Every company or organization that operates for profit is constantly seeking new opportunities to increase its value and profitability. If the company has stocks in an open market, the pressure increases to have a profitable business that offers investors opportunities to increase their investment through dividends. To achieve this, many companies engage in unethical accounting methods to manipulate the finances of the company. One of the biggest cases in history where the hunger to have a profitable business drove the executives of a well-known chain of orthopedic hospitals to engage in numerous unethical and illegal accounting behaviors is the case of HealthSouth. In 1984 Richard Scrushy started AmCare, which later changed its name to HealthSouth, …show more content…
It is unfortunate but top and senior executives’ unethical behaviors usually have a negative impact on all parties involved; in this case the employees, the customers, government the patients and the stockholders/investors also suffered the consequences of the HealthSouth scandal. The employees’ morale was probably affected. I can be certain that many felt betrayed and perhaps even ashamed by the outrages surrounding their employer. Due to the financial loses following the scandal; the HealthSouth employee count decrease by 30,000 within 6 years. The patients were confronted with less accommodations and location convenience since multiple locations had to close. After the scandals, the patients might have felt that their health and wellbeing was not at all the priority of HealthSouth, rather to take advantage of them through Medicare and Medicaid fraud. Patients also noticed that the therapeutic services in occasions where not performed by professionals and this was perhaps to save cost for the company that was running out of a deficit. Investors must have been furious after discovering how for years they were being cheated. During HealthSouth’s peak, stocks sold for $10-$15 and soon after the scandal they dropped to $3. The reputation of the external auditor company hired to conduct the audits on HealthSouth was also impacted. Ernst & Young accountant were fooled by the accounting team at HealthSouth in part due to the knowledge from previous employees of Ernst & Young working at HealthSouth. The Medicare & Medicaid frauds also created inflated expenses for this program, which potentially could have harmed the available funds for others to be able to benefit from affordable health
Problems at HealthSouth were being uncovered in 2002. In early 2002, Scrushy sold over $75 million dollars worth of stock and an additional $25 million back to HealthSouth. It was also disclosed in August of 2002 that a new Medicare payment policy would greatly lower reimbursements and consequently the stock would lose more than half of its value. Shareholder lawsuits were filed alleging that Scrushy acted on insider information when selling his shares of stock earlier in the year.
The health care organization with which I am familiar and involved is Kaiser Permanente where I work as an Emergency Room Registered Nurse and later promoted to management. Kaiser Permanente was founded in 1945, is the nation’s largest not-for-profit health plan, serving 9.1 million members, with headquarters in Oakland, California. At Kaiser Permanente, physicians are responsible for medical decisions, continuously developing and refining medical practices to ensure that care is delivered in the most effective manner possible. Kaiser Permanente combines a nonprofit insurance plan with its own hospitals and clinics, is the kind of holistic health system that President Obama’s health care law encourages. It still operates in a half-dozen states from Maryland to Hawaii and is looking to expand...
...FO at the Houston airport. While Mr. Fastow's parents were undergoing a random search, he stopped to chat with Mr. Schwieger. "I never got an opportunity to explain the partnerships to you," he said, according to Mr. Schwieger. Mr. Schwieger replied, "With everything that has come to light, I probably wouldn't like the answer I would have gotten."
Corruption is an individual and institutional process where there is a gain by a public official from a briber and in return receives a service. Between the gain and the service, there is an improper connection, (Thompson p.28). The two major categories of bribery is individual and institutional corruption. Receiving personal goods for the pursuit of one’s own benefit is personal fraud. An example of individual distortion is the financial scandal involving David Durenberger. Organizational corruption involves “receiving goods that are useable primarily in the political process and are necessary for doing a job or are essential by-products of doing it,” (Thompson p.30). An instance of institutional fraud is the Keating Five case. There are also times where there is a mixture of both individual and organizational corruption in a scandal. An example of this diverse combination is James C. Wright Jr. actions while he was the Speaker of the House.
The Enron scandal is one of the biggest scandals to take place in in American history. Enron was once one of the biggest companys in the world. It was the 6th largest energy company in the world. Due to Enron’s downfall investors of the company lost nearly 70 billion dollars. This was all due to many illegal activities done by Eron's employees. One of these employees was Andrew Fastow, the chief financial officer of the Enron corporation had a lot to do with the collapse of the Enron company.
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Bernard Madoff had full control of the organizational leadership of Bernard Madoff Investments Securities LLC. Madoff used charisma to convince his friends, members of elite groups, and his employees to believe in him. He tricked his clients into believing that they were investing in something special. He would often turn potential investors down, which helped Bernard in targeting the investors with more money to invest. Bernard Madoff created a system which promised high returns in the short term and was nothing but the Ponzi scheme. The system’s idea relied on funds from the new investors to pay misrepresented and extremely high returns to existing investors. He was doing this for years; convincing wealthy individuals and charities to invest billions of dollars into his hedge fund. And they did so because of the extremely high returns, which were promised by Madoff’s firm. If anyone would have looked deeply into the structure of his firm, it would have definitely shown that something is wrong. This is because nobody can make such big money in the market, especially if no one else could at the time. How could one person, Madoff, hold all of his clients’ assets, price them, and manage them? It is clearly a conflict of interest. His company was showing high profits year after year; despite most of the companies in the market having losses. In fact, Bernard Madoff’s case is absolutely stunning when you consider the range and number of investors who got caught up in it.
