Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction To Greed
Is greed good? A loaded question. The socially acceptable response would be no, however the answer is not as black and white. Despite the negative connotations that the word itself carries with it, the fact of the matter is that a lot of financial, political, and social gains have been the product of greed when we think of greed in the sense of an “intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food”. This is illustrated in the technological monopoly that Steve Jobs created when he founded it in 1976; in addition to this, Obama took advantage of the productive aspects of greed by campaigning in all the states, and not just the ones that would determine the results of the election; finally, Boss Tweed back in the 1800s used greed to control the votes by pleasing everyone, not just the people who supported him.
Greed was an essential component in the ultimate success of Steve Jobs and his company. If not for the incessant greed of Steve Jobs and his vision to monopolize the computer business, he definitely wouldn’t have gotten as far as he did. It was his greed that drove him to build, fortify, and expand his business until it reached a point where it became the richest company in the world. It also helped further innovation and improve the general quality of life. Steve Jobs
…show more content…
had an intense selfish desire to profit from his business, which is parallel with the definition of greed. Another example of greed is the way in which presidential candidates campaign during their elections.
In this country, in order to win the election, only 9 states are needed to win the election as the amount of electoral college votes each of these states possesses constitutes more than half of all electoral college votes, a simple majority. However, in every election in this country’s history all the candidates have campaigned in more states than just the 9 that could guarantee the outcome of the election. This illuminates the greed within every candidate as they want all the state’s approval although that is virtually impossible due to political party based
bias. A third example of how greed has been beneficial can be seen within the career of William M. Tweed during the gilded age where he would manipulate the public into vote for the political candidate he promoted. He used to please the populace of New York City by attending funerals, buying kids ice cream, taking men out for drinks and many other methods that all had similar outcomes, the approval, and trust of the general populace. He did this so that when the time came to vote on any major decision pertaining to the New York City residents, he could control the vote of a large group of people. Without that approval, he would have never made it as far as he did in his career. Throughout the years, greed has benefitted the economy, political campaigns, and social crusades. Moreover, while greed is viewed as an undesirable trait and even considered a deadly sin in the christian religion, it has many positive aspects that fail to gain recognition or even acknowledgement due to the insidiously distasteful connotation the word itself carries with it.
Steve developed innovations and inventions in technology that were meant to benefit the people. He wanted to make technology accessible to everyone, so he made his tech smaller and cheaper. In addition to creating technology that helps us in more ways than one, is that he also donated large sums of his own money to charities. Jobs was a very private person and never mentioned philanthropic duties in the media (which lead to many criticising him) but did in fact donate $50 million to Stanford hospitals in California and funded HIV and AIDS research.
Florida is a good example of what I'm talking about--not because that state turned out to make the decisive difference in this week's election, but because more than 2 million voters--nearly as many as will go to the winning candidate--had no say in the outcome. All of Florida's 25 electoral votes will go to the other guy. That's the unavoidable consequence of the winner-take-all system that prevails in all the states. At the end, of course, any contest for a single office is a winner-take-all affair. But why should it be that way in the United States?
The Electoral College allows a candidate to win the presidency without winning the majority of popular votes. Additionally, the unequal representation created by the number of electors each state has leads to a differential worth depending upon a voter’s state of residency. Moreover, the winner-take-all rule of the results in votes which are essentially rendered worthless if they are contrary the state majority. Finally, the system places much of the focus and power to effect elections in the hands of so called swing states that are not historically aligned with only one party. (Dahl, 80-83) These aspects of the U.S. political system are utterly counterintuitive and stand in stark contrast to many of the cardinal ideals of
Greed Economics: The uplifting or debilitating effect of the excessive desire of gain on the production, consumption and distribution of goods and services.
Nevertheless, a greater populated state such as Texas is granted “thirty –two electoral college votes for an outsized population of twenty-five million”. If the Electoral College votes are viewed in perceptive of the population, the smaller states are privileged enough to have one elector per a smaller group of citizens. This disproportional misrepresentation allows the citizens of the less populated states to have a greater voice than those of the greater populated states. Another issue would be concerning “Faithless Electors”. The Electors were chosen as a way to disregard any uneducated votes made by the citizens but also keeping in mind which particular candidate the majority of the population of a state wishes to vote for.
