Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Examine the elements of strategic thinking
Challenges for strategic thinking
Five key elements of strategic thinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Examine the elements of strategic thinking
More and more, experts in the field of strategic planning and management are advocating for more attention to be paid on strategic thinking, and recommending for it to be considered a separate and distinct stage in the strategy planning and executing cycle. Results from the strategic thinking exercise feeds directly into creation of the strategic vision, which according Thompson, Strickland & Gamble (2008) is the first phase of a strategy-making, strategy executing cycle.
Ingid Bonn (Bonn, 2001) is very convincing in her argument that not only is strategic thinking an important aspect of any manager’s role, but also that the thinker has special qualities. This implies that not all managers are necessarily strategic thinkers, and in order for an organization to have the best chance at producing optimal strategic plans, they should be particular about the people they hire at levels where strategic decisions are required, and that there should be some sort of criteria to evaluate the creative strengths of these individuals. Since the function of strategic thinking cannot be the effort of one individual, it is imperative that care is taken to build a cohesive strategic management team, who complement each other, and are able to draw from each other in a way that their efforts will be truly representative of a thorough analysis of the available information and who can produce a set of best strategic options of courses of action available to the organization.
In reality though, the cost, both in terms of time and also money, of investing in the process of preparing an involved, focused strategic vision and plan (involving the strategic thinking phase) can be very high, even prohibitive (Temkin, 2003), and as such may not be considered an immediate priority to an organisation’s management team. As well, considering internal factors, building such a strategic team can be a challenge occasioned by -among other issues- lack of appropriate/accurate information required by team to deliberate on the best strategic vision and consequent plans, or inadequate feedback of the results/effects of the existing strategy that is being executed; mistrust amongst the team members (especially if they feel that they are all not being given equal opportunity to exercise their creativity); professional competitiveness (where the chosen members of the strategic team feel that they can use the task as a means to shine), internal office politics (which can adversely affect the composition of the team), and insufficiently apportioned time to complete the strategic thinking and vision development phase and proceed with the rest of the strategic execution process.
For any strategic plan to be successful there should be effective communication between the management and the employees. The department heads and managers should communicate to their subordinates the significance of their input in the development of the strategic plan for the company.The management should engage the staff in all the phases of the strategic plan as their perspective is valuable to the company. Employees will then be allowed to offer their input through different platforms, such as focus groups, surveys or questionnaires. This communication and engagement within the organization will give the management a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the company. For the strategic plan to be successful, both the management and the employees of the company should be involved in the implementation process.
Prior to analyzing the characteristics, specifically the knowledge, skills, and abilities required by strategic leaders, this paper will briefly discuss the concept of strategic leadership and later explore those attributes that best characterize the s...
In today’s organization, strategic leadership is required for the drive to the top, the leaders believe in innovation and change. Therefore, they set forth by investing their strength to achieve success. Strengths Based Leadership by Tom Rath and Barry Conchie discussed the three keys to becoming a more effective leader through strengths, working with the right people of equal strength, seeking the right people on the team and achieving the basic need of a leadership. The strength of a leader is in his communication, a great communicator is one who thinks ahead of time in making sure things are done thoroughly. However, a leader’s strength can be categorized as a visionary thinker. The strength of a visionary thinker is one that understands the purpose of a project and work effectively to accomplish the project in a timely manner. According to (Rath & Conchie 2009, p.13), “Leaders can learn to develop certain skills which can help them become more effective, efficient,...
In addition, this evolution is not only shows on top management, but also reveals on all level of participators in the organization. They contribute to scan the environment for vital information, advise innovations to future plans and projects to take advantage of environment changes, and cooperate with others to constantly enhance work methods and processes. The company needs to make appropriate shifts through strategic management because of current dynamic and complex environment. As a result, strategic management is an evolution and a destination.
Most of the common activities in our daily life present an opportunity to negotiate, whether or not we realise it. Meta-reflecting upon my negotiation experiences during the class and other activities have led me to identify few common themes. In this assignment, the two themes I will be discussing are (1) the importance of being clear on the strategic intent and big picture thinking, and (2) the importance of managing the negotiation process through understanding the various phases and visualising negotiation as a train journey.
Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J., & Gamble, J. E. (2008). Crafting & executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage (16th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
For today’s managers, there is a need to learn and to understand the complex nature of complex problems, but not from the simple version, we know and learned from an early age. J. Atwater and Paul Pittman (2006) clarify that as children we learn in a simple linear view. For example, if someone cries, there will be someone there to comfort. A simple action and result, but in reality it is more dynamically complex, not simply a cause-and-effect, or cause and reaction. According to Jay Forrester (1995) , it is hard for a company and senior leadership to evaluate behavior in a complex environment without tools and technology. People do not naturally think systemically or strategically, therefore, managers must be trained in systemic thinking tools and concepts to learn strategic thinking (Forrester, 1995). From the perspective of the structure of an organization, it is important in how the organization structure influences behavior and decision making by placing constraints on what the company has historically known from its experiences, which influence decision-making process within the business. According to excerpt articles from Bob De Wit and Ron Meyer, strategic thinking is not simply framed in the manner in which we have learned in our prior class. In the prior class, we framed our understanding according to Hamel and Prahalad (1996), the rational reasoning approach. To expand on strategic thinking, creative approach must be added to gain additional understanding of De Wit and Meyer’s intent, in addition to a rational systems thinking approach.
