Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of executive compensation
Analyzing the impact of the sarbanes-oxley act
Analyzing the impact of the sarbanes-oxley act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the United States, the term executive compensation has many factors that have driven change in the landscape of executive compensation. Examples of those elements include the turmoil in commodity prices, market volatility, and political pressure for the reform of the executive compensation. Further, the executive compensation in the U.S. beats the average worker’s salary growth by a wider margin. However, when looking at the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which was supported by Paul Sarbanes and Michael Oxley represented a massive adjustment to the securities law. Further due to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, publicly-traded and privately-held companies are obligated to implement and report in-house accounting controls to the SEC for compliance. Nonetheless, I will expand on whether executive compensation is ethical or unethical in the workplace, as well as if the Sarbanes-Oxley Act too strict or not strict enough as it relates to investors. The executive compensation in its numerous …show more content…
Although at the same time functional goals encourage unnecessary risk-taking and increased the probability of unethical and possibly unlawful behavior (James, 2015). All the same, the purpose of executive compensation is an incentive for well-trained executives that make the most of the firm’s value (James, 2015). Further, the benefit that is put in place for the executive is structured to remove all conflicts of interest amongst the executive and shareholders (James, 2015). Although, some workers feel as though the executive compensation is unethical; but according to James (2015) it is given to the executives that are well trained, therefore, it is ethical from his point of view. Additionally, the compensation package assists as an enticement for executives to participate in potentially risky, maximizing activities, and profits that benefit the shareholders whenever ventures are successful (James,
Nonprofit executive compensation should be within a range that generously rewards the executive for meeting goals and a job well done while not taking away from the nonprofits ability to meet the needs that it serves. A good leader has not met the duties of the job if they spend extremely high amounts on travel and office supplies or personal equipment without fairly compensating their staff or while reducing benefits to the cause. When government funds are secured for a cause or people give to a charity, people often assume that the money is going directly to the cause. It is understandable that the charity has business expenses including staff compensation but there is something that doesn't feel right when you see leadership of the
FAS 123 was revised during 2004. For public entities that are not small business issuers, the effective date of FAS 123(R) is June 15, 2005. FAS 123(R) 74 states that all public entities that used the fair-value-based method for either recognition or disclosure shall adopt this Statement using a modified prospective application. Under the modified...
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Imagine being in a world where people are paid in cash bonuses, stock options, or generous severance pay when fired from their job due to a company merger, are asked to leave, or choose to retire. This happens to be a reality for many CEO’s and top executives of companies. We live in an economy where mergers and take over’s have become common, and to allow this option for the highest paid employees of a company is arguably unfair. While researching golden parachutes, I formed questions due to the circumstances surrounding this executive option. For example, why should CEO’s, who live very comfortably, be given a compensation package for losing their position due to a company merger or retirement when employee and shareholder’s futures are at stake? Is it fair for the rich to get richer when numerous employees below top executives are dealt the same fate from a merger and shareholders’ investments are at risk but neither receive a form of additional compensation? Of course, there’re those who support the issuance of golden parachutes, arguing they can persuade a possible company merger to not take place due to the costs associated with a top executives golden parachute package. Another supporting point for golden parachutes is, they can make it easier for higher up executives, like CEO’s be absorbed into the future merged company. I will be addressing the point of whether CEO’s and other executives deserve to be awarded a Golden Parachute option by their company. As well as a brief background of Golden Parachutes and my stance on them. They’re a very important part of our growing economy and will always be considered in a merger/takeover if awarded to executives.
This report explores the issue of the pay that top executives make, and the reasons why they do. It also suggests improvements that can be made to make the system better. High Pay Seems Small When Compared To Company Profits Many companies pull in profits that are extremely high. When an employee of such a companies salary is compared to the amount of profit that the company earns, it starts to seem reasonable. It only makes sense that if the employee is directly responsible for the success of their company, then they deserve to get their payback. It seems ironic, but many salaries even look small once compared with a companies profits. Top Executives Are Under A Lot Of Pressure Being the CEO of a company is not an easy job. There is all kinds of pressure for a person in such a position to succeed. If they do not, then it is their job on the line. Therefore, they deserve to receive a large sum of money for the work that they do. It is the only way to compensate these employees for the tremendous strain that their job puts on them. It is essential that the employees get paid the amount of money that they deserve. Pay Should Reflect Performance When CEOs are being given big paychecks, they are expected to perform at a high level. There success is impeccable. However, this does not always happen. There should be some way of connecting pay to job performance. The best way of doing this would be to award bonuses to those workers who are at the top of their class. This would not only motivate workers to do a good job, but also reward the employees that do succeed.