This means there is biased in the electoral college. Another big factor of bias is the states being mainly republican or mainly democratic. Just like in the 1992 election were bill clinton lost the popular vote but won the electoral vote. We could of had a completely different outcome. People are afraid of change and they vote the same party's candidate over and over because that's what they have done their whole life and it's also what their parents have done their whole life. When we count the census every 10 years the smaller states get bigger. The smaller states get more inspiration to
If the success of a leader is measured by the success of that leader’s vision then Steve Jobs was truly an “icon of inventiveness, imagination, and sustained innovation” (p.V) as Isaacson described. Unfortunately, transformational leadership is measured by more than just success. It requires the highest levels of visionary leadership without sacrificing ethical behavior. Steve Jobs had some exceptional visionary traits that deserve to be emulated by leaders everywhere, but never at the expense of those morals and values held in high regard by society.
They affirm that the voting power advantage that large states possess outweighs the arithmetical edge of the smaller states. Furthermore, the argument made about faithless electors can only be viewed as erroneous since “only nine such electoral votes have been cast against instructions since 1820, and none has ever influenced the outcome of an election” (Electoral College: Reform). Arguments supporting the Electoral College also deem that small states and large states are equally represented in one way or another in the Electoral College system. Since small states have more direct representation and therefore are able to strongly influence their Electoral College results, “political parties recognize that in a close election their electoral vote may be crucial” (Thornton). This means that both large states and small states are equally important, and one state is not undermined by the other. After all, the Electoral College system is built on the foundation of separation of powers, just like any American political
Steve Jobs was a college dropouts with no big plans. No one would have guessed that him and two of his friends working in a garage would be the beginning of a revolution in the world of technology. The free enterprise system made it possible for Steve Jobs to revolutionize the world with Apple products.
Another unreasonable and unfair aspect of the Electoral College is the disproportionate voting power it gives to different states. Document D shows that Alaska, Delaware, DC, Hawaii, Idaho, Maine, Montana, North Dakota, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming collectively have 44 electoral votes representing their total population of 12,500,722, even though Illinois, with a population of 12,830,632 people, only has 20 electoral votes. As George C. Edwards has proven, the way the electoral votes are divided up amongst the states “is not a neutral counting device” and “violates political equality.” The power of a vote should not depend on where the voter cast it. The fact that the Electoral College works against some voters and favors others a testament to its inability to fulfil its role as a fair voting system giving all people an equal voice in choosing
When revisiting the famous quote by Gordon Gekko, he doesn’t actually say “greed is good.” This phrase has been misquoted. It seems like this misquote has become a simple way for people who believe that the businessmen of the world are evil to summarize the perceptions of capitalism.
Greed is a natural consequence of trying to get the most for the least. From the beginning, humans have been greedy to the point where now it is part of being human to be greedy. There is no person on Earth that has never been greedy and there never will be. The first person who walks this planet without having ever been greedy will no longer be human. Greed is valuable to self, to society, and to our species. Humans act like a swarm, when everyone follows their own personal interests; we appear to be following an organized pattern. From chaos a perfect order is born. An order governed solely by greed.
Although Steve and Bill are competitors, there are similarities between Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Both of them are the most successful CEO’s in the world. Though they were college dropouts, but they still achieved a lot of success in their own way. Steve was a very innovative man. As the English proverb goes by “ Have no fear of perfection - you will never reach it.” by Salvador Dali. No matter how many times he failed, he could develop things from his own idea and turn them into a successful product. In 1979 Apple’s first product was introduced, people like it very much because of its simplicity and innovative ideas. Later on in year 1980, the company showed a tremendous performance, where its share rose by 32% (Messa, 1998). Similarly, Bill Gates was also like that, but just that Steve was in a company which makes hardware prod...
Greed is so powerful in a person that it has the ability to destroy them, their friends, and family relationships. I have lived in the poorest country my first nine years, so when I was adopted, my mom gave me everything I ever wanted, everything I ever needed. However, using myself as an example, I was so mesmerized of the materialistic things that were available, that I stole. I took something that was not mine because I felt greedy. I felt like I needed that object for whatever reason. My mom tore my butt when I got home and I never thought of steeling because of my own selfish need of wanting. Not to mention how greed made me afraid. It made me afraid because I knew what I did was wrong. People are constantly being bombarded with images of things that we believe will make us happy and the selfish thoughts of greed makes us wanting more. For example, the iPhone 6 Plus came out September of 2015, now there is iPhone 7 which has new camera zoom, ear pods, and better quality. However, the week before it was released, everyone talked about wanting it because it’s the new “cool” thing. However, what people fail to understand is that the reason they want