Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Urban sprawl conclusion
Urban sprawl conclusion
Introduction for an urban sprawl research essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Urban sprawl conclusion
Sprawling may seem like a great idea for those whom grew tire of a congested city life, and want to live in a more spacious and “safe” environment. There may be many benefits for those who seek more personal space, but there are just as many negative impacts. First and foremost I would like to address that it would be very difficult to defend sprawl as there is a predominant view that it is responsible for everything that is wrong with America. Sprawl has many negative consequences that affect our quality of life, and our natural habitat. We have to put in consideration the need of the many, and not the desire of the few. Sprawling can weaken the integrity of a city, by draining resources such as educational budgets for the areas in the city …show more content…
It makes everyone living in it vehicle dependent, this means the streets are tailored to vehicles. (Moe, Richard) These settlement have use land so poorly, businesses like walmart and kmart use so much space that it can be equal to or greater than that of the entire square footage used by the market district in the city. Superstores and the suburbs go hand in hand, these stores do generate jobs and provide affordable goods for the consumer. These benefits come at the cost of losing business in downtowns and main streets city areas where local businesses once thrived, this most definitely increases unemployment rates in the city decaying the economy overall as unemployed residents will have to seek social benefits in order to maintain …show more content…
An important element to the quality of life of any community is the way it looks and cultural fulfilment it brings. If the environment they live in is dominated by the same type of housing unit and strip malls, the lack of desirable buildings that has facilities where people can interact reduces their satisfaction with their community. Sprawl is responsible for the making of communities that are far less tolerant to new ideas, as sprawl only attracts a certain demographic. This intolerance leads to people alienating from their very own neighbors. Whereas in a higher density area people are more welcoming and are more tolerant to new ideas, leading to a diverse culture. This proves to be true as in a densely populated area there is greater
“gentrification as an ugly product of greed. Yet these perspectives miss the point. Gentrification is a byproduct of mankind 's continuing interest in advancing the notion that one group is more superior to another and worthy of capitalistic consumption with little regard to social consciousness. It is elitism of the utmost and exclusionary politics to the core. This has been a constant theme of mankind to take or deplete a space for personal gain. In other words, it 's very similar to the "great advantage" of European powers over Native Americans and westward expansion”(Wharton).
Since these were low income areas there wasn’t a high tax revenue to maintain the areas. This would cause in the infrastructures not being up to date or completely reliable. It is far to expensive to pay to renovate these areas and the issue also comes from who will pay for it. when there is a low income area that is heavily concentrated with people it becomes very difficult to upkeep that area which results in it becoming more and more rundown.
Mystique Caston Ms. Jefferson English 22 february 2016 Gentrification and Chicago Gentrification and chicago “Gentrification refers to trends in the neighborhood development that tend to attract more affluent residents, and in the instances concentrates scale commercial investment. ”(Bennet,).This means that gentrification can change how a neighborhood is ran or even how much income the community takes in depending on what businesses come in and what class of people decide to invest into that community. In this paper i will be discussing gentrification and and poverty, pros and cons of gentrification, relationships due to gentrification, conflict due to gentrification, reactions/ feelings or of small business owners about
Gentrification is defined as the process by which the wealthy or upper middle class uproot poorer individuals through the renovation and rebuilding of poor neighborhoods. Many long-term residents find themselves no longer able to afford to live in an area, where the rent and property values are increasing. Gentrification is a very controversial topic, revealing both the positive and negative aspects of the process. Some of the more desirable outcomes include reduced crime rate, increased economic activity, and the building of new infrastructures. However, it is debated whether the negatives overwhelm the positive. An increase in the number of evictions of low-income families, often racial minorities can lead to a decline of diversity
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention defines gentrification as “the transformation of neighborhoods from low value to high value…gentrification is a housing, economic, and health issue that affects a community’s history and culture and reduces social capital often by shifting a neighborhood’s characteristics by adding new stores and resources in previously run-down neighborhoods.” Gentrification disproportionately affects special populations, including but not limited to the poor, women, children, the elderly and a vast majority of minority groups.
