Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How much would bilingual education benefit the student
Bilingualism- Importance of Bilingualism educational for deaf student
How much would bilingual education benefit the student
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sign language or spoken language for a hearing impaired child?
The parent of a hearing impaired child is charged with the task of making very important life decisions for their child, who is too young to make the choices for themselves. Therefore it is very important that the parent is well informed about the issues that surround choosing how their child communicates; whether they use sign language or spoken language. In this essay the difference between sign language and spoken language will be defined, as well as the issues that surround raising a child with only sign language or only spoken language. The positives and negatives of giving the child a bimodal bilingual education will also be discussed.
The difference between sign languages
…show more content…
Besides the fact that it is the most convenient for them, some parents think that this will help their child communicate better with the general public; leading to satisfying personal relationships and unlimited career goals. Dolnick (1993) says that spoken language is an extremely challenging thing to learn for a child who has been born deaf, because they are trying without any direct feedback to copy sounds that they have never heard before. Even if the deaf child does learn to speak, lip reading is a very hard skill to learn, many words look exactly the same on the lips but sound very different. Most deaf people even in good conditions result to guessing half of what they see on the lips. “In tests using simple sentences, deaf people recognize perhaps three or four words in every ten.” (Dolnick, 1993). This form of communication is extremely hard for the deaf child, their level of language develops much slower than their peers and they end up being years behind their age group. Some deaf people never reach an adequate level of spoken language Dolnick (1993) says, to gamble 12 to 15 years of a deaf child’s life is almost …show more content…
Dolnick (1993) says that deaf children born to deaf parents learn sign language as easily as a hearing child learns spoken language from their hearing parents. Deaf children therefore develop at the same rate as hearing children when using sign language. Dolnick (1993) asked the parents of a hearing impaired child who had decided to change over to sign language with their daughter how it affected her “the improvement in her language and communication skills development since she started using sign language has been tremendous. She likes signing and we all sign with her.” However Finch (2015) states that some professionals in the field of deafness believe that if a hearing impaired child learns to use sign language, the child won’t be able to learn vocal and written language as well. As far as research goes this is the only downside to a deaf child learning sign language; that they may struggle to learn spoken
This issue is important because if you try to force the Deaf to hear, they might not grow because they will have no form of communication to use with other people. Even though the doctors might say to not use ASL, this will greatly hinder your child's well-being in the long run. I learned a lot about Deaf people, ASL, and/or Deaf Culture after reading this book. Deaf people are normal, just like anybody else, and they should not be treated any differently. Some people treat deafness as a disease that needs to be cured, but it's not.
The movie “Audism Unveiled” was a very interesting and powerful movie. I never realized that deaf individuals are discriminated against. This could be partly because I have never been immersed in or educated about the deaf culture until this year. One of the things that struck me the most while watching “Audism Unveiled” was the many heart wrenching stories about children being unable to communicate with their own non-signing hearing families.. The deaf child would have to ask their family members, why everyone was laughing or what’s going on. The family members would just tell them “I’ll tell you later” or “Nevermind. It’s not important”, resulting in the individual feeling isolated. Personally, I agree with people saying that if a parent has a deaf child they should learn how to sign; communication is what brings families together. As a result, the most intriguing thing to me was the stories of family members never learning American Sign Language; leaving their family member isolated.
The documentary “For a Deaf Son,” delineates a young boy, Thomas Tranchin, who was born deaf into a hearing family, and the battle his parents endured to decide to teach Thomas in sign language communication, strictly communicate in English, or both. The documentary is educational for the hearing world to shape their own particular opinions on what type of technique would be better for their child in the event that they were to ever be in a comparative circumstance. As Dr. Carlos Erting expressed in the film, 93% of hearing impaired children have hearing parents; therefore, this documentary gives a glimpse at both perspectives of nonverbal communication and oral communication. However, as I viewed the short film, the clashing feelings of Thomas’
While the benefits for the hearing are great, there are better benefits for those who are Deaf. Jarashow stated that it was essentially frowned upon if a Deaf child was using sign instead of trying to use what ability they had to hear. This seems counterproductive and if they emphasized more on teaching Deaf children ASL, there would be better outcomes for them in the future. Instead of focusing on trying to make everyone the same, they should focus on giving these children the best opportunity possible despite their
All the other family members of the young boy were not deaf. The grandparents of the underlying boy were normal and they think that the boy will be normal without any problem. The grandparents of the Mark were against the sign language because they think if Mark understands the signing language he will become dependent. However, the parents of the Mark want to teach him the signing language because according to their point of view, the signing language will help the Mark in understanding the language. In the school, he used the signing language with his friends and teachers in order to communicate with all of them. After the learning of the signing language, Mark was able to understand all the signs and know everything which the other communicates. Mark loved his school and his friends and was very happy in his school. The grandparents of Mark saw him very happy after the learning of the signing class because by taking the signing class, Mark was able to understand the language of the others. When the grandparents of Mark saw him happy due to the learning of the signing class so both of them also took an admission in the signing class in order to understand the language of the other individuals (Oliva et.al,
Mark Drolsbaugh, the author of Deaf Again, was born to deaf parents at a time when the deaf population didn’t have and weren’t given the same availability to communication assistance as they have today. He was born hearing and seemed to have perfect hearing up until the first grade when he started having trouble understanding what was being said but was too young to understand what was happening. (Drolsbaugh 8).
