Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How the economy influenced the civil war
Sectionalism in the civil war confederacy
Social, political and economic impacts of the civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How the economy influenced the civil war
The decision for the South to secede from the Union was not a knee-jerk decision. There were many issues that played a role in their decision to secede. For example, economically speaking, the South's main economy was based on slave labor, and with the populous tide turning against the institution of slavery, it was a matter of time before the government would abolish the practice; thus, interfering with the livelihood of plantation planters and essentially bankrupting the South's overall economy. Also, politically speaking, "the effort to maintain a balance between free states and slave states was being threatened by the expansion in the West" (Schultz, K.M., 2013). Although a series of compromises were enacted, supporters eventually became …show more content…
frustrated with the process and would not abide by the rules dictated by the proposed compromises; thus, making the case for secession more appealing. Lastly, the reelection of President Lincoln was a "dog whistle" to southerners that their southern way of life and ideologies were under attack. Eventually, the South decided to secede from the Union.
The first state to do so was South Carolina. On December 20, 1860, in a state assembly, South Carolina ratification was repealed and they voted to withdraw from the Union. Consequently, six other states followed suit, Mississippi, Georgia, Texas, Florida, Alabama, and Louisiana; eventually forming their own independent republic, the Confederate States of America on February 7, 1861.
In response to the drastic measure taken by the southern states, President Lincoln sought a diplomatic middle course. He did this by first re-assuring them that he would leave the institution of slavery intact. Also, the president reminded them of the perpetual and indissoluble binding agreement that each state agreed to when joining the Union, and that secession was not an option. As stated in his first inaugural address:
"Physically speaking, we cannot separate. We cannot remove our respective sections from each other nor build an impassable wall between them. A husband and wife may be divorced and go out of the presence and beyond the reach of each other; but the different parts of our country cannot do this" (NPS.gov,
…show more content…
2015). Furthermore, he argued that federal property located in southern states belonged to the Union. However, the South was steadfast in their convictions.
In a dispute over shipping food to a garrison of men at Fort Sumter, President Davis of the Confederacy disputed the validity of President Lincoln's intentions. Amid the bickering, President Davis declared any effort by Union forces to deliver goods to Fort Sumter would be considered an aggressive act, and they would respond accordingly. But as a preemptive move, President Davis ordered the surrender of Fort Sumter. In any event, the garrison of men at Fort Sumter fought valiantly but to no avail, and eventually had to surrender the fort to the Confederate army. Consequently, the Union army responded with 75,000 volunteers to squash the rebellion. As it stands, this was the first physical altercation of the Civil War, but the first major battle of the Civil War was the Battle of Manassas (Bull Run). "It was a chaotic encounter fought by volunteers short of training and organization and haphazardly equipped" (Grant, R.G., 2017). Treated like a spectator sport, civilians showed up to the battlefield with picnic lunches to view the battle. The Confederates were victorious, killing nearly 3,000
northerners. Lastly, just as there is an impetus to war, there is also a chain of devastating events that ushers in the fate of the losing party. This, too, would be the South's fate as their defeat is imminent in the Civil War. As it stands, key actions taken by the North caused the South's defeat. To begin with, the Union forces changed their war strategy by fighting an all-encompassing war that would diminish southern military and civilian society, bring upon the destruction of southern railroads, bridges, cotton gins, and any supplies that aided their war tactics; thus, turning the tide in their favor. Next, the addition of 180,00 African American troops to the Union army and the promised emancipation of slavery if victorious, provided motivation for the troops and increased the Union's manpower and endurance against the Confederate army in the war. Lastly, "with a well-developed manufacturing sector, varied agricultural supplies, a diverse labor force, and a transportation system able to move food and troops, rapidly, the North outmaneuvered, outpaced, and out produced the South" (Schultz, K. M., 2013). References Grant, R. (2017, April 13). First Battle of Bull Run. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/event/First-Battle-of-Bull-Run-1861 Physically We Can Not Separate. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/liho/learn/historyculture/secession.htm Schultz, K. M. (2013). HIST. Wadsworth.