In other words, strategic objectives differ from goals/visions in terms of feasibility, practicality, and ultimately implementation. This theme makes its way into essentially every portion of the book, as it is vital to strategy. Often times, strategic planning and strategic thinking is thought to be any action performed by upper management. Rumelt debunks this myth and inserts that these executives are motivating and energizing their employees at best through vague visions and mission statements. Instead, upper-level management should actually focus on opportunities and detail orientated actions to avoid bad strategy. The same logic can be applied to hopeful wishes (over ambitious goals). These goals contain a great deal of uncertainty, as they lack a level of reality and planning. In fact, good strategy should be based off of an educated guess, even if that means you take a stance on an uncertain issue. Rumelt explains, “A new strategy is, in the language of science, a hypothesis, and its implementation is an experiment. As results appear, good leaders learn more about what does and doesn’t work and adjust their strategies accordingly” (Rumelt, 2011, pg. 241). In other words, successful strategists are constantly evaluating and adjusting their original hypothesis to perfect their strategy. This hypothesis allows them to
Eight skills/behaviours typically described as part of strategic thinking and the five that describes me best Strategic thinkers are: Future-based: Embrace and anticipate change by looking for opportunities Curious: They are interested in what is going on throughout their department, organization, industry, and the larger business environment. Long-term focus: They are willing to invest today to gain a better outcome for tomorrow. Willing to take Risks: They are not limited to past or current thinking and are willing to try new methods.
Throughout the global economic environment the desire to out-perform the competition is always present. In every situation, the companies who do better are the ones with superior strategy (Rothaermel, 2013). Strategic management is therefore important in every company, no matter what industry or market they operate in; and as stated by M. Carpenter and G. Sanders, 2013, is described as "The process by which a firm manages the formulation and implementation of its strategy". Strategic management is a constant topic under discussion with different schools of theorists with different beliefs and attitudes which is described as "A tense array of disagreement" (Rees, 2012).
Strategic implementation is a critical factor when making decisions regarding issues that affect the vision, mission, or objectives of an organization. Strategies are often implemented in accordance to the culture of the organization, the nature of control systems, the stakeholders, and the nature of the organizational design. In order to achieve success in the implementation of strategies, the structure of these factors must work in coordination with one another. For instance, the strategic vision of CPK lies in the creation of a globally recognized brand name and therefore, all of the goals and objectives of CPK must be directed in realizing that the company achieves this objective (California Pizza Kitchen 2011). Furthermore, the vision statement is inclusive in itself in that it communicates the message in a directional, flexible, and focused manner.
Many models are used to assist in understanding various leadership concepts. The one discussed in this essay is designed to illustrate the process of moving from a vision to a strategic execution. This class has given us the aptly named, “From Vision to Execution,” model. This model takes the shape of an inverted pyramid with six stages; Vision, Team Building, Environmental Scanning, Strategic Intent, Calibration, and Execution. This model, and the paragraphs below, are intended to show the necessary steps to take a broadly defined vision, evaluate and assemble the appropriate resources, review and design a plan of attack, and ultimately bring the vision to life. Encompassing each step is the overarching issue of constraints. Constraints can, and will, manifest themselves each step of the way. As seen in our slides, constraints can be regulation and laws, shareholders, the Board of Directors, social pressures and sanctions, legitimacy, or possibly even the vision itself. It is critical that leaders know where they want to go, and have a roadmap for getting there. This model is that roadmap. While it is not all-inclusive of the many talents leaders must possess, it does reflect many of the talents the great ones had. To further illustrate the model I will incorporate many examples of distinguished leaders from videos and class (Jobs, Kelleher, Welch), rely on several articles (Isaacson, PWC, Schwarber, Quiznos), and reiterate some information from our slides.
The key role in solving strategic tasks belongs to strategic planning, which is the process of developing and maintaining strategic balance between organization’s goals and resources in the changing market environment. The purpose of the strategic planning is to determine the most promising fields of activity providing its growth and prosperity. Strategic planning is a component of a broader concept “strategic management”. All four management functions (planning, organizing, leading and controlling), when talking about strategic management include strategic orientation. When viewing strategic planning from the highest level possible within a company, the planning function is the area that stands out as the most important area which involves a great deal of development and focus.
The four steps that lead managers and the firm through the strategic planning process are first defining the company’s mission, then setting objectives and goals, next designing a business portfolio and lastly developing functional plans. The first step involves focusing on consumers’ needs and wants. Setting forth a market oriented mission that organizations want to reach based on consumers of the environment. After finding the mission, organizations then proceed to put together supportive objectives for every level of management to help achieve its mission. Next the company has to design a business portfolio evaluating all of its current business and future business by coming up with
Strategic management is the “identification of one or more sustainable competitive advantages a firm has in the markets it serves (or intends to serve), and allocation of resources to exploit them” (Business Dictionary, 2016). In order for industries and organizations to thrive, they must have strategies in place and strategic management processes to stay competitive, profitable, attractive to stakeholders, and to sustain advantages that set them apart from other competitors (Barney & Hesterly, 2015). The strategic management process involves a set of procedures that lead to choosing a strategy that will eventually lead to competitive advantage (Barney & Hesterly, 2015). The six steps of the strategic management process involves defining