In this article, the author writes about the Urban Renewal Plan and what it did to a community in Oakland, California. The West Oakland community was found in 1852 and had a diverse population living there. That article says that upper-class people would be living next door to working class people. After the World Wars that changed because lower income families started moving to the area looking for jobs. The jobs they had were created because of the war. When the war ended these people lost their jobs. At the same time, the Urban Renewal Plan was put into place. This plan set out to remove slums in urban places. This plan would relocated families, demolish houses and create low-income housing. When a family was relocated they received little
to fund public programs or make general improvements throughout the community. Urban sprawl is expensive not only on people’s wallets, but is taxing on their health, the environment, their relationships. The.. After examining all of the problems associated with urban sprawl it is hard not to question how America lost the genuine communities of old and adopted the new community of
Gentrification does not follow traditional urban growth theory, which predicts ?the decline of inner city areas as monied classes move to the metropolitan fringe.? The traditional economic model of real estate says that wealthy people can choose their housing from the total city market (Schwirian 96). Once these people decide to live in the suburbs, the lower social classes move into the old homes of the upper class, essentially handing housing down the socioeconomic ladder. Gentrification is actually a reversal of this process. For a variety of reasons, many inner city areas are becoming more attractive to the wealthy, and they are selecting their housing in those areas (Schwirian 96). The problem is that now when the wealthy take over poor homes and renovate them, the poor cannot afford the housing that the wealthy have abandoned. Many researchers have argued whether gentrification has truly created problems in cities. I will analyze the arguments for and against gentrification by exploring the subject from both sides.
Gentrification is generally a sign of growth in economics. As money flows into a neighborhood, many characteristics of everyday life are transformed for the “better”. Buildings and parks are modernized and revamped. Jobs become available with the increased construction activity and new service and retail businesses. The funding for local public schools will increase as the property tax base increases. There are many benefits of gentrification. However, the questions posed by critics of gentrification are, "Do new and old residents alike equally share the benefits of economic growth?" and "Socially, what is the cost of economic growth?" These two questions provoke a host of others, such as: Who benefits the most from this growth? What will be the damage to the cultural and social fabric of the neighborhood with the arrival of new expectations, tastes, and demographics?
Gentrification is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that has been shaping the urban landscape of America for decades. To understand its significance, let's break it down into its key components: who, what, when, where, and why. * *Who:*
What exactly is gentrification? How is that different from diversifying poor neighborhoods and why is it important to know its consequences? Gentrification, according to British sociologist Ruth Glass, when “one by one, working class quarters have been invaded by the middle class… until all or most of the working class occupiers are displaced and the whole social character of the district is changed”. By this definition, gentrification is when a poor area of a city becomes invaded by the middle class, forcing lower income residents to move out. This phenomenon that has been emerging in some neighborhoods across inner cities, occurs primarily because the middle class are attracted to neighborhoods’ historic charm and seek to live near the city
For example, if the land use tends to residential with barely any commercial or institutional uses within a reasonable distance of most residences, its livability will decrease, as the lack of access to services and stores will hinder the lives of many residents. The same goes
Frank Lloyd Wright was perhaps the most influential American architect of the 20th century and one of the greatest to ever live. What was well known about Wright was that he was deeply ambivalent about cities and metropolis centers. His key criticism of large cities was that the advancing technologies had rendered the cities, which were created industry and immigration in the late 19th and early 20th Century, completely obsolete. He famously quoted that, “ The present city…has nothing to give the citizen…because centralization have no forces of regeneration”. Instead, Wright envisioned decentralized settlements (otherwise known as suburban neighborhoods) that would take advantage of the mobility offered by the automobile, telephones, and telegraphic communication. Because of the rise of the suburban complexes in the post WW2 era, this is where Wright first got the reputation has being a prophet for the architecture world.
It decreases the self-steam and confidence of the community because they fell neglected and unworthy of a nice, beautiful, functional environment. This general feeling can lead to many other problems in the community such as depredation, increase of criminality, homeless encampments and street prostitution to name a few (Popcenter.org, 2014). Indeed, back in 1982 Wilson and Kelling introduced the broken windows theory that states that keeping a well-ordered condition in urban environments may prevent vandalism and escalation into more serious
Sociologist … explained that open pattern of suburb is because of seeking environment free noise, dirt and overcrowding that are in the centre of cities. He gave examples of these cities as St. John’s wood, Richmond, Hampstead in London. Chestnut Hill and Germantown in Philadelphia. He added that suburban are only for the rich and high class. This plays into the hands of the critical perspectives that, “Cities are not so much the product of a quasi-natural “ecological” unfolding of social differentiation and succession, but of a dynamic of capital investment and disinvestment. City space is acted on primarily as a commodity that is bought and sold for profit, “(Little & McGivern, 2013, p.616).