Unlike today, there was no fast communication methods. The tensions between the "free" and "slave" states was already apparent, thus, inflamed passions now began to result regularly in violence. Under those circumstances, any proposition which restoration of peace and abandoned slavery, were slow to coming. The issue of slavery was no longer a matter which could be argued. President Lincoln and Seward, made some mistakes, by the time of Seward 's famous speech, “irrepressible conflict. " The southern states started to isolate themselves and by the time the Southern States seceded from the Union, the U.S. had virtually become two separate nations and when Lincoln became president, that was the last straw. Because the Southern states felt that President Lincoln 's election was viewed by Southerners as a blow to their well-being and honor. So, some of the wording in the speech sounded like thing were already coming at the end. Therefore, talks were no longer an option, this issues were “irrepressible conflict." war were inevitable. But that 's not absolute, the speech could have been a final call to action, to work together to resolve and complete “the unfinished
A controversial issue during 1860 to 1877 was state’s rights and federal power. The North and South were divided over this issue. The North composed of free states and an industrial economy while the South was made up of slave states and an agricultural economy. The South did not like federal authority over the issue of slavery; therefore, they supported the radical state rights’ ideology. South Carolina seceded from the Union because it believed that since states made up the Union, it could leave when it chooses to. The government argued against the South saying that they had no right to leave the Union because the Union was not made up of just states but people. However, the South counteracted this argument with the case that the 10th amendment “declared that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by its states, were reserved to the states.” (Doc A) However, the government still believed that secession from the Union was unjust and decided that a new change surrounding state’s rights was necessary. As a result, when the Union won in the Civil War, a resolution was made, where the state’s lost their power and the federal government gained power. U...
There were several issues that contributed to the split between the northern and southern states. Among these were the deep social, economic and political differences. The split could be traced as far back as the early 1800’s, just as the industrial revolution was beginning. It’s effects on the north and the south caused the economic split. As the north was becoming more industrialized; the south began to rely heavily on slave labor. This was one of the main reasons, as the southern view on slavery differed greatly from the North. These views were based on drastically different interpretations of the constitution.
The Southern and Northern states varied on many issues, which eventually led them to the Civil War. There were deep economic, social, and political differences between the North and the South. These differences stemmed from the interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, all of these disagreements about the rights of states led to the Civil War. There were reasons other than slavery for the South?s secession. The manifestations of division in America were many: utopian communities, conflicts over public space, backlash against immigrants, urban riots, black protest, and Indian resistance (Norton 234). America was a divided land in need reform with the South in the most need. The South relied heavily on agriculture, as opposed to the North, which was highly populated and an industrialized society. The South grew cotton, which was its main cash crop and many Southerners knew that heavy reliance on slave labor would hurt the South eventually, but their warnings were not heeded. The South was based on a totalitarian system.
After Abraham Lincoln was elected, the state of South Carolina announced that it was going to secede from the Union in December 1860. Declaring itself independent of the United States, the state government demanded that federal troops leave.
Eventually slavery did die out and the southern states were once again apart of the union, but not without a civil war. Ultimately the North and South’s differences could not be resolved through anything other than a Civil War. These causes, as well as others, left the South no other viable option, in their eyes, than to secede from the union, leading to the Civil War. Political, societal, and philosophical conflicts combined with one another to form the ultimate disagreement over slavery between the two regions. All in all, admitting a disproportionate amount of free states to slave states into the union, preventing slavery from expanding, and President Lincoln’s election were significant factors that lead to the secession of the southern states in 1860 and 1861.
...and Tennessee seceded. Again this is based on Freehling’s attempt to show that there were leaders of this movement that threatened secession in the past and continued to lead the way. However, it is important to understand why other States followed and why some like Kentucky did not.
Some states are currently threatening to leave the country because of the belief that the government has too much power over the people and the laws our country has to follow. In our society, we live by laws set by the government, and if any of them are broken, there is a punishment. These laws are set to make sure that the people of America are following the way things are ran so the country will not collapse. Although these laws are set for the safety of the people, sometimes when the government has that kind of power to make people follow certain things they should not have to follow, many issues arise. In the late 1800’s, many issues emerged between the South and the Union on whether the Southern states had the right to secede from the United States. The Southern states did have the right to secede because of political, economical, and social reasons. These reasons include numerous examples of the Union treating the South unfairly and violating the terms of the U.S constitution.