One excerpt mentioned that the idea that Deaf people are left with the burden of fitting into a hearing world was a product of “laziness” on the part of the Hearing. Instead of making adjustments to accommodate the Deaf, Deaf people are doing all of the work to accommodate the Hearing. Notwithstanding the major alterations that include learning to speak and wearing hearing aids, hearing people merely have to learn sign language. I’ve witnessed this in my own home. When my brother stopped speaking, it wasn’t ever a concern for the rest of the family to adjust to him, we continued on as if nothing changed. It’s true, Deaf children practically have no say in how they would rather communicate, it is left up to the parent and in most cases, Hearing parents. I’m just glad that I have an opportunity do the work to learn ASL and make strides in breaking down barriers that have hindered communication between the Hearing and the
...at sign language was a last resort if the child did not pick up lip reading and oral communication. Thomas now met someone who signed and spoke and realized that signing is a language in its own and its importance to people who could not hear the oral language. This began their quest to learn sign language and use it with Lynn despite the school and public opinion.
English is an interesting language. English is comprised of many different words from different languages all mashed up and mixed together. English is a very hard language to learn, especially if you can’t hear it. How easy would it be to confuse a “B” with a “P”, they sound similar and when trying to lip read how can you tell the difference? I feel that young Deaf /hard of hearing students being taught by a Deaf teacher or a child of a Deaf adult (C.O.D.A) teacher is very important because ASL is the first step to learning English and becoming bilingual. According to the article Why Schools for Deaf Children Should Hire Deaf Teachers: A Preschool Issue By Courtney Shantie and Robert Hoffmeister, the authors state “This paper will focus on
The problem faced by the deaf community is the injustice they encounter in the criminal justice system. Someone who is deaf or hard of hearing has at least a 50 percent loss of hearing in one ear (Ridgeway 2009), and some may be able to read lips. However, only 12 of all spoken sounds can be translated into American Sign Language (Ridgeway 2009), which makes it difficult for the deaf to communicate without using sign language. Because English and sign language are not the same language, many deaf people are illiterate because of a lack of schooling past a certain age. Even those with schooling up to the age of 18 or older are often functionally illiterate, read at a grade level of second grade or below, and have unintelligible speech (Vernon 2010).
The documentary of “Through Deaf Eyes” has open my eyes to the deaf culture. The movie has made it “click” that deaf people are just that people and individuals like me. Deaf community has its struggles just like everyone else. They struggle with growing into who they are as a person, harmful situations, and feeling a sense of belonging. They just speak a different language like Italians and Hispanics. Communicating with a different language does not make them lesser than a hearing person. When able to learn to communicate, the deaf are able to learn and gain knowledge just like a hearing person. The only difference is they have to learn more and work harder to achieve their goals and gain knowledge, which a hearing person learns just by hearing their surroundings.
The deaf community does not see their hearing impairment as a disability but as a culture which includes a history of discrimination, racial prejudice, and segregation. According to an online transcript,“Through Deaf Eyes” (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007) there are thirty-five million Americans that are hard of hearing. Out of the thirty-five million an estimated 300,000 people are completely deaf. There are ninety percent of deaf people who have hearing parents (Halpern, C., 1996). Also, most deaf parents have hearing children. With this being the exemplification, deaf people communicate on a more intimate and significant level with hearing people all their lives. “Deaf people can be found in every ethnic group, every region, and every economic class” (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007). The deaf culture and hard of hearing have plenty of arguments and divisions with living in a hearing world without sound however, that absence will be a starting point of an identity within their culture as well as the hearing culture (Weta and Florentine films/Hott productions Inc., 2007).
From a deafness-as-defect mindset, many well-meaning hearing doctors, audiologists, and teachers work passionately to make deaf children speak; to make these children "un-deaf." They try hearing aids, lip-reading, speech coaches, and surgical implants. In the meantime, many deaf children grow out of the crucial language acquisition phase. They become disabled by people who are anxious to make them "normal." Their lack of language, not of hearing, becomes their most severe handicap. While I support any method that works to give a child a richer life, I think a system which focuses on abilities rather than deficiencies is far more valuable. Deaf people have taught me that a lack of hearing need not be disabling. In fact, it shouldn?t be considered a lack at all. As a h...
For example, pg. 136 of our book, Speech, Language & Hearing Disorders: Guide for the Teacher by Barbara Hall, Herbert Oyer and William Haas, states that “hard of hearing children consistently show a 2-to3 year lag in vocabulary development, while deaf children show a significantly wider gap.” As the project taught us, in addition to helping improve any phonological, articulation and social language issues, as well as helping the patient learn to hear with their hearing device in noise, the speech-language pathologist is responsible for expanding a deaf child’s mental lexicon; an educator should do the same, and offer additional instruction after school. The book does say that “many mainstreamed hearing-impaired students cannot achieve the same goals as their hearing peers” (Hall, Oyer and Haas, 2001, pg. 136) and by the teacher talking to the parents and offering this assistance after school – or in the case of an older student, study hall – this will help to close the gap. While another point of the project was that some deaf children are more successful in speech/language learning than others, again, I do believe this additional assistance can help the child in getting to the same level as their normal hearing
Social Media has brought on an epidemic of sleep deprivation to people of all ages. All through the night they wake with the “beeps” and “dings” of new messages. They have been craving the sound of a new message and when it comes, no matter what time of the day (or night), they are quick in responding to whatever and whoever the message may be about. This addiction has been kept in-check but with the cost of a good night’s sleep. Today’s generation has been leaving the thought of sleep behind only to lose valuable relaxation time. Many people “…text, tweet, check messages, and post things right before sleeping” (Addiction). This had been proven to “…reduce melatonin in the brain” (Addiction) thus taking away minute by minute of our precious sleep. We put our phones down when we think necessary and go to sleep only to be awaken again within the next half-an-hour. The fact that we keep our devices on through the night does not help our case.