Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Malcolm x biography contributions
Malcolm X biography in Thesis
Brief biography of malcolm x
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“There is no better than adversity. Every defeat, every heartbreak, every loss, contains its own seed, its own lesson on how to improve your performance the next time” (Malcolm X). The civil rights movement of the nineteen fifties and sixties was an era of enlightened equality and while many shared the common goal of equality, not everyone shared the same vehicle to achieve it. In the March Trilogy that outlines John Lewis’s rise to prominence, there were many instances of internal disputation between leaders within the movement during that time. Consequently, creating sources of conflict between various civil rights organizations and within them. Freedom activists, Malcolm X and Stokely Carmichael shared the same goal as other civil rights …show more content…
leaders such as John Lewis and Martin Luther King Jr but were vastly different in their approach to that goal. While Lewis and King advocated non-violence, Carmichael and X shared the notion by any means necessary. Therefore as the civil rights movement gained traction, sources of conflict began to grow within the movement between new and old generation leaders. New generation leaders advocated the use of violence, forbidding the inclusion of whites within their organizations and had the perception that older generation leaders were not progressing fast enough. Although many within the civil rights movement shared a common end goal, many new and old generation leaders had different perspectives on getting there.
For instance, many felt that self-defense or the active pursuit of violence should be used as a viable option to combat inequality between blacks and whites. John Lewis narrates that Malcolm X was not invited to the March on Washington and describes his feeling towards him as thus, “I shared his belief that our struggle was not simply in the courts...but violence, no matter how justified, was not something I could accept.. But I could understand his appeal” (Lewis and Aydin 2:149). Lewis states here that he understands the emotions and general appeal that Malcolm X has, and that it is an appeal that he on a basic level shares. However, he cannot promote or participate the violent rhetoric in which he actively pursues. Stokely Carmichael while initially joining and later chaired the presidential position of Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and held their non-violent principles, began to drift away from those ideals and instead adhering to and advocating similar methods Malcolm X shared. Giving a speech at Greenwood, Mississippi during the walk against fear protest, he gave this famous speech "We been saying 'freedom' for six years, What we are going to start saying now is 'Black Power.'" (Stokely Carmichael). At that moment, Stokely Carmichael was upset at the beating he and other protesters endured and deemed that …show more content…
it was no longer an acceptable sacrifice. Synthesizing the notion in his mind of any means necessary and black separatism is the best option to combat inequality. By and large many, new generation leaders felt that white inclusion into the movement diluted the significance of their accomplishments and self-determination. Book two of John Lewis's graphic novel The March depicts a scene in which two Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee members get into a physical altercation over, a member stating that smoking is not allowed here. John Lewis narrates the effects of the scene for the future of the movement as thus “ by the end of 1962, you heard people questioning whether SNCC should even be a multi-racial organization" (Lewis and Aydin 2:123). In my opinion, Lewis feels that the movement towards racial separation within the organization is the wrong approach to follow. However, the idea of racial separation was an idea that Stokely Carmichael agreed with, when he was elected Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee chairman in 1965 he stated this for white activists within the organization “ form their own poor white communities” (Stokely Carmichael). This idea that whites should be barred, can be understood from the perspective of how people of color have been treated up to that point. Moreover, the ideology of black power or black self-determination was growing stronger causing racial integration becoming less of a popular idea. Ultimately, with the combination of this issue and the notion that leaders within the movement were holding them back, were pivotal in the formation of those ideas such as these. As the movement began its crescendo, many leaders new and old felt that the most prominent civil rights leaders were deliberately holding back the curtain of equality.
