Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My opinion on the Stanford prison experiment
Critiques on stanford prison study
My opinion on the Stanford prison experiment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: My opinion on the Stanford prison experiment
This week you will discuss either the Immunization study or the Stanford Prison study. You will tell your fellow classmates which of the studies you felt led to the most harm and what you think could have been done by the scientists, the media, and the public to avoid or fix the harms caused. Be as specific as possible. When I read the two studies this week, I found one of them stood out as beyond comprehension as to the harm it has done and continues to do throughout the world. When Leithead wrote “The Stanford prison experiment was supposed to last two weeks but was ended abruptly just six days later, after a string of mental breakdowns, an outbreak of sadism and a hunger strike” (Leithead, 2011), I knew I would be writing about the Immunization …show more content…
There was no basis for the study, the sample size of participants was too small to generate a true conclusion. 10 out of the 12 co-authors of the study retracted their findings the next day (Rao and Andrade, 2011). The main author, Andrew Wakefield had received payments from families engaged in a lawsuit against companies that produce vaccines, follow-up studies, proved there was no link between MMR vaccination and autism. Within two years, there was a complete retraction of the Wakefield paper, disclosure of errors and contrary findings had proven the study to be unethical and tainted to deliver results that were …show more content…
Everyday there are crazy new stories that someone somewhere believes with all their might, just as there is another person who wholeheartedly disagrees. There are people who insist the earth is flat, others that it is round, many believe in a magic pill to lose weight, then the many religions of the world, create an impossibility for everyone to be right. Therefore, we must rely on our scientists to save us from ourselves. Only they would have the credibility to accurately report on an exhaustive study, which would once and for all, decide if vaccinations cause autism. Maybe they do, maybe they don’t, thanks discredited Wakefield paper, the world may never
The Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Dr Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in the basement of Stanford University. This involved imprisoning nine volunteers in a mock up of Stanford prison, which was policed by nine guards (more volunteers). These guards had complete control over the prisoners. They could do anything to the prisoners, but use physical violence.
A local newspaper ad reached out for volunteers to participate in a Psychological study, created by Philip G. Zimbardo and his research team, which sounded interesting for many individuals. Was it the best option to follow through with it? Volunteers were given a promise of being paid fifteen dollars a day of the study. Multiple members probably considered this a once in a life time event that could result in quick, easy money. Many may have heard about the Stanford Prison Experiment, but may not have been aware of the scars that it left upon the participants. Taking a deeper look into the study and the impacted outcomes on individuals will be elaborated on (Stanford Prison Experiment).
In the Stanford Prison Experiment, a study done with the participation of a group of college students with similar backgrounds and good health standing who were subjected to a simulated prison environment. The participants were exposed completely to the harsh environment of a real prison in a controlled environment with specific roles of authority and subordinates assigned to each individual. The study was formulated based on reports from Russian novelist Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky. Dostoevsky had spent four years in a Siberian prison and his view on how a man is able to withstand anything after experiencing the horrors of prison prompted Dr. Philip Zimbardo a Professor of Psychology at Stanford and his
Haertlein, Lauren L. “Immunizing Against Bad Science: The Vaccine Court and The Autism Test Case.” Law and Contemporary Problems 72 (2012): 211-32. EconLit. Web. 16 Feb. 2014.
Social psychology is an empirical science that studies how people think about, influence, and relate to one another. This field focuses on how individuals view and affect each other. Social psychology also produces the idea of construals which represent how a person perceives, comprehends or interprets the environment. Construals introduce the idea that people want to make themselves look good to others and they want to be seen as right. It is also said that the social setting in which people interact impacts behavior, which brings up the idea of behaviorism. Behaviorism is the idea that behavior is a function of the person and the environment.
When put into the position of complete authority over others people will show their true colors. I think that most people would like to think that they would be fair, ethical superiors. I know I would, but learning about the Stanford Prison Experiment has made me question what would really happen if I was there. Would I be the submissive prisoner, the sadistic guard, or would I stay true to myself? As Phillip Zimbardo gave the guards their whistles and billy clubs they drastically changed without even realizing it. In order to further understand the Stanford Prison experiment I learned how the experiment was conducted, thought about the ethical quality of this experiment, and why I think it panned out how it did.
