Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Curriculum evaluation
Special education program objectives
Goals of the special education program
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Curriculum evaluation
Standard II allowed me to submit three artifacts: Professional Development Plan and survey, Curriculum Analysis Project-“Why Try” and the Student Learning Project. School Personnel and Administration allowed us to create a professional growth plan that is conducive to student learning. It allowed for analyzing school data and make a plan for improvement, creating a school climate with high expectations for students. This plan also allowed for promotion of the schools mission and vision. It provided all students with the knowledge and skills necessary to reach their fullest potential. The Curriculum Analysis allowed me to dig deep into a curriculum and evaluate how effective it is or could be at a school site for the success of every student. …show more content…
I created a survey and sent it out to all teachers at my current school. This anonymous survey was a way teachers could express the needs of the school and ways they could be addressed. I complied the demographics and student data along with survey results to develop a Professional Development Plan. The plan included two specific goals and were aligned with the schools vision and mission for the continued success of our students and school.
The Curriculum Analysis was on the "Why Try" Program. I examined the origin, organization and content of the curriculum. I also looked at how the curriculum should be implemented for best results. Through this analysis I was able to identify the benefits and weaknesses of the curriculum for the continued success of students academically and socially.
The Student Learning Project was comprised of several components. The first component was to interview a special education teacher and a parent of a special needs student. The second component was to assess the student with special learning needs and to determine areas to be worked on. The third component was to develop and implement an individualized learning program. I spent several weeks working with my student on specific standards in Algebra. I followed up with an assessment, documented his progress and reported back to
This integrative and alternative curriculum “would include cross-curricular objectives and be grounded on powerful learning environments” ones that include problem- and project- based tasks and promote student autonomy and control of the learning process (Alahiotis & Stavlioti, 2006, p.122). Inter- and intra- disciplinary knowledge is important to be included in curricular materials. Furthermore, it is noted that this approach is both content and process oriented and that is why is so deman...
Standard one consists of: Effective educational leaders develop, advocate, and enact shared mission, vision, and core values of high quality education and academic success, and well-being of each student. (PSEL 2015) Everything that is done within a school needs to be reflective of standard one, as the mission and vision of the school entwines within all activities of the school in order for the school to be successful. Without a shared vision and mission the goal of the school cannot be accomplished. Standard Five consists of: Effective educational leaders cultivate an inclusive, caring, and supportive school community that promotes the academic success and well-being of each student.
Alignment of purpose and collaboration among multiple stakeholders are critical to the success and sustainability of change efforts in schools. Our innovative School transformation and empowerment project focuses on (a) improving instructional leadership in schools (b) Teachers professional development (c) Setting systems and processes for effective functioning by building strong partnerships, robust community participation and addressing structural needs. The research imitative will focus on systematic documentation of learning’s, issues, focus areas to help build robust knowledge through empirical evidences that can contribute to the field of educational
Traditionally, teacher development typically occurs through trial and error in the isolated confinements of each teacher’s classroom with some periodic whole-group professional development (Goddard & Goddard, 2007). Within the past few decades, many schools and districts, including ours, have considered and experimented with Professional Learning Communities (PLC) as an alternative framework in guiding a more efficient development program for their teachers. PLCs are focused on enhancing student learning through developing teacher practices. The concept of PLC relies on using structured collaborative sessions amongst teachers within the school to build internal capacity. Through PLCs, teachers critically reflect on current practices, brainstorm solutions, and obtain help and advice from others in a supportive growth-oriented environment over an extended period of time (Vescio, Ross, & Adams, 2008; Nelson, 2009; Scher & O'Reilly, 2009; Bolam, McMahon, Stoll, Thomas, & Wallace, 2005). The theory of change guiding PLCs holds that by providing teachers with targeted support from within the school community, as oppose to hiring additional outside experts, professional developments can become for efficient. Implementation of effective PLCs requires intentional effort, school-wide and possibly district-wide restructuring of teacher schedules, and additional resources. For schools considering implementing PLCs, it is important to understand the logic of action and the benefits of PLCs as it relates to teacher improvement and increased student achievement.
When reviewing the literature regarding the past, present and future of educational curriculum, several main points seem apparent, namely that curriculum is cyclical, that a dilemma or paradox exists, and that curriculum must be looked at with a sensitive view.
Posner (2004, p. 36) discusses the importance of understanding the situational factors that lead to the development of a particular curriculum. This curriculum has been created as a response to the problem of technology skills and resources being typically isolated as a separate curriculum, rather than being integrated into the broader curricular areas. This leads to curricula that are often devoid of 21st century skills needed by students to ensure future success (Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 2004). The goal of the curriculum, therefore, is to focus on specific technology skills that can be readily integrated into other curricular areas without sacrificing critical objectives within those curricula and, in fact, enhancing the relevance and levels of engagement in those areas.
Since then, Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction has been a standard reference for anyone working with curriculum development. Although not a strict how-to guide, the book shows how educators can critically approach curriculum planning, studying progress and retooling when needed. Its four sections focus on setting objectives, selecting learning experiences, organizing instruction, and evaluating progress. Readers will come away with a firm understanding of how to formulate educational objectives and how to analyze and adjust their plans so that students meet the objectives. Tyler also explains that curriculum planning is a continuous, cyclical process, an instrument of education that needs to be fine-tuned.
I have used it more this year and my students downloaded the program to their phones.
Curriculum Development Interview The practice of curriculum development entails an efficient organization of what the teachers will teach the students and the process of teaching and assessment. The stakeholders in education such as educators, government, and parents have the responsibility of creating a curriculum. Presently, there are several challenges regarding policies and strategy that accompany the process of curriculum development. Curriculum development is important in any educational institution since it also identifies the resources required to impart knowledge.
The need to evaluate curriculum arises because it is necessary for both teachers and students to determine the extent to which their current curricular program and its implementation have produced positive and curricularly suitable outcomes for students. To evaluate curricular effectiveness we must identify and describe the curriculum and its objectives first and then check its contents for accuracy, comprehensiveness, depth, timeliness, depth and quality.
Curriculum is important being it’s the underlying factor that plays a role in determining ones growth, achievement and success. The majority of curriculum con...
One of my most influential experiences took place with my very first class, ED 523 taught by Dr. Howe. In this course, I learned about the Understanding by Design (UbD) Framework created by Wiggins and McTighe. This framework focuses on a backward design approach that uses big ideas, essential questions, and authentic assessments to create and guide curriculum (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005). The design encourages educators to “start with the end in mind.” Along with UbD, I also learned about a calendar-based curriculum mapping process created by Heidi Hayes Jacobs. The curriculum map allows for educators to examine curriculum both horizontally in a course and also vertically over the student’s K-12 academic career (Jacobs, 1997).
Curriculum mapping invites all individuals who deal with curricular concerns to enter into the curriculum analysis process. The values present in a web-based curriculum mapping tool are plentiful. A collaborative web-based tool can provide a framework for organization and communication which is not available in a traditional face-to-face, schedule bound meeting session. The ability to flexibly disseminate information facilitates the task of managing curriculum and sharing instructional best practices across grades, subjects, and schools. Another benefit is it can help build on what students have learned in previous years to prepare them for future classes and achievement.
Four Pillars of Learning for the Reorganization of Curriculum: Reflections and Discussions. By Zhou Nan-Zho
Lastly, educators have to differentiate between “curriculum” and “syllabus”. As it was mentioned in this paper, curriculum is the set of the experiences that are offered by the school to its students. However, syllabus is an outline of the course that includes a brief overview of the course objective, assignments, reading list, exam dates, and course expectation.