Arguably, they felt that the old methods of protest were not effective enough to produce lasting results, effectively holding back that curtain. In John Lewis's graphic novel The March, he recalls the protest in Nashville over fair employment practices. John Lewis narrates a moment at the protest in which he had to chastise Stokely Carmichael for breaking the rules establish within Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee on how to handle yourself during protests. “ Stokely later said he never saw it as his responsibility to be the moral and spiritual reclamation of some racist thug” (Lewis and Aydin 2:112). Even though Carmichael felt that nonviolence was an excellent strategy or tactic to employ, he did not view it as a basic principle that others within Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and Southern Christian Leadership Conference did. Although, Stokely Carmichael and Malcolm X shared the same beliefs when it came to methods and ideologies of black power and black independence. Carmichael once described this at a protest "When you talk of black power, you talk of building a movement that will smash everything Western civilization has created,'' (Stokely Carmichael). Regrettably, Carmichael is explaining that all black people must come together and create segregated cells away from whites to carve
out their own social, economic and political power base. This reinforces that notion that the methods that older generation leaders were no longer practiced by the younger generation for their perception that they were slow and ineffective and could not produce lasting results for future generations. These sources of conflict continue well into today's civil rights movements such as the black lives matter movement and could be argued that they stem from the conflicts that were never resolved in the nineteen fifties and sixties. But with the death of various prominent civil rights leaders, both white and black, these disagreements over ideology never had a chance of becoming resolved. Therefore, after the signing into law the civil rights act of 1964 and voting rights act of 1965 many organizations splitter into smaller, more radical organizations. Advocating various themes such as violence, forbidding the inclusion of whites into their organizations and maintaining the perception that older generation leaders ideas and methods of nonviolence were slow and produced no lasting effect. In my opinion, if these sources of conflict were quelled and the uniting of ideas and methods emerged, the dream that Martin Luther King Jr could come to fruition.
The book, “My Soul Is Rested” by Howell Raines is a remarkable history of the civil rights movement. It details the story of sacrifice and audacity that led to the changes needed. The book described many immeasurable moments of the leaders that drove the civil rights movement. This book is a wonderful compilation of first-hand accounts of the struggles to desegregate the American South from 1955 through 1968. In the civil rights movement, there are the leaders and followers who became astonishing in the face of chaos and violence. The people who struggled for the movement are as follows: Hosea Williams, Rosa Parks, Ralph Abernathy, and others; both black and white people, who contributed in demonstrations for freedom rides, voter drives, and
Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated on April 4, 1968.The Civil Rights movement started in the 1960’s and was most influenced by Martin Luther king Jr. and Malcolm X. Their purpose was to create equality among all races. “Requiem for Nonviolence” by Eldridge Cleaver is a non-fiction book that talks about a spark of change in the civil rights movement. The 1960’s was a decade full of political and social unrest. Martin Luther King, Jr. was an influential leader who wanted political and social changes to better the country as a whole. The inspiration that cleaver gathered from Martin Luther King and Malcolm X is described in “Requiem for Nonviolence.”
As a group, we believe that popular culture does in fact perpetuates stereotypes. Television is a main source of information of popular culture. Television has forever changed how humans have interacted with another and introduce a world of diversity and knowledge. But with this profit, television has also harbored negative aspects. As a group, we studied how racial stereotypes are portrayed in television. In the history of television, different racial and ethnic groups have been widely underrepresented and television itself has been overwhelming represented by white figures. And when racial groups are presented on TV, the characters are often played in limited roles based on stereotypes. A stereotype isn’t necessarily untrue, but it is an assumption based on an incomplete and complex ideas that are oversimplified into something that isn’t what it meant to be, and it’s usually negative. For example, African Americans are often depicted as violent or involved in some kind of criminal activity. Their characters often portrays a person who is always sassy and angry or that isn’t intelligent and won’t succeed in life and inferior to whites in some manner. Asian characters are
With this approach, King managed to become a worldwide icon, a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, and he managed to unite a divided nation. In regards to Stokely Carmichael’s internal philosophy, that is a more complicated answer. Whilst originating as a user of nonviolence, even working with King at some points, Carmichael converted to the side of violence after seeing James Meredith shot on his ‘Walk against fear’. Whilst finishing Meredith’s march, Stokely Carmichael popularised the pro-militant phrase ‘Black Power’. The concept of Black Power and its various interpretations spread throughout the nation like wildfire, leaving a fiercely angered and re-divided populace. Some interpreted the saying as a call for the integration of african americans into positions of power, like government. Others however perceived it as a sign to create an artificial apartheid, with an all black nation within, but separate to the U.S. (historylearningsite.co.uk 2015). Both approaches achieved different goals, and this is likely because they never wanted the same thing. Carmichaels militant movement managed to gain numbers of followers in an unprecedented time frame, whereas Kings nonviolent philosophy gained respect from everyone, something he would need if his movement were to
Ever since slavery black people have been fighting for their freedom time after time and many different activists had different ways of expressing themselves to get their point across. But in the mid 1960s Stokely Carmichael had his own way of pushing freedom in the black community. He gave more awareness to the words “Black Power” as he was the leader of SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) but soon changed his approach once he saw nonviolent protesters were being brutalized in the South. He had a speech at the university of California in 1966 where he addressed this issue of freedom in the black community in which he challenged the “civil rights leadership by rejecting integration and calling on blacks to oust whites from the freedom movement.” Because of Stokely Carmichael the freedom movement for blacks was heightened and was taken more seriously by whites and by other blacks and is also a main reason for blacks having the freedom we do today.