Financial Shenanigans was written by Howard Schilit. The main objective of the book is to show ways companies can alter their financial accounting reports to reflect a much attractive appearance of their company’s health and growth when indeed that company is running into severe trouble. There are different ways the company can accomplish this and the author gives us “Seven Shenanigans” that companies can change the investor’s point of view towards the performance of the company. Basically, he breaks up each chapter to the particular shenanigan and discusses different techniques for achieving each shenanigan. For example, the author used Priceline.com, Cendant/CUC, AOL, and Xerox to illustrate each shenanigan. Chapter 11 and 12 of the book discusses the analyzing of financial reports and how to use financial databases to discover warning signs. Then there is another chapter on finding shenanigans in the company’s annual 10K report and how to find hints for financial shenanigans.
Rather than being sticklers for following GAAP accounting principles and internal controls, this company took unethical behavior to a whole new level. They lied when the truth would have been easier to tell. It is almost as if they had no comprehension that the meaning of the word ethics is “the principles of conduct governing an individual or a group (professional ethics); the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation”, (Mirriam-Webster, 2011). To be ethical all one has to do is follow laws, rules, regulations and your own internal moral compass, all things this company seemed to know nothing about.
"This is why the market keeps going down every day - investors don't know who to trust," said Brett Trueman, an accounting professor from the University of California-Berkeley's Haas School of Business. As these things come out, it just continues to build up"(CBS MarketWatch, Hancock). The memories of the Frauds at Enron and WorldCom still haunt many investors. There have been many accounting scandals in the United States history. The Enron and the WorldCom accounting fraud affected thousands of people and it caused many changes in the rules and regulation of the corporate world. There are many similarities and differences between the two scandals and many rules and regulations have been created in order to prevent frauds like these. Enron Scandal occurred before WorldCom and despite the devastating affect of the Enron Scandal, new rules and regulations were not created in time to prevent the WorldCom Scandal. Accounting scandals like these has changed the corporate world in many ways and people are more cautious about investing because their faith had been shaken by the devastating effects of these scandals. People lost everything they had and all their life-savings. When looking at the accounting scandals in depth, it is unbelievable how much to the extent the accounting standards were broken.
HealthSouth is A Public company who is providing outpatient rehabilitation services, They noticed that the business is not that great as they proclaimed, business is not so profitable and it also have too much expenses which this will end up taking away from the profit and they will show lower earnings that expected so they came up with a fraudulent idea to create false entries in their books by claiming that the expenses they have is not real expenses, they called it investing like everyone understands when a business is buying a building its not called a expenses which will show the business less profitable ,it is the opposite the business is growing, the same think they did with entering regular expenses like payroll or utility expenses
Accounting fraud refers to fraud that is committed by a company by maintaining false information about the sales and income in the company books, when overstating the company's assets or profits, when a company is actually undergoing a loss. These fraudulent records are then used to seek investment in the company's bond or security issues. By showing these false entries, the company attempts to apply fraudulent loan applications as a final attempt to save the company by obtaining more money from bankruptcy. Accounting frauds is actually done to hide the company’s actual financial issues.
The Tyco accounting scandal is an ideal illustration of how individuals who hold key positions in an organization are able to manipulate accounting practices and financial reports for personal gain. The few key individuals involved in the Tyco Scandal (CEO Kozlowski and CFO Swartz), used a number of clever and unique tactics in order to accomplish what they did; including spring loading, manipulating their ‘key-employee loan’ program, and multiple ‘hush money’ payouts.
In the United States, the term executive compensation has many factors that have driven change in the landscape of executive compensation. Examples of those elements include the turmoil in commodity prices, market volatility, and political pressure for the reform of the executive compensation. Further, the executive compensation in the U.S. beats the average worker’s salary growth by a wider margin. However, when looking at the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which was supported by Paul Sarbanes and Michael Oxley represented a massive adjustment to the securities law. Further due to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, publicly-traded and privately-held companies are obligated to implement and report in-house accounting controls to the SEC for compliance. Nonetheless, I will expand on whether executive compensation is ethical or unethical in the workplace, as well as if the Sarbanes-Oxley Act too strict or not strict enough as it relates to investors.
My company would also potentially engage within the wrongful and unlawful accounting practices like those adopted by Enron. Enron adopted these wrongful and unlawful practice in financial accounting in the pursuit of an inflated business image that features success and innovation. For example, by trying to shift the loss of the company at the meantime to the future, Enron’s balance sheet looks much better. In addition, the profit that belongs to the future term could also be integrated into the reporting of the current terms’ revenue and profit Therefore, these practices managed to benefit the company in the short term. Our company would also make use of special purpose entities as vehicles to hide the company’s debt level so that the reported