This paper will discuss the reasons why CEOs are not being overpaid. It will apply the utilitarian ethical principle to many a few aspects to CEO compensation and whether or not it is justifiable for such pay. The paper will look at whether or not their performance is justifiable for the pay because they play such a big role in the livelihood of the company along with the principle agency theory and how it is being addressed for the benefit of the shareholders and others involved with the company, the supply and demand of the CEOs, and the paper will describe the comparison of other professions to help link the idea of CEOs being fairly compensated.
Namely, it depends upon how the executive’s compensation package is compiled. Therefore, if executive compensation is based solely on performance then there is a real danger of reducing the social values of the executive (Ims, Pedersen, & Zsolnai, 2014). Thus, compensation must “go beyond traditional economic rationality in which employees and organizations are mainly perceived as instruments to produce increased profits and financial wealth” (Ims et al., 2014, p.
Over the years many companies have decided abandon ethical practices is lieu of higher profits. Because of the high value placed on profits in America, many companies have taken extreme measures to increase profits and increase payouts for shareholders. Arthur Andersen LLP is a prime example of how business executives have been willing to make unethical business decisions in order to please clients and gain an edge on competition. In the short run, these unethical decisions may have seemed beneficial, but in the long run, the extensive consequences of this behavior was not worth any anticipated gain. Arthur Andersen made many unethical business decisions in lieu of higher profits that had drastic consequences that extended father than any executive
It is unethical for CEOs to be paid absurdly high amounts of money. How much a CEO actually impacts a company’s value is debatable. To make sure corporations are getting a good return on their investment they could give a base salary plus offer CEOs stock options. The positive is that CEOs would be partially compensated based on actual performance. The negative is one may create a situation where CEOs feel the need to do unethical things to guarantee a positive return.
The end of 2001 and the start of 2002 saw the end of a period of magnified share prices and booming businesses. All speculations of misrepresentation came to light and those firms which once seem unconquerable were now filing for bankruptcy. Within this essay, I shall discuss the corporate governance mechanisms and failures which led to the Enron scandal resulting in global corporate governance reforms being encouraged.
Additionally, the bonus money can be fairly divided between the two. Employees have the responsibility to follow and maintain business ethics and the code of ethics in the workplace. Employees have to be honest, communicate at all levels of the organization, deal with issues at the lowest possible level, and avoid conflict of interest that would lead to unethical decisions. Also, employees should be educated about the policies and regulations set by the company in order to maintain ethical practices in the workplace. Jacob and employees in general are bombarded by ethical issues and by abiding by their roles and responsibilities will guide them in making ethical decisions.
Maintaining strong capital levels will determine the size incentive compensation this will reflect how the company’s performance goes and as well as industry and environment factors. In senior management incentives compensation, there needs to be a program that recognizes capital planning outcomes this will advance alignment with shareholders’ performance assessments should be done to promote conduct based on the most ethical standards, incentive compensation, disciplinary actions when appropriate, communication and having moral principles at all times is the foundation of most businesses (CITI’S,
d. Usually stock compensation may be the motivation the managers have to make decisions to maximize the stock price, because they may be beneficiary as they may also be the company shares holders. Other managers with bad faith use accounting tricks to overstate the share price and sell it expensively to generate more profits. This strategy is critical and companies that offer options as remuneration are advised to allow managers to hold the stock for a number of
Are top executives worth what they are paid? The issue of executive compensation is one that has raised media and public scrutiny for many years. On the one hand, executives are viewed as being afforded exorbitant compensation packages, while the other paints a picture of select and fortunate individuals who provide a service that is unmatched and are therefore worthy of larger compensation packages and perks. However, due to the economic hardships facing the global environment it is clear that executives are being rewarded at a level that is not commensurate to their contributions to the organization.
Sometimes it is not easy to change the way people judge and think , but education can help. Thirdly , it may be useful to build appropriate mechanisms which allow employees to discuss ethical dilemmas and report unethical behaviour .This addresses the issue when employees have situations in which they face difficulty in making the appropriate ethical decision . Lastly ,if the senior staff in an financial institution is careful in making ethical decision ,chances are that will affect other employees also .To sum up, firms need to ensure that ethical conduct is rewarded, and provide clear and practical guidance on how it can be