Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lenin and stalin economy
Lenin and stalin economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lenin and stalin economy
A command economy is an economy that is under the control of the central government. A command economy focuses on the group rather than individual people. In this type of economy, the government regulates the means of production. An example of the command economy is in the Soviet Command Economy. The Soviet Command Economy started in 1924 under the rule of the Soviet Union leader, Joseph Stalin. It effected the social structure of the Soviet Union. The government took control of almost every aspect of a person’s life; therefore, the people of the Soviet Union were very poor and not taken care of. The Soviet Union accomplished growth from the 19502 to the 1970s, but economic growth slowed down after this period. Joseph Stalin created five-year plans, collectivized farmland, created labor camps to help industrialize the Soviet Union. By collectivizing …show more content…
There were flaws in collectivization, competition, wealth, and leadership. Collectivization is a government arrangement where the government collects all private farmland and making them into collective farms. Joseph Stalin thought collectivization would help the Soviet Union’s industry and economy, but a small deficiency would ruin it all. Things like famine and harsh winters would contribute to the failure of collectivization and the economy. The Soviet Command Economy create a lack of economic competition. Because the government owns everything in the Soviet Command Economy, the lack of competition comes from then restriction of private ownership. Command economies can create a lack communication. This develops a struggle for the government to communicate with other countries. This struggle destroys international relations and trade throughout the world, which causes poverty amongst a country. The leadership, also, created flaws. Mikhail Gorbachev allowed the people of the Soviet Union to have a restricted voice. Allowing the people of the Soviet Union to have a
In conclusion, the Communist Government faced many economic and political challenges in the years 1917-28 because of the civil war and government policy which tried to rebuild Russia. However later on they tried to fix some problems, but not all, as the Russian government could not industrialise the economy due to solving over political and economic challenges.
When Stalin became leader of the USSR the quality of life and standard of living dropped considerably. For instance the people had no personal freedom. Meaning that they had to worship Stalin as all other religions had been abolished and most churches had been demolished. The people who went into those churches that were left standing were arrested or punished otherwise. Soon there were food shortages. Somewhere between 1932 and 1933 over 6 million people died of starvation. This was the greatest man made famine in history. The famine came as a result of Stalin’s unrealistic goals . Also, people had poor family lives. Abortions came a dime a dozen as did divorces. Wedding rings were banned. There was insufficient housing, as some people had to live in tents. This may be because of workers not working hard enough. Maybe if the workers worked harder they could have received better housing.
“ The constitution promised the Soviets freedom of speech, conscious, press, assembly, and demonstrations in conformity with the interest of the working people and in order to strengthen the socialist system.”20 In fact the Soviet people never saw any of these rights. The Constitutional rights could only be used to support the regime, not to criticize it.
Stalin’s leadership of the Soviet Union can be best described as a period of terror and censorship. In other words, he was very strict, considering the fact that he created the totalitarian government. In order to create this type of government, Stalin used fear and propaganda. He took part in The Great Purge, which was a campaign of terror that was supposed to eliminate anyone who threatened Stalin’s power. He also relied on secret police, who would arrest and execute any traitors. The online blog, “The Reasons For the Failure of The Russian Revolution”, brings up information on how Stalin planned to rule as dictator of Russia. It has been noted, “This ‘reshaping’ had three main aspects: the elimination of all dissent; the liquidation of all forms of democracy and of working class organisation; the slashing of the living standards of the working class and the physical annihilation of millions of peasants” (Text 5). This quote explains how Stalin wanted to industrialize Russia, which includes the deaths of several peasants of Russia. The Russians did not just die from The Great Purge, but also from Stalin’s Five-Year Plan. The Five-Year Plan was an attempt to industrialize the Soviet Union. It was also a plan for increasing the output of steel, coal, oil, and electricity. He had control over economic resources, including farms and
“His plans were in 5 year intervals in which the government took control over all businesses and industries, focused mainly on factory output/transportation and to implement quota systems” (Greatneck). “The Soviet Union needed to become a top tier area in the global market, but their insufficient funds were what stopped from becoming types of governments such as communist, socialist and capitalist” (StudentPulse). Banks ceased to bail out industrial enterprises. The civilian administrative system, which was already creaking under wartime strains, started to collapse.
