Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strategic management question
Strategic management question
Strategic management question
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strategic management question
Stability Strategy: A stability strategy is a strategy that any company follows when- a. It serves the public in its existing products and services and does not venture into new products or services. b. Its focuses on increasing its efficiency in its existing products and services and thus improving its financial performance Stability strategy is basically known as ‘steady as it goes’ approach. Very small or no functional changes are made in the product or services. In an effective stability strategy the company will focus its resources in areas that it already has or in areas where it can gain a competitive advantage over other companies by improving its existing products and services. Stability strategy involves using defensive moves such …show more content…
It wants to focus on improvement in its activities and functions by reducing its activities. Growth strategies and the stability strategy are implemented by companies when they are in satisfactory competitive positions. But when they are not doing very well then the companies will adopt a retrenchment strategy. Retrenchment generally takes up one of the following forms- a. Turnaround strategy- The main objective of a turnaround is to transform a company into a leaner organisation. It helps the company to be more effective by eliminating or removing the products or services that are not profitable, cutting the distribution costs, reducing the size of the workforce. Turnarounds are often preceded by changes in the microenvironment, industry structure or competitive behavior. Broadly speaking a turnaround is not a drastic a move as restructuring although the two can work together. b. Divestment- If it is believed that one or more of the firm’s business units may function more effectively as part of another firm, a divestment strategy may be pursued. Divestment may be necessary when the industry is in decline or when a business unit drains the resources from more profitable units, is not performing well, or is not synergistic with other corporate …show more content…
Liquidation- It is the strategy of last resort, and terminates the business unit by selling its assets. Liquidation is nothing but the divestment of all the company’s business units. Shareholders and creditors experience financial losses, some of the managers and employees lose their jobs, suppliers lose a customer, and the community suffers an increase in unemployment and a decrease in tax revenues. For this reason, liquidation should be pursued only when other forms of retrenchment are not viable A retrenchment strategy is most often followed by the reorganization process is called as corporate restructuring. Corporate restructuring involves realigning divisions of the company, reducing the amount of cash under the authority of senior executives and acquiring or divesting business units. Companies that restructure voluntarily ordinarily do not have to be concerned about hostile takeover bids or even eternally forced restructuring, a process that is more costly. Retrenchment strategy is a strategy that is most commonly used at the decline stage of business. Or if prospects appear bleak, controlled disinvestment can be used. Firms may abandon market share, reduce expenses and assets and pursue maximum positive cash
But divesture of three out of four divisions leads to a very small portfolio which leads to chances of high risks as well. The process of restructuring and forming a better portfolio would provide the firm with a lot many opportunities including exploring newer and more compatible product lines and segments, thus increasing its opportunities to earn better revenues with efficient management.
Gaughan, P. A., 2002. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate restructuring. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The desired outcomes from reorientation of the company’s business were to reduce risk of increasing prices, decrease costs and increase sales. These desired outcomes have ap...
o Free up capital by divesting from the business units that are unprofitable or are outside of the company’s core competency.
...strategy when the initial downsizing failed to take them out of the red or gain back lost market share.
To accomplish the company’s long-term objectives the follow strategies have been put into place: forward/backward/horizontal integration,
The strategic stand during the transformation change at the beginning was focused on downsizing its business core units by cutting employment by 10%. Cutting costs was also a priority as they moved to outsourcing of some of its business processes, especially in the IT area if it met its core function of the company or if there was value in it.