John Lewis is an African American man born on February 21st, 1940, into a sharecropping family in Pike County, Alabama (Moye, 2004). He grew up on his family's farm, and attended segregated public schools as a child. Even when he was just a young boy, Lewis was always inspired by the happenings of the Civil Rights Movement. Events such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott or hearing the wise words of Martin Luther King Junior over the radio stimulated his desire to become a part of a worthwhile cause, and was a supporter of the Civil Rights Movement ever since ("Biography," para. 3). Lewis went to school at both the American Baptist Theological Seminary and Fisk University, both in Nashville, Tennessee. He graduated from the American Baptist Theological Seminary, and received a Bachelors degree in religion and philosophy from Fisk University. While at Fisk, he learned the philosophy of how to be nonviolent, and would soon incorporate that into his civil rights work ("John Lewis Biography," para. 3). While he was a student at Fisk University, Lewis began putting together sit-ins at local lunch counters to protest segregation. Many...
African Americans are fortunate to have leaders who fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very different. The background, environment and philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism.
Until the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., his life’s work was dedicated to the nonviolent actions of blacks to gain the freedoms they were promised in the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863 by Abraham Lincoln. He believed that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King, 1963). These injustices had become so burdensome to blacks that they were “plunged into an abyss of despair” (King, 1963). The nonviolent actions of the sit-ins, boycotts, and marches were so the “individual could rise from the bondage of myths and half-truths…to help men rise from the dark depths of prejudice and racism” and ultimately lead to “inevitably opening the door to negotiation” (King, 1963). Not only was King’s approach effective with the older black generation, it was also successful with white people. They did not feel threatened when approached by King. White people gained a sense of empathy towards the plight of black freedom as King’s promise of nonviolence did not threaten their livelihood. Malcolm X viewed the world similarly to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., however; his beliefs to changing the status quo were slightly different from his political counterpart. Malcolm X realized that “anger could blind human vision” (X, 1965). In realizing this, X knew that in order to achieve racial freedom blacks had to “forget hypocritical politics and propaganda” (X, 1965). While Malcolm X was more so an advocate for violent forces against white people than King, X merely used force when it became necessary for defense. According to X, “I don’t go for non-violence if it also means a delayed solution. I am for violence if non-violence means we continue postponing a solution to American black man’s problem” (X, 1965). However, this le...
Sometimes, when all else is lost, hope can be the only thing left guiding a movement. This is exactly what happened to the people in John Lewis’s March trilogy. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, the people pushing for equal rights for African Americans had many things taken away from them including their freedom, their physical possessions, their dignity, sometimes even the lives of their friends or family members. There was one thing, however, which could never be taken away from them: hope. The events illustrated in the March Trilogy prove that hope was the reason that the people in the Civil Rights Movement had the will to keep pushing for equal rights.