Doctor Andrew Wakefield had written a paper in Lancet journal in 1998 which suggested that MMR vaccine causes autism. In his research, he found out that MMR vaccine was responsible for bowel inflammation that leads to the translocation of non-permeable peptides into the bloodstream. (American Academy of Pediatrics) This in turn carries them to the brain causing the root of autism spectrum disorder to form. His research was called weak by drug corporations, governments and media companies and was then discredited earning him a fraud reputation. His paper has since raised a decade long argument on MMR vaccine originating autism spectrum disorder. This has caused a lot of parents to withdraw their children from being vaccinated, which increased measles infections.
In the Frontline episode The Vaccine War, a progressively distressful debate ensues among many scientists and doctors within the public health system and an unnerving alliance of parents, politicians, and celebrities. The topic of debate is the overwhelming pressure parents feel to vaccinate their children and their right to decline such vaccinations. In several American neighborhoods, groups of parents have been exercising their right to refuse vaccinations, which has elevated anxiety on the return of vaccine-preventable diseases such as pertussis and measles. The reason such parents are denying their children various vaccines such as the MMR “triple shot” for measles, mumps, and rubella is because they are convinced that it is linked to autism, a link that has yet to be proven. Many of these parents are focused solely on their children, not taking into account that their decision may put the American populace at risk for disease. Such parents are not thinking about other members of society that vaccines don’t work for, and in certain adolescents the effects deteriorate, thus only when every person is immunized the “heard immunity” is successful.
For example, medical researchers argue that vaccines and autism are not linked, but rather the development of autism and other brain abnormalities simply occurs in the same period of a child’s life as their measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination. At the same time, it presents the point that these vaccinations include dangerous chemicals such as mercury and thimerosal which are extremely toxic. And while he strives to present both sides equally, it is clear that Palfreman favors the side of vaccinations. The majority of footage focuses on how medical research has disproven a link between autism and vaccines, while the parents are given small moments to share their opinions and experiences. The documentary paints a picture of parents who are simply paranoid and are ignoring one of medicine’s greatest innovations for unfounded reasons. In this way, the director shows bias in favor of medical opinion, rather than give equal representation of both
Wakefield theorized that the MMR or the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine had the possibility to cause autism. This specific conception in the paper shook the world and was immediately advertised by the media. Wakefield received a lot of attention for his thesis, but after a while, his lies came crashing on him. Wakefield’s theory was contradicted and proven wrong by several studies and other doctors. At the end, Wakefield did not only lose his reputation in the society, but he also lost his license as a doctor making him a failure to the medical community. Although Andrew Wakefield lost his identity, a major result of his publication of The Lancet was The Mercury Moms foundation.
Over the last twenty years there has been a very large increase in the number of mandatory vaccinations, which leads many people to believe that the increase in the number of vaccinations has a direct correlation with the increase of childhood Autism. “Today, 40 percent of American parents have chosen to delay or refuse a recommended or mandated vaccine for their children (Largent, 18)”. Many parents are too young to remember when communicable diseases could ravage a classroom or school. Polio could paralyze ten thousand children in a year. Rubella coul...
Experts believe that failure to vaccinate your child based on unfounded and inconclusive reports will only result in an increase of infectious diseases. This fear is seen in a statement given by some of the most respected medical professionals; “Using an unsubstantiated hypothesis to question the safety of vaccination . . . could lead to widespread rejection of vaccines and inevitable increases of serious infectious disease” (qtd. in Allen 411). Some studies have revealed that in places where vaccines have been associated with autism vaccinations go down, and consequently, certain diseases resurface or grow in number (Autism and Vaccines). Overall, though vaccinations are accompanied by risks, they are also the best defence against our children developing many deadly infectious diseases (Meadows).
One of the most notorious reasons parents are choosing not to vaccinate their children is the supposed link between vaccines and autism. Glamorous cel...
Almost all concerns about autism are baseless. Some are founded based on a suspicion of both doctors, and the fact vaccines are composed of
... more epidemic outbreak of other deadly diseases. Rep. Henry Waxman states, “Yet as we in crease research, we must also make sure that every parent knows that the best available science does not support a link between vaccines and autism” (662 Waxman).