The protection enhances the ability of sustaining a business in a competitive marketplace for the long run. A firm should also undergo the DYB strategy to get rid of business units and other resources that do not add value to the company 's performance. It should adopt the GYB strategy, in which it would utilize the business opportunities lying at its disposal to its advantage. As a direct result of these two strategies, the company would gain a substantial competitive edge against rivals, as well as boost its profitability in the long run (Grimm, Lee & Smith, 2010). Knowing that today 's business environment is characterized by heightened competition that has led to extensive gaps between industry leaders and laggards, and that there are greater churns among the industry rivals, the GYB and DYB strategies are essential for any modern company. More importantly, the GYB strategy should be focused towards the increase of
Corporate Downsizing Organizations in every segment of business, industry, government, and education are downsizing. Downsizing is and has been a controversial phenomenon in the last few years. The controversy that surrounds downsizing may be better described as a debate in organizational theory about whether change is adaptive or disruptive. The issues which establish the outcome of the controversy include why the downsizing is taking affect, how it is implemented, and what steps are taken to enhance its effects on organizational performance. The reasons for corporate downsizing are presented in many forms. Some companies downsize due to technological changes such as automation, which brings about the need for a reduction in the production workforce. Others may feel that competitiveness with other companies warrants the need for a reduction in the workforce. Financial setbacks due to customer demand, market shares, and loss of revenue could also initiate the need for downsizing. When will it end? Experts say it won't. For instance, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was established as a universal trade agreement between the US, Cannada, and Mexico to allow free imports and exports.
There are times when management has no other option but to proceed with downsizing their current number of staff members. There are several facts that force staff reductions. These include changes in funding, new laws or regulations that limit profits for the organization, as well as mergers and many other operational setbacks. Most often mergers bring along consolidation of positions and cutbacks in the workforce because the number of employees regarded as necessary to accomplish the position tasks has changed (Fallon & McConnell, 2007).The process is different in every organization; however, many share the same reasoning for laying off a portion of their staff.
Monitor and adjust strategies in response to problems in the revitalization process. Every firm has to know how to continually monitor its behavior, in order to be able to learn how to learn.
The retrenchement was a measure to reduce cost due to crippling fuel prices and lower load factors. The carrier was also battling a cash shortage, overstaffing and an
Downsizing has become an extremely popular strategy in today’s business environment. Companies began downsizing in the late 1970’s to cut costs and improve the bottom line (Mishra et al., 1998). The term “downsizing” was coined to describe the action of dismissing a large portion of a company’s workforce in a very short period of time. According to online encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org downsizing refers to “layoffs initiated by a company in order to cut labor costs by reducing the size of the company.” Downsizing became a familiar management mantra in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. In fact, three million jobs were lost between 1989 and 1998 (Mishra et al., 1998). More than 350,000 jobs were lost in 2001 (DeSouza & Donaldson, 2002). Downsizing has become almost a way of life for U.S. companies. Typically, the first round of job cuts are followed by a second round of cuts a short time later. Not everyone agrees with the reasoning behind downsizing. According to an article in the Journal of Banking and Financial Services, downsizing is merely “a short-sighted business strategy motivated by arrogant CEO’s eager to appease shareholders (Unkles, 2001). Others feel downsizing is a necessary tool to ensure business survival in the face of a changing economy. Regardless, the costs of downsizing are high, and the payoffs of downsizing are mixed at best. This paper doesn’t serve as an approach to downsizing, rather, it explores the many aspects of downsizing, from when it’s time to downsize to what steps that can be taken to avoid the process altogether.
According to Jim Sirbasku the Organizational restructuring strategies help you get the most from people by developing a plan for corporate restructuring, layoffs and mergers. For organizations to develop, they often must experience significant changes in their overall strategies, practices and operational procedures. As companies evolve so must their employees to align with their organization.
That reminded me from the case study the director how to plays round of the company to succeed this Colombian Memorial Hospital. External control view of leadership, situations in which external forces where the leader has limited influence determine the organization 's success. Strategy, the ideas, decisions, and actions that enable a firm to succeed. competitive advantage firm 's resources and capabilities that enable it to overcome the competitive forces in its industries. Operational effectiveness, Performing similar activities better than rivals. Intend strategy, strategy in which organizational decisions are determined only by analysis. Realize strategy, strategy in which organizational decisions are determined by both analysis and unforeseen environmental developments, unanticipated resource limitations, and changes from managerial preferences. Strategy analysis studies of firms ' external and internal environments, and there with organizational vision and goals. Strategy formulation, decisions made by firms regarding investments, commitments, and other aspects of operations that create and sustain competitive advantage.