John Lewis was an influential SNCC leader and is recognized by most as one of the important leaders of the civil rights movement as a whole. In 1961, Lewis joined SNCC in the Freedom Rides. Riders traveled the South challenging segregation at interstate bus terminals. In 1963, when Chuck McDew stepped down as SNCC chairman, Lewis was quickly elected to take over. Lewis' experience at that point was already widely respected--he had been arrested 24 times as a result of his activism. In 1963, Lewis helped plan and took part in the March on Washington. At the age of 23, he was a keynote speaker at the historic event. He stepped down from his position in 1966. Stokeley Carmichael, a fellow Freedom Rider, was elected chairman of SNCC and soon after raised the cry of "black power." Some were alarmed by the concept of black power and many were critical of Carmichael's new approach.
Malcolm X was particularly firm in his opinions of the nonviolent strategies advocated by Martin Luther King, Jr. During a November 1963 address, Malcolm ridiculed the theory that African Americans could achieve their freedom nonviolently. "The only revolution in which the goa...
After the death of Malcolm X the movement started to get funky. It seemed as though after the assinaition of Malcom X, the revolution’s focal point began to change. The movement began to head towards a more intense, and nitty gritty level. It seemed as though all the non-violent organizations such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, the Congress of Racial Equality, as well as the Christian Leadership Conference had little hold on what was about to happen to the movement. The death of Malcolm X brought a new direction in the movement. In a society of a violent system it was hard for young blacks to take charge in an non-violent organization, it seemed to be a hypocrisy. And the idea of tolerance was wearing thin for the whole generation.
The fifties and sixties were a crazy time to live; riots were happening, many Civil Rights Movement leaders were speaking in the streets, and student sit-ins were held. Many radical activists were preaching their thoughts on racism and things needed for equality. Some people felt it necessary to turn the other cheek to violence while others claimed it to be a right to defend themselves. The major figures in the Civil Rights Movement had their own opinions on how to equalize society. Martin Luther King, Jr. felt that a peaceful movement was the best route to freedom. I discovered after much research that famous African American figures tended to side with Malcolm X and Elijah Muhammad on the best approach. Rosa Parks, Maya Angelou and James Baldwin fall under this category. They did not by any means agree completely, but had many views in common with the Islam thinkers. Malcolm X was not a pro-violence leader, but encouraged it when necessary for self-defense and protecting loved ones as Jenkins reported, “Malcolm X encouraged blacks to take a stand against their white oppressors if they were physically threatened,” (Jenkins 267). This was Malcolm’s motto when asked how blacks should fight the “white man”. James Baldwin does not share this idea even though he does admire many of Malcolm X”s thoughts. Malcolm and Baldwin strongly believe that history is an important part of knowledge and is necessary to live a prosperous life.
From the Boston Tea Party of 1773, the Civil Rights Movement and the Pro-Life Movement of the 1960s, to the Tea Party Movement and Occupy Wall Street Movement of current times, “those struggling against unjust laws have engaged in acts of deliberate, open disobedience to government power to uphold higher principles regarding human rights and social justice” (DeForrest, 1998, p. 653) through nonviolent protests. Perhaps the most well-known of the non-violent protests are those associated with the Civil Rights movement. The movement was felt across the south, yet Birmingham, Alabama was known for its unequal treatment of blacks and became the focus of the Civil Rights Movement. Under the leadership of Martin Luther King Jr., president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, African-Americans in Birmingham, began daily demonstrations and sit-ins to protest discrimination at lunch counters and in public facilities. These demonstrations were organized to draw attention to the injustices in the city. The demonstrations resulted in the arrest of protesters, including Martin Luther King. After King was arrested in Birmingham for taking part in a peaceful march to draw attention to the way that African-Americans were being treated there, their lack of voter rights, and the extreme injustice they faced in Alabama he wrote his now famous “Letter from Birmingham.”
Malcolm X argues that for Blacks to fight for civil rights nonviolently is “insane.” His strongest arguments revolve around the idea of fighting back to get what is rightfully yours or being a “fighter.” As Malcolm X states, “Whites idolize fighters. They idolize the Hungarian freedom fighters, who came to this country and right now work on jobs that the sit-in students can’t get.” This idea of becoming a “fighter” or a “man” is powerful because of the injustices wrought upon the African American community. Though the usage of violence may be preferred to be avoided, Malcolm X uses the ideology of those who “love [their] enemy” or “pray for those who despitefully use you” as being a double standard in our culture, especially when stated by