One of Lincoln’s most famous quotes is “A House divided against itself cannot stand.” This describes his presidency well- focusing on maintaining the Union. In the beginning, Lincoln tried to stay out of sensitive affairs involving the North and South in an attempt to keep them together, promising the South little interference. Despite this, he played a key role in passing the Thirteenth Amendment, doing whatever it takes to end slavery for good and ending the Civil War.
In a speech that Lincoln gave prior to his presidency, we can see how ambiguous his stance on slavery truly was. This speech, known as the ‘House Divided’ speech, was given on the 16th of June, 1858, and outlined his beliefs regarding secession, but did not solidify the abolition of slavery as his main goal. Lincoln states that the nation “could not endure, permanently half slave and half free,” and that the slavery will either cease to exist, or will encompass all states lawfully (Lincoln). At this point in his life, Lincoln’s primary concern is clearly with the preservation of the nation.
Four and a half months after the Union defeated the Confederacy at the Battle of Gettysburg, Abraham Lincoln delivered the Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863. He gave the Union soldiers a new perspective on the war and a reason to fight in the Civil War. Before the address, the Civil War was based on states’ rights. Lincoln’s speech has the essence of America and the ideals that were instilled in the Declaration of Independence by the Founders. The sixteenth president of the United States was capable of using his speech to turn a war on states’ rights to a war on slavery and upholding the principles that America was founded upon. By turning the Civil War into a war about slavery he effortlessly ensured that no foreign country would recognize the South as an independent nation, ensuring Union success in the war. In his speech, Lincoln used the rhetorical devices of juxtaposition, repetition, and parallelism, to touch the hearts of its listeners.
Tensions between the North and South had grown steadily since the anti slavery movement in 1830. Several compromises between the North and South regarding slavery had been passed such as the Nebraska-Kansas and the Missouri act; but this did little to relieve the strain. The election of President Lincoln in 1861 proved to be the boiling point for the South, and secession followed. This eventually sparked the civil war; which was viewed differently by the North and the South. The Northern goal was to keep the Union intact while the Southern goal was to separate from the Union. Southern leaders gave convincing arguments to justify secession. Exploring documents from South Carolina’s secession ordinance and a speech from the Georgia assembly speech will explain how the Southern leaders justify the secession from the United States.
The First Inaugural Address of Abraham Lincoln was given on Monday March 4, 1861 to his fellow citizens of the United States. In order to preserve the Union, President Lincoln needed the support from both the North and the South. The Southerners despised Lincoln because they believed he wanted to ban slavery. President Lincoln assured in his address that he would not interfere with slavery in the South and implored with the Confederate states to reconcile with the North. President Lincoln used logos, ethos, and pathos to appeal to his audience throughout his address. President Lincoln appealed to his audience using logos by providing the logical reasoning behind the slavery conflict, which was addressed primarily to the South. President Lincoln made it known to his audience that being a president you can only enforce laws that are already in place, so the issue of whether or not he was going to ban slavery had already been settled in the Constitution. President Lincoln referred back to the Constitution throughout his speech using logical appeal to explain to his people the reasoning, laws, and logic to why they could not secede. President Lincoln continues to primarily address the South and talk about slavery, adding an ethical appeal to his speech. President Lincoln says, “I have no purpose directly or indirectly, to ...
middle of paper ... ... By the beginning of February, six other states had decided to leave the Union: Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas. These seven states formed the Confederate States of America, and on February 18 Jefferson Davis was sworn in as its president. There were numerous peace talks on how to settle the dispute, but nothing worked.
...om’s Cabin in 1852, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Dred Scott Decision of 1857, John Brown’s raid on Harper’s Ferry in 1859, and the outcome of the Presidential Election of 1860—created conditions where Southerners felt the need to secede from the United States (they felt that their “way of life” was being threatened), as well as created conditions where the Northerners decided to go to war against the Southern Confederacy in order to maintain the Union. It is not surprising, however, that the Civil War occurred; since the Industrial Revolution, the Industrial North had always been different than the Agricultural South. If each region paid more attention to resolving the issues that separated them, instead of trying to prove themselves right, they could have stopped the bloodiest battle in American history (even though this is using hindsight knowledge).