The cold war was failed by the Soviet Union for many reasons, including the sudden collapse of communism (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) This sudden collapse of communism was brought on ultimately by internal factors. The soviet unions president Gorbachev’s reforms: glasnost (openness) and perestroika (political reconstructering) ultimately caused the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev’s basics for glasnost were the promotion of principles of freedom to criticize; the loosening of controls on media and publishing; and the freedom of worship. His essentials of perestroika were, a new legislature; creation of an executive presidency; ending of the ‘leading role’ of the communist party; allowing state enterprises to sell part of their product on the open market; lastly, allowing foreign companies to own Soviet enterprises (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) Gorbachev believed his reforms would benefit his country, but the Soviet Union was ultimately held together by the soviet tradition he was trying to change. The Soviet Union was none the less held together by “…powerful central institutions, pressure for ideological conformity, and the threat of force.
It could be argued that this increasing power for the single leader drawn from his party was due to the need for fast, decisive and unquestioned leadership of the type needed in battle. After all, Russia was portrayed by the Soviet propaganda machine as being at war with its own industrial backwardness as workers were urged to industrial fronts'. If the period of the 1930s is considered, it was a time of crisis. The building tension due to the rise of Nazi Germany making European foreign politics a risky place to navigate, the economic onslaught at home in Russia and the economic depression in the rest of the world making the times harsh. This change then could be argued as being beneficial to the USSR as only a single individual can provide the strong leadership needed, amongst a large group of individuals disputes would hinder the decision making process.
Communism was the ideology followed by the Soviet Union. Originally founded by Karl Marx, it said that everything should be owned by the government and then divided up equally among the people who would then all work for it. For the communist party in Russia, their political system was always in danger. From the start of the Russian Revolution there have been dangers to communism. Before World War II most of the western nations ignored Russia simply because it was a communist state and the western nations actually supported Hitler because they believed that Germany would provided a buffer against Communism. The permanent threat against Russia gave the incentive to expand and spread communist influence as much as possible to keep their way of life intact, it was very much Russia against the world. However not only was the Soviet Union communist, they were totalitarian, meaning all the power was with the rulers. While this was effective for keeping the standard average of living the same for everyone and preventing poverty, it also led to a poor work ethic among the working population...
at age 26. He no idea what was involved, what to do and went along
The major difference between a command economy and a market economy is who makes the decisions. In a command economy, the government decides what to produce, who to produce for, and how to produce. In a market economy, the people get to decide what to produce, who to produce for, and how to produce. The major difference lies with the control and who is in charge.
...change of industrial leadership crippled Russia's mechanization efforts and it is still argued today if the effects are still felt. By removing these people from the Soviet society both the biologist theories of Nature verses Nurture were challenged at best and destroyed at worst. For the argument of nature being the greatest influence on learning ability most of the intellectuals and brightest leaders were removed from the gene pool. In contrast to Nurture these people could not influence society any longer. Through these changes in society Stalin has forever made his mark. His pollicies effected every area in Russian culture.
The Soviet Union, which was once a world superpower in the 19th century saw itself in chaos going into the 20th century. These chaoses were marked by the new ideas brought in by the new leaders who had emerged eventually into power. Almost every aspect of the Soviet Union was crumbling at this period both politically and socially, as well as the economy. There were underlying reasons for the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and eventually Eastern Europe. The economy is the most significant aspect of every government. The soviet economy was highly centralized with a “command economy” (p.1. fsmitha.com), which had been broken down due to its complexity and centrally controlled with corruption involved in it. A strong government needs a strong economy to maintain its power and influence, but in this case the economic planning of the Soviet Union was just not working, which had an influence in other communist nations in Eastern Europe as they declined to collapse.
Stalin pushed so hard that it put everyone in a financial crisis. Lands were taken from people and if they opposed the people were put into prison camps. Many people fought back and caught their land on fire which put the Soviet Union into agricultural depression. Because of the uprising and standing up for what they believed in millions of more people died because starvation. Stalin tried to make it look like he had everything under control by posting pictures of well-fed and happy workers with green lands.
Joseph Stalin ruled the USSR from 1929 until his death in 1953. His rule was one of tyranny, and great change from the society that his predecessor, Lenin, had envisioned (Seton, 34). Stalin put into effect two self proclaimed "five-year plans" over the course of his rule. Both were very similar in that they were intended to improve production in the nation. The first of these plans began collectivization, in which harvests and industrial products were seized by the government and distributed as needed. The government eliminated most private businesses and the state became the leader in commerce. Stalin also initiated a process called "Russification". (Great Events, 119)"
There are two types of economic systems that a society may adhere to; which are polar opposites. The Command system, also known as communism or socialism. In a command economy, the government owns the majority of the resources, and all decisions for the society is made based on a central plan. The command system has been adopted by countries such as the Soviet Union, China and North Korea. This economic system is commonly used by countries under a dictatorship. Despite the negative aura surrounding a dictatorship this system does have its pros and