Stephen Richards Case

906 Words2 Pages

While Stephen Richards was the head of global sales at Computer Associates he was a faciliter in the illegal extension of the fiscal quarter. He also allowed his employees to obtain contracts after the end of the quarter, and then backdate them so that they would add to the expired quarter's revenues. In the eyes of the DOJ (Department of Justice) and SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) the deliberate misreporting or omittance of financial accounting information is viewed as a felony, punishable with time in prison. Yet, according to Richards’ “This was simply a timing issue of a deal coming in and being recognized two or three days earlier as opposed to two or three days later.” Had Richards and his team been honest and thorough about …show more content…

Nevertheless, it should not have mattered what CA’s competitors were doing, as these types of blunders do not just disagree with basic accounting principles, but also are fraudulent and illegal regardless of what competitors are …show more content…

These targets put pressure on the executives of these large companies, who in turn put pressure on their employees and cause a “trickle down effect” where the motivation for the company is to meet these obscure targets (huge earnings numbers), because then their public company will stack up higher when compared to other companies like their own. One thing that Stephen Richards emphasized in his letter was how Computer Associates International “was among the most aggressive in its pursuit of goals,” therefore exerting immense pressure to excel on the employees, especially the executives. While CA was one of the first computer software companies of its time, in the 1980s and

More about Stephen Richards Case

Open Document