to be a child and an adult due to their pervasive, and punitive approaches to crime and delinquency. Although adolescents today enjoy many new freedoms and greater time to experiment, those that don’t conform to “normative behaviors” and engage in socially constructed definitions of delinquency, often end up under the firm hands of the juvenile justice system. Despite the creation of this phase in an adolescent’s life, the injustices within the adult justice system have breached into the juvenile system, thus, blurring the lines of what it means to be an adolescent in modern times. Thereby, the adolescent stage is constantly being manipulated to conform and match the social construction of crime and delinquency, and the rise in the practice of trying juveniles as adults within the court system and mandating life sentences is evidence of this
Youth crime is a growing epidemic that affects most teenagers at one point in their life. There is no question in society to whether or not youths are committing crimes. It has been shown that since 1986 to 1998 violent crime committed by youth jumped approximately 120% (CITE). The most controversial debate in Canadian history would have to be about the Young Offenders Act (YOA). In 1982, Parliament passed the Young Offenders Act (YOA). Effective since 1984, the Young Offenders Act replaced the most recent version of the Juvenile Delinquents Act (JDA). The Young Offenders Act’s purpose was to shift from a social welfare approach to making youth take responsibility for their actions. It also addressed concerns that the paternalistic treatment of children under the JDA did not conform to Canadian human rights legislation (Mapleleaf). It remained a heated debate until the new legislation passed the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Some thought a complete overhaul was needed, others thought minor changes would suffice, and still others felt that the Young Offenders Act was best left alone.
People have, not too long ago, realized that youth and adults are very diverse and should not be treated the same. They gave no time for children to develop the “meins reis”, therefore, they were not given the opportunity to learn. People were not aware that the brain of the youth were not fully developed and were not given the chance of change. They thought that once guilty you shall remain guilty. For that reason they were considered adults, when in reality, adult criminals will only continue to infatuate their mind with evil. The new Youth Criminal Justice Act focuses on change and reintegration with society. We have learned that the youth have not fully developed and do not have the full ability to comprehend such judgements.
The Youth Criminal Justice Act, often called by the name of YCJA, is specifically made for youths ages varying from 12 to 17 that disobey the law. In April 1, 2003, the YCJA replaced the previous justice act called Young Offenders Act due to several negative concerns. “These concerns included the overuse of the courts and incarceration in less serious cases, disparity and unfairness in sentencing, a lack of effective reintegration of young people released from custody, and the need to better take into account the interests of victims.” The main purpose of the YCJA aims to have a fairer and more equitable system. Although the YCJA is an effective law within the justice system, a main aspect/characteristic that needs to remain, is keeping the
In all the analysis, the youth justice policy analyst has to judge the use of specific words and their interpretations conveyed and the interpretations captured by society and formalise a method which in all way tries to curb the spread of wrong interpretation. Moral panic, demonization, and politicisation are of invaluable use for the youth policy analyst as the interpretations of these words makes most of the difference in the way juvenile crime is viewed and accepted by society at large.
... parliament has enhanced its Extrajudicial Measures, ensured effective reintegration of a young person once released from custody while creating more jobs and lowering crime re-offending rates and provided much needed clarification on sentencing options giving better guide lines to courts. Although The Youth Criminal Justice Act remains a very important acts with a lot of improvements there are still many problems contained within the act that are still to be improved. With this closing I must insist on posing the following question, Will there ever be a non problematic piece of legislation? One can only envision the answer, for now that is.
Most young offenders get into trouble with the law only once. But the younger children are when they first break the law, the more likely they are to break the law again (Statistics Canada study, 2005). The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) attempts to acknowledge that different youth need different sentences within the justice system, while ensuring that it is fair and equitable for them. Many people, both in Canada, and around the world, believe that youth are not reprimanded harshly enough for the crimes they commit and that they are, in general, are able to squeeze through the justice system without punishment. Others, believe that the justice system does not treat youth fairly and punishes them without acknowledging that rehabilitation
juvenile justice” (Elrod & Ryder, 2011) is to detour juvenile crimes and not be so easy on
Opinions such as those found in the Smith Family Youth Unemployment Report (2003) which hypothesize that juvenile crime is directly connected to the high rates of youth unemployment in Australia cannot be neither accepted nor critiqued until there is a clear understanding of what the terms “Youth Unemployment” and “Juvenile Crime” mean in the context of this essay. In this essay youth unemployment is generally taken to include the entire 15-24 age cohort – not just 15-19 year old teenagers – who are no longer at school or university and who are without a job. I have chosen to include 20-24 year olds under the banner of “Youth”, as it gives a fairer picture of the performance of all young people in the labor market and takes into account the pattern of employment both during and after leaving school or university.
The modern teen court concept began in the early 1970’s when a small number of local communities in America began to establish the first Global Youth Justice programs (Peterson, p. 2). In 1994 there were 78 youth court programs in existence. As of March, 2010, there are over 1,050 youth court programs in operation in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Teen courts serve as a “diversion” program used to divert first time offenders away from a lifetime of criminal activity. The primary function of most teen court programs is to determine a fair and restorative sentence or disposition for the youth respondent. Although the primary function of teen courts is to rehabilitate offenders, some may wonder if teen courts are actually beneficial to young offenders.
“Juvenile Justice and Injustice” New York, New York Margaret O. Hyde, 1977. Johnson, Jason B. Slain Teen’s family: Cops eyeing 7-10 suspects.” Boston Herald. 7 April 1995 Olney, Ross R. Up Against The Law. New York, New York: NAL Penguin Inc., 1985.
Youth and juvenile crime is a common and serious issue in current society, and people, especially parents and educators, are pretty worried about the trend of this problem. According to Bala and Roberts, around 17% of criminals were youths, compared to 8% of Canadian population ranging between 12 to 18 years of age between 2003 and 2004 (2006, p37). As a big federal country, Canada has taken a series of actions since 1908. So far, there are three justice acts in the history of Canadian juvenile justice system, the 1908 Juvenile Delinquents Act, the 1982 Young Offenders Act, and the 2003 Youth Criminal Justice Act. In Canada, the judicial system and the principle of these laws have been debated for a long time. This paper will discuss how these three laws were defined and why one was replaced by another.
The Youth Criminal Justice Act is an act for youth justice, it applies to youths at the age of twelve to seventeen who are alleged to committing criminal offences. Also known as the YCJA, the act will take into account the interests of victims and ensure that youth will have meaningful consequences such as rehabilitation, community service, and use of juvenile facilities and so on. Even though many people think that the youth are not treated equally, some think differently. I agree that the Youth Criminal Justice Act instills equality among the youth because no matter their race. The Youth Criminal Justice Act will give youth a voice in court no matter how bad the crime was, they will help give the youth a fair chance at their consequence no matter their gender, and youth who commit offences must take responsibility for their actions.
Stokes, D. 2004. Submission to the Youth Justice Agency. [Online] Available from: www.youthreach.ie [Accessed 7th May 2012]